English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51032959      Online Users : 949
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/148650


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148650


    Title: 公害民事責任程序中之舉證責任減輕──評最高法院110年度台上字第50號民事判決
    Other Titles: Alleviation of the Onus of Proof in Public Nuisance Civil Cases - Comment on No.50 Civil Judgement (2021) of Supreme Court
    Authors: 姜世明
    Chiang, Shyh-ming
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 公害;舉證責任;證明度降低;合理蓋然性;舉證責任減輕
    Public nuisance;Onus of proof;Burden of proof;Reduction of standard of proof;Reasonable probability alleviation of the onus of proof
    Date: 2022-12
    Issue Date: 2023-12-13 13:31:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公害或大型職災之民事責任程序，被害人主張不同請求權會面臨不同之證明負擔程度，部分請求權之要件事實會造成被害人之證明困難，對此，除立法上可思考無過失責任、危險責任、舉證責任轉換、情報請求權等建制之外，個案處理時，法院自有斟酌事件類型，必要時對於被害人為舉證責任減輕。然而，究竟在何等條件下乃得啟動何等舉證責任減輕，乃實務上應具體說明者。對於舉證責任減輕之運用，宜探求及說明個案所存在之具體不平等或領域及證據之偏在性，採取對稱之減輕方法，始能妥適實踐舉證責任法則之公平指標。
    Victims of public nuisance events or serious occupational accidents are faced with different levels of burden of proof when they apply to civil courts for compensation for damages, and some essential legal elements of rights are difficult to prove for the plaintiffs. Hence, apart from contemplating legislative approaches such as setting strict liability, dangerous activities liability, reversing the burden of proof and right to information in civil law, judges can also alleviate the onus of proof on the plaintiff’s side when necessary depending on different situations case by case. At the same time, judges should also explain specifically the reason why they alleviate the burden of proof whenever they do so. Acceptable reasons can be inequality between the parties or difficulty for one party to access evidence, and the way of reducing the burden of proof should correspond to the level of such inequality or difficulty.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.331, pp.201-215
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593133112
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593133112
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML96View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback