English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51095046      Online Users : 959
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151127


    Title: 無償供公眾通行土地之地價稅─最高行政法院111年度上字第354號判決解說
    The Land Value Tax on Land Used for Public Passage Free of Charge
    Authors: 陳立夫
    Chen, Li-Fu
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 地價稅;建築基地;法定空地;公眾通行之道路;騎樓地
    Land Value Tax;Land Used for Public Passage;Building Base;Statutory Vacant Space;Arcade Land
    Date: 2024-03
    Issue Date: 2024-05-08 10:25:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 按憲法第143條第1項規定,私有土地應照價納稅。承此,土地稅法規定,已規定地價之土地,除依規定課徵田賦者外,應按申報地價(平均地權條例第13條、第14條、第16條併參)課徵地價稅(平均地權條例第17條、土地稅法第14條);但為發展經濟,促進土地利用,增進社會福利,對於國防、政府機關、公共設施、騎樓走廊、研究機構或公益事業及合理之自用住宅等所使用之土地,得予適當之減免;其減免標準及程序,由行政院定之(平均地權條例第25條、土地稅第6條)。據此,依平均地權條例及土地稅法授權訂定之土地稅減免規則,對於諸如:「無償供公眾通行之道路土地」、「供公共通行之騎樓走廊地」等具供公眾通行性質之土地,設有免徵或減徵地價稅之明文(同規則第9至11條參照)。鑑於其規定內涵交織著錯綜複雜之法律議題,是本期土地法裁判精選以「無償供公眾通行土地之地價稅」為題,擇錄近期最高行政法院111年度上字第354號判決解說之。
    This article mainly focuses on the Supreme Administrative Court’s 2022 Shangzi No. 354 judgment to explain the land value tax on land that is free for public passage. In a nutshell, a land that has been assessed the value shall be subject to land value tax. However, the land used for public passage free of charge is exempted from land value tax, provided that status of usage is found factual. Notwithstanding the foregoing, statutory vacant space (which includes the vacant space provided for use as private access roads, setback arcade land or unshielded sidewalks) reserved as required under building base, even if there is a fact that it is provided to the public free of charge, it is still not the subject of land value tax exemption.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.346, pp.158-170
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593134610
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593134610
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML111View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback