政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149632

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149632

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51182833 線上人數 : 745

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程） > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/149632

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149632

題名:	探討社會比較、錯失恐懼、創新接受程度對網紅線上課程購買意願與EWOM之影響：以模仿慾望為中介、自我效能為調節 Exploring the Effects of Social Comparison, Fear of Missing Out, and Innovation Acceptance on Purchase Intention and eWOM towards Influencers' Online Courses: The Mediating Role of Mimicry Desire and the Moderating Role of Self-efficacy
作者:	許與安 Hsu, Yu-An
貢獻者:	陳冠儒 Chen, Kuan-Ju 許與安 Hsu, Yu-An
關鍵詞:	網紅線上課程社會比較錯失恐懼創新接受程度模仿慾望自我效能購買意願 eWOM Influencers Online Courses Social Comparison Fear of Missing Out Innovation Acceptance Mimicry Desire Self-Efficacy Purchase Intention eWOM
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2024-02-01 11:34:54 (UTC+8)
摘要:	隨著線上學習風潮的興起，線上課程也成為網紅流量變現、內容變現的重要管道之一，而在眾多學習管道以及線上課程類型中，網紅課程如何從中以自己特殊的定位跟優勢殺出血路，是平台端或網紅端都在面對的課題。故本研究以有在關注網紅或是曾經有在關注網紅的族群為對象，探討社會比較、錯失恐懼、創新接受程度對於網紅線上課程的購買意願與eWOM的影響，亦會針對模仿慾望的中介效果及自我效能的調節效果進行探究。本研究採用線上發放問卷的方式進行，最終回收323份有效問卷。研究結果顯示，錯失恐懼、創新接受程度對於網紅線上課程的eWOM具顯著影響，且模仿慾望在社會比較、錯失恐懼、創新接受程度對於網紅線上課程的購買意願與eWOM之影響上存在中介效果，而自我效能則會調節社會比較、錯失恐懼、創新接受程度經由模仿慾望對網紅線上課程的購買意願產生的間接效果。本研究成果的貢獻在於，平台或網紅在行銷課程時，可以鎖定具有較高創新接受程度的族群或是塑造錯失恐懼的心理情境，便有機會在eWOM層面達到更好的效果，而網紅若欲推課程，除了以自身專業打造高品質課程外，也可以善用人們模仿慾望的心理情境，形塑讓人憧憬且易被複製的成功形象或模式，並多分享學員的成功案例與經驗，使成功可期以刺激模仿慾望，有望提升購買意願與eWOM。 With the rise of online learning trends, online courses have also become one of the diverse channels for influencers to make profits. Among the many learning channels and types of online courses, how can influencers leverage their unique positioning and advantages to win the game of online courses? This is a problem that both the platform end and the influencers end are facing. This research focuses on consumers who are following influencers, and explores the effects of social comparison, fear of missing out, and innovation acceptance on their purchase intention and eWOM towards influencers' online courses. In addition, the mediating role of mimicry desire and the moderating role of self-efficacy are also explored. The research collected a total of 323 valid responses through an online survey. The research results show that fear of missing out and innovation acceptance have significant impact on the eWOM of influencers’ online courses. The mimicry desire has a mediating effect on the influence of social comparison, fear of missing out, and innovation acceptance on the purchase intention and eWOM of influencers’ online courses. At the same time, self-efficacy moderates the effects of social comparison, fear of missing out, and innovation acceptance on purchase intention of influencers’ online courses through mimicry desire. The contribution of this study lies in the fact that when marketing courses, both platforms and influencers can target groups with a high degree of innovation acceptance or create a psychological situation of fear of missing out, which will have the opportunity to achieve better results at the eWOM level. If influencers want to promote online courses, in addition to creating high-quality courses based on their own specialties, they can also make good use of the psychological situation of consumers’ mimicry desire by shaping a successful image or model, which is aspirational and easy to be copied, and sharing more successful cases and experiences. By doing so, success can be expected by stimulating consumers’ mimicry desire to increase their purchase intention and eWOM.
參考文獻:	英文文獻 Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. UK: Emerald. Andrew K. Przybylski, Kou Murayama, Cody R. DeHaan, Valerie Gladwell, Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out, Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 2013, Pages 1841-1848. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Baturay, M. H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497– 529. Cantallops, A. S., & Salvi, F. (2014). New consumer behavior: A review of research on eWOM and hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 41-51. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1238. Das, G. (2014). Linkages of retailer personality, perceived quality and purchase intention with retailer loyalty: A study of Indian non-food retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(3), 407-414. Dinh, T.C.T. and Lee, Y. (2022), "“I want to be as trendy as influencers” – how “fear of missing out” leads to buying intention for products endorsed by social media influencers", Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 346- 364. 67 Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends’’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47-55. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public relations review, 37(1), 90-92. Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., & Marticotte, F. (2010). e‐WOM Scale: word‐of‐ mouth measurement scale for e‐services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 27(1), 5-23. Gueguen, N., Jacob, C., & Martin, A. (2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect on human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 253–259. Hogg, M. K., Bruce, M., & Hough, K. (1999). Female images in advertising: the implications of social comparison for marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 18(4), 445–473. doi:10.1080/02650487.1999.11104 Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K. & Cook, C. D. (1997). Scale for the measurement of innovativeness, Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65. Johns, N. (2021, Mar 22). They’re small but mighty: Why the nano-influencer is the surest bet for brands in 2021. Footwear News : FN (Online). JWT (2011). Fear of Missing Out (FOMO). JWT (2012). Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), March 2012. 68 Ki, C-W‘C’, Kim, Y-K. The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychol Mark. 2019; 36: 905– 922 Landsverk, K. H. (2014). The Instagram Handbook: 2014 Edition. PrimeHead Limited. Libai, B., Bolton, R., Bügel, M. S., De Ruyter, K., Götz, O., Risselada, H., & Stephen, A. T. (2010). Customerto-customer interactions: Broadening the scope of word of mouth research. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 267–282. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 McGinnis, P. J. (2004). Social theory at HBS: McGinnis’ two FOs., Harbus. Mcleod, S. (2020, December 29). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Simply Psychology. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement, International Journal of Electronic Commerce , 11, 125-148. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848 Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovativeness, New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusions of innovations, (3rd ed.). NewYork: The Free Press.69 Ruvio, A., Gavish, Y., & Shoham, A. (2013). Consumer’s doppelganger: A role model perspective on intentional consumer mimicry. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(1), 60–69. Schiffman, L .G. & L. L. Kanuk, (2000).“Consumer Behavior”, Upper Saddle River. Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product- Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. Schwarze, R., & Born, A. (1997). Optimistic Self-Beliefs: Assessment of General Perceived Self-Efficacy in Thirteen Cultures. World Psychology, 3(1–2), 190. Valkenburg P. M., Peter J., Walther J. Media Effects: Theory and Research [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2015, 67(1): 315 – 338. Vodák, J., Novysedlák, M., Čakanová, L., & Pekár, M. (2019). Who is influencer and how to choose the right one to improve brand reputation? Managing Global Transitions, 17(2), 149-162,190. Wang, P., Huang, Q., & Davison, R. M. (2021). How do digital influencers affect social commerce intention? the roles of social power and satisfaction. Information Technology & People, 34(3), 1065-1086. Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231. Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teacher’s sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91. Wortham, J. (2011). How Social Media Can Induce Feelings of ‘Missing Out’. 70 中文文獻林以正(1999)。華人的社會比較:比較什麼?與誰比較?為何比較?。本土心理學研究，(11)，93-125。  郭子菱譯(2019)。《那個為什麼會熱賣:商品與資訊氾濫的時代, 如何利用「框架攻略法」讓消費者「衝動購買」》。遠流出版張海良(2020)。《行銷就需要一些梗:一眼看穿消費者內心》。清文華泉。陳映璇(2021). 未來教育大變革?線上教學席捲全球，大學校時代來了! 黃希庭(民 87)。人格心理學。台北市，東華。 楊運秀、郭芳伃 (2017)。網紅業配文的說服效果: 懷疑人格，熟悉度及專業性的影響。行銷管理評論, 14(2)，163-189。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 110363007
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110363007
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
300701.pdf		3252Kb	Adobe PDF	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋