政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150239
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51289130      線上人數 : 810
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150239


    題名: 數位科技如何影響競合?以台灣半導體產業為例
    HOW DOES DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AFFECT COOPETITION ? A CASE OF TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY
    作者: 陳品瑄
    Chen, Ping-Hsuan
    貢獻者: 郭曉玲
    Guo, Shiau-Ling
    陳品瑄
    Chen, Ping-Hsuan
    關鍵詞: 競爭
    合作
    競合動態
    數位科技
    半導體產業
    Competition
    Cooperation
    Coopetition
    Digital technology
    Semiconductor industry
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2024-03-01 14:03:51 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在過去的研究中，競爭與合作同時存在於企業間被證實為一種常見的互動關係，而競合方面的研究也大多聚焦於兩者如何互相影響、亦或是強調競合關係如何發生並帶來績效，然而卻較少有研究關注不同時段競爭與合作之間會有什麼樣的交互影響。因此本研究將探討在數位科技的採用下，隨著時間推移，競爭與合作會有什麼樣的變化。隨著數位轉型的風潮盛行，許多商業行為都會廣泛地採取新的科技或技術，而數位科技帶來的不僅僅是績效的變化，也對企業間的關係有所影響，因此本研究採用輿情資料分析，針對2020第一季至2022年第二季之間台灣半導體產業中的十家公司與其相關的226,281篇報章雜誌內容進行分析，探討在數位科技採用前後這些公司的競合動態變化。研究結果發現，半導體業中最常採用的數位科技為人工智慧與智慧供應鏈的相關技術，而排名靠前(亦即排名前10)與排名靠後(排名50之後)的半導體公司採用數位科技的驅動者往往來自自身，相反的排名中等的廠商(排名10~20之間)則較常由下游品牌廠商驅動採用科技。同時，當數位科技採用達到一定程度之後，大部分的企業在競爭與合作的頻率都會有所增加，但依據其科技採用強度的差異，有些廠商得以跳脫其原始的低競低合狀態轉往競爭主導、合作主導亦或高度競合的狀態，有些則會停滯於低度競爭與合作。而另外一個結果則顯示當科技採用高峰之後，無論其排名，所有的樣本公司採用數位科技的驅動者皆會回歸自我驅動。
    Previous coopetition research has confirmed that competition and cooperation coexist as a common interaction between firms. Most studies on coopetition have focused on how they influence with each other, or on how coopetition can lead to performance improvements. However, there has been relatively little research on the interactive effects between competition and cooperation over time. Therefore, this study will use a problem-oriented approach to investigate how competition and cooperation change over time with the adoption of digital technology.
    With the prevalence of digital transformation, many business activities have widely adopted new technologies, and the impact of digital technology extends beyond performance improvements. It also affects the relationships between firms. Therefore, this study will analyze 10 Taiwanese semiconductor companies with 226,281 related articles from 2020 Q1 to the 2022 Q2, examining dynamic changes between competition and cooperation under the diffusion of digital technology.
    This study suggests that the impact of digital technology on firm coopetition depends on their ranking and status in the industry. The intensity of digital technology adoption also leads to different outcomes. We found that artificial intelligence and intelligent supply chain are the most commonly adopted digital technologies in the semiconductor industry. And companies that rank in the top 10 or bottom 50 of the industry are often driven by themselves when adopting digital technology, while firms with a middle ranking (especially ranking between 10 and 20) are more likely to be driven by brand owners.
    Furthermore, when digital technology diffusion reaches a certain level, most firms experience an increase in both competition and cooperation. However, depending on the differences in technology adoption intensity, some firms can move across quadrants from Low-Low (Low competition and Low cooperation) to a state of competition dominance, cooperation dominance, or High-High (High competition and High cooperation) quadrant. Others may remain in a state of low competition and cooperation. Another finding shows that after the diffusion of technology, regardless of their ranking or status, all companies tend to return self-driven in adopting digital technology.
    參考文獻: 英文文獻
    1.Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., Bremser, K., & Llach, J. 2015. Proactive and reactive strategies deployed by restaurants in times of crisis: Effects on capabilities, organization and competitive advantage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(7), 1641-1661.
    2.Batra, G., Jacobson, Z., Madhav, S., Queirolo, A., & Santhanam, N. 2019. Artificial-intelligence hardware: New opportunities for semiconductor companies. McKinsey and Company, January, 2.
    3.Behnke, K., & Janssen, M. F. W. H. A. 2020. Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101969.
    4.Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. 2014. Coopetition—quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180-188.
    5.Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. 2016. A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23-39.
    6.Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. 2013. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 471-482.
    7.Bown, C. P. 2021. Semiconductors and pandemic resilience. World Trade Report 2021: Economic Resilience and Trade, World Trade Organization.
    8.Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. 1996. Co-opetition. New York, NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
    9.Bucheli, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (Eds.). 2014. Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford University Press.
    10.Carley, K. 1993. Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75-126.
    11.Chen, M. J. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134.
    12.Claver-Cortés, E., Molina-Azorı, J. F., & Pereira-Moliner, J. 2007. Competitiveness in mass tourism. Annals of tourism Research, 34(3), 727-745.
    13.Crick, J. M., & Crick, D. 2020. Coopetition and COVID-19: Collaborative business-to-business marketing strategies in a pandemic crisis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 206-213.
    14.Czakon, W., Mucha-Kus, K., & Rogalski, M. 2014. Coopetition research landscape-a systematic literature review 1997-2010. Journal of Economics & Management, 17, 121-150.
    15.Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank A. G. 2018. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394.
    16.Denzin, N.K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Research Methods. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
    17.Durach, C. F., Wiengarten, F., & Choi, T. Y. 2020. Supplier–supplier coopetition and supply chain disruption: first-tier supplier resilience in the tetradic context. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1041-1065..
    18.Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
    19.Fernandez, A. S., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. R. 2014. Sources and management of tension in coopetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 222-235.
    20.Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. 1999. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372-388.
    21.Frieske, B., & Stieler, S. 2022. The “Semiconductor Crisis” as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Impacts on the Automotive Industry and Its Supply Chains. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 13(10), 189.
    22.Gnyawali, D.R., & Park, B.J.R. 2011. Coopetition between giants: collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663.
    23.Gnyawali, D. R., & Ryan Charleton, T. 2018. Nuances in the interplay of competition and cooperation: Towards a theory of coopetition. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2511-2534.
    24.Graebner, M. E., Knott, A. M., Lieberman, M. B., & Mitchell, W. 2023. Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question‐driven, phenomenon‐based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 44: 3-10.
    25.Granata, J., Lasch, F., Le Roy, F. and Dana, L.P. 2018, “How do micro-firms manage coopetition? A study of the wine sector in France”, International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 331-355.
    26.Gulati, R., Lawrence, P. R., & Puranam, P. 2005. Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 415–440.
    27.He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E., & Child, J. 2020. Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31, 589-617.
    28.Hoffmann, W., Lavie, D., Reuer, J.J., & Shipilov, A. 2018. The interplay of competition and competition. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 3033-3052.
    29.Insider Intelligence 2022. Semiconductor Foundry Revenue Share Worldwide, by Country, 2021 & 2022, Retrieved from https://www.insiderintelligence.com/chart/256095/Semiconductor-Foundry-Revenue-Share-Worldwide-by-Country-2021-2022-of-total on December 7, 2022.
    30.Kern, P., & Gospel, H. 2023. The effects of strategy and institutions on value creation and appropriation in firms: A longitudinal study of three telecom companies. Strategic Management Journal, 44: 343-366
    31.King, I., Wu, D., & Pogkas, D. 2021. How a chip shortage snarled everything from phones to cars. Bloomberg. Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-semiconductors-chips-shortage/.
    32.Klimas, P., Czakon, W., & Fredrich, V. 2022. Strategy frames in coopetition: An examination of coopetition entry factors in high-tech firms. European Management Journal, 40(2), 258-272.
    33.Leite, E., Pahlberg, C., & Åberg, S. 2018. The cooperation-competition interplay in the ICT industry. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(4), 495-505.
    34.Lincoln, Y.S., Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. London, UK: Sage.
    35.Lundgren-Henriksson, E. L., & Kock, S. 2016. Coopetition in a headwind–The interplay of sensemaking, sensegiving, and middle managerial emotional response in coopetitive strategic change development. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 20-34.
    36.Ma, K., Yu, Z., Ji, K., & Yang, B. 2019. Stream-based live public opinion monitoring approach with adaptive probabilistic topic model. Soft Computing, 23(16), 7451-7470
    37.Matt, C., Hess, T. & Benlian, A. 2015. Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57, 339–343.
    38.Meena, A., Dhir, S., & Sushil, S. 2023. A review of coopetition and future research agenda. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(1), 118-136.
    39.Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.
    40.Morris, R. 1994. Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. Journal of Management, 20(4), 903-931.
    41.Nair, A., Narasimhan, R., & Bendoly, E. 2011. Coopetitive buyer–supplier relationship: An investigation of bargaining power, relational context, and investment strategies. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 93-127.
    42.Ozkan, B., & Wu, D. 2009. Market entry analysis when releasing distinctive products in independent markets. Working paper. Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
    43.Peng, T.J.A., & Bourne, M. 2009. The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 377-400.
    44.Phones-review, 2010. Can HTC Desire Outgun Google Nexusone?. Available at https://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2010/02/18/can-htc-desire-outgun-google-nexus-one/, posted date: Februarty 18, 2010.
    45.Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. 2014. The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189-198.
    46.Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. 2013. Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition—The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 154–169.
    47.Ritala, P., & Sainio, L. M. 2014. Coopetition for radical innovation: Technology, market and business-model perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 155–169.
    48.Ritala, P., Kraus, S., & Bouncken, R.B. 2016. Introduction to coopetition and innovation: contemporary topics and future research opportunities. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 1-9.
    49.Rogers, D. L. 2016. The digital transformation playbook: Rethink your business for the digital age: 52,73-74. Columbia University Press.
    50.Satyanarayana, A. 2021. TSMC has the largest market share in the global semiconductor manufacturing industry: Counterpoints research. Retrieved from: https://www.notebookcheck.net/TSMC-has-the-largest-market-share-in-the-global-semiconductor-manufacturing-industry-Counterpoints-Research.518137.0.html on December 7, 2022.
    51.Schallmo, D., Williams, C. A., & Boardman, L. 2017. Digital transformation of business models: Best practice, enablers, and roadmap. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21, art. 1740014.
    52.Shilov, A. 2007. Asustek’s Reformation Plans Remain Vague. Available at http://www.xbitlabs.com.
    53.Sia, S. K., Soh, C., & Weill, P. 2016. How DBS Bank Pursued a Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2)..
    54.Tidström, A. 2014. Managing tensions in coopetition. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 261-271.
    55.Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. 2018. Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer.
    56.Vendrell-Herrero, F., Gomes, E., Bustinza, O., & Mellahi, K. 2018. Uncovering the role of cross-border strategic alliances and expertise decision centralization in enhancing product-service innovation in MMNEs. International Business Review, 27, 814–825.
    57.Wakolbinger, T., & Cruz, J. M. 2011. Supply chain disruption risk management through strategic information acquisition and sharing and risk-sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Research, 49(13), 4063-4084.
    58.Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. 2015. Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Management Review.
    59.Wired, 2016. Google Pixel upends the Android universe. Available at https://www.wired.com/2016/10/google-pixelupends-android-universe/, posted date: October 4, 2016.
    60.Wolf, M., Semm, A., & Erfurth, C. 2018. Digital transformation in companies–challenges and success factors. In Innovations for Community Services: 18th International Conference, I4CS 2018, Žilina, Slovakia, June 18-20, 2018, Proceedings: 178-193. Springer International Publishing.
    61.Wu, Z., & Choi, T. Y. 2005. Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 24(1), 27-52.
    62.Yan, Y., Zhao, R., & Lan, Y. 2019. Moving sequence preference in coopetition outsourcing supply chain: Consensus or conflict. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 221-240.
    63.Yang, M., & Lu, J. 2011. Asus fight for second place in China market. Available at http://www.wantchinatimes.com.
    64.Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    65.Zineldin, M. 2004. Coopetition: The organisation of the future. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(7), 780-790.

    中文文獻
    1.SEMI Taiwan，2021。供應鏈如何數位轉型？從高科技智慧製造論壇看企業導入案例。https://www.semi.org/zh/blog/smart_manufacturing_forum。擷取日期: 2023年3月24日。
    2.力智電子股份有限公司官網。http://www.upi-semi.com/。擷取日期: 2022年3月2日。
    3.天下雜誌，2022。《台積艦隊衝十年》，748期，第52-53頁。
    4.台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司官網。https://www.tsmc.com/chinese。擷取日期:2022年3月4日。
    5.宇瞻科技股份有限公司官網。https://www.apacer.com/zh。擷取日期: 2022年3月2日。
    6.威盛電子股份有限公司官網。https://www.viatech.com/tw/。擷取日期: 2022年3月2日。
    7.華邦電子股份有限公司官網。https://www.winbond.com/hq/?__locale=zh_TW。擷取日期: 2022年3月2日。
    8.華東科技股份有限公司官網。https://www.walton.com.tw/index.php。擷取日期: 2022年3月2日。
    9.勤業眾信(Deloitte)，2021。《台灣智慧製造關鍵能力調查》。https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/rp201201-tw-intelligent-manufacturing-survey.html。擷取日期:2023年2月14日。
    10.瑞昱半導體股份有限公司官網。https://www.realtek.com/zh-tw/。擷取日期: 2022年3月4日。
    11.經濟部工業局智慧電子產業計畫推動辦公室SIPO，2022。半導體產業現況。ttps://www.sipo.org.tw/industry-overview/industry-state-quo/semiconductor-industry-state-quo.html。擷取日期:2022年10月7日。
    12.資誠聯合會計師事務所(PwC)，2021。《2021 臺灣中小企業轉型現況調查報告》。https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/sme-digitalisation-survey.html。擷取日期:2023年2月14日。
    13.聯發科技股份有限公司官網。https://www.mediatek.tw/。擷取日期: 2022年3月4日。
    14.聯華電子股份有限公司官網。https://www.umc.com/zh-TW/Home/Index。擷取日期: 2022年3月4日。
    15.聯詠科技股份有限公司官網。https://www.novatek.com.tw/zh-TW/Home/index。擷取日期: 2022年3月4日。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    110363089
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110363089
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    308901.pdf655KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋