English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50900053      Online Users : 706
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/151640


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151640


    Title: 「學習成果」導向之高等教育品質保證對大學教與學之影響：高教深耕計畫可以再深化什麼？
    Learning Outcome Based Institutional Review in Taiwan Higher Education and Its Impacts on University’s Teaching and Learning: What Else Can MOE Deep Plowing Project Do Further?
    Authors: 侯永琪;林劭仁;周華琪
    Hou, Angela Yung-chi;Lin, Shaw-ren;Chou, Hua-chi
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 校務評鑑;高教深耕計畫;學生學習成效
    Institutional review;MOE Deep Plowing Project;Student learning outcome
    Date: 2018-02
    Issue Date: 2024-06-12 12:00:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2016年第二週期校務評鑑，以「學生學習成效」及「資訊公開」為主軸，鼓勵大學運用有效能的教學方式，開創新的學習課程。2017年，教育部推出高教深耕計畫，希望凸顯各類大學的特色，打破系和系的僵化限制，藉由教學創新，啟發學生的學習自主動能，強化跨領域知能及技能。因此，教學現場的翻轉與帶動教學創新成為高教深耕的主軸。藉此，本研究的目的有三：一、了解臺灣高等教育評鑑中心2011年第一週期校務評鑑對大學教學創新與學生學習的影響；二、比較分析2016～2017年第二週期校務評鑑與高教深耕計畫之目的、性質、指標內涵及與教學創新及學生學習之關聯性；三、由品質保證的觀點分析教學創新在高教深耕計畫的角色。
    Following two major concerns of “student learning outcomes” and “information transparency”, the second cycle of HEEACT institutional review was launched in 2016. All institutions were encouraged to develop effective teaching strategies and approaches as well as offer innovative courses in the self-assessment process. In 2017, Ministry of Education initiated a new higher education enhancement project called “Deep Plowing”, aiming at universities’ features development and interdisciplinary learning and skills. In other words, funded universities are supposed to equip students with self-learning capacities, and cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills. Hence, the fi rst purpose of the study is to explore the impact of the first cycle institutional review in 2011 on university’s teaching quality and learning outcomes. The difference and similarities between the second cycle institutional review in 2016-2017 and 2017 MOE Deep Plowing project will be analyzed next in terms of objectives, standards and review procedures. The suggestions for MOE “Deep Plowing” project in teaching innovations and quality improvement will be made as a conclusion from a perspective of quality assurance at the end of the paper.
    Relation: 教育研究月刊, No.286, pp.20-36
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602018020286003
    DOI: 10.3966/168063602018020286003
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML59View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback