Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152269
|
| Title: | 從《詩藪》到《詩源辯體》：明代復古派的杜詩價值論
A Study on the Value of Du Fu’s Poetry: According to the Writings of Hu Ying-Lin and Xu Xue-Yi |
| Authors: | 陳英傑 |
| Contributors: | 中文系 |
| Keywords: | 杜甫詩;典範;大家;復古派;胡應麟《詩藪》;許學夷《詩源辯體》
Du Fu’s poetry;paradigm;Da-jia(great poet);revivalist in Ming Dynasty;Hu Ying-lin’s Shi Sou;Xu Xue-yi’s Shi Yuan Bian Ti |
| Date: | 2016-10 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-07-04 14:12:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本計畫擬探討的核心問題是：「宋人」學杜不遺餘力，然明代復古派既反對宋詩，亦以學杜自許，其如何展現新異性（novelty）？這其實涉及如何理解杜詩價值的問題。實際翻閱明代文獻資料，可獲致一個基本印象：復古派雖然並未忽略宋人學杜的事實，但不覺得宋人已瞭解杜詩所以堪為典範（paradigm）的真正價值所在，而僅掌握到杜詩較庸劣的一面，諸如拗澀變體之類。由於宋人對杜詩的認識被認為有所不足或偏差，那麼，關於杜詩的真正價值所在，自然也就有待重構。故具體言之，本計畫擬探討的乃是復古派如何重構杜詩價值的問題。 據初步梳理可知，復古派對宋人學杜狀況的批判，正透露出他們清楚地注意到杜詩在藝術表現上的豐富多樣性，惟各面向的價值不盡一致。換句話說，隨著宋人學杜的問題，杜詩利鈍雜陳、變化多態的「大家」特性，浮上檯面，成為復古派評價杜詩的重要基礎。上述特性，原可溯及唐宋以來「集大成」之說，世人每每嘆服不已，卻也因此增加了評價或模習上的困難。故就復古派立場而言，宋人雖知學杜，徒然誤入歧途，流為「宋詩」；然而復古派重構杜詩價值，並不僅單純在於商榷宋人，也和當代詩學理論和創作的脈搏同步發展，與時俱進。是知復古派的杜詩價值論，絕非純然抽象的思辨行為。 杜詩價值論是復古派的重要議題。本計畫將以明代後期胡應麟《詩藪》、許學夷《詩源辯體》為主據進行研究。這兩部詩學著作，非但建構出杜詩的評價系統，觀念表述格外詳密；再者佐以大量選詩、摘句，也尤能具體呈現杜詩係以那些篇章或詩句奠定其典範價值，實足以視為復古派詩學的縮影和結晶。 本計畫預計以一年為期，透過堅實的文獻基礎進行整理和研究，深化上述的議題。倘能順利執行，將可為明代杜詩學研究提供專題性成果。
The project focus on how Revivalist in Ming Dynasty evaluate Du Fu’s poetry, comparing to the view of Song Dynasty. It is well known the Song people fairly admired Du Fu's loyalty to the throne and his achievement in poetry. However, retrieving from ancient documents, Revivalist in Ming Dynasty disagreed with the way of evaluating Du Fu’s poetry from Song Dynasty aspect. They thought Song Dynasty only learned the inferior features and simply mimicked the form of writing, but could not master the essence of Du Fu’s literature. Based on preliminary research, Revivalist’s criticism on Song people just revealed they evaluate Du Fu in a different direction. Because Du Fu’s poetry is full of variety in art performance, each characteristic shows different value to others. With the fact that Song people cherished and further imitated Du Fu’s poetry just reflects the phenomenon of “Da-jia(Great poet)” in Du Fu’s poetry, which also provides multiple dimensions for Revivalist’s to explore which characteristic stands superior to others. It is because of the complexity and profundity of Du Fu’s poetry, there are numerous debates through Song, Yuan, and Ming Dynasty. To Revivalist’s view, Song Dynasty tended to evaluate and mimic Du Fu’s poetry based on their own preference, eventually created the writing which is not with whole spirit of Du Fu, but the biased aesthetic standards of Song Dynasty. On the other hand, Revivalist focused on each dimension of Du Fu’s poetry, analyzing and evaluating every aspects carefully, therefore obtained detailed interpretations. The evaluating and promoting of Du Fu’s poetry from Revivalist is not only to criticize the literature style in Song Dynasty, but it also reflect the prevailing concepts for an excellent composition in Ming Dynasty. How to evaluate Du Fu’s poetry was the top issue of Revivalist. The project will apply Hu Ying-lin’s Shi Sou and Xu Xue-yi’s Shi Yuan Bian Ti(from late Ming Dynasty) to enhance the idea. These two masterpieces, which not only constructed a system precisely indicates the concept for evaluation, but also highlighted which sentences from poems exactly constitute the great value of Du Fu, have been considered the epitome of Revivalist’ s literature concept. The project aims to complete within one year. The project is expected to provide a new way to value Du Fu's poetry and acquire specific understanding to the forming of paradigm of Du Fu. The progress of research, the methods expected to adopt, the research schedule, and the expected results are briefly stated in the plan. |
| Relation: | 科技部, MOST104-2410-H004-167, 104.08-105.07 |
| Data Type: | report |
| Appears in Collections: | [中國文學系] 國科會研究計畫
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 38 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
