政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150718
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113313/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50946471      在线人数 : 966
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150718


    题名: 以計畫與徵收之關係談先行區段徵收制度之合憲性問題：以新設都市地區實施開發建設為中心
    Constitutional Issues Regarding "Zone Expropriation in Advance" through Examining the Relationship between Urban Planning and Expropriation: Focused on "Newly Established Urban Area Undergoing Development and Construction"
    作者: 李明芝
    Lee, Ming-Chih
    贡献者: 地政系
    关键词: 先行區段徵收;都市計畫;計畫公益;徵收公益;日本土地收用法;日本都市計畫法;日本都市計畫事業
    Zone Expropriation in Advance;Urban Planning;the Public Interests of Urban Planning;The Public Interests of Expropriation;Japan's Expropriation of Land Act;Japan's City Planning Law;Japan's Urban Redevelopment Projects
    日期: 2023-12
    上传时间: 2024-04-11
    摘要: 本文聚焦以「新設都市地區實施開發建設」為由之「先行區段徵收制度」，並以區段徵收與都市計畫之關係為中心，討論：（1）此類型區段徵收制度的徵收公益為何？是否來自都市計畫？（2）應如何在徵收個案審查中看待計畫與徵收之間之關係？先行區段徵收制度是否違反憲法對徵收應合於最嚴謹程序之要求？本文先探究先行區段徵收制度之起源與變遷，並檢視先行區段徵收制度中都市計畫與區段徵收之關係；又日本法就計畫公益與徵收公益差異之研究成果，可提供我國另一視角，因此本文接續討論日本法中計畫與徵收之關係；最後試圖從計畫與徵收論檢視我國先行區段徵收之合憲性問題。基於上開討論，本文認為計畫公益與徵收公益不同，並指出：（1）以「新設都市地區實施開發建設」為區段徵收之發動原因，無論是新設都市地區或都市計畫皆難以成為徵收公益而為剝奪人民財產權之理由，而先行區段徵收竟進一步在都市計畫尚未完全確定時就先進行徵收，更不具正當性；（2）計畫公益雖不等同於徵收公益，但與計畫合致性之要求應作為徵收程序之合法性要件之一，先行區段徵收僅因行政便利性為理由而排除都市計畫法第52條之適用，可能違反憲法對徵收應合於最嚴謹程序之要求。
    In Taiwan's past, there have been many cases of "zone expropriation in advance", ostensibly for the needs of newly established urban areas. The legislation permitting these seizures of property can be found in Article 4, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 1 of the Land Expropriation Act in Taiwan. The term "zone expropriation in advance" refers to government seizures of property prior to the formal announcement and implementation of urban planning. This article focuses on the "zone expropriation in advance" based on "newly established urban area undergoing development and construction" with a central emphasis on the relationship between zone expropriation and urban planning. The discussion includes the following points: (1) What is the public interests in this type of zone expropriation system, and does it originate from urban planning? (2) How should the relationship between planning and expropriation be considered in the examination of expropriation cases? Does the "zone expropriation in advance" violate the constitutional requirement that expropriation should adhere to the most rigorous procedures? This paper first explores the origin and changes of the "zone expropriation in advance", and examines the relationship between urban planning and zone expropriation in the system of "zone expropriation in advance"; then discusses Japan's urban planning and expropriation theory which can provide another perspective for discussing the difference of public interests between urban planning and expropriation; finally, this paper tries to examine the problems of "zone expropriation in advance". Based on the above discussion, this paper considers that the public interests of urban planning is different from the public interests of expropriation, and puts forward the following problems about "zone expropriation in advance": (1) Using "newly established urban area undergoing development and construction" as the rationale for initiating zone expropriation is difficult to justify the deprivation of people's property rights as a legitimate reason for expropriation, whether in newly established urban areas or urban planning. Moreover, "zone expropriation in advance" implemented before the full determination of urban planning, lacks legitimacy; (2) While the public interests of urban planning cannot serve as the public interests of expropriation, the consistency with the urban planning can be one of the elements for the legality of expropriation. Therefore, "zone expropriation in advance" may violate the constitutional requirement that expropriation should follow the strictest procedures.
    關聯: 輔仁法學, No.67, pp.93-165
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML104检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈