政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150209
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51390058      Online Users : 701
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150209


    Title: 決策疲勞對作業風險管理之影響-以國軍幹部為例
    Impacts of Decision Fatigue on Operational Risk Management – Case of Military Leaders
    Authors: 陳亭甫
    Chen, Ting-Fu
    Contributors: 王信實
    Wang, Shinn Shyr
    陳亭甫
    Chen, Ting-Fu
    Keywords: 作業風險管理
    決策疲勞
    精神疲勞
    認知負荷
    Operational risk management
    Decision fatigue
    Mental depletion
    Cognitive load
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-03-01 13:54:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 風險管理,是有效掌握未來不確定性的管理作為;對可能影響戰略規劃或目標實現之因素採取系統化的管控程序,以達成企業組織目標或創造價值之目的。國軍推動作業風險管理策略已然成熟、組織發展完備,惟訓練意外危安事件偶有所聞;反思風險管理理論架構,以客觀風險理論之學術主流基礎,重新審視人為因素對於個人心裡風險感知與損益評估之見解,延伸思考風險建構理論,進而探討組織文化修正空間。
    風險管理步驟之風險辨識仰賴個人敏銳度的心理認知需求,而內心意志在有限負荷能力下,可能產生精神疲勞而影響風險決策。決策疲勞,係長時間決策過程後決策質量下降,可能原因與決策複雜性、反覆行為、精神疲勞有關;高度認知負荷的精神情況下,可能會採取保守、默認的或現有的結果來做出簡化的風險決策。
    本研究採問卷調查國軍現役軍官幹部在反覆工作行為模式、複雜性決策、精神疲勞等交互作用關係下,探討決策疲勞對作業風險管理之影響;驗證結果背景因素對於反覆工作行為模式、複雜性決策有顯著差異,發現精神疲勞之部分中介、調節作用,歸納決策疲勞對作業風險管理形成顯著正相關之影響。
    結論與建議以「權重區分概念」、「風險策略矩陣」、「快速風險決策」等作法,提高在執行階層面臨動態風險的應處韌性,發展更經濟有效的組織管理模式,克服戰場環境臨機變數。
    Risk management involves effectively handling the management of future uncertainties. It entails implementing systematic control procedures for factors that may impact strategic planning or the achievement of objectives, ultimately aiming to fulfill organizational goals or create value. The military has matured in its operational risk management strategy and organizational development; however, occasional occurrences of unforeseen security incidents during training highlight the need for a reflective analysis of the theoretical framework of risk management.
    Taking the academic mainstream foundation of objective risk theory as a basis, a reevaluation of the perception and assessment of individual psychological risk in light of human factors is essential. This prompts an extended consideration of risk construction theory, leading to an exploration of the potential for organizational culture adjustments.
    The identification step in the risk management process relies on the cognitive needs of individual awareness, and the inner will, under limited cognitive capacity, may experience decision fatigue, potentially influencing risk decisions. Decision fatigue refers to a decrease in decision quality after prolonged decision-making processes, often associated with decision complexity, repetitive behavior, and mental depletion. In conditions of high cognitive load, individuals may adopt conservative, default, or existing outcomes to simplify risk decisions.
    This study employs a questionnaire survey to investigate the impact of decision fatigue on operational risk management among active-duty military officer personnel. Exploring the interactive relationships between repetitive work behavior patterns, complex decision-making, and mental depletion, the research validates significant differences in background factors affecting repetitive work behavior patterns and decision complexity. The findings suggest that mental depletion plays a mediating and moderating role, concluding that decision fatigue significantly correlates with the formation of operational risk management.
    In conclusion, recommendations include the incorporation of concepts such as "weighting differentiation," "risk strategy matrix," and "rapid risk decision-making" to enhance resilience in facing dynamic risks at the executive level. By developing more economically effective organizational management models, it becomes possible to overcome the variable nature of the battlefield environment.
    Reference: 一、中文部分:
    中華民國112年國防報告書編纂委員會(2023)。中華民國112年國防報告書。國防部。
    余桂霖(2012)。因素分析。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    宋明哲(2001)。現代風險管理。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    宋明哲(2020)。超圖解風險管理 : 全視角與案例學習,神速掌握重點 。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    崔海恩、王心靈、王承宗(2007)。危險識別與作業風險管理探討。危機管理學刊,4(2),95-106。
    歐陽瑜、周桂田(2016)。正視未知的風險知識資產: 以知識創造為中心的風險治理架構。政治與社會哲學評論(58),1-51。
    廖建容(譯)(2023)。圖像思考 : 用對的方法,釋放大腦潛能。台北市:遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    鄭永安(2014)。人為因素與飛航安全。科學發展(495)20-24
    鄭燦堂(2022)。風險管理: 理論與實務。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。

    二、英文部分:
    Bade, R., & Parkin, M. (2015). Foundations of economics / Robin Bade, Michael Parkin (Seventh edition ed.). Pearson.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? In Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 16-44). Routledge.
    Boksem, M. A. S., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2006). Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. Biological Psychology, 72(2), 123-132.
    Boksem, M. A. S., & Tops, M. (2008). Mental fatigue: Costs and benefits. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 125-139.
    Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
    Bruyneel, S., Dewitte, S., Vohs, K. D., & Warlop, L. (2006). Repeated choosing increases susceptibility to affective product features. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2), 215-225.
    Danziger, S., Levav, J., Avnaim-Pesso, L., & Kahneman, D. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(17), 6889-6892.
    Dean, M. (1998). Risk, Calculable and Incalculable. Soziale Welt, 49(1), 25-42.
    Department of U.S. Army. (2020). FM 5-0 Planning and Orders Production.
    Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
    Ewold, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, 197210, 201-202.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Gaski, J. F., & Nevin, J. R. (1985). The Differential Effects of Exercised and Unexercised Power Sources in a Marketing Channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 130-142.
    Gjerdrum, D., & Peter, M. (2011). The new international standard on the practice of risk management–A comparison of ISO 31000: 2009 and the COSO ERM framework. Risk management, 31(21), 8-12.
    Greenland, S. (2000). An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29(4), 722-729.
    Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., xe, dric, Birt, A. R., Brand, R., Brandt, M. J., Brewer, G., Bruyneel, S., Calvillo, D. P., Campbell, W. K., Cannon, P. R., Carlucci, M., Carruth, N. P., Cheung, T., Crowell, A., . . . Zwienenberg, M. (2016). A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546-573.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis / Joseph F. Hair, Jr. ... [et al.] (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
    Hamilton, K., Shih, S.-I., & Mohammed, S. (2016). The Development and Validation of the Rational and Intuitive Decision Styles Scale [Article]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 523-535.
    Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183). North-Holland.
    Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
    Hirshleifer, D., Levi, Y., Lourie, B., & Teoh, S. H. (2019). Decision fatigue and heuristic analyst forecasts. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(1), 83-98.
    Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers.
    Jiao, Y. (2023). Managing decision fatigue: Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 101615.
    Johansson, B., & Ronnback, L. (2014). Evaluation of the mental fatigue scale and its relation to cognitive and emotional functioning after traumatic brain injury or stroke. Int J Phys Med Rehabil, 2(01).
    Jones, B. D. (2002). Bounded rationality and public policy: Herbert A. Simon and the decisional foundation of collective choice [Article]. Policy Sciences, 35(3), 269.
    Linder, J. A., Doctor, J. N., Friedberg, M. W., Reyes Nieva, H., Birks, C., Meeker, D., & Fox, C. R. (2014). Time of Day and the Decision to Prescribe Antibiotics. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(12), 2029-2031.
    Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
    Ma, X., He, J., & Liao, J. (2021). Does decision fatigue affect institutional bidding behavior? Evidence from Chinese IPO market. Economic Modelling, 98, 1-12.
    McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.
    Meertens, R. M., & Lion, R. (2008). Measuring an Individual's Tendency to Take Risks: The Risk Propensity Scale1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506-1520.
    Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003). Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54(4), 345-352.
    Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(6), 1321.
    Pietarinen, A.-V., Chapman, P., Bosveld-de Smet, L., Giardino, V., Corter, J., & Linker, S. (2020). The Sung Diagram: Revitalizing the Eisenhower Matrix. In (Vol. 12169, pp. 498-502). Springer International Publishing AG.
    Pignatiello, G. A., Martin, R. J., & Hickman, R. L., Jr. (2020). Decision fatigue: A conceptual analysis. J Health Psychol, 25(1), 123-135.
    Pronin, E., Kruger, J., Savtisky, K., & Ross, L. (2001). You don't know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 639-656.
    Reason, J. (1990). The Contribution of Latent Human Failures to the Breakdown of Complex Systems. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences (Vol. 327, pp. 475-484). The Royal Society.
    Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 33-46.
    Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of occupational health psychology, 3(4), 356.
    Steglich-Petersen, A., & Skipper, M. (2019). Explaining the Illusion of Asymmetric Insight. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 10(4), 769-786.
    Stewart, A. F., Ferriero, D. M., Josephson, S. A., Lowenstein, D. H., Messing, R. O., Oksenberg, J. R., Johnston, S. C., & Hauser, S. L. (2012). Fighting decision fatigue. Annals of Neurology, 71(1), A5-A15.
    Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zait, A. (2015). How Reliable are Measurement Scales? External Factors with Indirect Influence on Reliability Estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679-686.
    Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. In Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 45-77). Routledge.
    Whitney, P., Rinehart, C. A., & Hinson, J. M. (2008). Framing effects under cognitive load: The role of working memory in risky decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1179-1184.
    Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2010). A Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems [Article]. Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 107-146.
    Zheng, B., Kwok, E., Taljaard, M., Marie-Joe, N., & Stiell, I. (2020). Decision fatigue in the Emergency Department: How does emergency physician decision making change over an eight-hour shift? The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(12), 2506-2510.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    111921307
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111921307
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    130701.pdf5117KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback