Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150099
|
| Title: | 以子公司和代理商擴充在亞洲之營運-以高科技公司為例
Expanding Business in Asia with Subsidiaries and Distributors: The Case of a High-Tech Company |
| Authors: | 陳宏棋
CHEN, HUNG-CHI |
| Contributors: | 于卓民
巫立宇
陳宏棋
CHEN, HUNG-CHI |
| Keywords: | 多國企業
台灣網通業
國際市場經營模式
母子公司關係
子公司角色
Multinational enterprise
Taiwanese networking communications industry
International market operation model
Parent-subsidiary relationship
Subsidiary role |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-03-01 11:56:38 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 台灣多國企業在進行海外布局時，不論是創造代工的成本優勢或是經營品牌的差異化策略，必須深思如何因應每個國家環境與文化差異，以發展適合自己的經營方式，展現相對競爭力，並確保企業競爭力能之持續與成長。
本研究以2012-2015期間，台灣網通多國企業在亞州市場經營策略之個案，探討其在不同的國家、不同政經制度與文化，及複雜的經營環境等因素，為達成母公司賦予的使命與任務，如何適當的規劃經營結構以執行經營的策略。
本研究發現:
(一) 獨資模式最重要在於: 地主國商業誠信與；母公司高階經理人常駐，
對商業夥伴、客戶、在地子公司所聘雇員工給予較高強度制度化管理，進而把多國企業母公司的策略方向延伸落實到地主國。合資子公司則須考量對地主國的商業夥伴、當地子公司所聘雇員工有無激勵功能？法規面是否有限制？
(二) 子公司對於母公司的戰略定位策略:
1.印度個案，地主國策略重要性高，子公司資源與能力中低。驗證處在Bartlett & Ghoshal (1989) 提出「子公司一般性角色」中的「黑洞」。母公司2012年將其從合資子公司轉型成獨資子公司，就是有計畫性提升該子公司的資源與能力，後續茁壯成「策略領袖」。
2.韓國個案，地主國策略重要性屬中等，子公司資源與能力高，驗證介於「子公司一般性角色」中的「貢獻者」與「策略領袖」之間。母公司2012年從代理(授權) 模式轉型為合資子公司，透過新建立的在地團隊深耕市場，確立子公司新團隊的資源與能力直接扮演「貢獻者」+「策略領袖」角色，可以彈性配合母公司的策略與資源，也讓韓國扮演「類策略領袖」提供母公司東北亞市場商業訊息與脈動。
3.日本、澳洲個案，地主國策略重要性高，但並未成立子公司。多國母公司可持續以代理 (授權) 模式來擴充，等待時機尋覓合適的在地專業經理人或可信賴的合資伙伴，再適時投入資源，跨入「子公司一般性角色」中的「黑洞」，成為多國企業國際佈建的一份子。
When Taiwanese multinational enterprises (MNEs) expand overseas, they must meticulously assess how to navigate the diverse environments and cultures of each country. This is paramount for crafting a tailored business model, showcasing competitive advantages, and ensuring enduring growth.
This study delves into the operations of a Taiwanese networking communications enterprise in the Asian market from 2012 to 2015. It delves into how these firms strategize their organizational frameworks and execute business strategies across nations marked by distinct political, economic, and cultural landscapes, as well as intricate business ecosystems. The objective is to effectively fulfill the mandates and objectives set by their parent companies.
Key findings include:
1. Critical factors for the wholly owned subsidiary model:
The level of business integrity within the host country. The presence of senior managers from the parent company. These factors facilitate heightened levels of institutionalized management for business partners, customers, and local employees. Consequently, the strategic direction of the MNE parent company is effectively disseminated and implemented in the host country. Conversely, joint ventures must assess the presence of incentive mechanisms for local business partners and employees, as well as any legal constraints.
2. Subsidiary strategic positioning in relation to the parent company:
(1)In the case of India: The host country strategy holds high importance, while the subsidiary's resources and capabilities are medium-low.The parent company's strategic move to transform the subsidiary from a joint venture to a wholly owned subsidiary in 2012 significantly bolstered its resources and capabilities. Subsequently, the subsidiary evolved into a "strategic leader."
(2)In the case of South Korea: The host country strategy holds moderate importance, while the subsidiary's resources and capabilities are high. The transformation of the subsidiary from a distribution model to a joint venture in 2012 allowed the newly established local team to cultivate the market and fortify its resources and capabilities. This enabled the subsidiary to directly assume roles as a "contributor" and "strategic leader," offering flexibility in aligning with the parent company's strategies and resources. South Korea also played a "quasi-strategic leader" role by providing the parent company with crucial business insights into the Northeast Asian market.
(3)In the cases of Japan and Australia: The host country strategy holds high importance, yet no subsidiaries have been established. MNE parents can sustain expansion using distribution models while awaiting opportune moments to identify suitable local professional managers or reliable joint venture partners. Subsequent resource allocation allows for entry into the "black hole" in the "generic subsidiary roles," contributing to the MNE's global expansion efforts. |
| Reference: | 一、中文文獻:
1.于卓民 (2014)，國際企業環境與管理，第四版，台北 : 華泰文化。
2.于卓民 (2023)，台灣產業創生平台「跨國在地經營菁英班」。https://www.tw-ren.com/renaissance/828，2023/7/5.
3.中山大學企業管理系 (2005)，管理學，第十八章國際企業。台北 : 前程圖書。
4.朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。臺北：揚智。
5.曲惠雯 (2004)。轉投資策略、集團管理機制對集團經營績效之影響-以IC設計集團為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
6.周旭華譯 (2010)，Michael E. Porter著。競爭策略：產業環境及競爭者分析，台北 : 天下文化。
7.林全興 (2006)，「台灣電線電纜業海外獨資進入模式與價值鏈活動整合程度之個案研究」，銘傳大學管理學院為出版碩士論文。
8.胡幼慧、姚美華 (1996)，質性研究方法集：本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流圖書。
9.段思安 (2015)，多國企業子公司高階主管任用決策之研究-資源基礎觀點. 中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10.郭國湞 (2005)，台灣高科技廠商關鍵成功因素對競爭策略選擇及執行之影響研究-以台灣蘭娃無線通訊產業為例，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班管理科學組碩士學位論文。
11.郭書言，(2023)，異軍突起-IC載板產業廠商之輕盈與發展策略分析: 以景碩公司為例。國立台灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文。
12.陳省三 (2003)，國際市場進入模式評估程序之研究-以機車產業為例，國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。
13.陳兆麟 (2011)，少數股權股東管理地主國合資子公司之研究。國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程論文。
14.黃錫欽 (2014)，隱形冠軍的競爭策略個案分析。國立清華大學科技管理學院高階主管經營管理碩士在職專班論文。
15.董旭英、黃怡娟譯 (2000)，次級資料研究法，台北: 弘智文化。
16.蕭瑞麟 (2017)，不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡，第四版，台北:五南圖書。
二、英文文獻:
1. Bartlett & Ghoshal (1989). Managing Across Borders, Boston,MA: Harvard Business School
2. Bartlett & Ghoshal, (1989). Organizational typology. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), 449-464.
3. Bergen et al., (1992). (Bergen, M., Dutta, S. & Walker, Jr. O.C.) (1992). Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. The Journal of Marketing, 1-24.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786321000739
4. Birkinshaw, J. M., & Hood, N., (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolutions: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795.
5. Bitektine, A. & Haack, P. (2015). The macro and micro of legitimacy: Towards a multi-level theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75.
6. Chatfield, S.L. (2020). Recommendations for secondary analysis of qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 833-842.
7. Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy.
Organization Studies, 34(3), 345-376.
8. Dunning, J. H., (1993). How should national governments respond to globalization? The International Executive, 35(3), 187-198.
9. Dunning, T. (1988). Expaining International Production. Harper Collins Publishers.
10. Erramilli, K. M. (1991). The experience factors in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. Journal of International Business Studies. 22, 479-501.
11. Heenan, D.A. & Perlmutter, H. V., (1979). Multinational Organization Development, NY: Addison-Wesley.
12. Hill C.W.L. & Jones G.R., (1998). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Fourth Edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
13. Hill C.W.L., Hwang P., & Kim W.C., (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry model, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 117-128.
14. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.E., (1977). Internationalization process of firm-model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
15. Kim, W.C. and Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode Choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 29-53.
16. Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988). Joint venture: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319-332.
17. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
18. Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Neill, S. and Rose G. M., (2006). The effect of strategic complexity on marketing strategy and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 1-10.
20. Onkvisit, S. & Shaw, J. (1993). International Marketing: Analysis and Strategy. New York : Macmillan Pub. Co.
21. Paterson, S.L., & Brock, D.M. (2002). The development of subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review, 11(2), 139-163.
22. Porter, E. Michael, (1980). Competitive Strategy, NY: The Free Press.
Porter, E. Michael, (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, January 2008.
23. Prahalad, C.K., & Doz, Y.L. (1981). An approach to strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Review, 22, 5-13.
24. Slater, S. F., E. M. Olson, & G. T. M. Hult (2006). The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability – Performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221-1231.
25. Slater, S. F. & J. C. Narver (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization, Journal of Business Research, 59 (July), 63-74.
26. Sundaram, A.K. & Black, J.S. (1992). The environment and internal organization of multinational enterprises. Academy of Management Review, 17, 729-757.
27. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509-533.
28. Verreynne, M. L. (2006). Strategy-making process and firm performance in small firms, Journal of Management and Organization, 12(3), 209-222.
29. Vissak, T., & Francioni, B. (2013). Serial nonlinear internationalization in practice: A case study. International Business Reviews, 22(6), 951-962.
30. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
31. Yin, R.K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Zhao, H. & Levary, R. R. (2002). Evaluation of country attractiveness for foreign direct investment in the E-retail industry, Multinational Business Review, Spring, 1-10.
三、網路資料:
1. Vishal Malhotra (2012). Presto Participated at Plastindia 2012- A grand success. Presto Stantest Pvt. Ltd. https://www.prestogroup.com/news/prestos-participation-at-plastindia-2012-a-grand-success/ |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
110932026 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110932026 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 110 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
