政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149664

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149664

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50997461 Online Users : 842

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Graduate Institute of TIPM > Theses > Item 140.119/149664

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149664

Title:	串流音樂平台的價值獲取策略－以KKBOX以及LINE MUSIC為例 Value Capture Strategy of Streaming Music Platforms – Case Studies of KKBOX and LINE MUSIC
Authors:	賴品安 LAI, PING-AN
Contributors:	許牧彥 Hsu, Mu-Yen 賴品安 LAI, PING-AN
Keywords:	平台策略串流音樂產業價值主張價值創造價值獲取 KKBOX LINE MUSIC Platform Strategy Streaming Music Industry Value Acquisition Value Proposition Value Creation KKBOX LINE MUSIC
Date:	2024
Issue Date:	2024-02-01 11:45:27 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	根據國際唱片業協會的資料顯示，2023年全球音樂市場收入達到262億美元。然而，自2000年的210億美元下降至2022年的46億美元，僅剩四分之一產業價值，反觀串流音樂收益則不斷攀升。串流科技產業包括了雲端、影視串流、唱片公司、廣告商和使用者。KKBOX早期在台灣市場成功開發線上音樂平台，佔有率高，是台灣串流音樂代表性平台。相對地，LINE MUSIC於2019年進入串流音樂市場，兩者的初期價值主張和發展路徑不同，對獲值方式造成影響。不同時代條件導致商業模式和數據收集方式的變化。因此，本研究聚焦於KKBOX和LINE MUSIC，深入探討串流音樂產業的價值獲取、商業模式和策略。主要分析兩者在這一領域的價值主張、傳遞和價值獲取方式，並關注它們在多邊市場中的價值獲取關係。研究提出三個關鍵問題：KKBOX和LINE MUSIC如何在多邊市場中獲取價值、它們的互動模式有何不同。研究方法包括個案研究法和質性研究，並分成七章節進行介紹：平台的定義、特性和不同類型平台的盈利方式的文獻回顧、串流音樂產業的整體市場概況、使用的方法和流程、針對KKBOX和LINE MUSIC的個案分析、運用文獻回顧理論來分析這些案例之間的盈利模式發展差異，以及最後的研究結論和未來研究方向。希望深入了解串流音樂平台在盈利方面的不同策略和趨勢。深入探討後得出結論，對於KKBOX，建議以去中心化技術和自創版權方式降低版權費用，提高音樂人收益和版權管理透明度，同時與微軟合作提升服務品質。對LINE MUSIC，建議透過了解用戶行為降低授權成本，並善用LINE生態系統創造價值。這些建議強調了透過技術創新和成本控制提升收益和服務品質的重要性。KKBOX和LINE MUSIC可以透過成本控制、了解用戶需求和發揮平台價值潛力，實現更佳的盈利模式和競爭力 The global music market revenue hit $26.2 billion in 2023, marking a stark decline from $21 billion in 2000 to $4.6 billion in 2022, a mere quarter of its previous value. Despite this, revenue from music streaming continues to soar steadily. The streaming technology industry encompasses cloud-based services, video streaming, record labels, advertisers, and users. KKBOX swiftly established a significant market share in Taiwan by launching an online music platform early on, while LINE MUSIC entered the streaming music market in 2019, charting distinct paths in value proposition and development, influencing their approaches to value acquisition. Evolving eras have shaped changes in business models and data collection methods within the industry. This study examines KKBOX and LINE MUSIC, exploring their value acquisition, business models, and strategies within the streaming music industry. It scrutinizes their value propositions, transmission, and approaches to value acquisition, particularly focusing on their roles in the multi-sided market. Three key questions are addressed: how these platforms acquire value in multi-sided markets and what sets their interactive models apart. Employing case studies and qualitative research, this study spans seven chapters: defining platforms, their characteristics, a literature review on profitability methods across various platform types, an overview of the streaming music industry, research methodologies, case analyses of KKCompany and LINE MUSIC, using literature to dissect differences in their profit models, concluding with research findings and future directions. The objective is to grasp a comprehensive understanding of diverse profitability strategies and trends within streaming music platforms. Recommendations for KKBOX include harnessing decentralized technology and self-generated copyright to reduce expenses, boost artists' earnings, and improve copyright management transparency, alongside a collaboration with Microsoft to enhance service quality. For LINE MUSIC, suggestions involve understanding user behavior to lower licensing costs and utilizing the LINE ecosystem to create value. These recommendations underscore the pivotal role of technological innovation and cost control in augmenting revenue and service quality. By managing costs, understanding user needs, and maximizing their platform's potential, KKBOX and LINE MUSIC can develop more effective profit models and enhance competitiveness.
Reference:	參考文獻中文參考文獻劉光倫. (2016). 美國線上音樂平台 Conquer Entertainment 之商業模式與迷消費探討 (博士論文). 劉官維. (2015). 獨立音樂是什麼: 獨立音樂認同界線的生產與游移. 簡妙如. (2013). 台灣獨立音樂的生產政治. 在思想 (書名未提供出版者資訊) 中的章節. 林泓宇. (2021). 臺灣獨立音樂因應數位串流影響之研究 (碩士論文). 國立臺灣師範大學音樂學院表演藝術研究所行銷及產業組. 林長誼. (2004). 數位音樂服務之競爭策略分析 (碩士論文). 國立台灣大學商學研究所. 林慶達. (2020). LINE 生態系建構與互補性之個案分析. 羅浩恩. (2019). 年輕族群選擇串流音樂平台之關鍵因素-以 AHP 法分析 (博士論文). Zhuan zhe. 莊于葶. (2014). 串流音樂產業之平台競爭策略：以 KKBOX 為例 (Publication Number 2014年) 國立臺灣大學]. AiritiLibrary. 許媛媜. (2020). 平台生態系中的互補機制與價值創造之個案分析 (碩士論文). 國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA 學位學程). 許牧彦. (2007). 以消费過程为基礎的獲利策略. 管理評論, 19(8), 29-36. 張詒銘. (2011). 從破壞創新觀點論數位音樂市場之競爭策略 (碩士論文). 資訊傳播學系碩士班. 蘇任弘. (2014). 台灣流行音樂產業之數位商業模式探討. 王富生. (2021). 平台商業模式的價值創造與價值獲取：以 Peloton 為例黃建誠. (2016). 臺灣獨立音樂產業結構困境之探討 (博士論文). Live House 的空間演繹─ 以台北市公館地區為例. (2013). 陳威如和余卓軒. (2013). 平台革命: 席捲全球社交, 購物, 遊戲, 媒體的商業模式創新. 商周出版. 楊惠嵐. (2019). 數位影音生態系. 臺灣經濟研究月刊, 42(9), 36-46. 鮑慧文和陳鄭羽. (2017). 階段性平台策略之探究－以線上旅遊平台為例 [The study on platform strategy of online travel agencies]. 觀光與休閒管理期刊, 5, 71-84. https://doi.org/10.6510/jtlm.5(s2).07 賴彥銘, 林珮珺和孫雅彥. (2015). 應用消費價值理論探討旅客選擇郵輪旅遊之因素 (博士論文). 國立成功大學運輸科學系. 潘淑滿. (2022). 質性研究: 理論與應用 (Vol. 43). 心理. 陳仕偉. (2019). 以消费過程為基礎的獲利策略來探討台灣大車隊的平台轉型. 文化內容策進院. (2022). 2022年臺灣文化內容產業調查報告. 網路文章參考文獻大大學院（2019）。LINE MUSIC搶進台灣串流音樂市場，介面設計是關鍵！https://www.smartm.com.tw/Article/35393431cea3 數位時代（2017）讓台灣音樂產業更進步的秘訣：「區塊鏈」技術 https://startuplatte.com/2017/04/01/blockchain-music-application-framework/ 張凱喬（2020）。【數位轉型】什麼是平台？淺談平台經濟模式。https://weilihmen.medium.com/什麼是平台-淺談平台經濟模式-29c27af93574 傅珮晴和蕭閔云（2021）。「蘋果稅」遭重擊！一紙禁令為何讓蘋果市值瞬間蒸發843億美元？。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/65021/apple-in-app-purchase-restrict 盧凌（2019）。點數經濟—KKBOX的會員經營之道。Feversocail發燒互動。https://info.feversocial.com/howto/casestudy-KKBOX-KKPoints-472 台北國際電腦展（2015）。台灣數位音樂的發展趨勢與未來可能。https://tavis.tw/Post?PId=24436 王珈琳(Wang Chia-Lin) (2018) 上海公益創投發展策略之研究 Zeek玩家誌（2020）。春節塞車來點音樂不怕悶！KKBOX支援智慧車機雙系統、還有Android車用模式輕鬆聽。Yahoo新聞。https://autos.yahoo.com.tw/news/春節塞車來點音樂不怕悶-kkbox支援智慧車機雙系統-還有android車用模式輕鬆聽-041909051.html。柯宗鑫（2021）KKBOX Group 更名 KKCompany 布局三大戰線為內容創作者解決科技痛點。Yahoo新聞。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/kkbox-group-更名-KKCOMAPNY -布局三大戰線為內容創作者解決科技痛點-152844454.html Kanter 凱度洞察（2020）。台灣串流音樂市場概況分析（上篇）: 防疫期間居家數位娛樂急速增長https://kantar.com.tw/News_detail.php?nid=70。 INSIDE報導（2021）文化內容消費趨勢調查：Netflix、KKBOX 是串流冠軍！https://www.inside.com.tw/article/23092-taicca-research 葉俐緯（2020）有關串流音樂：一些你該知道的事。TAVIS。https://tavis.tw/Post?PId=26753 楊又肇（2019）KKBOX串流音樂服務移轉至微軟Azure雲端平台預期創造全新音樂服務中華民國著作權協會（2018）。區塊鏈於著作權產業之應用 TAICCA(2021) 台灣文化內容產業調查報告III。文化內容策進院。https://taicca.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/files/2021_流行音樂廣播產業.pdf 高敬原（2022)。LINE MUSIC將於8月停止服務！不到3年就黯然退場，背後有哪些原因？。數位時代https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/69982/line-music-termination-of-service 高敬原（2022)。日本練兵四年，LINE Music 將於7月進軍台灣首推個人化特色。數位時代https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/NYkyKZ 黃慧雯（2021）。LINE MUSIC LIVE 付費直播功能在台上線會員可免費參與。中時新聞網。https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20210505004994-260412?chdtv= 翁竹霆（2016）淺談區塊鏈之著作權保護機制。https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=0&tp=3&i=94&d=7680 陳秉弘(2020) 音樂新世紀：串流20年來如何改變台灣樂壇文化面貌https://www.cna.com.tw/culture/article/20200328w006 英文參考文獻 Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field. The journal of environmental education, 32(4), 8-15. Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making. Academy of management Journal, 35(1), 232-244. Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Strand, R. (2020). Sustainable open innovation to address a grand challenge: Lessons from Carlsberg and the Green Fiber Bottle. British Food Journal, 122(5), 1505-1517. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage AU. Cusumano, M., Yoffie, D., & Gawer, A. (2020). The future of platforms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan Management Review. Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., & Hesterly, W. S. (2018). The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic management journal, 39(12), 3140-3162. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review, 84(10), 92. Evans, D., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European journal of marketing, 45(1/2), 223-240. Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162-174. Holmström, B., & Tirole, J. (1998). Private and public supply of liquidity. Journal of political Economy, 106(1), 1-40. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2024). Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures. Research Policy, 53(1), 104906. Jeon, H. R., & Jung, S. Y. (2010). Introduction of Open Innovation System for Convergent Technology R&D. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 25(1), 23-31. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American economic review, 75(3), 424-440. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994). Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of economic perspectives, 8(2), 133-150. Nowak, R. (2016). When is a discovery? The affective dimensions of discovery in music consumption. Popular Communication, 14(3), 137-145. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2015). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons. Parker, D. J., Burton, R. R., Diongue‐Niang, A., Ellis, R. J., Felton, M., Taylor, C. M., ... & Tompkins, A. M. (2005). The diurnal cycle of the West African monsoon circulation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: A journal of the atmospheric sciences, applied meteorology and physical oceanography, 131(611), 2839-2860. Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 110364114
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110364114
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
411401.pdf		11402Kb	Adobe PDF	0	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback