English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50800755      Online Users : 622
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149275


    Title: [研究紀要]留學中國的韓國中國研究專家之發展、觀點與特點
    [Research Note]The Development, Perspective and Characteristics of China-Trained Korean China Studies Scholars
    Authors: 陳泰勳
    Jin, Tae-hun
    Contributors: 中國大陸研究
    Keywords: 知識社會學;中國研究;留中派;研究方法
    The Sociology of Knowledge;China Studies in Korea;The China-Trained Group;Methodology
    Date: 2023-12
    Issue Date: 2024-01-17 09:30:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 知識社會學著重於瞭解知識產生的外部情境。在過去,韓國的中國研究發展受制於「冷戰」的外部因素,以「留美派」與「留臺派」為主導。但隨著韓中建交,前往中國取得博士學位的韓國留學生逐漸增加,並形成了一個新的學術社群,被稱為「留中派」。留中派在韓國的中國研究當中占有主要地位,但他們的研究仍需進一步探討。本文將「留中派」作為研究對象,並詳細考察留中派的現況和研究方法,以期深入瞭解他們在韓國的中國研究中的地位。多數留中派在北京大學取得博士學位,這有助於深入瞭解中國社會和政治,但也有可能限制研究多樣性。此外,隨著中國崛起,韓國對中國區域研究的需求不斷增加,使留中派在韓國的對外政策中變得更為關鍵。留中派在中國當地接受教育,具備明顯優勢,包括語言、歷史、文化、經濟、社會以及政治等方面的知識,並建立龐大人際關係,從而產出實證的研究成果。然而,這也可能使他們被視為接近中國主流觀點。但留中派內部存在著多樣的立場和觀點,不應將之化約為全盤具有相同意見的學術社群。如今韓國社會普遍存在對中國的憤怒情緒,尤其在薩德爭端和經濟制裁後,韓國民眾對中國感到反感。留中派有責任以學術專業和研究倫理為基礎,對待中國議題採取客觀和實證的態度,並思考如何克服國家利益與民眾反感之間的差距。
    The sociology of knowledge emphasizes that in exploring the production of knowledge, one must deeply understand the external factors that affect the nature of knowledge. In the past, the development of Chinese studies in South Korea was influenced by external factors such as the “Cold War.” Before the establishment of diplomatic relations between South Korea and China, Chinese studies in South Korea were mainly dominated by the US-trained group and Taiwan-trained group. However, with the establishment of diplomatic relations between South Korea and China, the number of South Korean students pursuing doctoral degrees in China gradually increased, forming a new academic community known as the China-trained group. The China-trained group has an absolute majority in terms of quantity in South Korea’s Chinese studies, and currently dominates the field. However, there is still insufficient research on them. This article will focus on the China-trained group as the research object and examine their current situation and research methods in detail, in order to gain a deeper understanding of their position in South Korea’s Chinese studies. The majority of the China-trained group obtained their doctoral degrees from Peking University. This may have an impact on Korean research on China, including facilitating a deeper understanding of Chinese society and politics, but it may also limit research diversity. In addition, with the rise of China, the demand for China’s regional research in Korea has been continuously increasing. Consequently, the role of the China-trained group faction in Korea’s foreign policy has become increasingly significant. In terms of research methods, compared to other academic communities, the China-trained group who received education in China not only has a significant advantage in Chinese language, history, culture, economy, society, and politics but has also established extensive interpersonal relationships in China, thus obtaining empirical research results. The China-trained group, while having sufficient academic resources and interpersonal networks to contribute to Korean research on China, is also often perceived as Pro-China. However, within the China-trained group, there are diverse positions and perspectives on China’s issues. As such, they should not be considered as a homogeneous academic community with only one viewpoint or position. Currently, there is widespread anger towards China in Korean society, especially after the THAAD dispute and economic sanctions. Lastly, the China-trained group has the responsibility to approach China’s issues with academic expertise and research ethics, adopting on objective and empirical attitude, and considering ways to bridge the gap between national interests and public antipathy.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 66(4), 127-164
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30389/MCS.202312_66(4).0004
    DOI: 10.30389/MCS.202312_66(4).0004
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
    [東亞研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    66-4-4.pdf1681KbAdobe PDF132View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback