English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51827200      Online Users : 381
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150349


    Title: 論智慧裝置上行動醫療應用程式之法律管制︰以 Apple Watch相關功能之爭議為例
    Other Titles: The Legal Regulation of Mobile Medical Apps on Smart Devices: Taking the Controversy of Related Functions of Apple Watch as an Example
    Authors: 劉宏恩
    Liu, Hung-en
    Contributors: 法科所
    Keywords: 心電圖;血氧;行動應用程式;醫療器材;蘋果手錶
    ECG;Blood oxygen;Mobile apps;Medical device;Apple watch
    Date: 2023-10
    Issue Date: 2024-03-05 15:58:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 智慧手機、智慧手錶等智慧裝置，已經成為現代人幾乎每日難以離身的必備裝置。而各式各樣行動應用程式中，與醫療或健康相關的程式越來越多。本文借用Apple Watch相關功能的例子，來說明行動醫療應用程式在管理與規範上的可能爭議。究竟Apple Watch的心電圖功能及血氧濃度測量功能，是否應該定位為醫療器材？在醫療應用程式相關產業與市場規模居於全球領先地位、也是Apple Watch品牌所來自的美國，是否以之為醫療器材來加以管理？其管理方式如何？究竟為什麼Apple Watch的心電圖功能於2020年時在臺灣仍然無法開放使用，但血氧濃度測量功能卻可以開放，而且食藥署於媒體上的公開說法前後相互矛盾，可能顯示了什麼問題？而直接以一般民眾或消費者為使用與宣傳對象的相關應用程式，其訴諸醫療健康功能的行銷廣告在美國如何受管制？由於過去研究指出臺灣相關規範指引深受美國影響，本文將以美國管制架構及方式為比較研究對象，針對上述議題提出初步探討與分析。
    Smart devices with internet connectivity have become essential tools that people almost never leave home without. In Taiwan, among all the mobile apps, the number of mobile health app users has increased the most, mainly because of the convenience of the apps, the easy accessibility and intuitive operation, and the autonomy of users to control their own medical and health conditions. However, the widespread uses of the apps may lead to many controversial issues, such as: Are they medical devices and should they be pre-approved? Are they likely to pose health risks to users? This paper aims to examine the regulatory system and experience and their problems in the U.S. and Taiwan on these issues, and it takes Apple Watch as an example for discussion.
    Relation: 月旦醫事法報告, No.84, pp.132-154
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.53106/241553062023100084011
    DOI: 10.53106/241553062023100084011
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML150View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback