政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152451
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390027      Online Users : 474
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses >  Item 140.119/152451


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152451


    Title: 伺服器公司的跨國策略聯盟—以A公司為例
    The Cross-border Strategic Alliance of a Server Company — A Case Study of Company A
    Authors: 莊晴雯
    Chuang, Ching-Wen
    Contributors: 傅浚映
    翁嘉祥
    莊晴雯
    Chuang, Ching-Wen
    Keywords: 伺服器產業
    波特五力分析
    外來者劣勢
    策略聯盟
    Server Industry
    Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    Liability of Foreignness
    Strategic Alliance
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 12:14:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究採個案研究法，並佐以深度訪談，以 A 公司作為研究對象，旨在了解伺服器品牌公司 A 在日本市場所採取的策略聯盟，選擇原因與益處風險、未來性，研究較少見的品牌公司間的合作。此研究先利用五力分析了解日本的伺服器產業環境，並了解日本伺服器市場的外來者劣勢，解釋雙方採策略聯盟的原因，及對雙方帶來的益處。
    經本研究深入了解，在面對外來者劣勢下，外國公司採策略聯盟的國際進入方式與日本當地國公司合作、彼此分工下，可以成功擴展彼此營收與市佔率、克服外來者劣勢；同時，此模式因為轉換成本高，所以雙方不會輕易被取代，也預期日本伺服器市場會持續成長下將持續可行。
    This study adopts a case study methodology supplemented by in-depth interviews, focusing on Company A, a server brand, to understand its strategic alliances in the Japanese market. The research aims to explore the reasons, benefits, risks, and future prospects of this strategic alliance, highlighting the relatively uncommon cooperation between brand companies. Initially, Five Forces Analysis is used to examine the server industry environment in Japan and to understand the disadvantages faced by foreign entrants in the Japanese server market. This analysis helps explain the reasons for forming strategic alliances and the benefits they bring to both parties.

    Through this in-depth study, it is found that in the face of liability of foreignness, foreign companies can successfully expand their revenue and market share and overcome these disadvantages by adopting international entry strategies through strategic alliances with local Japanese companies. This strategic alliance, due to high switching costs, ensures that both parties are not easily replaced. Additionally, it is expected that this approach will remain feasible as the Japanese server market continues to grow.
    Reference: 參考網頁
    伺服器（server）是什麼？伺服器概念股有哪些？AI 伺服器商機湧現，https://www.stockfeel.com.tw/%E4%BC%BA%E6%9C%8D%E5%99%A8%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%EF%BC%9F%E6%9C%89%E5%93%AA%E4%BA%9B%E7%A8%AE%E9%A1%9E%EF%BC%9F/，擷取日期：2024年5月9日。
    緯穎洪麗寗：中美對峙讓伺服器產業難進入紅海，反而成了台廠保護傘，https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/5408104，擷取日期：2024年5月9日。
    台灣AI供應鏈包括哪些公司？3張表看懂，https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5125456，擷取日期：2024年5月9日。
    全球科技大廠的AI晶片爭霸戰，台廠誰將受惠？一張圖看懂伺服器供應鏈，https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/eb7e12c9-5a4d-43b4-8ea6-3ac7d652b599，擷取日期：2024年5月13日。
    【關鍵報告】雲端服務商機！白話文解構「伺服器產業」，https://blog.fugle.tw/server-report-2022/，擷取日期：2024年5月13日。

    中文文獻
    于卓民（2000），國際企業管理：環境與管理，台北：華泰文化。
    李陳國（2015），企業策略聯盟，台北：鼎茂文化。
    呂鴻德（1995），技術與製造策略配合對新產品績效影響之研究，中原學報，第23卷第4期，頁1-9。
    吳青松 （1996），國際企業管理，台北：智勝文化。
    許逸晟 （2003），台商赴大陸國際化歷程之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

    英文文獻
    Aaker, D.A. (1992), The Value of Brand Equity, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp.27-32.
    Agarwal S, Ramaswami SN (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: impact of ownership, location, and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.23(1), pp.1-27.
    Anand J, Delios A (2002). Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23(2), pp.119-134.
    Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis & Propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.17(3), pp.1-26.
    Asmussen CG, Goerzen A. (2013). Unpacking dimensions of foreignness: firm-specific capabilities and international dispersion in regional, cultural, and institutional space. Global Strategy Journal. Vol.3(2), pp.127–149.
    Berry H, Guillen MF, Zhou N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol.41(9), pp.1460-1480.
    Contractor, F. J. and P. Lorange (1988). Competition v.s. cooperation: A benefit/cost framework for choosing between fully-owned investments and cooperative relationships. Management International Review, Vol.28, pp.5-18.
    Delios A, Henisz WJ. (2000). Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal. Vol.43, pp.305–323.
    Dunning, J. H. (1981). International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. RLE International Business, (1st ed.), Routledge.
    Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Eden L, Miller SR. 2004. Distance matters: liability of foreignness, institutional distance, and ownership strategy. The Evolving Theory of the Multinational Firm (Advances
    in International Management Vol. 16), Hitt MA, Cheng JLC (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.187–221.
    Elmuti, D. and Y. Kathawala (2001). Av overview of strategic alliances. Management Decision, London, Vol.39, pp.205-237.
    Garcia-Canal E & Guillen MF (2008). Risk and the strategy offoreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29(10), pp.1097-1115.
    Glaister, K. W. and P. J. Buckley (1996). Strategic motives for international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, Vol.33, pp.301-332.
    Hymer SH. (1960). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. MIT Press: Cambrige, MA.
    Melin, L. (1992). Internationalization as a Strategy Process. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, pp.99-118.
    Meschi PX. (2009). Government corruption and foreign stakes in international joint ventures in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol.26, pp. 241-261.
    Nikola Denk, Lutz Kaufmann, &Jan-Frederik Roesch (2012). Liabilities of Foreignness Revisited: A Review of Contemporary Studies and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of International Management, Vol.18, Issue 4, pp. 322-334.
    Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press.
    Porter & Fuller (1986). Coalitions and Global Strategy: Competition In Global Industries. Harvard University Press, pp.315-343
    Qian G, Li L, Rugman AM. (2013). Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies. Vol.44(6), pp.635-647.
    Root, F. R. (1987). Entry strategies for international markets. Journal of Marketing, pp.128-132.
    Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. Cooperative strategies in international business, pp.205-226.
    Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S & Nartey L. (2014). Spinning gold: the financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.35(12), pp.1727-1748.
    Hennart JF. (2001). Theories of the multinational enterprise. In Oxford Handbook of International Business, Rugman AM, Brewer T (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., pp.141-170.
    Kobrin SJ. (1987). Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. International Organization, Vol.41, pp.609-638.
    Varadarajan, P. R. and M. H. Cunningham (1996). Strategic alliances : a synthesis of conceptual foundations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol 23. pp.282-296.
    Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), pp.34-55.
    Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.), Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, Inc.
    Zaheer S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal. Vol.38, pp.341-363.
    Zhou, N. & Guillen, M. F. (2016). Categorizing the Liability of Foreignness: Ownership, Location, and Internalization-Specific Dimensions. Global Strategy Journal, Vol.6, pp. 309-329.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    111363083
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111363083
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[MBA Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    308301.pdf2089KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback