政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149061

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/149061

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51217913 線上人數 : 862

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/149061

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149061

題名:	救護意願與染疫風險的掙扎-新冠疫情間醫護人員雙歧態度的成因與影響 Feeling Ambivalent between Willingness to Work and Risk of Infection-Causes and Effects of Ambivalence among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic
作者:	陳彥任 Chen, Yen-Jen
貢獻者:	施琮仁 Shih, Tsung-Jen 陳彥任 Chen, Yen-Jen
關鍵詞:	新冠疫情雙歧態度救護意願風險感知人際溝通 COVID-19 Ambivalence Willingness to work Perception of risk Interpersonal communication
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2024-01-02 15:35:09 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究從雙歧態度的觀點出發探討醫護人員在新冠疫情期間持續救護意願與染疫風險的掙扎，並試圖透過不同衝突型態去梳理雙歧態度形成的原因以及探討雙歧態度如何影響醫護人員的持續救護意願。本研究以全台灣醫護人員為研究對象，蒐集共401份的樣本進行分析，研究發現醫護人員對新冠疫情普遍抱有雙歧態度，而其通過風險感知與職業責任所形成的衝突(研究中稱為:風險-責任衝突)程度越高，雙歧態度越高、持續救護意願越低。且無論人際溝通衝突程度的高低，對於雙歧態度的程度並無太顯著的關係。此外雙歧態度作為中介變項在感知責任衝突與持續救護意願之間存在部分的中介效果。在測量雙歧態度上，主觀的方式比起客觀的無論是與衝突或是救護意願的關係上都更具顯著性。本研究不僅是少數針對醫護人員的雙歧研究，在醫護人員面對風險及人際傳播等相關領域也有所貢獻。 This study investigates the ambivalent attitudes of 401 healthcare professionals in Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings suggest that conflict arising from their perceptions of risk and professional responsibilities significantly correlates with heightened ambivalence and reduced willingness to provide aid. Moreover, these ambivalent attitudes partially mediate the relationship between perception-responsibility conflict and the willingness to offer assistance. In measuring ambivalence, subjective methods were found to be more significant than objective ones, both in relation to conflict and willingness to rescue. This study not only represents one of the few focused on healthcare professionals' ambivalence but also contributes to understanding healthcare professionals' attitudes in areas such as risk and interpersonal communication.
參考文獻:	一、英文文獻 Ainslie, G. (1986). Beyond microeconomics: Conflict among interests in a multiple self as a determinant of value. The Multiple Self, 133-175. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1421-1432. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 893. Barnett, D. J., Balicer, R. D., Thompson, C. B., Storey, J. D., Omer, S. B., Semon, N. L., Bayer, S., Cheek, L. V., Gateley, K. W., & Lanza, K. M. (2009). Assessment of local public health workers' willingness to respond to pandemic influenza through application of the extended parallel process model. Plos One, 4(7), e6365. Bauer, R. A. (1967). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Marketing: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 13-21. Benedek, D. M., Fullerton, C., & Ursano, R. J. (2007). First responders: mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 28, 55-68. Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 253-271. Brückner, H., Martin, A., & Bearman, P. S. (2004). Ambivalence and pregnancy: adolescents' attitudes, contraceptive use and pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(6), 248-257. Bui, M., Droms, C. M., & Craciun, G. (2014). The impact of attitudinal ambivalence on weight loss decisions: Consequences and mitigating factors. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(4), 303-315. Chan, A. K., Nickson, C. P., Rudolph, J. W., Lee, A., & Joynt, G. M. (2020). Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID‐19 pandemic. Anaesthesia, 75(12), 1579. Chang, C. (2011). Feeling ambivalent about going green. Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 19-32. Chang, C. (2014). The influence of ambivalence toward a communication source: Media context priming and persuasion polarization. Communication Research, 41(6), 783-808. Chang, C. (2020). How branded videos can inspire consumers and benefit brands: Implications for consumers’ subjective well-being. Journal of Advertising, 49(5), 613-632. Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 565-577. Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 37-70. Cox, C. L. (2020). ‘Healthcare Heroes’: problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(8), 510-513. Davies, H., & Cheung, M. (2022). COVID-19 and first responder social workers: An unexpected mental health storm. Social Work, 67(2), 114-122. Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., Van Der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D., & Van Der Linden, S. (2022). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. In COVID-19 (pp. 162-174). Routledge. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt brace Jovanovich college publishers. Fingerman, K. L., Pitzer, L., Lefkowitz, E. S., Birditt, K. S., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: Implications for the well-being of both parties. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), P362-P371. Gardner, P. (1987). Measuring ambivalence to science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 241-247. Gardner, R. C. (1988). Attitudes and motivation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 135-148. Gee, S., & Skovdal, M. (2017). The role of risk perception in willingness to respond to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola outbreak: a qualitative study of international health care workers. Global Health Research and Policy, 2(1), 1-10. Gupta, S., & Sahoo, S. (2020). Pandemic and mental health of the front-line healthcare workers: a review and implications in the Indian context amidst COVID-19. General Psychiatry, 33(5). Hartley, P. (2002). Interpersonal communication. Routledge. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. Hendrickson, R. C., Slevin, R. A., Hoerster, K. D., Chang, B. P., Sano, E., McCall, C. A., Monty, G. R., Thomas, R. G., & Raskind, M. A. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, occupational functioning, and professional retention among health care workers and first responders. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(2), 397-408. Holt-Lunstad, J., & Uchino, B. N. (2019). Social ambivalence and disease (SAD): A theoretical model aimed at understanding the health implications of ambivalent relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 941-966. Horan, K. A., Marks, M., Ruiz, J., Bowers, C., & Cunningham, A. (2021). Here for my peer: The future of first responder mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11097. Jonas, K., Broemer, P., & Diehl, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 35-74. Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 190-210. Kasperson, R. E., & Kasperson, J. X. (1996). The social amplification and attenuation of risk. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545(1), 95-105. Kotera, Y., Ozaki, A., Miyatake, H., Tsunetoshi, C., Nishikawa, Y., Kosaka, M., & Tanimoto, T. (2022). Qualitative investigation into the mental health of healthcare workers in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 568. Kronenberg, M., Osofsky, H. J., Osofsky, J. D., Many, M., Hardy, M., & Arey, J. (2008). First responder culture: Implications for mental health professionals providing services following a natural disaster. Psychiatric Annals, 38(2). Lavine, H., Thomsen, C. J., Zanna, M. P., & Borgida, E. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(4), 398-421. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2010). Theories of human communication. Waveland press. MacDonald, T. K., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 427-441. Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., & Bell, D. W. (2000). Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 32(1), 58. Masterson, L., Steffen, C., Brin, M., Kordick, M. F., & Christos, S. (2009). Willingness to respond: of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36(1), 43-49. McGregor, B. A., Bowen, D. J., Ankerst, D. P., Andersen, M. R., Yasui, Y., & McTiernan, A. (2004). Optimism, perceived risk of breast cancer, and cancer worry among a community-based sample of women. Health Psychology, 23(4), 339. Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28(5), 602-626. Murray, E. J., Mason, M., Sparke, V., & Zimmerman, P.-A. P. (2021). Factors influencing health care workers’ willingness to respond to duty during infectious disease outbreaks and bioterrorist events: an integrative review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(3), 321-337. Ogedegbe, C., Nyirenda, T., DelMoro, G., Yamin, E., & Feldman, J. (2012). Health care workers and disaster preparedness: barriers to and facilitators of willingness to respond. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 5(1), 1-9. Passi, V., Doug, M., Peile, E., Thistlethwaite, J., & Johnson, N. (2010). Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Education, 1, 19. Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431. Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 19. Rubinelli, S., Myers, K., Rosenbaum, M., & Davis, D. (2020). Implications of the current COVID-19 pandemic for communication in healthcare. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(6), 1067. Salehi, G., Soto, C. D., & Amani, R. (2020). HOW HIGHLY EDUCATED CANADIAN WOMEN (HCW) PERCEIVE FOLLOWING VEGAN DIET (FVD): A QUALITATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE. Shaffer, H. J., & Simoneau, G. (2001). Reducing resistance and denial by exercising ambivalence during the treatment of addiction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20(1), 99-105. Shreffler, J., Petrey, J., & Huecker, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on healthcare worker wellness: a scoping review. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(5), 1059. Sparks, P., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1992). An investigation into the relationship between perceived control, attitude variability and the consumption of two common foods. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 55-71. Swick, H. M. (2000). Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Academic Medicine, 75(6), 612-616. Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 4, 361-386. Tortella-Feliu, M., Fullana, M. A., Pérez-Vigil, A., Torres, X., Chamorro, J., Littarelli, S. A., Solanes, A., Ramella-Cravaro, V., Vilar, A., & González-Parra, J. A. (2019). Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 154-165. Toth-Manikowski, S. M., Swirsky, E. S., Gandhi, R., & Piscitello, G. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among health care workers, communication, and policy-making. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(1), 20-25. Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K. A., Bradburn, N., & D'ANDRADE, R. (1989). Carryover effects in attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(4), 495-524. Turner, J. A., Rebmann, T., Loux, T. M., & Charney, R. L. (2020). Willingness to respond to radiological disasters among first responders in St. Louis, Missouri. Health Security, 18(4), 318-328. Veenema, T. G., Walden, B., Feinstein, N., & Williams, J. P. (2008). Factors affecting hospital-based nurses' willingness to respond to a radiation emergency. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2(4), 224-229. Vigil, N. H., Grant, A. R., Perez, O., Blust, R. N., Chikani, V., Vadeboncoeur, T. F., Spaite, D. W., & Bobrow, B. J. (2018). Death by suicide—The EMS profession compared to the general public. Prehospital Emergency Care, 61, 185–196. 二、中文文獻王金蓮、邱淑媞、簡莉盈、黃心苑(2018)。〈探討台灣臨床護理人員工作待遇滿意度與離職及轉業意念之相關因素〉，《澄清醫護管理雜誌》，14(2)：27-39。姜恬、宛小燕(2011)。〈淺議如何定義醫學職業素養〉，《中國醫學倫理學》，6：815-817。施琮仁(2021)。〈新冠肺炎的日常防疫行為:媒體，情緒與風險認知的作用〉，《新聞學研究》，(148)：153-196。韋苡爭(2011)。〈憂鬱症風險感知影響因素之探討〉，《危機管理學刊》，8(2)：43-54。張卿卿(2014)。〈從認知與情感雙歧檢視台灣民眾的廣告規避與趨近行為〉，《中華傳播學刊》，(25)：71-98。張卿卿(2016)。〈以網路購物為例探討媒介作為娛樂的功能〉，《中華傳播學刊》，(29)：3-43。張卿卿(2017)。〈政黨雙歧不確定的糾結:成因，決策過程，媒體接收與行為意向〉，《中華傳播學刊》，(32)：167-202。楊意菁、徐美苓(2010)。〈風險社會概念下的風險溝通與網路傳播:以全球暖化議題為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，(18)：151-191。廖士程、李明濱、李宇宙、吳佳璇、曾美智(2005)。〈知情同意與術前矛盾之相關聯〉，《醫學教育》，9(1)：80-90。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 108464052
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108464052
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
405201.pdf		2355Kb	Adobe PDF	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋