English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50946786      Online Users : 978
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149374


    Title: 霍布斯與洛克論家庭、女性與 家父長主義
    Hobbes and Locke on Family, Women and Patriarchalism
    Authors: 周家瑜
    Chou, Chia-yu
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 霍布斯;洛克;父權;家父長主義;菲爾默;家庭社會;女性主義
    Thomas Hobbes;John Locke;Paternal power;Patriarchalism;Robert Filmer;Conjugal society;Feminism
    Date: 2023-06
    Issue Date: 2024-01-29
    Abstract: 本文探討霍布斯與洛克兩個近代契約論思想家之理論關聯，特別著重兩人對女性角色的相關論述。本文試圖回應當前兩個學界論述主軸：一方面，霍布斯與洛克研究學者傾向聚焦在宗教寬容脈絡與洛克早期的霍布斯主義，另一方面，自Carole Pateman 以來，近年接續以性別角度重新詮釋兩個思想家的女性主義批判。相對於這兩種閱讀這篇文章論證：霍布斯關於家庭與自然平等的論述核心在於指出「自然權威的不穩定」，自然的權力如父親權力無法形成穩定與持久的政治統治；而洛克則進一步主張父親權力與政治權力本質、範圍與目的均不相同。綜而言之，就家父長主義而言，本文期望論證：霍布斯與洛克政治思想的共同主軸都是對家父長論述的疑慮與批判。
    This essay explores the theoretical relationship between Hobbes’s and Locke’s political thoughts, in particular their accounts of women. It aims to respond to the current debates: first of all, the debate on the relationship between their political thought which mainly focuses on Locke’s Hobbism in his early accounts of religious toleration and second, Carole Pateman’s feminist critique of Hobbes’s and Locke’s political thoughts. To do so, I argue that Hobbes and Locke both aim to refute patriarchal accounts of political power by first revealing the instability of natural authority (Hobbes) and by clarifying the different natures of these two distinct powers (Locke). In sum, this essay intends to point to the theoretical concern shared by the two thinkers, namely a critique of patriarchalism.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, No.78, pp.189-244
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6523/SOCIETAS.202306_(78).004
    DOI: 10.6523/SOCIETAS.202306_(78).004
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML148View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback