English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50795761      Online Users : 295
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152251


    Title: 研究中國外交還需要國際關係理論嗎？
    Do We Still Need International Relations Theory to Study Chinese Foreign Policy?
    Authors: 張廖年仲
    Chang-Liao, Nien-chung
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 中程理論;中國外交;中國崛起;國際關係理論;對華交往
    Middle-Range Theories;Chinese Foreign Policy;Rise of China;International Relations Theories;Engaging China
    Date: 2024-06
    Issue Date: 2024-07-04 10:12:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來國際關係理論面臨可能終結的危機，國際關係理論的三大典範：現實主義、自由主義與建構主義的發展呈現停滯的狀態，理論與政策應用之間的鴻溝也逐漸加深，以中程理論為導向的經驗研究逐漸取代了傳統國際關係理論強調通則化與系統性的分析架構。儘管國際關係理論仍有其重要性，但不論現實主義、自由主義與建構主義皆沒有預測到中國的崛起對國際政治所造成的變化，美國學界也開始反思過去對華交往政策的國際關係理論基礎。就臺灣的研究者而言，隨著從事中國大陸研究的限制增加，研究中國外交是否還能像過去那樣地依賴國際關係理論？本文提出四種研究途徑作為中國外交研究者除了傳統國際關係理論以外的選擇，分別是歷史研究途徑、跨國比較途徑、經驗研究以及中程理論。
    In recent years, international relations theory has faced a potential crisis of obsolescence. The development of the three major paradigms—realism, liberalism, and constructivism—has stagnated, and the gap between theory and policy implications has widened. Empirical research guided by middle-range theories are replacing traditional international relations theory that emphasize generalization and systematic frameworks. Although international relations theory remains important, neither realism, liberalism, nor constructivism have predicted correctly the influence of China’s rise on international politics. Against this backdrop, the American academic community also reflects on the theoretical foundations of the policy of engaging China. As obstacles to study China for researchers in Taiwan have increased, can we still rely on international relations theory to study Chinese foreign policy? This paper proposes four alternatives: historical approach, cross-national comparative approach, empirical research, and middle-range theory.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 63(2), 1-30
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202406_63(2).0001
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202406_63(2).0001
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    63-2-1.pdf7487KbAdobe PDF64View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback