English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51573256      Online Users : 940
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152252


    Title: 非戰爭的攻防：論美國對中國採行的預防性舉措
    Non-War Offense and Defense: On Preventive Measures Taken by the United States Towards China
    Authors: 殷志偉
    Ying, Chee-wei
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 中美關係;晶片與科學法案;半導體;權力轉移理論;預防性動機
    China-US Relations;CHIPS and Science Act;Semiconductor;Power Transition Theory;Preventive Motivation
    Date: 2024-06
    Issue Date: 2024-07-04 10:12:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 對於強權並存且有爆發戰爭可能性的國際格局，戰爭由誰引發在學界的論點迥異。權力轉移理論認為崛起國基於不滿現狀，會對主導強權發起戰爭；另有聲音則認為衰退的國家基於預防性動機，會對崛起的對手採取行動；然而，權力轉移理論與預防性動機的論述，主要關注於戰爭的發動，此觀點反映一種以「戰爭」進行解析的框架，即探討國與國之間是否會發生戰爭。本研究則以另一個「非戰爭的攻防」的分析框架，論述主導強權與崛起國之間在兵戎之外的攻防行動。本文以美國在2022年施行的晶片與科學法案為例，論述美國對中國採行的非戰爭預防性舉措。該法案禁止受資助企業在中國及其他受關注國家，對相對先進的半導體進行重大擴產。
    過往權力轉移理論的相關文獻，多是以戰爭為中心進行探討；本研究則為此理論提供更多非戰爭視角的探討，進行主導強權與崛起國之間的動態競爭分析。本文認為權力轉移理論偏重於崛起國是戰爭發起者的觀點，相對少關注主導強權面對崛起國時的反應及其可能採取的舉動。晶片與科學法案的排除中國及其他受關注國家的條款，顯現華盛頓對北京的警戒，這亦可理解為前者對後者採取「非戰爭的攻防」的預防性舉措。此舉應可視為美國對中國崛起的反應，因此若權力轉移理論的分析，能多加以關注主導強權面對崛起國時的反應及其可能採取的舉動，將能更全面解釋當今中美兩強博弈的動態變化。
    In the international arena where powerful nations coexist, and the possibility of war exists, there are differing opinions on who triggers wars. Power transition theory suggests that a rising power will initiate war against a dominant power out of dissatisfaction with the status quo. Other argue that the declining state is motivated by preventive motivation to take action against rising adversary. However, both the power transition theory and the preventive motivation argument primarily focus on the initiation of war. This perspective reflects an analysis framework based on “war”, that is, to explore the possibility of war between states. This study investigates offensive and defensive measures other than war between the dominant and rising powers by utilizing another analytical framework termed “non-war offense and defense”. This paper discusses the United States’ non-war preventive approach towards China, exemplified by the CHIPS and Science Act implemented in 2022. The bill prohibits recipients from materially expanding their relative advanced semiconductor manufacturing capacity in China and other countries of concern.
    Previous literatures related to power transition theory has primarily focused on war. This research provides more non-war perspective to the discussion of this theory, analyzes the dynamic competition between dominant and rising powers. Power transition theory tends to view the rising power as the instigator of war, while relatively little attention to the reaction and potential actions of the dominant power towards the rising power. The provision of excluding China and other concerning countries from the CHIPS and Science Act signifies the Washington’ caution towards Beijing. This can also be interpreted as a “non-war offense and defense” preventive measure of the former towards the latter. This can be seen as a response of the United States to the China’s increasing power. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of the ongoing power dynamics between China and the United States in the analysis of the power transition theory, can be achieved by paying more attention to the dominant power’s responses and potential actions in the face of a rising power.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 63(2), 31-82
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202406_63(2).0002
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202406_63(2).0002
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    63-2-2.pdf7496KbAdobe PDF43View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback