| Abstract: | 民初報刊雜誌當中的「論學書劄」及「書評」，配合報刊雜誌「公共性」的傳媒效應，就知識文本的生成、修辭策略及其話語權力之特徵，有別於私劄論學或學術論文的表述，「論學書劄」及「書評」在民初學術史及文化史上的意義及價值究竟為何？目前學界尚未有相關文獻史料之蒐羅及專題研究。尤其民初的歷史變遷及社會環境，不論是新舊文化交替、中西文化對揚、文白教育拉鋸、民族主義與文化情懷等等，都讓報刊雜誌裡頭「論學書劄」、「書評」等知識文本的生成，有其呼應時代思潮的面向，因此除了這些知識文本的修辭及敘述運用值得關注以外，構成知識文本以外的其他社會文化因素，包括社會地位、人際關係、生產方式、權力結構、民族精神、文化心理等等，都是形塑知識文本之價值觀、世界觀重要的成素，值得進一步深入探析。民初學人早期的「論學書劄」或「書評」，隨著學思觀點的變化，或者學術地位的更迭，或者交誼情況的改變，甚至1949年之後的大陸學人及臺灣學者，往往因政治氛圍不得不改易過去的文字，進而否定過去的論學交誼。也因此有時在作者晚年所自編的文集或全集中，這些「論學書劄」或「書評」可能「刻意」被刪訂或完全摒除，這一改動，既可視之為學人自我形象維護，表達自身治學意義與價值的作為，也可說是具有一種「自我宣示」的學術評斷。然而，若將早期報刊雜誌所刊文字與後期「去歷史化」 的「自訂稿」相互比對，從異文當中細察學人在不同時空場域中的所思、所行，尤其學人如何將自我形象及學思歷程、價值定位放在「公」、「私」領域中擺盪，這又是一個饒負興味並值得深究的課題。
The Letters of the Discussions on Knowledge and Book Reviews with the media effect of "publicity" in the Newspapers and Magazine, with regard to the formation of knowledge texts, rhetorical strategies and the characteristics of their discourse power, are different from private papers or academic papers. What are their meaning and value in the academic and cultural history of the Republic of China? At present, there is no related collection of historical documents and special literature studies topics. Especially in the early Republican historical changes and social environment, compared both the old and the new cultural alternation, Chinese and Western culture to Yang,Classics Vernacular education, Nationalism and cultural feelings and so on, it makes the Productions of "academic study", "Book Review" and other knowledge text on newspapers and magazines has its own echoes of the times.Therefore, in addition to the rhetoric and narrative use of these texts, Other social and cultural factors besides the text of knowledge,such as social status, interpersonal relations, mode of production, power structure, national spirit, cultural psychology, etc.,are the important elements that shaped the values of knowledge texts and worldviews,it is worth noticing and in-depth analysis.After 1949 with the change of academic thinking, status or friendship, mainland scholars and Taiwanese scholars, had to change the texts, and early people's early learning papers or book review, because of the political climate, and then denied the past academic fellowship. In his later years, these "study notes" or "book reviews" on his collection of autobiographies or compilations, may be "deliberately" deleted or completely excluded.This change can be regarded as the maintenance of self-image of scholars, to express their own sense of learning and value of the work.It can also be said to have one self-proclamation and academic judgment. However, if the texts of the earlier periodicals and magazines were later "de-historicized".From the perspectives of different languages, we can see how the scholars think and act in different time and space fields. In particular, how can scholars put their self-image, learning history and value orientation on the "public" and "private" fields? It is a very interesting and worthwhile topic. |
