English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51715425      Online Users : 643
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/149565
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149565


    Title: 國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究
    A Study on the Relationship among the Principals’ Distributed Leadership, Teachers’ Professional Development, and School Effectiveness in Elementary School
    Authors: 周竹一
    CHOU, CHOU-I
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    Chin, Meng-Chun
    周竹一
    CHOU, CHOU-I
    Keywords: 校長分布式領導
    教師專業發展
    學校效能
    Distributed leadership
    Teacher professional development
    School effectiveness
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2024-02-01 11:18:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之現況分析,不同背景變項對校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能之差異情形,並研究三者間之相關分析及校長分布式領導與教師專業發展對學校效能之預測影響程度,最後分析校長分布式領導透過教師專業發展對學校效能之中介效果。
    本研究採調查研究法,共計抽樣69所學校,以新北市國民小學教師為研究對象,發出748份問卷,回收705份問卷,回收率達94.25 %。資料處理分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析及結構方程式之中介效果進行分析。本研究主要研究發現如下:
    一、教師知覺校長分布式領導為中高程度,以「提升教師領導能量」之知覺程度為最高,「掌握變革時機」之知覺程度為最低。
    二、教師知覺教師專業發展為中高程度,以「職場素養」之知覺為最高,「教育專業」之知覺為最低。
    三、教師知覺學校效能為中高程度,以「教學效能」之表現為最高,「學習成效」的表現為最低。
    四、教師因性別、擔任職務及學校規模之不同,在知覺校長分布式領導上有顯著差異。
    五、教師因擔任職務及學校規模之不同,在知覺教師專業發展上有顯著差異。
    六、教師因擔任職務及學校規模之不同,在知覺學校效能上有顯著差異。
    七、校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能整體及各層面,彼此之間具有顯著正相關。
    八、校長分布式領導與教師專業發展對教師教學效能具有顯著預測程度。
    九、校長分布式領導能透過教師專業發展之中介變項間接影響學校效能。
    本研究依據以上結論,分別提供教育行政機關、各級學校校長、教師、教育人員及未來後續研究作參考。
    This research aims to understand the current status of the relationship between distributed leadership of elementary school principals, teacher professional development, and school effectiveness. It also analyzes the differences in principal distributed leadership, teacher professional development, and school effectiveness based on different background variables. Furthermore, the study explores the correlation between these three factors and examines the predictive impact of principal distributed leadership and teacher professional development on school effectiveness. Finally, it analyzes the mediating effect of principal distributed leadership on school effectiveness through teacher professional development.
    The research adopts a survey research method, sampling a total of 69 schools in New Taipei City, with teachers from primary schools as the subjects. A total of 748 questionnaires were distributed, and 705 were collected, achieving a response rate of 94.25%. Data analysis includes descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, multiple stepwise regression analysis, and structural equation modeling for the mediating effect.

    The main findings of this study are as follows:
    1.Teachers perceive principal distributed leadership at a moderate to high level, with the highest perception in "enhancing teacher leadership capacity" and the lowest in "seizing the opportunity for change."
    2.Teachers perceive teacher professional development at a moderate to high level, with the highest perception in "workplace literacy" and the lowest in "educational professionalism."
    3.Teachers perceive school effectiveness at a moderate to high level, with the highest performance in "teaching effectiveness" and the lowest in "learning outcomes."
    4.There are significant differences in teachers' perception of principal distributed leadership based on gender, job position, and school size.
    5.There are significant differences in teachers' perception of teacher professional development based on job position and school size.
    6.There are significant differences in teachers' perception of school effectiveness based on job position and school size.
    7.Principal distributed leadership, teacher professional development, and school effectiveness are positively correlated.
    8.Principal distributed leadership and teacher professional development significantly predict teacher instructional effectiveness.
    9.Principal distributed leadership can indirectly influence school effectiveness through the mediating variable of teacher professional development.

    Based on these conclusions, the study provides recommendations for educational administrative agencies, school principals at all levels, teachers, education personnel, and future research directions.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    丁文祺(2008)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/97n464。
    丁雪華、徐超聖(2010)。臺北縣國小教師同儕課程領導與專業發展之相關研究。教育科學期刊,9(2),1-29。
    王昭人(2011)。臺北市國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6j7hx7。
    王秋敏(2018)。臺北市優質學校專業發展指標認同度與教師專業發展關係之研究﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3q8tu6。
    王政暘(2017)。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導、兼任行政教師情緒勞務與組織公民行為關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jh82a2。
    王素貞(2014)。國民小學校長道德領導、教師工作投入與學校效能之研究﹝博士論文。國立暨南國際大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sedn67。
    王連生(2002)。教育人類學-理論與應用。臺北:五南。
    朱正雄、林俊瑩(2011)。追求卓越精進的動力來源─學前教師參與專業成長活動的影響機制。臺北市立教育大學學報,42 ( 1 ),125-156。
    朱經明 (2022) 。教育及心理統計學。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    江俊儀(2021)。國民中學校長學習領導、學校社會資本與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j3326w。
    何嘉惠(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究﹝博士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。htps://hdl.handle.net/11296/scq25d。
    吳卓容(2017)。教師自我調節能力、自我效能、社會支持 對教師專業發展之影響﹝博士論文。國立彰化師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rza3d8。
    吳昌諭(2016)。竹苗區國民中學校長願景領導、學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c6c4u8。
    吳勁甫(2018)。校長正向領導,教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊,2,1-32。
    吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
    吳清山(2002)。學校效能研究(二版)。臺北市:五南。
    吳清山、林天祐(2003)。創新經營。教育資料與研究,53,134-135。
    吳清山、林天祐(2011)。協作領導。教育研究月刊,210,117-118。
    吳清山(2012)。教育幸福的理念與實踐策略。教育研究月刊,220,4-15。
    吳清山、林天祐(2014)。教育U辭書。高等教育出版。
    吳煥烘(2004)。學校行政領導理論與實務。臺北市:五南
    李奉儒(2006)。國中小學教師評鑑機制規劃之芻議:英國的經驗與啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,2(3),193-216。
    李奕芸(2018)。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9nkbv8。
    李建南(2021)。臺北市國民小學校長學習領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qj54js。
    李重毅(2012)。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9jhts8。
    李俊毅(2018)。公立高中職校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與教師專業發展相關之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z58528。
    李晏禎(2017)。高雄市國民中學校長分布式領導、 教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/99c2w9。
    李菁菁(2014)。高級中學校長正向領導、教師職場希望感與學校效能之相關研究﹝博士論文。國立臺南大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m475am。
    呂紹弘(2020)。國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究﹝ 博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c9rpzm。
    周美慧(2014)。校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能之研究﹝博士論文。國立暨南國際大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gz4suh。
    周淑卿(2003)。教師敘事與當代教師專業的開展。教育資料集刊,28,407-420。
    周崇儒(2008)。國民中小學校務評鑑專業內涵建構之研究﹝博士論文。臺北市立教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fp394t。
    周麗修(2016)。高級中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展 與教師創新教學關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jw73zf。
    林天祐(2009)。學校特色發展的概念與理論。臺北教育,111,18-27。
    林志成(2009)。教師專業發展與評鑑之省思與前瞻。教育研究月刊,178,47-57。
    林忠仁(2010)。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n2p24x。
    林明地、連俊智(2013)。國小學校長領導動力及其學校效能的差異分析。教育研究集刊,59 ( 4 ),1-45。
    林奕成(2018)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立中正大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x67v4q。
    林海清(2003)。教育視導與專業發展。高雄市:麗文。
    林浩銘(2016)。新竹縣國民小學校長學習領導、教師專業發展與教師教學效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/86yvm6。
    邱馨儀(2006)。國民小學教師知識管理教學檔案管理與教師專業發展關係之研究﹝未出版之博士論文﹞。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    侯世昌(2002)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wqqpbq。
    胡士雄(2016)。越南胡志明市高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/42gdjt。
    洪毓澤(2016)。國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業社群學習與教師教學效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d5q583。
    洪碧梅(2016)。國民小學校長分布式領導、組織信任與教師工作滿意度關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v4992b。
    姚麗英(2019)。高中校長道德領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w6bk2y。
    徐吉春(2014)。分散式領導理論內涵之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺南大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ch38tr。
    袁亭雅(2020)。校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之後設分析﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pf74qu。
    袁建銘(2017)。高雄市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/64qcq8。
    秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
    秦夢群(2013)。教育領導理論與應用(二版)。臺北市:五南。
    秦夢群(2017)。教育行政理論與模式(三版)。臺北市:五南。
    秦夢群(2019)。教育領導理論與應用(三版)。臺北市:五南。
    馬曉蓁(2013)。新北市國民小學校長分布式領導與學校創新經營關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mqck82。
    莊清寶(2011)。學校本位財務管理、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究:以國中小特色學校為例﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4fs722。
    教育部部史(n.d.)。教育大事紀。https://history.moe.gov.tw/Memorabilia。
    教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
    教育部(2016)。中華民國教師專業標準指引。http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/公告/教師專業標準指引105-2-15(1050018 281函).pdf。
    教育部(2016)。中華民國教師專業表現指標。
    教育部(2022)。中華民國教育統計,111。臺北市:教育部。
    張本文(2011)。論教師領導對教師專業發展之影響。學校行政,75,21-36。
    張明輝(2001)。發展趨勢。載於吳清基(主編)。學校行政新論,501-532。北市:師大書苑。
    張奕財(2018)。智慧學校校長科技領導、教師專業發展與創新經營效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/75432b。
    張奕華(1997)。國民小學組織學習與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立台中師範學院﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/papjy6。
    張奕華(2009)。分散式領導、教師學術樂觀與學生學習成就關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC-98-2410-H-004-011)。
    張奕華、蔡瑞倫(2010)。國民中學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,65,33-53。https://doi.org/10.6423/hhhc.201001.0033。
    張奕華、顏弘欽(2012)。學校分散式領導構面之探究分析: 領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育理論與實踐學刊,25 ( 2 ),225-254。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201212.0225。
    張素花(2012)。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師情緒勞務對教師教學效能影響之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yrfxpt。
    張國保(2003)。私立大學董事會組織運作與職權效能之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/22w6hd。
    張新仁、邱上真、王瓊珠(2008)。中小學教師評鑑標準之理論與研究基礎。載於潘慧玲(主編),教師評鑑理論與實務,20-50。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
    張德銳(1996)。國小教師成績考核系統之研究。教育研究資訊,4 ( 5 ),89-99。
    張德銳(2006)。中小學優良教師專業發展歷程及教學經驗之研究。國立教育資料館。
    張慶勳(2000)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。高雄市:復文。
    康燕玉(2011)。臺北市國民小學校長知識領導與教師專業發展之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pv7mzu。
    許聰顯(2014)。國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織公民行為之關係﹝博士論文 。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/twq65t。
    陳世栓(2021)。臺中市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6x5vm。
    陳怡君(2013)。國民小學校長知識領導、教師專業學習社群、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fj5f98。
    陳佳雯(2020)。臺北市國民小學教師知覺校長分布式領導、學校組織氣氛與學校組織執行力關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2qe9uf。
    陳欣暐(2021)。桃園市國民小學組織溝通與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nvx34y。
    陳亭燏(2009)。校長教學視導、教師知識分享與教師專業發展關係之研究-以屏東縣國民小學為例﹝碩士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g66u8f。
    陳建志(2013)。國民小學組織內部行銷、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r85mb2。
    陳姵臻(2016)。新北市國民小學學校分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究 ﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2b4apv。
    陳昭蓉(2021)。國民小學校長靈性領導與學校效能關係之研究-以組織文化、教師幸福感為中介變項﹝博士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3me987。
    陳國清(2012)。宜蘭縣國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究 ﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ehjnck。
    陳維寧(2011)。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究~以原高雄市為例﹝碩士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/64ck23。
    陳慧儒(2017)。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究 ﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yjrx9a。
    陳麗捐(2012)。校長分布式領導對組織健康影響之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hh7net。
    游焜智(2017)。國民小學內部行銷、教師工作投入 與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3j4925。
    傅木龍(1998)。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對我國之啟示﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/amdeuc。
    彭慧婷(2011)。國民小學教師專業發展評鑑與教師專業成長關係之研究 ﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8ufepj。
    黃千盈(2021)。國民小學校長正向領導、教師工作士氣與學校效能關係之研究:以澎湖縣及新北市為例﹝博士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gy98c5。
    黃丞傑(2020)。臺灣地區公立國民小學校長正向領導、教師專業社群文化與教學效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9ha89z。
    黃芳銘 (2015)。 結構方程模式-理論與應用。 台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    黃建翔、吳清山(2013)。提升教師專業學習社群之可行策略研究:「資料導向決定」觀點。教育研究學報,47 ( 1 ),39-58。
    黃政傑(1996)。從課程的角度看教師專業發展。教師天地,83,13-17。
    黃國城(2012)。桃園縣國民小學教師專業社群、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立新竹教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/492cdp。
    黃國政(2015)。新北市國民小學校長分布式領導、教師工作壓力與學校創新經營效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zygmk9。
    黃敏榮(2013)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞ 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yfh9k9。
    黄崴 (2001)。後現代主義教育管理思想解析。教育理論與實踐,21 ( 7 ),18-20。
    黃鼎強(2011)。高雄市國民中學校長分布式領導與學校效能之相關研究 ﹝碩士論文。臺北市立教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tzx43h。
    馮佳怡(2020)。國中校長空間領導、教師工作滿意度與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9867ze。
    程煒庭(2021)。校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能之關係研究-後設分析與結構方程模式之應用﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3759xu。
    楊昊韋(2017)。臺北市公立國中校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wxuvf5。
    楊念湘(2011)。國民小學校長混合教練、師傅教導與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p393f3。
    楊茵茵(2021)。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、教育設施品質與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5mxb4n。
    楊雅婷(2020)。高級中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/79d4tk。
    楊詠翔(2013)。國民小學校長知識領導、教師專業發展與學校智慧資本關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dnjdwx。
    楊慶麟(2001)。學校本位教師分級制度可行評估之研究-以國民小學為例﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k5a5cv。
    甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務-解構與重建。台北:高等教育。
    蔡來淑(2015)。校長分布式領導、團隊信任對學校效能影響之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u637x2。
    蔡炳坤(2006)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/25ug9q。
    蔡玲玲(2013)。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9n6b8m。
    蔡培村(1985)。台灣地區國民中小學學校組織行為之比較研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/95csqg。
    蔡培村(1995)。成人教育與生涯發展。麗文文化。
    蔡惠淑(2017)。國民小學校長道德領導行為、學校創新、組織溝通與學校效能徑路模式之建構與驗證﹝博士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pu2yp7。
    蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6zw9d。
    蔡碧璉(1993)。國民中學教師專業成長與其形象知覺之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ngt7xx。
    劉乙儀(2017)。幼兒園園長分布式領導、教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究-以中彰投地區為例﹝博士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/69bbvn。
    劉幼玲(2010)。學業樂觀的引入及對我國教育的啟示。基礎教育,7 ( 9 ),59-62。
    劉侑承(2013)。桃園縣國民小學校長空間領導與學校效能相關之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yn3vqn。
    劉姿君(2016)。大臺北地區國民小學分布式領導對教育成效影響之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/39r2pt。
    劉耘汝(2020)。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8474yg。
    潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊,43,77-102。
    潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7 ( 5 ),138-153。
    潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、陳淑敏、蔡濱如(2004)。國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之發展。教育研究資訊,12 ( 4 ),129-168。
    潘慧玲(2006)。教育效能與教育革新。載於謝文全(主編),教育行政學-理論與案例,471-495。臺北市:五南。
    潘慧玲(2006)。彰權益能評鑑之探析。當代教育研究,14 ( 1 ),1-24。
    潘慧玲、張德銳、張新仁(2007,10月)。臺灣中小學教師評鑑標準之建構。[論文發表] 2007東亞教育評鑑論壇,臺北市。
    鄭卉玶(2012)。國民小學分布式領導對教師賦權增能影響之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2sng58。
    鄭旭宏(2022)。臺北市公立國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ex7z4c。
    鄭詩釧(2005)。國民中小學組織文化與教師專業發展關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ttzdc4。
    鄭載德(2016)。臺北市國民中學校長學習領導、教師專業發展及學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/43kxwq。
    鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理:發展的機制。臺北市:心理。
    鄧宇君(2020)。屏東縣國民小學教師專業發展、創新教學與幸福感關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立屏東大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/m7ws38。
    歐用生(1996)。敎師專業成長。臺北市:師大書苑。
    賴志峰(2008)。分佈式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。
    賴志峰(2010)。分布式領導的研究成果分析。教育研究月刊,201,75-86。
    賴志峰、秦夢群(2014)。國民中、小學分布式領導層面之建構與驗證。中正教育研究,13 ( 2 ),29-70。https://doi.org/10.3966/168395522014121302002。
    賴協志(2008)。國民小學校長知識領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。臺北市立教育大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/avwrt5。
    賴連功(2018)。國小校長學習領導、學校組織學習與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2b4d7s。
    謝文全(2014)。分布式領導:一種新的領導理念。管理評論,33(3),1-16。
    謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。
    謝傳崇、陳愛玲(2015)。國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,98,1-22。
    薛雅玲(2016)。高雄市國小校長分布式領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/68g6f4。
    鍾玉枝(2019)。高雄市國小教師專業發展學習動機與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立屏東大學﹞ https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z5pw4s。
    鍾佳容(2013)。屏東縣國民中學校長分布式領導、創新經營、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立屏東教育大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/22972n。
    鍾德馨(2020)。臺北市國民小學校長正向領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究﹝博士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3wrv67。
    聯合國教科文組織(1996)。教育—財富蘊藏其中。北京:教育科學出版社。
    魏文佑(2021)。臺北市國民小學校長素養導向領導與學校效能關係之研究﹝碩士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x8x3k8。
    羅昌龍(2018)。臺北市國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與教師組織公民行為關係之研究﹝博士論文﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/92x34h。
    羅清水(1999)。教師專業發展的另一途徑:談教師評鑑制度的建立。研習資訊,16(1),1-10。
    蘇栯安(2021)。智慧學校推動、資料導向決策與教師專業發展關係之研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d593dy。
    嚴麗華、王壘 (2003)。何為分佈式領導。中國人力資源開發,( 8 ),54-55。
    龔祐祿(2018)。國小校長學習領導、教師專業發展與學習型學校關係之研究﹝博士論文。臺北市立大學﹞。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3h68kf。

    貳、英文部分
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
    Airasian, P. W., Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Pedulla, J. J. (1977). Proportion and direction of teacher rating changes of pupils' progress attributable to standardized test information. Journal of educational Psychology, 69(6), 702.
    Averch, H. A. (1974). How effective is schooling?: A critical review of research.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.
    Barberio, E. (1991). Organizational effectiveness, student alienation, and the high school teacher's perceived sense of academic freedom.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi delta kappan, 82(6), 443-449.
    Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., Wise, C., & Woods, P. (2003). Distributed leadership:Summary report. Retrieved from http://ema.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/4/439.
    Birnbaum, R., Bensimon, E. M., & Neumann, A. (1989). Leadership in higher education: A multi-dimensional approach to research. The Review of Higher Education, 12(2), 101-105.
    Bolam, R. (2004). Reflections on the NCSL from a historical perspective.Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(3), 251-267.
    Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International journal of management reviews, 13(3), 251-269.
    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
    Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205-229.
    Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models (Vol.154). Sage.
    Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations.London: Sage.
    Burstein, (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. In Review of Research in Education.
    Bush, T. (2003). Concepts and Evidence in Educational Leadership and Management. Educational Management & Administration, 31(3), 227-230.
    Chapman, J. (1993). Leadership, management and “the effectiveness of schooling”:A response to Mr Gradgrind. Journal of Educational Administration.
    Cheong Cheng, Y. (1996). Total teacher effectiveness: new conception and improvement. International journal of educational management, 10(6), 7-17.
    Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
    Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. F., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M.,Weifeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
    Corrigan, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: rhetoric or reality?. Journal of higher education policy and management, 35(1), 66-71.
    Cox, J. (2019). Characteristics of a 21st-century teacher.
    Creemers, B.P.M., Kyriakides, L., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. Educational Research and Evaluation,16(4), 257-262.
    Creemers, B. P., Kyriakides, L., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. Routledge.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
    Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational researcher, 27(1), 5-15.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development.
    Darrow, A. A. (2016). The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) What It Means for Students With Disabilities and Music Educators. General Music Today, 30(1),41-44.
    Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857-880.
    DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
    Duke, D. L. (1990). Developing teacher evaluation systems that promote professional growth. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 131-44.
    Edmonds. R. R. (1979a). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24.
    Edmonds. R. R. (1979b). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9(2),28-32.
    Edmonds. R. R. (1981). Making public schools effective. Social Policy, 12, 56-60.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
    Fraser, W. J., & Maguvhe, M. O. (2008). Teaching life sciences to blind and visually impaired learners. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 84-89.
    Frederick, J. M. (1987). Measuring school effectiveness: Guidelines for educational practitioners.
    Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation.Greenwood Publishing Group.
    Frost, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda.Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479-498.
    Fullan, M. (2002). Principals as leaders in a culture of change. Educational leadership, 59(8), 16-21.
    Fullan, M. (2007). Change theory as a force for school improvement (pp. 27-39).Springer Netherlands.
    Georgopoulos, B. S., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American sociological review, 22(5), 534-540.
    Gibb, J. R., Platts, G. N., & Miller, L. F. (1951). Dynamics of participative groups.St. Louis, MO: John S. Swift.
    Goals 2000: Educate America Act . Retieved from http://www.tecweb.org/eddevel/telecon/ de99.html.
    Griffith, D. E.,Hemphill, J. K.,Frederiksen, N.(1967).Administrative performance and personality.NY:Columbia University.
    Griffith, J. (2003). Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 29-47.
    Grint, K. (2005). Leadership: Limits and possibilities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architect for leadership.Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
    Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The leadership quarterly, 13(4), 423-451.
    Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration, 653-696.
    Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
    Hair, A., & Anderson, R. (1998). Tatham, and Black, 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, USA.
    Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
    Hammershaimb, L. (2018). Distributed leadership in education. Journal of Online Higher Education, 2(1), 1-5.
    Hardy, I. (2012). The politics of teacher professional development: Policy, research and practice. Routledge.
    Hargreaves, D. H. (1972). Interpersonal relations and education Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. G. (1992). Understanding teacher development.Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
    Hargreaves, A., & Macmillan, R. (1995). The balkanization of secondary school teaching. The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school, 141-171.
    Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2002). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In Teachers' professional lives (pp. 9-35). Routledge.
    Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological review, 102(3), 458.
    Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In effective leadership for school improvement( pp.72-83). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
    Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201-219.
    Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188.
    Harris, A. (Ed.) (2009). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7 ):Springer Science & Business Media.
    Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press.
    HayGroup. (2004). The five pillars of distributed leadership in schools.Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. UK: NCSL.
    Herrera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives from principals and teachers. Western Michigan University.
    Hiller, N.J. (2002), Understanding and measuring shared leadership in work teams.University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from:http://www.ccl.org/leadership/pdf/community/CCL_kenclark_hiller.pdf
    Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal's time use and school effectiveness. American journal of education, 116(4), 491-523.
    Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research,and practice. Random House Trade.
    Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2006). Educational administration: Theory, research,and practice (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). School effectiveness. Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 299-308.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, V. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013-1034.
    Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers' organizational commitment: a study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1745-1784.
    Kangas, J., Venninen, T., & Ojala, M. (2016). Distributed leadership as administrative practice in Finnish early childhood education and care.Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 617-631.
    Kanika (2016). Teachers’accountability: Key to quality education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education & Technology, 3(1), 53-54.
    Kearsley, G. (2010). Andragogy (M. Knowles). The theory into practice database.
    Kitchener, R. F. (1996). The nature of the social for Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 243-249.
    Knowles, M. S. (1984). Theory of andragogy.
    Knowles, M. S., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
    Knowles, M., Holton III, E., & Swanson, R. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development [Kindle for Mac version].
    Kramarski, B., & Revach, T. (2009). The challenge of self-regulated learning in mathematics teachers' professional training. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 379-399.
    Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1998, April). Distributed leadership and student engagement in school. Persented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Associations, San Diego, CA.
    Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice.
    Lovell, C. W. (2009). Principal efficacy: An investigation of school principals' sense of efficacy and indicators of school effectiveness.
    Lucia, R. T. (2004). Distributed leadership: An exploratory study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
    MacKinnon, D. (2012). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Routledge.
    Magulod Jr, G. C. (2017). Factors of school effectiveness and performance of selected public and private elementary schools: implications on educational planning in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 73-83.
    Mardia, K. V., & Foster, K. (1983). Omnibus tests of multinormality based on skewness and kurtosis. Communications in Statistics-theory and ethods, 12(2),207-221.
    Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of personality.
    Mayo, P. (1997). Paulo Freire 1921-1997.
    McCann, J. (2004). Organizational effectiveness: Changing concepts for changing environments. People and Strategy, 27(1), 42.
    McDonald, A. L. (1993). Comparisons of the perceptions of parents and elementary principals on the components of an effective school. Wayne State University.
    McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64.
    Moe, T. M. (2005). Power and political institutions. Perspectives on politics, 3(2),215-233.
    Morley, L., & Rassool, N. (2000). School effectiveness: New managerialism,quality and the Japanization of education. Journal of Education Policy, 15(2),169-183.
    Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Improvement through empowerment. School Leadership & Management, 31 (4), 437-449.
    Muijs, D. (2006). New directions for school effectiveness research: Towards school effectiveness without schools. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 141-160.
    Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., & Johnson, J. F. (1985). The salience of item-levelfeedback: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 709-715.
    National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE) . (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author.
    National Board for Professional Teaching Standard ( NBPTS) . (1989). What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org No Child Left Behind Act, NCLB. (2001). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
    Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory.
    O'Connell, P. K. (2014). A simplified framework for 21st century leader development. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 183-203.
    OECD (2009). Education at a glance. Author.https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/43636332.pdf
    Otto, B. (2010). How can motivated self-regulated learning be improved? In A.Mourad & J. de la Fuente Arias (Eds.), International perspectives on applying self-regulated learning in different settings. Frankfurt am Main: Lang (inpress).
    Owens, D. A., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Strategic formation of groups:Issues in task performance and team member selection. Research on managing groups and teams, 1(1998), 149-65.
    Parkay, F. W., Stanford, B. H., & Gougeon, T. D. (2010). Becoming a teacher (pp.432-462). Pearson/Merrill.
    Peterson, K. D., & Peterson, C. A. (Eds.). (2005). Effective teacher evaluation: A guide for principals. Corwin Press.
    Petrie, K., & McGee, C. (2012). Teacher professional development: Who is the learner?. Australian journal of Teacher education, 37(2), 59-72.
    Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in motivation and achievement, 6, 117-160.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. Student perceptions in the classroom, 7(1), 149-183.
    Purkey, S. C., & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 427-452.
    Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge.
    Reeves, P. L. (2004). Increasing organization capacity: A systems approach utilizing transformational and distributed leadership practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Michigan.
    Reid, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school: the problems and some solutions. Basil Blackwell.
    Reynolds, C. R. (1985). Forward and backward memory span should not be combined for clinical analysis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1(1), 85-96.
    Rhodes, C., Nevill, A., & Allan, J. (2004). Valuing and supporting teachers: A survey of teacher satisfaction, dissatisfaction, morale and retention in an English local education authority. Research in education, 71(1), 67-80.
    Robb, L. (2000). Redefining Staff Development: A Collaborative Model for Teachers and Administrators. Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
    Robbins, S. P. (1997). Managing today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Roberson Jr, D. N., & Merriam, S. B. (2005). The self-directed learning process of older, rural adults. Adult education quarterly, 55(4), 269-287.
    Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2),241-256.
    Rogus, J. F. (1983). Building an effective staff development program: A principal's checklist. NASSP Bulletin, 67(461), 8-16.
    Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Harvard University Press.
    Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2011). Effective schools, equity and teacher efficacy:A review of the literature. Profesorado, revista de curriculum y formacion del profesorado, 15 (3), 9-26.
    Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. (1989). Conceptualizing school effectiveness.International journal of educational research, 13 (7), 691-706.
    Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School effectiveness and school improvement, 1(1), 61-80.
    Scheffé, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance.Biometrika, 40(1-2), 87-110.
    Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
    Sergiovanni, T. J.(1995). The principalship: A reflective practive perspective.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (2009). The principalship : A reflective practice perspective (6th ed.). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Seyfarth, J. T. (1991) Personnel Management for Effective Schools. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
    Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57 (1), 1-23.
    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312.
    Spillane, J., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76 (1), 1-17.
    Spillane, J., Halverson, R., Diamond, J. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36 (1), 3-34.
    Spiliane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143-150.
    Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Spillane, J. P. (2012). Distributed leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
    Standerfer, L. (2006). Before NCLB: The History of ESEA. Principal Leadership, 6(8), 26-27.
    Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1994). School effectiveness and school improvement: Voices from the field. School effectiveness and school improvement, 5 (2), 149-177.
    Sudman, S. (1976). Sample surveys. Annual Review of sociology, 2(1), 107-120.
    Sun, A., & Xia, J. (2018). Teacher-perceived distributed leadership, teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: A multilevel SEM approach using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86-97.
    Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703-729.
    Tannebaum, R. P. (2016). Cooperating teachers’ impact on preservice social studies teachers’ autonomous practices: A multi-case study. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(2), 97-107.
    Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79,111-123.
    Travers, R. M., & American Educational Research Association. (1973). Second handbook of research on teaching: A project of the American Educational Research Association.
    Trent, J. (2012). Teacher professional development through a school-university partnership: what role does teacher identity play?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7).
    UNESCO(1996). Learning: The treasure within Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century,UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001095/109590eo.pdf.
    Unicef. (2000). Defining Quality in Education: A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education. Florence:UNICEF, 6.
    United States. National Education Goals Panel. (1996). The National Education Goals Report. National Education Goals Panel.
    Van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 255-273.
    Vinovskis, W. (2009). From a nation at risk to no child left behind: National education goals and the creation of federal education policy. New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
    Wasley, P., Hampel, R., & Clark, R. (1997). The puzzle of whole-school change. The Phi Delta Kappan, 78(9), 690-697.
    West Chester University. (2004). An introduction to distributed leadership.Retrieved Nov 5, 2015, from http://www.wcupa.edu/_information/Distlead.htm
    Williams, J. M. (1985). A Study of Professional Development Practices of Part-Time Instructors at Selected League for Innovation Community Colleges. A League Report.
    Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of applied psychology, 71(2), 219.
    Wood, M. S. (2005). Determinants of shared leadership in management teams.International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 64-85.
    Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Longman.
    Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation. Alternative approaches and practical guidelines, 2, 42-47.
    Wu, R. T. (2005). Relationship between Teachers' Teaching Effectiveness and School Effectiveness in Comprehensive High Schools in Taiwan, Republic of China. Online Submission.
    Young, D. J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(4), 386-418.
    Yukl, G. A. (2009). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). NJ: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
    Zepeda, S. J. (1999). Staff development: Practices that promote leadership in learning communities. Eye on Education.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    109152509
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109152509
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    250901.pdf10943KbAdobe PDF3View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback