政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/148655
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51047228      Online Users : 919
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148655


    Title: 行政處分構成要件效力適用之省思─以行政法院相關裁判為觀察
    Other Titles: Reflections on the Factual Effect of Administrative Act—Observation Based on the Judgments of Administrative Courts
    Authors: 詹鎮榮
    Chan, Chen-jung
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 行政處分構成要件效力;行政處分之有效性與合法性;構成要件效力之例外;行政訴訟之功能
    Factual effect of administrative act;Effectiveness and legality of administrative act;Exception of factual effect;Function of administrative litigation
    Date: 2023-03
    Issue Date: 2023-12-13 13:31:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 行政處分具有構成要件致力，向為學說與實務所肯認。然而，有鑑於行政處分法制將其有效性與合法性脫鉤處理，故一有效存在之行政處分，並不必然合法。此等脫鉤現象在行政訴訟中應如何調和，頗具爭議。本文認為，行政處分構成要件效力縱使對法院有適用之餘地，亦僅限於其有效存在之部分而已，而不及於合法性之擬制。既然行政處分為行政訴訟事件程序標的之先決問題，法院本於對程序標的合法性審查之職權，原則上自可對未經判決確認其合法性之先決處分，為合法性之審查，並以審查之結果作為後續審理程序標的合法性之基礎。
    It has been widely acknowledged in both academia and practice that the administrative act has factual effects. In the administrative law system, the effectiveness and legality of the administrative act are considered separately; therefore, an effective administrative act may not necessarily be legal. How such separation should be approached in administrative litigation process is a controversial issue. This paper clarifies that although the court is bound by the factual effect of the administrative act, this merely means that the existence of the administrative act is recognized; however, the legality of the administrative act is not therefore assumed. As a subject matter of action of the administrative litigation process, the administrative court may review the legality of an administrative act that the court has not yet rendered a decision based on its authority, whose result may serve as a basis for the legality of the subsequent administrative act.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.334, pp.114-131
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593133407
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593133407
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML131View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback