政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/151528
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51002775      線上人數 : 928
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151528


    題名: 以去中心化架構改善匿名式交友軟體性能與體驗之設計與評估
    Design and Evaluation of Using Decentralized Architecture to Improve the Performance and Experience of Anonymous Dating App
    作者: 邱彥閔
    Chiu, Yen-Min
    貢獻者: 陳聖智
    廖峻鋒
    Chen, Shen-Chih
    Liao, Chun-Feng
    邱彥閔
    Chiu, Yen-Min
    關鍵詞: 匿名式交友軟體
    匿名聊天
    去中心化設計
    使用動機
    滿足感
    Gun.js
    WebRTC
    使用者體驗
    Anonymous Dating Apps
    Anonymous Communication App
    Decentralized Design
    Using Motivations
    Satisfaction
    Gun.js
    WebRTC
    User Experience
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-06-03 11:51:43 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 過去出現匿名式交友軟體 Wootalk，在這樣匿名隨機配對的聊天成果下出現種種問題導致許多的使用者體驗感受較差。舉例而言，男女比例失衡、連線穩定性差與使用者素質低落。然而，Wootalk 擁有這麼多的問題，卻還是許多人曾經使用過與經常使用的匿名式交友軟體。因此，本研究打算利用去中心化特性「匿名性與安全性」、「連線穩定性」、「登入審查機制」導入匿名式交友軟體與優化匿名交友軟體的功能設計。並使用 GUN 的分散式技術與 WebRTC 的端對端連線(Peer-to-Peer)來完成此研究模型與改善匿名式交友軟體的使用者體驗。

    本研究採用混合研究法，透過自行開發的去中心化匿名交友軟體《Funny-Cat》，對大學中的學生（大學生、碩士生）進行了一系列質性訪談和問卷調查。這項研究旨在探討學生匿名交友軟體的使用動機、《Funny-Cat》的體驗設計、以及對去中心化設計、軟體滿足感和功能設計的感受。總共有35位受訪者參與了《Funny-Cat》的使用體驗和隨後的訪談研究。透過這種方法，以深入了解去中心化匿名交友軟體在大學環境中的使用情境及其對學生社交互動的影響。

    研究結果發現，使用匿名交友軟體的動機並不直接預測去中心化設計與《Funny-Cat》的滿足感；然而，去中心化設計對《Funny-Cat》的滿足感有正面影響，這表明去中心化的特性滿足了使用者對匿名交友軟體的期望；儘管匿名交友軟體的功能設計未能直接增強去中心化設計對《Funny-Cat》滿足感的正面影響，訪談結果卻顯示，這些功能設計提高了使用者的使用意向並優化了整體的使用者體驗。綜上所述，在匿名交友軟體開發過程中，去中心化設計和匿名交友軟體的功能設計有助於提升與改善使用者滿足感和使用者體驗的重要性。
    Historically, anonymous dating apps like Wootalk have faced challenges such as imbalanced gender ratios, unstable connections, and poor user quality, compromising the user experience. Despite these setbacks, Wootalk remained popular for anonymous dating. This study seeks to enhance anonymous dating apps by incorporating decentralized features that promote anonymity, security, and stable connections, alongside mechanisms for reviewing logins. Utilizing GUN's decentralized technology and WebRTC's peer-to-peer connections, the study aims to improve the user experience significantly.

    A mixed-methods approach was adopted to examine the effectiveness of these improvements through the development and analysis of a new app, "Funny-Cat." The research involved conducting qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys with college students, both undergraduates and postgraduates, to understand their motivations for using anonymous dating apps, their experiences with "Funny-Cat," and their views on its decentralized design and functionality. Engaging 35 participants in using "Funny-Cat" and participating in interviews provided valuable insights into the role of decentralized anonymous dating apps within the college setting and their influence on student social interactions.

    The findings suggest that while the reasons for using anonymous dating apps like "Funny-Cat" don't directly influence user satisfaction, the app's decentralized design significantly enhances it. This implies that "Funny-Cat's" decentralized features align well with user expectations for anonymity in dating apps. Although the app's functionalities didn't directly boost how the decentralized design improved satisfaction, interviews revealed that these features played a crucial role in increasing user engagement and enhancing the overall experience. In essence, the development of anonymous dating apps demonstrates that both decentralized design and functional features are key to elevating user satisfaction and experience.
    參考文獻: Aws (2024年3月14日)。什麼是分散式運算。Aws 雲端運算概念中心。https://aws.amazon.com/tw/what-is/distributed-computing/

    BBC (2018年8月6日)。Tinder, Chappy, Bumble 約會App中看年輕人交友觀。BBC News 中文。https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-45080517

    Dcard (2019年11月24日)。女生要當兵？！。Dcard 有趣版。https://www.dcard.tw/f/funny/p/232559947?fbclid=IwAR1ux9ed2D5c1YdUmEnjX5PM4soZQ2i-TN5NaMP3cdvcjKFkdvVF1gjRYHE

    Jerry (2017年10月2日)。匿名聊天安全嗎？透過中間人攻擊，你的聊天訊息全被看光光。傑瑞窩在這。https://jerrynest.io/wootalk-auto-chat/

    Metro Pop (2022 年7月27日)。【POP10】十大交友App 【興趣篇】。Line 生活。https://today.line.me/hk/v2/article/NvZka6Z

    OOSGA Global (2023年10月20日)。台灣社群媒體現況：2023年社群平台發展趨勢、用戶分佈數據。OOSGA Global。https://zh.oosga.com/social-media/twn/

    OpenView社群口碑資料庫(2022年12月31日)。網友熱異Top6 交友軟體。OpenView社群口碑資料庫。https://www.opview.com.tw/

    Social Lab社群實驗室(2023年3月29日)。【2023交友APP推薦】年輕人都用這6款交友軟體！PTT、Dcard網友實測「它」最容易找到真愛。風傳媒。https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/4768027

    Tim Berners-Lee (2018年9月29日)。One Small Step for the Web…。medium。https://medium.com/@timberners_lee/one-small-step-for-the-web-87f92217d085

    王玉珍、李宜玫、吳清麟(2019)。青少年優勢力量表之發展研究。教育心理學報，50(3)，503-528。

    王俞心、宋婕榆 (2022)。被妖魔化的交友軟體？那些你不知道的污名大小事。 http://hdl.handle.net/11536/159946

    朱俊彥、楊洲松 (2021)。大學生與 Dcard。教育研究月刊，(328)，17-25。

    吳靜吉(1987)。害羞，寂寞，愛。台北：遠流。

    每日頭條(2017年06月01日)。美國大學流行hook up，就連哈佛大學也問這麼大尺度的問題。每日頭條。https://kknews.cc/education/k3nknap.html

    林以婉(2012)。結合使用與滿足理論與社會互動理論探討社交媒體之持續使用行為。國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理所，高雄市。

    邱秋雲(2002)。透過網路建立愛情關係者之網路使用行為、個人依附型態、自我揭露之初探。國立交通大學，新竹市。

    侯政男（2020）。行動通訊時代下的尋找自我：男同志透過行動定位服務交友軟體的性傾向認同探索。性學研究，11(1)，1-20。https://doi.org/10.6206%2fSIS.202007_11(1).0001

    許佳琦(2018)。口袋裡的秘密: 使用交友軟體 Wootalk 的汙名管理策略。國立政治大學傳播研究所，台北市。

    陳慈鈴(2023年3月27日)。快回來！交友神器「維修1週沒下文」 網崩潰：我還沒找回聊天對象。三立新聞網。https://reurl.cc/kalXeL

    陳曉莉(2022年8月12日)。研究人員踢爆：臉書與IG行動程式會跨站追蹤用戶行為。iThome 新聞。https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/152465

    數位時代(2017 年 5 月 10 日)。5 年打造每月 800 萬不重複訪客，社群新星 Dcard 如何崛起？。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/44423/how-social-media-dcard-reaches-millions-users

    鄭英傑(2021)[薄友誼] 現象: 數位原住民世代的 網路社群交友觀及課程思維----以臺灣的大學生為例。Journal of Curriculum Studies/Kecheng Yanjiu, 16(2)，63-86。

    蕭歆諺(2023)糖衣毒藥的解方── 防止兒少網路性剝削的支持系統建構與強化。國立台灣大學新聞研究所，台北市。

    簡恆信(1999)。虛擬社群匿名行為模式研究—以網際網路電子布告欄為例。私立東吳大學社會所，台北市。

    譚躍、郭莘（2021）。青少年使用移動交友軟體的動機和社交風險及其調節因素。傳播與社會學刊，(58)，29-59。https://doi.org/10.30180%2fCS.202110_(58).0003

    鐘心辰(2016)。寂寞經濟時代：行動交友APP自我揭露與使用動機研究。國立政治大學新聞研究所，台北市。

    Abdullah, D., Rahardja, U., & Oganda, F. P. (2021). Covid-19: decentralized food supply chain management. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy,12(3), 142-152.

    Aitken, B. C., & Taylor, L. (2024). Uses and Grindifications: Examining the Motivators and Antecedents of Grindr Usage Among GBMSM. Journal of Homosexuality, 1-23.

    Alam, S. S., Islam, M. R., Mokhbul, Z. K. M., & Makmor, N. B. (2018). Factors affecting intention to use online dating sites in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 192-198.

    Attwood, F. (2011). Through the Looking Glass? Sexual Agency and Subjectification Online. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Ayub Khan, A., Laghari, A. A., Shaikh, A. A., Bourouis, S., Mamlouk, A. M., & Alshazly, H. (2021). Educational blockchain: A secure degree attestation and verification traceability architecture for higher education commission. Applied Sciences, 11(22), 10917.

    Balan, K. B., Rahim, F. A., Zulfakar, Z. A., Jin, G. P., & Chelliah, M. K. (2021, March). Swipe at first sight: The continuous intention to use dating apps in Malaysia. In CoMBInES-Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 20-34.

    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

    Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2020). Blockchain in education management: present and future applications. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1-17.

    Bonebrake, K. (2002). College students' Internet use, relationship formation, and personality correlates. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 551-557.

    Boudkouss, H., & Djelassi, S. (2021). Understanding in-store interactive technology use: a uses and gratifications theory (UGT) perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(12), 1621-1639.

    Brian Coffey, Stephen Woolworth. (2004). "Destroy the scum, and then neuter their families:" The web forum as a vehicle for community discourse? The Social Science Journal, 41(1), 1-14.

    Bryant, K., & Sheldon, P. (2017). Cyber dating in the age of mobile apps: Understanding motives, attitudes, and characteristics of users. American Communication Journal, 19(2), 1-15.

    Camilleri, M. A., & Falzon, L. (2021). Understanding motivations to use online streaming services: integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the uses and gratifications theory (UGT). Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 25(2), 217-238.

    Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication research, 30(6), 625-648.

    Carpenter, C. J., & McEwan, B. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187

    Chan, L. S. (2021). The politics of dating apps: Gender, sexuality, and emergent publics in urban China. The MIT Press.

    Chen, Y. C., Zhu, W. Y., Peng, W. C., Lee, W. C., & Lee, S. Y. (2014). CIM: Community-based influence maximization in social networks. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 5(2), 1-31.

    Chen, Y., Richter, J. I., & Patel, P. C. (2021). Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1305-1337.

    Ciocca, G., Robilotta, A., Fontanesi, L., Sansone, A., D’Antuono, L., Limoncin, E.& Jannini, E. A. (2020). Sexological aspects related to Tinder use: A comprehensive review of the literature. Sexual medicine reviews, 8(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.12.004

    Clemens, C., Atkin, D., & Krishnan, A. (2015). The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 120-129.

    Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., & Gordon, K. (2003). Variations in patterns of developmental transitions in the emerging adulthood period. Developmental Psychology, 39, 657-669.

    Comunello, F., Parisi, L., & Ieracitano, F. (2021). Negotiating gender scripts in mobile dating apps: Between affordances, usage norms and practices. Information, Communication & Society, 24(8), 1140-1156.

    Corriero, E. F., & Tong, S. T. (2016). Managing uncertainty in mobile dating applications: Goals, concerns of use, and information seeking in Grindr. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 121-141.

    Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online dating and mating: The use of internet to meetsexual partners. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 268-279.

    Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, 420-443. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Dai, C. (2020). DEX: A DApp for the decentralized marketplace. Blockchain and Crypt Currency, 95, 95-106.

    Davis, D. A. (2018). Understanding the motivations behind dating applications: Exploring future predictions.
    Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 21(1), 1-8.

    Dedeoglu, V., Jurdak, R., Putra, G. D., Dorri, A., & Kanhere, S. S. (2019). A trust architecture for blockchain in IoT. MobiQuitous '19: In Proceedings of the 16th EAI international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: computing, networking and services, 190-099. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360774.3360822

    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.

    Devidas, S., Rao YV, S., & Rekha, N. R. (2021). A decentralized group signature scheme for privacy protection in a blockchain. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 31(2), 353-364.

    Dib, O., & Toumi, K. (2020). Decentralized identity systems: Architecture, challenges, solutions and future directions. Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), 2516-0281.

    Dietzel, C. (2024). Clickable Consent: How Men Who Have Sex with Men Understand and Practice Sexual Consent on Dating Apps and in Person. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(3), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2235584

    Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

    Elzweig, Brian, & Trautman, L. J. (2023). When does non-fungible token (nft) become security?. Georgia State University Law Review, 39(2), 295-336.

    Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, K. C. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2(2), 100014.

    Felix Krause. (2022, Aug 10). iOS Privacy: Instagram and Facebook can track anything you do on any website in their in-app browser. Fleix Kraus Github. https://krausefx.com/blog/ios-privacy-instagram-and-facebook-can-track-anything-you-do-on-any-website-in-their-in-app-browser

    Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Internet and face‐to‐face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379809370100

    Flesia, L., Fietta, V., Foresta, C., & Monaro, M. (2021). “What Are You Looking For?” Investigating the Association Between Dating App Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors. Sexual Medicine, 9(4), 100405-100405.

    Gill, Rosalind. (2003). From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Resexualisation of Women’s Bodies in the Media. Feminist Media Studies, 3(1), 99-114.

    Gillett, Rosalie. (2018). Intimate Intrusions Online: Studying the Normalization of Abuse in Dating Apps. Women’s Studies International Forum, 69. 212–219.

    Goodell, G., & Aste, T. (2019). A decentralized digital identity architecture. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2, 17-20.

    Gruber, D. A., Smerek, R. E., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & James, E. H. (2015). The real-time power of Twitter: Crisis management and leadership in an age of social media. Business Horizons, 58(2), 163-172.

    Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 347-365.

    Ho, S. S., Lee, E. W., & Liao, Y. (2016). Social network sites, friends, and celebrities: The roles of social comparison and celebrity involvement in adolescents’ body image dissatisfaction. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 1-11.

    Hussain, A., & Shabir, G. (2020). Cognitive needs and use of social media: A comparative study of gratifications sought and gratification obtained. Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(2), 79-90.

    Jing, N., Liu, Q., & Sugumaran, V. (2021). A blockchain-based code copyright management system. Information Processing & Management, 58(3), Article 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102518

    Kallis, R. B. (2020). Understanding the motivations for using Tinder. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 21(1), 66-73.

    Katz, E., Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. The Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research, 19-34. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.

    Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181.

    Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Chen, S., Malibari, A., & Almotairi, M. (2020). Why do people purchase virtual goods? A uses and gratification (U&G) theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 53, 101376.

    Kim, H., Oh, S., Lee, G., Jung, S., Jung, K., & Lim, H. (2024). Exploring Multi-faceted Motivations and Strategies Using Mobile Dating Applications: Case Study of Tinder Users in South Korea. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 1-14.

    Kuhle, P., Arroyo, D., & Schuster, E. (2021). Building A blockchain-based decentralized digital asset management system for commercial aircraft leasing. Computers in Industry, 126, Article 103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103393

    Kuske, M. R. (2020). Social media use in the maintenance of long‐distance romantic relationships in college. UWL Journal of Undergraduate Research, 23, 1-14.

    Lawson, H., & Leck, K. (2006). Dynamics of internet dating. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 189-208.

    Lee, E. (2021). The bored ape business model: Decentralized collaboration via blockchain and nfts. Chicago-Kent College of Law - Illinois Institute of Technology. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3963881

    Lee, E. (2022). NFTs as Decentralized Intellectual Property. Chicago-Kent College of Law - Illinois Institute of Technology. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4023736.

    Lenton-Brym, A. P., Santiago, V. A., Fredborg, B. K., & Antony, M. M. (2021). Associations between social anxiety, depression, and use of mobile dating applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(2), 86-93.

    Li, J., & Greenhow, C. (2015). Scholars and social media: tweeting in the conference backchannel for professional learning. Educational Media International, 52(1), 1-14.

    Li, Q., Guo, X., & Bai, X. (2017). Weekdays or weekends: Exploring the impacts of microblog posting patterns on gratification and addiction. Information & Management, 54(5), 613-624.

    Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., Sung, J. Y., Gan, C. L., & Lee, Y. Y. (2023). Love is in the cloud: Uncovering the factors driving continuous use intention of online dating applications. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2232110

    Ligtenberg, L. (2015). Tinder, the app that is setting the dating scene on fire: A uses and gratifications perspective. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.

    Lin, Y. H., & Chu, M. G. (2021). Online communication self-disclosure and intimacy development on Facebook: the perspective of uses and gratifications theory. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1167-1187.

    Liu, I., Cheung, C., & Lee, M. (2010, July 9-12). Understanding twitter usage: What drive people continue to tweet. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2010, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Liu, X., Min, Q., & Han, S. (2020). Understanding users’ continuous content contribution behaviours on microblogs: An integrated perspective of uses and gratification theory and social influence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 525-543.

    McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.

    Meisami, S., Beheshti-Atashgah, M., & Aref, M. R. (2021). Using blockchain to achieve decentralized privacy in IoT healthcare. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics (IJCI), 12(2), 97-108.

    Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2006). Online friendship formation, communication channels, and social closeness. International Journal of Internet Science, 1(3), 217-233.

    Min, T., & Cai, W. (2022). Portrait of decentralized application users: an overview based on large-scale Ethereum data. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction, 4(2), 124-141.

    Mita, M., Ito, K., Ohsawa, S., & Tanaka, H. (2019). What is stablecoin?: A survey on price stabilization mechanisms for decentralized payment systems. IEEE, 60-66.

    Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in human behavior, 19(6), 659-671.

    NBC News. (2019, July 22). These technologists think the internet is broken. So they're building another one. NBC News. https://reurl.cc/lQVdGE

    Nguyen, D. H. (2020). Optimal solution analysis and decentralized mechanisms for peer-to-peer energy markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(2), 1470-1481.

    Nika, A., Wang, G., Wang, B., Wang, T., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2014). Whispers in the dark: analysis of an anonymous social network. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on internet measurement conference, 137-150.


    Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television: A discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155-179.

    Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7(2), 161-192.

    Patil, P., Sangeetha, M., & Bhaskar, V. (2021). Blockchain for IoT access control, security and privacy: a review. Wireless Personal Communications, 117, 1815-1834.

    Peros, R., Gimeno, M. A., Pinazo, D., Orrer, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people, CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(1), 43-51.

    Peter, J.,Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P.(2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8(5), 423-430.

    Petrychyn, J., Parry, D. C., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Building community, one swipe at a time: Hook-up apps and the production of intimate publics between women. Health Sociology Review, 29(3), 249-263.

    Piterou, A., & Coles, A. M. (2021). A review of business models for decentralised renewable energy projects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1468-1480.

    Pruchniewska, Urszula. (2020). I like that It’s My Choice a Couple Different Times’: Gender, Affordances, and User Experience on Bumble Dating. International Journal of Communication, 14(18), 2422–2439.

    Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361.

    Raees-Riaz, M.(2023, November 14). Visualizing Decentralized Data Storage with Gun.js. Linkedin.

    Rezaeibagha, F., & Mu, Y. (2019). Efficient micropayment of cryptocurrency from blockchains. The Computer Journal, 62(4), 507-517.

    Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3-37.

    Sambra, A., Guy, A., Capadisli, S., & Greco, N. (2016, April). Building decentralized applications for the social Web. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. 1033-1034.

    Schreurs, L., Sumter, S. R., & Vandenbosch, L. (2020). A prototype willingness approach to the relation between geo-social dating apps and willingness to sext with dating app matches. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 1133-1145.

    Seth, A., & Seth, K. (2022). Digital Anonymity in Decentralized Environment. In The Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities. 325-351.

    Sharabati, A. A. A., Al-Haddad, S., Al-Khasawneh, M., Nababteh, N., Mohammad, M., & Abu Ghoush, Q. (2022). The impact of TikTok user satisfaction on continuous intention to use the application. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 125-145.

    Shen, C., & Williams, D. (2011). Unpacking time online: Connecting internet and massively multiplayer online game use with psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 38, 123-149.

    Solovyeva, O., & Laskin, A. V. (2022). Gamification, Tinder effect, and Tinder fatigue: Dating as a CMC experience. In The Emerald Handbook of Computer-Mediated Communication and Social Media. Emerald Publishing Limited. 197-211.

    Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288.

    Stephure, R. J., Boon, S. D., MacKinnon, S. L., & Deveau, V. L. (2009). Internet initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 658-681.

    Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504-525.

    Suratkar, S., Shirole, M., & Bhirud, S. (2020). Cryptocurrency wallet: A review. In 2020 4th international conference on computer, communication and signal processing (ICCCSP), IEEE. 1-7.

    Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341-350.

    Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/Always-on-you: The tethered self. (J. E. Katz). Handbook of communication studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 121-137.

    Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human communication, 12(2), 215-229.

    Van De Wiele, C., and Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking Boundaries : The Uses & Gratifications of Grindr. 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 619-630.

    W. Cai, Z. Wang, J. B. Ernst, Z. Hong, C. Feng and V. C. M. Leung. (2018). Decentralized Applications: The Blockchain-Empowered Software System. IEEE, 6, 53019-53033.

    Wang, C., & Chang, Y. (2010). Cyber relationship motives: Scale development and validation. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 38(3), 289-300.

    Wang, Q., Zhu, X., Ni, Y., Gu, L., & Zhu, H. (2020). Blockchain for the IoT and industrial IoT: A review. Internet of Things, 10, Article 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100081

    Watts, A. (2015, Jananuray 3). A Teenager’s View on Social Media. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2015/01/a-teenagers-view-on-social-media/

    Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. Networks in the Global Village, 331-366.

    Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative market research: an international journal, 16(4), 362-369.

    Widayanti, R., Aini, Q., Haryani, H., Lutfiani, N., & Apriliasari, D. (2021, September). Decentralized electronic vote based on blockchain p2p. In 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) IEEE. 1-7.

    Wu, S., & Trottier, D. (2022). Dating apps: a literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(2), 91-115.

    Xie, C., Wang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2024). Does artificial intelligence satisfy you? A meta-analysis of user gratification and user satisfaction with AI-powered chatbots. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(3), 613-623.

    Xue, X., Dou, J., & Shang, Y. (2021). Blockchain-driven supply chain decentralized operations–information sharing perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 184-203.

    Yazdinejad, A., Srivastava, G., Parizi, R. M., Dehghantanha, A., Choo, K. K. R., & Aledhari, M. (2020). Decentralized authentication of distributed patients in hospital networks using blockchain. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 24(8), 2146-2156.

    Yeung, C. M. A., Liccardi, I., Lu, K., Seneviratne, O., & Berners-Lee, T. (2023). Decentralization: The future of online social networking. In Linking the World’s Information: Essays on Tim Berners-Lee’s Invention of the World Wide Web, 187-199.

    Young, M., & Roberts, S. (2023). “Shifting old-fashioned power dynamics”?: women’s perspectives on the gender transformational capacity of the dating app, Bumble. Feminist Media Studies, 23(3), 1238-1255.

    Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. (1975). Marketing Research: Fundamentals and Dynamics.

    Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). Decentralized finance (defi). Journal of Financial Regulation, 6, 172-203.

    Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.

    Zhao, X., Ai, P., Lai, F., Luo, X., & Benitez, J. (2022). Task management in decentralized autonomous organization. Journal of Operations Management, 68(6-7), 649-674.

    Zytko, D., Mullins, N., Taylor, S., & Holler, R. H. (2022). Dating Apps Are Used for More Than Dating: How Users Disclose and Detect (Non-) Sexual Interest in People-Nearby Applications. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(30), 1-14.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    數位內容碩士學位學程
    110462014
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110462014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[數位內容碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    201401.pdf8133KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋