政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150154
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51288711      線上人數 : 845
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150154


    題名: 菲律賓軍文關係（1965-2022）：戰略三角模式分析
    Civil-Military Relations in the Philippines (1965-2022): An Analysis of the Strategic Triangle Model
    作者: 梁敬偉
    Liang, Ching-Wei
    貢獻者: 孫采薇
    Sun, Tsai-Wei
    梁敬偉
    Liang, Ching-Wei
    關鍵詞: 菲律賓
    政治家族
    軍文關係
    戰略三角
    The Philippines
    Political Family
    Civil–Military Relations
    Strategic Triangle
    日期: 2024
    上傳時間: 2024-03-01 12:57:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 菲律賓自獨立建國以來，傳統政治家族勢力盤據於中央及地方政壇上，對其政治發展造成許多重大影響，軍方在歷經馬可仕戒嚴時期後成為具有政治影響力的集團，試圖透過政變行為影響政府決策甚至與外部勢力合作推翻政府。因此除政府本身以外，政治家族與軍方皆是影響菲律賓政局走向的重要角色，為了理解三者間的關係如何形塑菲律賓的政治發展，本文透過戰略三角模式來分析自1965年馬可仕上台後至2022年杜特蒂卸任時，菲律賓七任總統任內的政府、軍方、政治家族三方的互動關係如何塑造不同時期的菲律賓政治發展及軍文關係狀態。在研究分析中，影響三方關係的因素分別為制度變化、政經局勢變化以及派系是否分裂。在制度變化中，政府透過戒嚴令、經濟與土地改革政策使得三方關係出現變化，不論是強化或是弱化其與政治家族和軍方間的關係。而在政經環境變化中，經濟狀態較為良好的情況下三方合作狀態較為明顯，反之則對立較為嚴重，而國際局勢變化同樣也會影響到三方關係的好壞，尤其在面臨外部威脅時，國內各方勢力較為團結一致。在派系分裂變化中主要在於軍方內部有無分裂狀態，如果軍方內部分裂情況嚴重，則容易與政治家族合作結盟推翻政府。在戰略三角關係的型態中，只要政治狀態處於三邊家族型態時，菲律賓國內政局較為穩定且不容易發生政變行為，而當政治狀態處於結婚型以及羅曼蒂克型時，國內政局較為不穩定且容易爆發社會抗爭與軍事政變。
    Since the founding of the Philippines as an independent nation, traditional political families have dominated the central and local political arena, causing many significant impacts on the political development of the country. Since the Marcos Martial Law period, military has become another politically influential group, which attempts influence the government's decision-making process. Therefore, in addition to the government itself, the political families and the military are also important players in influencing the political situation in the Philippines. In order to understand how the relationship among three actors shapes the political development, this paper analyzes the interaction between the government, the military, and the political families during the seven presidencies of the Philippines after Marcos. By using the Strategic Triangle Model, this paper analyzes how the interactions among the government, military, and political families shape the political development and the state of civil-military relations in different periods. The factors affecting the tripartite relationship are institutional changes, changes in the political and economic situation, and whether or not factions are divided. In the institutional changes, the government's policies of martial law, economic and agrarian reforms are able to bring changes in the tripartite relations, either by strengthening or weakening its relationship with the political families and the military. In the change of political and economic environment, the cooperation among the three parties would be more obvious when the economy is in a better state, while the opposition is more serious when the economy is getting worse. The changes of the international situation also affect the relationship among the three parties. When the country faces the external threat, the domestic forces are more united. The major change of factional division is from the military . If the military is seriously divided, it is easy to cooperate with political families to overthrow the government. In the case of the Philippines, as long as the political state is in the trilateral “family” type, the domestic political situation is more stable and less prone to coup, when the political state is in the “marriage” type and the “romantic” type, the domestic political situation is more unstable and prone to social resistance and military coup.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    書籍
    包宗和、吳玉山編，1999，《爭辯中的兩岸關係理論》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。

    江懷哲，2022，《現代菲律賓政治的起源》，台灣：左岸文化。

    朱幸福，2002，《風雲詭譎的菲島政壇∶中國資深記者對菲律賓民主的觀察與思考》，北京 : 社會科學出版社。

    吳玉山，1997，《抗衡或扈從-兩岸關係新詮》，台北：中正書局。

    洪陸訓，1997，《軍事政治學與文武關係的理論和研究途徑：兼論軍事社會學對政戰制度的作用》，台北：政戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心出版。

    洪陸訓，1990，《武裝力量與社會》，台北：麥田出版股份有限公司。

    洪陸訓，2002，《軍事政治學：文武關係理論》，台北：五南圖書出版社。

    周東華，2010，《戰後菲律賓現代化進程中的威權主義起源研究》，北京：人民出版社。

    高民政、王永強，2011年，《西方軍事政治學評論︰美國經典文武關系思想》，北京：時事出版社。

    陳列甫，1983，《馬可仕統治下的菲律賓》，台北，台灣商務印圖書館。

    陳烈甫，1998，《東南亞第一位女總統-柯拉蓉艾奎諾》台北：台灣商務印圖書館。

    陳鴻瑜，1980，《菲律賓的政治發展》臺北市：台北商務出版社。

    陳鴻瑜，2001，《菲律賓，東南亞政治論衡》，台北：翰蘆出版社。

    陳鴻瑜，2003，《菲律賓史-東西文明交會的島國》，台北：三民出版社。

    陳鴻瑜，2006，《東南亞政府各國政府與政治》，臺北：翰蘆出版社。

    陳佩修，2009，《軍人與政治：泰國的軍事政變與政治變遷》，台北市：中央研究院。

    陳鴻瑜，2020，《東南亞史概論》，臺北市：空中大學。

    顧長永，2000，《東南亞政府與政治》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。

    Nordlinger, Eric 著，洪陸訓譯，2002，《軍人與政治：亞非拉美國家的軍事政變》，臺北市：時英出版社。

    Morris Janowitz 著，洪陸訓譯，1998，《專業軍人：社會與政治的描述》，台北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。

    Samuel E.Finer著，洪陸訓譯，1997，《馬背上的人－軍人在政治中的角色》，台北:政戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心。

    期刊論文

    丁傳英，1993，〈拉莫斯上台後的菲律賓局勢〉，《現代國際關係》，頁23~29。

    王韞，2004，〈菲律賓與印尼軍人政治參與的比較〉，《東南亞研究》，2004年第二 期，頁30~55。

    沈有忠，2006，〈美中臺三角關係：改良的戰略三角分析法〉，《展望與探索》，第
    43期，頁20~40。

    洪松輝，1996，〈論菲律賓文武關係之演變〉，《東亞季刊》，第27卷第5期，頁123~140。

    吳東林，2016，〈菲律賓國防轉型與區域安全〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，12卷4期，頁81~111。

    洪陸訓，1998，〈軍人脫離政治之探討〉，《問題與研究》，37卷1期，頁57~71。

    黃耀東，2006，〈菲律賓：2005～2006年回顧與前瞻〉，《東南亞縱橫》，第四期，頁8~14。

    秦若愚，2021，〈後威權時代菲律賓文武關係的發展演變〉，《江南社會學院學報》第1期，頁75~80。

    陳鴻瑜，1981，〈馬可仕續掌菲律賓國政〉，《問題與研究》，第20卷第10期，
    頁31~59。

    陳鴻瑜，1998，〈一九九八年菲律賓總統大選〉，《問題與研究》，37卷9期，頁31~44。

    陳鴻瑜，1999，〈菲律賓的政黨政治：從兩黨政治到多黨政治之轉變〉，《問題與研究》，第38卷第5期，頁54~55。

    羅石圃，1987，〈菲律賓『八二八』兵變及其影響〉，《問題與研究》，第27卷第2期頁57~64。

    翁俊桔，2005，《菲律賓的第二次人民力量革命：寡頭政治再現》，高雄：中山大學中山學術研究所博士論文。

    謝光中，1998，《菲律賓文武關係的回顧與展望》，台北：政治作戰學校政研所碩士論文。

    網際網路

    周慧儀，2022，〈誰最愛的戒嚴時代？菲律賓大選錯亂的馬可仕「獨裁愛與恨」〉，聯合報，https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/6289443。

    陳妍君，2023年，〈菲軍方洗牌 候任防長籲將領堅守崗位〉，中央社，
    https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202301110314.aspx。

    陳妍君，2003，〈美中競逐南海緊張 小馬可仕：菲軍隊使命已改變〉，中央社， https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202302280240.aspx。

    2000，〈菲國參院開始彈劾總統審訊〉，BBC中文網，http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_1050000/newsid_1058500/1058536.stm。

    盧思綸，2023，〈傳菲律賓前總統杜特蒂密謀政變 軍界也出現「顛覆勢力」蠢蠢欲動〉，聯合報， https://udn.com/news/story/6809/7586277。

    〈菲國大選，貪腐大咖紛紛勝出〉，2013，自由時報，https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/679382。

    暨希，2021，〈下注北京“賭錯了” 菲律賓欲歸隊美菲聯盟〉，美國之音，https://www.voacantonese.com/a/US-China-Philippines-strategy-20210724/5977792.html。




    英文部分
    書籍
    Beeson, Mark & Bellamy, Alex J. 2008. Securing Southeast Asia . London and New
    York: Routledge.

    De Castro, Renato C. 2013 . 21st Century Philippine Civil-Military Relations: Why. Partnership Instead of Subordination ? in Re-awakenings: The Study of National Security at 50 , Manila: Institute for National Security Studies.

    Eric Nordlinger, Eric.1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Prentice-Hall. Inc.Englewood Cliffs,.

    Hernandez, Carolina G .1985. The Philippines ” in Zakaria Hajiahmad and Harold Crouch (eds.) , Military-Civilian Relations in South-East Asia . Singapore: Oxford University Press.

    Johnson, Bryan. 1987.The Four Days of Courage: The Untold Story of the People.
    Who Brought Marcos Down. New York: The Free Press.

    Essler, Richard J. 1998. Development and the Military: Role of the Philippine Military in Development,” in J. Soedjati Djiwandono and Yong Mun Cheong (eds.), Soldiers and Stability in Southeast Asia . Singapore: Regional Strategic Studies Programme Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Miranda, Felipe B. 1986. The Military ” in R. J. May & Francisco Nemenzo (eds.), The Philippines After Marcos. Great Britain: Printed and bound .

    Morada,Noel M. & Collier, Christopher . 2001. The Philippines: State versus Society,” in Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences (Ed) Muthiah Alagappa . Stanford, California: Stanford University Press1.

    Taylor, George E.1964 .The Philippines and the United States: Problem of Partnership .NewYork: Praeger .

    Timberman, David G.1991 .Continuity and Chang in Philippine Politics . Singapore:
    Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Doronila ,Amando.2001.The Fall of Joseph Estrada: The Inside Story . Manila, Philippines: Anvil Publishing.

    期刊論文

    Arcala Hall, Rosalie.2022. “Hobbesian Flirtation and Viral Entanglements: Shifts in Philippine Civil Military Terrain under the Duterte Administration”.Southeast Asian Affairs:293-306.

    Arugay ,Aries A.2004.“Mobilizing for Accountability: Contentious Politics in the Anti-Estrada Campaign.” Philippine Sociological Review. 52: 75~96.

    Arcala Hall,Rosalie.2004.“Exploring New Roles of the Philippine Military: Implications to Civilian Supremacy,” .Philippine Political Science Journal .Vol. 25, No. 48: 107-130.

    Beeson , Mark ,2008. “Civil–Military Relations in Indonesia and the Philippines Will the Thai Coup Prove Contagious ?”, Armed Forces & Society , 34(3):474¬-490.

    Brillo, Bing Baltazar C. ,2008. “The Arroyo Government and the Military: Maintaining Civilian Authority Amidst Undue Influence of the Military” UPLB Journal , Vol. 6, No: 115-128.

    Chambers ,Paul.2012.“A Precarious Path: The Evolution of Civil-Military Relations in. the. Philippines”, Asian Security. Vol. 8, No. 2:138-163.

    Dal Bó , Ernesto & Bó, Pedro Dal & Snyder, Jason .2006. “Political Dynasties”. Economic Studies:115-142.

    Dittmer , Lowell.1981.“The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical. Analysis”. World Politics .Vol. 33, No. 4:485-515.

    Encarnacion Tadem ,Teresa S &Tadem, Eduardo C .2016.“Political dynasties in the. Philippines: Persistent patterns, perennial problems”. South East Asia Research. Volume 24, Issue 3: 329-331.

    Guerrero, Salvador.2007. “The Reform the Armed Forces Movement (RAM): A Creation of Historical Experience” . Kasarinlan : Philippine Journal of Third World Studies: 51-57.

    H,William H.1986;“Overholt, "The Rise and Fall of Ferdinand Marcos”, Asian Survey November.

    Hutchcroft,Paul.2008.“The Arroyo Imbroglio in the Philippines ,”Journal of Democracy. Vol. 19, No. 1:141-155.

    Miranda, Felipe B .1986.“The Military” in R. J. May & Francisco Nemenzo (eds.), The Philippines After Marcos , Great Britain: Printed and bound: 96-99.

    Lasswell, Harold D. 1941. “The Garrison State”, The American Journal of. Sociology , Vol. 46, No. 4: 455-468.

    Kreuzer , Peter . 2022. “Killing Politicians in the Philippines: Who, Where, When, and Why”, PRIF Reports:1-34.

    Purdey , Jemma 2016.“Political families in Southeast Asia”, South East Asia Research , Vol. 24, No. 3:319-327.

    Labonne, Julien & Parsa, Sahar & Querubín , Pablo .2021.“Political Dynasties, Term Limits and Female Political Empowerment: Evidence from the Philippines”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization .Volume 182: 212-228.

    Montinola ,Gabriella R.1999. “The Philippines in 1998: Opportunity amid Crisis. ” , Asian Survey.1999. 39(1):64-71.

    Mendoza , Ronald U & Banaag, Miann&Hiwatig, Joshua & Henry Yusingco , Michael . 2020.“Term Limits and Political Dynasties: Unpacking the Links” Asia-Pacific Social Science Review.20(4):88-99.

    Querubin , Pablo.2016.“Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines ”.Quarterly Journal of Political Science:151-181.

    Javad Heydarian , Richard 2022 .“ The Return of the Marcos Dynasty ” .Journal of Democracy. Volume 33, Number 3: 62~76.

    Hernandez ,Carolina G. 1985 .“The Philippine Military and Civilian Control: Under Marcos and Beyond”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 4: 907-923.

    Hernandez, Carolina G.1996. “The Philippines in 1995: Growth Amid Challenges. ”Asian Survey.1996 , 36(2):142-151.

    Reid, B.2004. “The Philippine Democratic Uprising and the Contradictions of Neoliberalism: EDSA II. ”, Third. World Quarterly. 22(5):777-793.

    Sawin , Janet L.1993. “a study of peaceful revolution: the Philippines , 1986”.The Fletcher. Forum of World Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1: 181-207.

    Thompson ,Mark R. 2016.“Bloodied democracy: Duterte and the Death of Liberal
    Reformism in the Philippines. ”, Journal of Current Southeast Asian
    Affairs.35(3):39-68.

    網際網路

    Arugay , Aries.2021. “The Generals’ Gambit: The Military and Democratic Erosion in Duterte’s. Philippines. ” .Heinrich Böll Stiftung Southeast Asia. https://th.boell.org/en/2021/02/18/generals-gambit-military-and-democratic-erosion-dutertes-philippines.

    Aspinwall,Nick. 2015.“Mindanao after Martial Law”, The Diplomat.
    https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/mindanao-after-martial-law/.

    Baron , Gabriela . 2021.“Poverty, underdevelopment exist where 'fat' political. dynasties thrive -- Ateneo dean”, Manila Bulletin. https://mb-com-ph.webpkgcache.com/doc/-/s/mb.com.ph/2021/11/10/poverty-underdevelopment-exist-where-fat-political-dynasties-thrive-ateneo-dean.

    Castaneda , Jason . 2023.“Philippines: coups rumors and destabilization plots”, Asia. Times. https://asiatimes.com/2023/01/philippines-coups-rumors-and-destabilization-plots/ .

    Favila ,Aaron. 2022. “Marcos junior is the latest beneficiary of ‘bloodlines’ in Southeast Asian politics”, The Conversation .https://theconversation.com/marcos-junior-is-the-latest-beneficiary-of-bloodlines-in-southeast-asian-politics-184246 .

    Fonbuena ,Armela . 2016.“Aquino and the PH military: Toys for the big boys .” Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/137691-aquino-military-modernization/.

    Goldman ,Russell.2017.“The Latest Unrest in the Southern Philippines, Explained” , The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/world/asia/philippines-martial-law-marawi-mindanao.html.

    Grace,Li. 2021. “COVID 19 Recovery Index”.Nikkei Asia .https://
    asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/COVID-19-Recovery-Index/Nikkei-
    COVID-19-Recovery-Index.
    Hutt ,Davi.2020. “Southeast Asia’s Princelings” , The Diplomat . https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/southeast-asias-princelings/ .

    Heydarian,Richard. 2022. “Fidel Ramos, a former Philippine general who denounced despots” , Nikkei Asia .https://asia.nikkei.com/Life-Arts/Obituaries/Fidel-Ramos-a-former-Philippine-general-who-denounced-despots.

    Katreena Cabico ,Gaea. 2019. “Duterte records new personal high satisfaction
    rating” , Philstar. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/07/08/1933042/sws-
    duterte-records-new-personal-high-satisfaction-rating.

    Nepomuceno, Priam. 2020. “High satisfaction rating proves commitment to excellence: AFP”, Philippine News Agency, https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1095747.

    Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippinehttps : //www.officialgazette.gov.ph/edsa/the-ph-protest/。

    Parada , Vincent Kyle. 2023.“Politics, power and private armed groups in the. Philippines”.East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/04/14/politics-power-and-private-armed-groups-in-the-philippines/ .

    Porcalla,Delon& Romero,Paolo .2018.“Pantaleon Alvarez ousted ; Gloria. Macapagal-Arroyo is House Speaker”. Philstar . https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/07/24/1836320/pantaleon-alvarez-ousted-gloria.
    Petty,Martin&Lema , Karen.2017.“PDEA: Army to Play Support Role in War on
    Drugs”. ABS CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/02/06/17/
    pdea-army-to-play-support-role-in-war-on-drugs.

    Sabillo , Kristine Angeli.2014 “Aquino backs anti-dynasty bill ”, Inquirer.
    https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/708217/aquino-pushes-for-anti-dynasty-law.

    Santos ,Ana P. & Ebbighausen, Rodion .2018.“Investigating Duterte’s Drug War in. Philippines — Facts. and Fiction.” Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/investigating-dutertes-drug-war-in-philippines-facts-and-fiction/a-43695383.
    Teng ,Carla .2023. “Asia's Political Dynasties: Philippines”, Asia Media Centre . https://www.asiamediacentre.org.nz/features/asias-political-dynasties-philippines/ .

    Tordecilla ,Jaemark.2011, “A politicized military” .Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSMAN324651/.

    Timberman ,David. 2019. “Philippine Politics Under Duterte: A Midterm. Assessment”.Carnegie. Endowment for International Peace , https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/01/10/philippine-politics-under-duterte-midterm-assessment-pub-78091 .

    2017.“Duterte thanks PMA for 'double honor' ”. ABS-CBN News , February 18, 2017,
    https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/02/18/17/duterte-thanks-pma-for-double-honor

    2010.“Noy to AFP : Defend Democracy. ”.The Philippine Star . https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/us-philippines-partnership-the-cause-maritime-defense

    2010.“Navy Lots for Lease to Business Groups” . 2010.The Philippine Star,
    https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2010/07/29/597358/navy-lots-lease-business- groups.

    2020.“Philippines Drugs War: UN Report Criticises ‘permission to kill”.BBC.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-5291756
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    東亞研究所
    109260018
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109260018
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[東亞研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    001801.pdf2813KbAdobe PDF5檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋