政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/152398
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 112704/143671 (78%)
造访人次 : 49796381      在线人数 : 452
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152398


    题名: 以機器學習模型建構多空投資組合策略
    Constructing Long-Short Investment Portfolio Strategies Using Machine Learning Models
    作者: 黃紀豪
    Huang, Ji-Hao
    贡献者: 鍾令德
    Chung, Ling-Tak
    黃紀豪
    Huang, Ji-Hao
    关键词: 機器學習
    股價報酬預測
    投資組合選擇
    Machine Learning
    Return Predictability
    Portfolio Choice
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2024-08-05 11:57:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究比較 18 個機器學習模型預測台灣股市上市公司報酬的能力，並回測以 10 種不同多空比例及加權比重建構之 180 種機器學習投資策略。結果顯示 11 種機器學習模型能有效預測個股超額報酬，神經網路模型、決策樹模型預測表現較佳，其中 XGBoost 模型建構之多空投資組合策略績效最為優異，能在樣本外期間獲得 3.58% 之月均報酬，並達到 3.56 之年化夏普比率，顯示機器學習模型確實能捕捉股票特徵與下期報酬的非線性關係，產生有價值之交易訊號，進而為投資人帶來顯著的報酬。另外，本研究發現 10-1 分位多空策略相較全市場多空策略能有效提升夏普比率，而 130/30 策略雖然能創造比淨零投資組合策略更高的報酬，卻因波動性更高而無法有效提升夏普比率。
    This study evaluates 18 machine learning models in predicting stock returns of listed companies in Taiwan. Through 10 combinations of long-short ratios and weighting schemes, I backtest 180 investment strategies based on machine learning predictions. The results show that 11 machine learning models can effectively predict individual stock excess returns. Neural network models and decision tree models exhibit better predictive performance, with the XGBoost model constructing the best performing long-short investment portfolio strategy. This strategy achieves an average monthly return of 3.58\% and an annualized Sharpe ratio of 3.56 during the out-of-sample period. Machine learning models can capture non-linear relationships between stock characteristics and future returns, generating valuable trading signals that bring significant Alphas for investors.
    Furthermore, this study finds that the 10-1 long-short strategy effectively improves the Sharpe ratio compared to full market long-short strategies. Although the 130/30 strategy can generate higher returns than net-zero investment strategies, it fails to effectively improve the Sharpe ratio due to its higher volatility.
    參考文獻: Alpaydin, Ethem, 2010, Introduction to Machine Learning (MIT Press).
    Amihud, Yakov, and Haim Mendelson, 1986, Liquidity and Stock Returns, Financial
    Analysts Journal 42, 43–48.
    Ang, Andrew, Robert J. Hodrick, Yuhang Xing, and Xiaoyan Zhang, 2006, The Cross-
    Section of Volatility and Expected Returns, The Journal of Finance 61, 259–299. Bali, Turan G., and Nusret Cakici, 2008, Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Cross Section
    of Expected Returns, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43, 29–58.
    Bao, Yanlin, 2023, Replication of Gu, Kelly and Xiu (2020, RFS), Re- trieved May 25, 2024, from https://colab.research.google.com/drive/ 1fcWNL5CgD21kuFDRLvYpEV8l9f5m2n9m#scrollTo=463f2485.
    Blitz, David, Hoogteijling Tobias, Harald Lohre, and Messow Philip, 2023, How Can Machine Learning Advance Quantitative Asset Management?, The Journal of Port- folio Management 50, 31–63.
    Buchanan, Lauren J., 2011, The Success of Long-Short Equity Strategies versus Tradi- tional Equity Strategies Market Returns.
    Bui, Dien Giau, De-Rong Kong, Chih-Yung Lin, and Tse-Chun Lin, 2023, Momentum in machine learning: Evidence from the Taiwan stock market, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 82, 102178.
    Chen, Andrew Y., and Tom Zimmermann, 2021, Open Source Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing, Critical Financial Review 11, 207–264.
    Chen, Tianqi, and Carlos Guestrin, 2016, XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794, ACM.
    Dopfel, Frederick E., and Sunder R. Ramkumar, 2005, The Efficiency Gains of Long- Short Credit Strategies, The Journal of Fixed Income 15, 5–15.
    Drobetz, Wolfgang, Fabian Hollstein, Tizian Otto, and Marcel Prokopczuk, 2024, Esti- mating Stock Market Betas via Machine Learning, Journal of Financial and Quanti- tative Analysis 1–56.
    Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 2015, A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model, Journal of Financial Economics 116, 1–22.
    Freyberger, Joachim, Andreas Neuhierl, and Michael Weber, 2020, Dissecting Charac- teristics Nonparametrically, The Review of Financial Studies 33, 2326–2377.
    Grinold, Richard C., and Ronald N. Kahn, 2000, The Efficiency Gains of Long–Short Investing, Financial Analysts Journal 56, 40–53.
    Gu, Shihao, Bryan Kelly, and Dacheng Xiu, 2020, Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning, The Review of Financial Studies 33, 2223–2273.
    Hameed, Allaudeen, and Yuanto Kusnadi, 2002, Momentum Strategies: Evidence from Pacific Basin Stock Markets, The Journal of Financial Research 25, 383–397.
    Heaton, J.B., Nick Polson, and Jan Witte, 2016, Deep Learning for Finance: Deep Port- folios, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 33, 3–12.
    Htun, H.H., M. Biehl, and N. Petkov, 2023, Survey of feature selection and extraction techniques for stock market prediction, Financial Innovation 9.
    Huber, Peter J, 1964, Robust estimation of a location parameter, The Annals of Mathe- matical Statistics 35, 73–101.
    Jacobs, Bruce I., and Kenneth N. Levy, 1993, Long/Short Equity Investing, The Journal of Portfolio Management 20, 52–63.
    Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, and Sheridan Titman, 1993, Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency, The Journal of Finance 48, 65–91.
    Kelly, Bryan T., Seth Pruitt, and Yinan Su, 2019, Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return, Journal of Financial Economics 134, 501–524.
    Kingma, Diederik P., and Jimmy Ba, 2015, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimiza- tion, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representa- tions, San Diego.
    Lee, Yongjae, John R. J. Thompson, Jang Ho Kim, Woo Chang Kim, and Francesco A. Fabozzi, 2023, An Overview of Machine Learning for Asset Management, The Jour- nal of Portfolio Management 49, 31–63.
    Lewellen, Jonathan, 2015, The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns, Critical Fi- nance Review 20, 1–44.
    Miffre, Joëlle, and Adrian Fernandez-Perez, 2015, The Case for Long-Short Commodity Investing, The Journal of Alternative Investments 18, 92–104.
    Moritz, Benjamin, and Tom Zimmermann, 2016, Tree-Based Conditional Portfolio Sorts: The Relation between Past and Future Stock Returns, Working Paper, Lud- wig Maximilian University of Munich.
    Pástor, Ľuboš, and Robert F. Stambaugh, 2003, Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Re- turns, Journal of Political Economy 111, 642–685.
    Rapach, David, Jack Strauss, and Guofu Zhou, 2012, How Can Machine Learning Ad- vance Quantitative Asset Management?, Journal of Finance 68, 1633–1662.
    Sadhwani, Apaar, Kay Giesecke, and Justin Sirignano, 2021, Deep Learning for Mort- gage Risk, Journal of Financial Econometrics 19, 313–368.
    Samuel, A. L., 1959, Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers, IBM Journal of Research and Development 3, 210–229.
    Spearman, Charles, 1904, The proof and measurement of association between two things, American Journal of Psychology 15, 72–101.
    Tol, Ramon, and Christiaan Wanningen, 2009, On the Performance of Extended Alpha (130/30) versus Long-Only, The Journal of Portfolio Management 35, 51–60.
    Tol, Ramon, and Christiaan Wanningen, 2011, 130/30: By How Much Will the Infor- mation Ratio, The Journal of Portfolio Management 37, 62–69.
    Tsai, Pei-Fen, Cheng-Han Gao, and Shyan-Ming Yuan, 2023, Stock Selection Using Machine Learning Based on Financial Ratios, Mathematics 11.
    Turing, Alan M., 1950, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind 59, 433–60. Waid, Robert J, 2009, Long-Only: The Natural Benchmark Choice for 130/30, The
    Journal of Portfolio Management 35, 48–50.
    Wang, Yun-Chin, Jean Yu, and Shiow-Ying Wen, 2014, Does Fundamental and Tech- nical Analysis Reduce Investment Risk for Growth Stock? An Analysis of Taiwan Stock Market, International Business Research 7, 24–34.
    White, 1988, Economic Prediction Using Neural Networks: The Case of IBM Daily Stock Returns, in IEEE 1988 International Conference on Neural Networks, 451– 458 vol.2.
    蔣佳穎, 2022, 以財務指標預測台股橫斷面期望報酬 ，未出版之博 (碩) 士論文， 國立政治大學，國際經營與貿易學系，台北市.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    111351024
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111351024
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    102401.pdf2984KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈