English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51671848      Online Users : 546
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149937


    Title: 理性、語言與翻譯:德希達的翻譯政治論
    Reason, Language, and Translation: Jacques Derrida’s Politics of Translation
    Authors: 黃雅嫺
    Huang, Ya-Hsien
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 德希達;語言;理性;翻譯;機構;笛卡爾
    Jacques Derrida;language;reason;translation;institution;René Descartes
    Date: 2024-01
    Issue Date: 2024-02-21 15:11:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文擬探討德希達對於多語書寫的翻譯政治問題。德希達在解構了單一語言之後,便展開了多語之間的翻譯轉換問題的探討。首先便是通過對笛卡爾的著作以及若干書信的分析,討論笛卡爾思想中對理性的規定以及對語言的看法,進一步來說,德希達藉由對近代理性主義之父──笛卡爾──文本的重新閱讀,討論其哲學內部的形上學以及歷史出現的問題。在這問題中,德希達以其獨特的解構手法,分析隱藏在笛卡爾哲學中的神學政治觀。最後,我們也要藉由德希達對笛卡爾看待人工語言的意見,來探討自然語言與人工語言之間的符號流動問題,這一點既呼應了德希達對笛卡爾的形上學語言分析,也顯露出德希達自己對於書寫問題所持的立場。
    This article aims to explore Derrida’s politics of translation concerning multilingual writing. Derrida, after deconstructing a single language, discussed translation and conversion between multiple languages. Derrida started with the discussion of the rules of reason in Descartes’ thought and Descartes’ views on language through the analysis of Descartes’ works and letters. By re-reading Descartes’ works and letters, Derrida intended to discuss the metaphysics within Descartes’ philosophy as well as historical issues. In this question, Derrida used his unique method of deconstruction to analyze the theological and political views hidden in Cartesian philosophy. This article also discusses the problem of symbolic flow between natural language and artificial language based on Derrida’s viewpoint on Descartes’ view of artificial language. This discussion not only echoes the linguistic analysis of Cartesian metaphysics by Derrida but also reveals Derrida’s own position on the issue of writing.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 51, 1-31
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202401_(51).0001
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202401_(51).0001
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    51-1.pdf932KbAdobe PDF163View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback