政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152488
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51148852      在线人数 : 819
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/152488


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152488


    题名: 關係人交易關鍵查核事項之探討
    The Study of Key Audit Matters in Related Party Transactions
    作者: 劉俊毅
    Liu, Chuni
    贡献者: 張祐慈
    Chang, Yu-Tzu
    劉俊毅
    Liu, Chuni
    关键词: 關係人交易
    關鍵查核事項
    查核程序
    Related Party Transactions
    Key Audit Matter
    Audit Procedure
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2024-08-05 12:22:01 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究針對台灣 2016 年至 2022 年所有與關係人交易相關之關鍵查核事項進行分析，統整關係人交易之類型，分析關鍵查核事項之品質，判斷交易風險為何，並探討會計師將其納入關鍵查核事項所考量之因素為何，以及會計師如何因應風險。結果發現，最常被納入關鍵查核事項者係與關係人交易之收入認列有關，其次為與關係人交易之揭露有關，其他議題如與關係人固定資產交易或股權交易相關者則為較為零星。而會計師主要係考量財務報表使用者之關注度、金額之重大性、查核時所投入之資源以及交易影響之層面，而將其納入關鍵查核事項。會計師所執行之查核程序，除了測試內部控制外，亦著重於檢視董事會會議紀錄，確認交易經過核准，並檢視關係人交易之合約，判斷交易是否符合常規，亦查核期後收款與相關訂單，確認交易之真實性。本文透過上述之整理，期能透過關鍵查核事項令財務報表使用者對關係人交易有更深入之瞭解。
    This study analyzes all KAMs related to related party transaction (RPT) in Taiwan from 2016 to 2022. It categorizes the types of RPT- related KAMs, assesses the quality of KAMs, identifies RPT transaction risks, and discusses the factors auditors considers when determining RPTs as KAM, as well as how auditors responds to the risks of RPT.The results reveal that the most frequently included KAMs are related to the revenue recognition of RPT, followed by disclosures concerning RPT. Other issues, such as RPT
    involving assets or equity, are less common. When determining RPTs as KAMs, auditors primarily consider the concerns of financial statement users, the materiality of
    the amounts involved, the resources devoted in the audit, and the impact of the transactions. The audit procedures performed by Auditors include testing internal controls, reviewing meeting minutes of board of directors to confirm RPT approvals, inspecting RPT contracts to determine their commercial substance, and checking subsequent receipts and related orders to verify the authenticity of RPT. This
    comprehensive analysis aims to through KAM assist financial statement users in understanding RPT deeply
    參考文獻: 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會，2009，國際會計準則公報第24號-關係人揭露。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會，2022，審計準則公報第700號-財務報表查核報告。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會，2022，審計準則公報第701號-查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通。
    Al-Dhamari, R. A., B. Al-Gamrh, K. N. I. Ku Ismail, and S. S. Haji Ismail. 2018. Related party transactions and audit fees: the role of the internal audit function. Journal of Management & Governance 22: 187-212.
    Al Lawati, H., and K. Hussainey. 2022. The determinants and impact of key audit matters disclosure in the auditor’s report. International Journal of Financial Studies 10 (4): 107.
    Armitage, S., and C. Marston. 2008. Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors. The British Accounting Review 40 (4): 314-336.
    Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2012. Investors', auditors', and lenders' understanding of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements. Accounting Horizons 26 (2): 193-217.
    Asbahr, K., and K. Ruhnke. 2019. Real effects of reporting key audit matters on auditors' judgment and choice of action. International Journal of Auditing 23 (2): 165-180.
    Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, and D. R. Hermanson. 2001. Top 10 audit deficiencies. Journal of Accountancy 19 (1): 63.
    Bédard, J., N. Gonthier-Besacier, and A. Schatt. 2019. Consequences of expanded audit reports: Evidence from the justifications of assessments in France. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 38 (3): 23-45.
    Benston, G. J., and A. L. Hartgraves. 2002. Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21 (2): 105-127.
    Boolaky, P. K., and R. Quick. 2016. Bank directors’ perceptions of expanded auditor's reports. International Journal of Auditing 20 (2): 158-174.
    Burke, J. J., R. Hoitash, U. Hoitash, and S. Xiao. 2023. The disclosure and consequences of US critical audit matters. The Accounting Review 98 (2): 59-95.
    Chen, Y., C. H. Chen, and W. Chen. 2009. The impact of related party transactions on the operational performance of listed companies in China. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 12 (4): 285-297.
    Cheung, Y.-L., L. Jing, T. Lu, P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2009. Tunneling and propping up: An analysis of related party transactions by Chinese listed companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 17 (3): 372-393.
    Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors' decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4): 71-93.
    Church, B. K., S. M. Davis, and S. A. McCracken. 2008. The auditor's reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 69-90.
    Coase, R. H. 2012. The firm, the market, and the law: University of Chicago press.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review 14 (4): 532-550.
    Enriques, L. 2015. Related party transactions: Policy options and real-world challenges (with a critique of the European Commission proposal). European Business Organization Law Review 16: 1-37.
    Gay, G., P. Schelluch, and A. Baines. 1998. Perceptions of messages conveyed by review and audit reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11 (4): 472-494.
    Gordon, E. A., and E. Henry. 2005. Related party transactions and earnings management. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, T. J. Louwers, and B. J. Reed. 2007. Auditing related party transactions: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 21 (1): 81-102.
    Gutierrez, E., M. Minutti-Meza, K. W. Tatum, and M. Vulcheva. 2018. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies 23 (4): 1543-1587.
    Habib, A., H. Jiang, and D. Zhou. 2015. Related-party transactions and audit fees: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting Research 14 (1): 59-83.
    IASB. 2009. International Accounting Standards 24. Related Party Disclosures. November 2009.
    IAASB. 2015. International Standard on Auditing 700 (Revised). Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements. January 2015.
    IAASB. 2015. International Standard on Auditing 701. Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor's Report. January 2015.
    Jian, M., and T. J. Wong. 2010. Propping through related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies 15: 70-105.
    Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2000. Tunneling. American economic review 90 (2): 22-27.
    Kachelmeier, S. J., J. J. Schmidt, and K. Valentine. 2017. The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report. SSRN Electronic Journal.
    Kang, M., H.-Y. Lee, M.-G. Lee, and J. C. Park. 2014. The association between related-party transactions and control–ownership wedge: Evidence from Korea. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 29: 272-296.
    Khan, A. W., and Q. A. Subhan. 2019. Impact of board diversity and audit on firm performance. Cogent Business & Management.
    Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 2002. Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups. The Journal of Finance 55 (2): 867-891.
    Kohlbeck, M., and B. W. Mayhew. 2010. Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29 (2): 115-137.
    Köhler, A., N. Ratzinger-Sakel, and J. Theis. 2020. The effects of key audit matters on the auditor’s report’s communicative value: Experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Accounting in Europe 17 (2): 105-128.
    Li, H. 2020. A study of key audit matters disclosure. Modern economy 11 (2): 399-406.
    Lo, A. W., R. M. Wong, and M. Firth. 2010. Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 16 (2): 225-235.
    Louwers, T. J., E. Henry, B. J. Reed, and E. A. Gordon. 2008. Deficiencies in auditing related-party transactions: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing 2 (2): A10-A16.
    Mock, T. J., J. Bédard, P. J. Coram, S. M. Davis, R. Espahbodi, and R. C. Warne. 2013. The audit reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 32 (Supplement 1): 323-351.
    Nekhili, M., and M. Cherif. 2011. Related parties transactions and firm's market value: the French case. Review of Accounting and Finance 10 (3): 291-315.
    Peecher, M. E., I. Solomon, and K. T. Trotman. 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 (8): 596-620.
    Rapley, E. T., J. C. Robertson, and J. L. Smith. 2021. The effects of disclosing critical audit matters and auditor tenure on nonprofessional investors’ judgments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40 (5): 106847.
    Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V., and J. Theis. 2019. Does considering key audit matters affect auditor judgment performance? Corporate Ownership & Control 17 (1).
    Reid, L. C., J. V. Carcello, C. Li, T. L. Neal, and J. R. Francis. 2019. Impact of auditor report changes on financial reporting quality and audit costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research 36 (3): 1501-1539.
    Ryngaert, M., and S. Thomas. 2012. Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: Ex ante versus ex post RPTs. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (3): 845-882.
    Shakhatreh, M. Z., S. A. Alsmadi, and A. Alkhataybeh. 2020. The effect of audit fees on disclosure quality in Jordan. Cogent Business & Management 7 (1): 1771076.
    Sirois, L.-P., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2018. The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor's report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons 32 (2): 141-162.
    Turner, J. L., T. J. Mock, P. J. Coram, and G. L. Gray. 2010. Improving transparency and relevance of auditor communications with financial statement users. Current Issues in Auditing 4 (1): A1-A8.
    Vanstraelen, A., C. Schelleman, R. Meuwissen, and I. Hofmann. 2012. The audit reporting debate: Seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review 21 (2): 193-215.
    Velte, P. 2018. Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters' readability in the audit report? UK evidence. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management 25 (5): 748-755.
    Williamson, O. E. 2007. The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting: Springer.
    Yeh, Y.-H., P.-G. Shu, and Y.-H. Su. 2012. Related-party transactions and corporate governance: The evidence from the Taiwan stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 20 (5): 755-776.
    Zeng, Y., J. H. Zhang, J. Zhang, and M. Zhang. 2021. Key audit matters reports in China: Their descriptions and implications of audit quality. Accounting Horizons 35 (2): 167-192.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353035
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353035
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈