政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150824
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114409/145439 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53227774      線上人數 : 719
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150824


    題名: 論離婚法定事由要求之發展與排除──歐陸主要規範與我國民法之比較觀察
    The Development of Requirement of Legal Ground for Divorce and Its Abandonment: A Comparative Observation of the Main Legislations in Continental Europe and Art. 1052 of the Civil Code of Taiwan
    作者: 林易典
    Lin, Yi-tien
    貢獻者: 政大法學評論
    關鍵詞: 離婚;離婚法定事由;破綻主義;有責主義;別居期間;反省期間;婚姻存續期間;苛刻條款
    Divorce;Legal grounds for divorce;Irretrievable breakdown;Fault divorce;Separation period;Reconsideration period;Continuance period of marriage;Hardship clause
    日期: 2023-12
    上傳時間: 2024-04-11 16:19:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 於單方離婚受有法定事由限制之立法例下，如我國民法第1052條，須具備法定事由始得離婚。惟比較法上亦有無庸具備法定事由即得自由離婚，從而排除離婚法定事由要求之立法例。於立法政策上，經由導入無庸具備法定事由即得離婚之規範，始能尊重個人已無意維繫婚姻之意思，並正視婚姻存續基礎已不存在之事實，此並有助於維護婚姻隱私與子女保護。由於無須具備婚姻破綻即得離婚，規範上即得捨棄就破綻為有責者不得請求離婚之限制，惟仍得加諸別居、結婚滿一定期間或反省期間已經過之限制，並得導入苛刻條款，於離婚將對於他方造成苛刻結果時排除離婚請求權。經此，單方與合意離婚同樣不受法定事由限制，婚姻與離婚法制始能真正擺脫來自教會法之影響。
    Under the legislation where legal grounds are required for divorce, such as those regulated under Art. 1052 of the Civil Code of Taiwan, divorce is not permitted while no legal ground exists. However, there exists legislation in comparative law in which couples enjoy the freedom of divorce for that divorce is still permitted while no legal ground such as a fault or irretrievable breakdown of the marriage exists. By introducing such kind of mechanism, the free will of individuals not to maintain marriage can be respected. Meanwhile, the nonexistence of the foundation of marriage can also be truly evaluated. This is also helpful for the protection of the privacy of the marriage and children. While the requirements for legal grounds to divorce are abandoned, the regulation to exclude the responsible party’s right to claim for divorce can also be abandoned. Yet the requirement for the period of separation, reconsideration, or continuance of marriage can be introduced as supplementary measures. Besides, the hardship clause can be introduced to exclude the divorce application while the divorce itself could result in a hardship situation. By abandoning the requirements for legal grounds to divorce, unilateral divorce therefore requires no legal grounds as consent divorce. The regime of marriage and divorce can thus truly be free from the influence of ecclesiastical law.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 175, 165-270
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202023120175003
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202023120175003
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML158檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋