政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/151961
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51029298      線上人數 : 914
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151961


    題名: 東亞的凍卵補助方案：政策目標與說辭
    Government Subsidies for Elective Egg Freezing: Comparing Policy Objectives and Rhetoric in East Asia
    作者: 安宜
    Peterson, Annika
    貢獻者: Simandjuntak, Deasy Rumondang Priscilla
    安宜
    Annika Peterson
    關鍵詞: 冷凍卵子
    政策分析
    輔助生殖技術
    生育力
    東亞
    Oocyte Cryopreservation
    Policy Analysis
    Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Fertility
    East Asia
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-07-01 12:09:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 東亞國家的一些生育率是過去 20 年來世界上最低的。由於生育率仍然較低，各國政府已開始利用輔助生殖技術來糾正生育率下降的趨勢。隨著許多輔助生殖技術程序變得更加容易取得，輔助生殖技術的普及和使用量激增。同時，醫學性不孕症病例不斷增加，使得更多的人訴諸輔助生殖技術來生育。不同國家獲得選擇性凍卵的機會仍然存在很大差異，一些國家公開資助該程序，而另一些國家則完全禁止該程序。除了韓國、日本和台灣之外，法國和塞浦路斯最近也實施了政府計劃，為選擇性冷凍卵提供補貼。當政策制定者採用輔助生殖技術時，政策目標通常分為以下三類：增加獲得該程序的平等機會、減少相關的健康風險以及增加獲得機會以提高出生率。各國政府根據每個國家認為最重要的目標和社會議題，利用這些框架來補貼和限制輔助生殖技術的可用性。 透過研究韓國、日本和台灣對選擇性凍卵的政府補貼，我認為，針對選擇性程序（例如凍卵）的輔助生殖技術的生育框架對婦女和兒童有害，而且在以下情況下也不具有成本效益：目標是提高活產率。 透過批判性分析韓國、日本和台灣擴大選擇性凍卵的政策，本研究解釋了以提高出生率為目標的選擇性凍卵政策的弱點。我還提出了政策建議，重點是政策目標的根本轉變和生育教育的大幅增加。各國政府應與醫療專業人員繼續合作，以推動未來婦女和生殖健康政策的改變。
    Countries in East Asia have reported some of the lowest fertility rates in the world in the last 20 years. As fertility rates remain concerningly low, governments have begun to utilize assisted reproductive technology (ART) to rectify the decline. ART popularity and usage have skyrocketed as many ART procedures become more readily available. One form of ART that has increased in popularity in recent years is elective egg freezing (EEF). Access to EEF still varies dramatically by country with some publicly funding the procedure and others banning it altogether. In the cases of South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, local governments have implemented subsidy programs for EEF with the explicit goal of increasing birth rates by removing some of the social and monetary burdens that make child-rearing increasingly difficult. When policymakers approach ART, the policy goals often fall into the following three categories: increasing equal access to the procedure, reducing the associated health risks, and expanding access to increase birth rates. Governments use these frameworks to subsidize and restrict ART availability depending on the goals and social issues deemed most important by each country. Through examining the government subsidies for EEF in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, I argue that a fertility framework towards ART for elective procedures, such as EEF, is harmful to women and children while also not being cost-effective when the goal is to increase live birth rates. By critically analyzing the policies for EEF expansion in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, this research explains the weaknesses in approaching EEF policy through the goal of increasing birth rates. I also propose policy recommendations focusing on a fundamental shift in policy goals and a dramatic increase in fertility education. Governments should use continued collaboration with medical professionals for any women and reproductive health policy changes in the future.
    參考文獻: Ando, S., et al(2013). Review of Mental‐health‐related stigma in Japan. Psychiatry and
    Clinical Neurosciences, 67(7), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12086.
    Argyle, C. E., Harper, J. C., & Davies, M. C. (2016). Oocyte cryopreservation: Where are
    we now? Human Reproduction Update, 22(4), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw007.
    Atoh, N. (2020, December 31). Multivariate analysis of marital fertility in Japan. 日本公
    衆衛生雑誌 [Japanese Public Health Journal]. https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.67.12_892.
    Bae, J.-H. (2020). Determinants of the gap between desired and actual/expected number
    of children in Japan and South Korea. Low Fertility in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore - Population Policies and Their Effectiveness, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2830-9_2.
    Bae, G., & Kim, K.-S. (2012). A study on the influence of family values and birth policy
    on the wanted fertility rate. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 43(3), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2012.43.3.239.
    Balabanova, E., & Simonstein, F. (2010). Assisted reproduction: a comparative review of
    IVF policies in two Pronatalist countries. Health care analysis: HCA: journal of health philosophy and policy, 18(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0123-2.
    Barro, R. J., & Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility Choice in a Model of Economic Growth.
    Econometrica, 57(2), 481–501.
    Birenbaum-Carmeli D. (2016). Thirty-five years of assisted reproductive technologies in
    Israel. Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.004.
    Borovecki, A., Tozzo, P., Cerri, N., & Caenazzo, L. (2018). social egg freezing under
    public health perspective: Just a medical reality or a women's right? An ethical case analysis. Journal of Public Health Research, 7(3), 1484. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2018.1484.
    Brinton, M. C., Mun, E., and Hertog, E. (2021). Singlehood in contemporary Japan:
    Rating, dating, and waiting for a good match. Demographic Research, 44, 239–276. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2021.44.10.
    Caldwell, J. C., et al (2006). Demographic transition theory. Springer.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4498-4.
    Cascante, S. D., et al. (2022). Fifteen years of autologous oocyte thaw outcomes from a
    large university-based fertility center. Fertility and sterility, 118(1), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.013.
    Castro-Vázquez, G. (2015). Assisted Reproductive Technologies in contemporary Japan:
    Experiences and perceptions of some Japanese mothers. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415596862.
    Census and Statistics Department. (2024, April 5). Table 115-01011 : Vital Events.
    Center and Statistics Department. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/web_table.html?id=115-01011.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, January 8). Art success rates. Centers
    for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html.
    Cha, W., Yun, I., Nam, C. M., Nam, J. Y., & Park, E. C. (2023). Evaluation of Assisted
    Reproductive Technology Health Insurance Coverage for Multiple Pregnancies and Births in Korea. JAMA network open, 6(6), e2316696. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16696.
    Chambers, G. M., et al. (2021). International Committee for Monitoring Assisted
    Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 36(11), 2921–2934. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab198.
    Chambers, G. M., et al. (2009). The economic impact of Assisted Reproductive
    Technology: A review of selected developed countries. Fertility and Sterility, 91(6), 2281–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029.
    Chen, C. (1986). Pregnancy After Human Oocyte Cryopreservation. Preliminary
    Communication, 327(8486), 884–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90989-X.
    Cheng, Y. A., and Yang, C. W. (2021). Continuity and changes in attitudes toward
    marriage in contemporary Taiwan. Journal of Population Research, 38(2),
    139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-021-09259-z.
    Chronopoulou, E., et al. (2021). Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility
    decline. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 38(5), 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02072-w.
    Chung, Y.-C. (2023, September 26). KMT presidential hopeful vows housing subsidy for
    three-child families. Focus Taiwan - CNA English News. https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202309250025#:~:text=At%20present%2C%20egg%20freezing%20cannot,as%20a%20result%20of%20chemotherapy.
    Clay, A. S. (2023, September 11). South Korea’s Bioethics and Biosafety Act (2005).
    Embryo Project Encyclopedia. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/south-koreas-bioethics-and-biosafety-act-2005.
    Committee for Assisted Reproductive Technology Statistics, et al. (2017). The status of
    assisted reproductive technology in Korea in 2012. Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 44(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2017.44.1.47.
    Connolly, M. P., Hoorens, S., & Chambers, G. M. (2010). The costs and consequences of
    assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Human Reproductive Update, 16(6), 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq013.
    Cross, C. (2023, September 26). Freezing eggs: Preserving fertility for the future. Johns
    Hopkins Medicine. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/freezing-eggs-preserving-fertility-for-the-future.
    Croydon S. (2022). Reluctant Rulers: Policy, Politics, and Assisted Reproduction
    Technology in Japan. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics: CQ: the international journal of healthcare ethics committees, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000603.
    Cyprus Profile. (2022, May 2). Government subsidy on egg freezing garnering
    popularity. Cyprus Profile - Cyprus’ Trade & Investment Business Portal. https://www.cyprusprofile.com/articles/government-subsidy-egg-freezing-garnering-popularity.
    Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. Republic of China
    (Taiwan). (2024). Population by Sex and 5 Year Age Group for Counties and
    Cities. https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/en/3910.
    Department of Information Services, Executive Yuan. (2023, October 6). National
    Childcare Policy for ages 0-6. Executive Yuan. https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/7b033800-d295-4a7a-8fba-dfbf617142d6.
    Department of Public Health, Taoyuan. (2023, August 7). Taoyuan Egg Freezing
    Nutrition Fund subsidy. https://dph.tycg.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=5298&s=964432#:~:text=Program%20period%3A%20The%20application%20period,allocated%20funds%20have%20been%20expended.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic
    address: asrm@asrm.org (2021). Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and sterility, 116(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.019.
    The Federal Law Gazette. (2011, November 21). The Embryo Protection Act.
    https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/Gesetze_und_Verordnungen/GuV/E/ESchG_EN_Fassung_Stand_10Dez2014_01.pdf.
    Gauthier, A. H., & Shah, I. H. (2015). Social Norms, Institutions, and Policies in
    Low-Fertility Countries. In N. Ogawa (Ed.), Low Fertility and Reproductive
    Health in East Asia (Vol. 11, pp. 11–30). essay, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9226-4_2.
    Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Brandén, M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and
    childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 1097–1126. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2013.29.40.
    Graham, M. E., et al. (2023). Assisted reproductive technology: Short- and long-term
    outcomes. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 65(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15332.
    Ha, J.-O. (2014). Advanced Approach to Pregnancy and Childbirth: moving from a
    Perspective of Population Control to One Focused on Women’s Health. Journal of
    Korean Maternal and Child Health, 18(1), 24–34.
    Hammond, K. (2023, September 6). The Problems with Employer-Funded Elective Egg
    Freezing. Bill of Health.
    https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2023/09/06/the-problems-with-employer-funded-elective-egg-freezing/.
    Harada, S., et al. (2023). Fact‐finding survey on Assisted Reproductive Technology in
    Japan. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 49(11), 2593–2601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15780.
    Harwood, K. (2008). Egg Freezing: A Breakthrough For Reproductive
    Autonomy? Bioethics, 23(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00680.x.
    Hodgetts, K., et al. (2014). Disinvestment policy and the public funding
    of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups. BMC Health Serv Res 14, 204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-204.
    Hong, Y. H. et al. (2019). A survey on the awareness and knowledge about elective
    oocyte cryopreservation among unmarried women of reproductive age visiting a
    private fertility center. Obstetrics and Gynecology Science, 62, 438–444. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.438.
    Hsinchu City Government. (2023, May 24). Hsinchu City’s egg-freezing subsidy
    program officially launched. 新竹市政府 [Hsinchu City Government].
    https://www.hccg.gov.tw/en/home.jsp?id=10006&parentpath=0%2C5&mcustomize=municipalnews_view.jsp&dataserno=202305240007&aplistdn=ou&mserno=201601300240&toolsflag=Y.
    Hsu, J. C. (2018). Use of assisted reproductive technologies before and after the Artificial
    Reproduction Act in Taiwan. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206208.g002.
    Hu, L.-C., & Chiang, Y.-L. (2020). Having children in a time of lowest-low fertility:
    Value of children, sex preference and fertility desire among Taiwanese young
    adults. Child Indicators Research, 14(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09753-5.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2024). New law comes into force
    giving greater flexibility for fertility patients. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-press-releases/2022/new-law-comes-into-force-giving-greater-flexibility-for-fertility-patients/.
    Inhorn, M. C. (2023). The Mating Gap - Educated Women and Missing Men. In
    Motherhood On Ice: The Mating Gap and Why Women Freeze Their Eggs (pp.
    43–55). essay, New York University Press.
    Inoue, Y. (2024, March 11). Tokyo to continue offering subsidy to women seeking to
    freeze eggs. The Japan Times.
    https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/11/japan/science-health/egg-freeze-tmg/#:~:text=Tokyo%20will%20continue%20to%20offer,metropolitan%20government%20confirmed%20on%20Monday.
    Jamwal, V. D. S., & Yadav, A. K. (2023). The Assisted Reproductive Technology
    (Regulation) Act, 2021: A Step in the Right Direction. Indian journal of
    community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 48(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_169_22.
    Jeong, K., Yoon, J., Cho, H.J. et al. The relationship between changes in the Korean
    fertility rate and policies to encourage fertility. BMC Public Health 22, 2298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14722-4.
    Jhang, J. R. (2024, February 2). Assisted Reproductive Act amendment: The Testing
    Ground for the new Taiwanese Parliament’s power dynamics. Taiwan Insight. https://taiwaninsight.org/2024/02/02/assisted-reproductive-act-amendment-the-testing-ground-for-the-new-taiwanese-parliaments-power-dynamics/.
    Johnson L. (2014). Regulation of assisted reproductive treatment (ART) in Australia &
    current ethical issues. The Indian journal of medical research, 140, S9–S12.
    Jones, G. W. (2019). Ultra-low fertility in East Asia: Policy responses and challenges.
    Asian Population Studies, 15(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2019.1594656.
    Jung, H. (2023). Part 4: My Body: Chapter 12. In Flowers of Fire: The Inside Story of
    South Korea’s Feminist Movement and What it Means for Women’s Rights
    Worldwide (pp. 311–315). essay, BenBella Books, Inc.
    Jung, H. (2023, January 27). Women in South Korea are on strike against being
    “baby-making machines.” The New York Times.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/27/opinion/south-korea-fertility-rate-feminism.html.
    Jwa, S. C., et al. (2021). Social Capital and use of assisted reproductive technology in
    young couples: Ecological Study using application information for government
    subsidies in Japan. SSM - Population Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100995.
    Kamel R. M. (2013). Assisted reproductive technology after the birth of Louise Brown.
    Journal of reproduction & infertility, 14(3), 96–109.
    Kikuchi, I. et al. (2019). Early Outcomes of a municipally funded oocyte
    cryopreservation programme in Japan. Human Fertility, 22(4), 266–272.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2018.1464215.
    Kim, C. J. (2018). The Assisted Reproductive Technology Subsidy in Korea: Criticism
    from a Perspective of Reproductive Responsibility. Acta Bioethica, 24(2), 245–252.
    Kim, H.-S. (2015). Women’s Wages and Fertility Hazards in South Korea. Asian Women,
    31(2).
    Kim M. (2021). National policies for infertility support and nursing strategies for patients
    affected by infertility in South Korea. Korean journal of women health nursing, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.03.12.1.
    Kim, S. (2019). Reproductive Technologies as population control: How pronatalist
    policies harm reproductive health in South Korea. Sexual and Reproductive
    Health Matters, 27(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1610278.
    Koch, L., & Morgall, J. (1987). Towards a Feminist Assessment of Reproductive
    Technology. Acta Sociologica, 30(2), 173–191.
    Kocourkova, J., Stastna, A., & Burcin, B. (2023). The influence of the increasing use of
    assisted reproduction technologies on the recent growth in fertility in Czechia.
    Scientific Reports, 13, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37071-7.
    Korean Statistical Information Service. (2024). Vital Statistics of Korea. KOSIS - Korean
    Statistical Information Service. https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do.
    Korean Statistics Information Service. (2023, August 30). Attempted/total birth rate, birth
    rate by maternal age. KOSIS - Korean Statistical Information Service.
    https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B81A21&vw_cd=MT_TM2_TITLE&list_id=101_B0501&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_TM2_TITLE&path=%252FeasyViewStatis%252FcustomStatisIndex.do.
    Kuleshova, L., et al. (1999). Birth following vitrification of a small number of human
    oocytes: Case Report. Human Reproduction, 14(12), 3077–3079. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.12.3077.
    Kuwayama, M., et al. (2005). Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation
    of human oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 11(3), 300–308.
    Kyweluk, M. A., Reinecke, J., & Chen, D. (2019). Fertility Preservation Legislation in
    the United States: Potential Implications for Transgender Individuals. LGBT
    health, 6(7), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2019.0017.
    Lai, S., & Jiang, L. (2024, March 28). 人工生殖修法公聽會再度登場 正反意見場內外
    持續交鋒 [Public hearing on Artificial Reproduction law revision was held again; Pros and Cons continued to compete on and off the court]. Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation.
    https://news.pts.org.tw/article/687694.
    Lem, W. G., et al. (2023). Public Stigma Related to People With Mental Health
    Conditions Among Japanese Company Employees. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 15(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4868.
    Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition.
    Population And Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.
    Lida, A. (2022). How do traditional gender roles influence women’s lives in Taiwan? An
    investigation of highly educated women’s willingness to create families. East Asia, 40, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-022-09392-3.
    Lin, C., et al. (2021). The Value of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in the Prediction of
    Spontaneous Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in
    endocrinology, 12, 695157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.695157.
    Master, F. (2023, August 1). Taiwan women freeze their eggs as “insurance” in hopes of
    law change. The Wider Image.
    https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/taiwan-fertility/.
    Ministry of Health. (2024, January 21). Find out about freezing eggs (oocytes). Gov.il.
    https://www.gov.il/en/service/oocyte-cryopreservation.
    Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. (2022, February 28). 人口動態統計速報（令
    和4年(2022)12月分) [Population Statistics Report from December 2022 to 2024].
    https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/s2022/dl/202212_1.pdf.
    Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2018, March 1). Assisted Reproduction Act. Laws &
    Regulations Database of the Republic of China (Taiwan). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070024.
    Morrison, P. S. (2020). The child deficit and the changing value of children in Asia.
    Population Change and Impacts in Asia and the Pacific, 30, 313–339.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0230-4_14.
    Nargund G. (2009). Declining birth rate in Developed Countries: A radical policy
    re-think is required. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 1(3), 191–193.
    National Development Council. (2024). National Development Council. Low Birth Rate.
    https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=6F69D4E5D624660A.
    National Population and Talent Division. (2024). Marriage & Parenthood.
    https://www.population.gov.sg/our-population/population-trends/marriage-&-pare
    nthood.
    Njagi, P., et al (2023). Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in
    low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Human reproduction
    open, 2023(2), hoad007. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad007.
    NSW Government. (2023, August 15). Assisted Reproductive Technology-assisted
    reproductive technology. NSW Health. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/art/Pages/default.aspx.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2020). Egg Freezing in the UK. London, UK. Retrieved
    May 5, 2024,
    https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/topics/beginning-of-life/egg-freezing#:~:text=Nuffield%20Council%20welcomes%20extension%20of,storage%20period%20of%2055%20years.
    The Parliamentary Counsel Office. (2023, July 1). Human Assisted Reproductive
    Technology Act 2004. New Zealand Legislation. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0092/latest/whole.html.
    Petropanagos, A., Cattapan, A., Baylis, F., & Leader, A. (2015). Social OC: risk, benefits
    and other considerations. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal =
    journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 187(9), 666–669.
    https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141605.
    Pinzon, J. L. (2023, October 2). Taipei to offer egg freezing subsidy for cancer patients.
    TVBS.https://news.tvbs.com.tw/english/2260465#:~:text=Hsinchu%20and%20Ta
    oyuan%20City%20stand,to%20apply%20for%20the%20subsidy.
    Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. (2023, September 15). Trends in live births, live
    birth rates (per 1,000 population), total fertility rates and sex ratio of live births:
    Japan.
    https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?page=1&query=fertility+rate+2005&
    layout=dataset&bunya_l=02&stat_infid=000040101521&metadata=1&data=1.
    Prime Minister’s Office of Japan. (2023, March 17). Press Conference by Prime Minister
    Kishida. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/101_kishida/statement/202303/_00015.html.
    Proost, M. de, & Johnson, M. (2021). The revision of the French bioethics law and the
    questions it raises for the future of funding for egg freezing. Reproductive
    BioMedicine Online, 44(4), 591–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.002.
    Pugh S. (2019). Politics, power, and sexual and reproductive health and rights: impacts
    and opportunities. Sexual and reproductive health matters, 27(2), 1662616.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1662616.
    Ranji, U., Long, M., & Salganicoff, A. (2020, September 15). Coverage and use of
    fertility services in the U.S. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
    https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/coverage-and-use-of-fertilit
    y-services-in-the-u-s/.
    Republic of Cyprus. (2020). Laws regarding Motherhood. Web portal of the Republic of
    Cyprus.
    https://www.cyprus.gov.cy/portal/portal.nsf/gwp.getGroup?OpenForm&access=0&SectionId=citizen&CategoryId=Family+and+Child&SelectionId=Laws+regarding+Motherhood&print=0&lang=en.
    Republique Francaise. (2021, August 3). Loi n° 2021-1017 DU 2 août 2021 relative à la
    bioéthique. Legifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/dossierlegislatif/JORFDOLE000038811571/#:~:text=Le%20projet%20de%20loi%20vise,femmes%20comme%20pour%20les%20hommes.
    Rosenwaks, Z., & Pereira, N. (2017). The pioneering of intracytoplasmic sperm injection:
    historical perspectives. Reproduction, 154(6), F71–F77. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0308.
    Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E., & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in
    health care policy analysis. Journal of health services research & policy, 13(1),
    40–46. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029.
    Ryu, Y. (2005). A comparative study on the effect of welfare states’ childcare support
    systems on total fertility rates. Korean Social Security Studies, 21(3), 233-261.
    Schirmer, D. A. et al. (2020, September). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after
    assisted reproductive technologies: trends, predictors, and pregnancy outcomes. National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc.
    Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2023, August 24). Project to support for the egg
    freezing cost to kick off.
    https://english.seoul.go.kr/project-to-support-for-the-egg-freezing-cost-to-kick-off/#:~:text=The%20project%20to%20support%20the%20egg%20freezing%20cost%20supports%20women,and%20egg%20retrieval%20is%20excluded.
    Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2024a, February 19). Seoul Metropolitan Government
    to increase subsidies for citizens in their 20’s seeking egg freezing and double the
    number of beneficiaries across all age groups.
    https://english.seoul.go.kr/seoul-metropolitan-government-to-increase-subsidies-for-citizens-in-their-20s-seeking-egg-freezing-and-double-the-number-of-beneficiaries-across-all-age-groups/.
    Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2024b, March 15). Seoul launches all-out attack on
    falling fertility rate by abolishing residency and age requirements for fertility
    subsidies and increasing the number of subsidy payments. https://english.seoul.go.kr/seoul-launches-all-out-attack-on-falling-fertility-rate-by-abolishing-residency-and-age-requirements-for-fertility-subsidies-and-increasing-the-number-of-subsidy-payments/.
    Shirasawa, H., et al. (2023). The first nationwide website survey of the availability and
    costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan. Heliyon,
    9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19074.
    Statistics Korea. (2020, November 18). 2020 Social Survey Results.
    https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20111050000&bid=11761&act=view&list_no=386681&tag=&nPage=1&ref_bid.
    St. Peter, C. (1989). Feminist Discourse, Infertility, and Reproductive Technologies.
    NWSA Journal, 1(3), 353–367. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4315920.
    Stromboni, C. (2024, February 6). France’s delicate approach to preventing infertility. Le
    Monde.
    https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/02/06/france-s-controversial-approach-to-preventing-infertility_6496867_7.html.
    Suzuki M. (2014). In vitro fertilization in Japan - early days of in vitro fertilization and
    embryo transfer and future prospects for assisted reproductive technology.
    Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences, 90(5), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.90.184.
    Tan, J. (2024). Beyond fertility figures: towards reproductive rights and choices.
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02608-2.
    Tan, J. (2023). South Korea’s fertility puzzle: A Mismatch Between Sustained
    Childbearing Desires and Declining Fertility. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 54(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.54.2.030.
    Thomas, J., Rowe, F., & Lin, E. S. (2022, February 8). Declining fertility in Taiwan: The
    deterring impact of housework imbalance. Asian Population Studies, 19(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2022.2035555.
    Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Welfare. (2024a). 【お知らせ】令和6年度
    の卵子凍結に係る費用助成について [Notice: Subsidies for egg freezing costs in fiscal year 2024]. Bureau of Social Welfare, Tokyo Metropolitan Government. https://www.fukushi.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kodomo/shussan/ranshitouketsu/touketsu/index.html.
    Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Welfare. (2024b). 事業の概要 [Project
    Overview].
    https://www.fukushi.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kodomo/shussan/ranshitouketsu/shiyou/gaiyou.html.
    Tozzo, P., Fassina, A., Nespeca, P., Spigarolo, G., & Caenazzo, L. (2019). Understanding
    social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students’
    awareness and attitudes. Life Science, Society and Policy, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-019-0092-7.
    Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and
    epidemiology. Clinical biochemistry, 62, 2–10.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012.
    Volgsten, H., & Schmidt, L. (2023). Exploring Swedish single women’s decision to
    choose motherhood through medically assisted reproduction–a qualitative study.
    Human Fertility, 26(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.2017026.
    Wang H. (2023). Single women's access to egg freezing in mainland China: an
    ethicolegal analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108915.
    Wennberg A.-L. (2020). Social freezing of oocytes: a means to take control of your
    fertility. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125(2), 95-98.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2019.1707332.
    Wu, C.-L. (2023). Making Multiple Babies - Anticipating Regimes of Assisted
    Reproduction (Vol. 52, Ser. Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality). Berghahn Books.
    Wu, C. L., Ha, J. O., & Tsuge, A. (2020). Data Reporting as Care Infrastructure:
    Assembling ART Registries in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. East Asian
    Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 14(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8233676.
    Wu, C. L., et al. (2020). 公平近用、預防風險或增長人口? —助孕科技公費補助的日
    韓台比較 [Equal Access, Risk Prevention, or Pronatalism? Public Financing of In Vitro Fertilization in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan]. 臺灣民主季刊 [Taiwan Democracy Quarterly], 17(4), 49–104.
    Yamada, M., et al. (2022). Guidelines for Reproductive Medicine in Japan. Reproductive
    Medicine and Biology, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12483.
    Yang, E. (2024, March 28). Child rights highlighted at 2nd Reproductive Law
    Amendment hearing - Focus Taiwan. Focus Taiwan - CNA English News. https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202403280015.
    Yang, I. J. et al. (2022). Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective
    oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study. Reproductive biology and
    endocrinology: RB&E, 20(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00996-1.
    Yip, P. S., & Chen, M. (2016). An elasticity analysis of the effectiveness of pronatalist
    measures in Taiwan. Asian Population Studies, 12(3), 273–293.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2016.1221207.
    Yoshinaga, K., et al. (2023). Non-medical oocyte cryopreservation at a single center in
    Japan: 8 years of experience. Reproductive medicine and biology, 22(1), e12549.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12549.
    Zhang, T.-T., et al. (2023). The effect of family fertility support policies on fertility, their
    contribution, and Policy Pathways to fertility improvement in OECD countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064790.
    Ziadeh, S., & Yahaya, A. (2001). Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Archives of
    gynecology and obstetrics, 265(1), 30–33.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s004040000122.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    111926044
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111926044
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    604401.pdf6801KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋