English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51577805      Online Users : 920
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151684


    Title: 論營業秘密法第13條之2之「意圖在境外使用」要件與情況證據：從最高法院111年度台上字第3655號刑事判決談起
    “Intent to Use Abroad” Element under Article 13-2 of the Trade Secrets Act and Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court riminal Judgment Tai-Sheng No. 111-3655
    Authors: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: 營業秘密;侵害營業秘密罪;意圖在境外使用;美國經濟間諜法;情況證據
    Trade Secret;Criminal Misappropriation of Trade Secrets;Intent to Use Abroad;United States’Economic Espionage Act;Circumstantial Evidence
    Date: 2024-03
    Issue Date: 2024-06-12 14:42:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國營業秘密法自2013年起導入刑事責任。同法第13條之1規定侵害營業秘密罪；第13條之2加重處罰「意圖在境外使用」受侵害營業秘密之行為。在比較法上，第13條之2類似美國《經濟間諜法》（Economic Espionage Act，EEA）的經濟間諜罪（18 U.S.C.§1831），其要求被告有意圖或知悉使其犯行能圖利外國政府、外國政府所控制之單位、與外國代理人。近期，最高法院於111年度台上字第3655號刑事判決中，就營業秘密法第13條之2之「意圖在境外使用」要件提出證據法的原則，並據此基準而廢棄前審判決。可預期本案發回智商法院後應是改判被告等成立第13條之2之罪。本文欲借鏡美國EEA判決United States v. Chung, 659 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2011)，並佐以最高法院111年度台上字第3655號刑事判決之案例事實，而就其一被告之「意圖」認定，提供情況證據判斷之建議。
    Criminal liabilities were introduced to Taiwan Trade Secrets Act in 2013. Article 13-1 criminalizes trade secret infringement, while Article 13-2 imposes higher punishment on an accused with an intent to use stolen trade secrets outside this country. Article 13-2 has its counterpart in United States’ Economic Espionage Act. 18 U.S.C. § 1831. § 1831 criminalizes economic espionage and requires an accused to have an intent or knowledge that his act benefits a foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent. Recently, the Supreme Court in Criminal Judgment Tai-Sheng No. 111-3655 illustrated evidentiary rules for reviewing the “intent for off-border use” element under Article 13-2. It further reversed the IP & Commerce Court’s decision. It is expected that the IP & Commerce Court will find the defendants guilty. This article will introduce United States v. Chung, 659 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2011), as a reference for discussing Criminal Judgment Tai-Sheng No. 111-3655. The author further provides guidance for using circumstantial evidence to determine the intent element regarding one defendant.
    Relation: 司法新聲, No.145, pp.127-153
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML90View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback