English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 53013167      Online Users : 807
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148573


    Title: 從德國法角度評析我國二○二二年刑事訴訟暫行安置新法
    Analyzing the 2022 New Regulations of the Criminal Procedure Code on the Provisional Placement from the Perspective of German Law
    Authors: 連孟琦
    Lien, Meng-chi
    Contributors: 政大法學評論
    Keywords: 暫行安置;保安處分;矯治與保安處分;監護;人身自由;強制治療;精神衛生法;身心障礙者權利公約;法治國原則;無罪推定原則;速審原則
    Provisional placement;Rehabilitative measures;Measures of reform and prevention;Tutelage;Right to freedom;Coercive treatment;Mental Health Act;Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;CRPD;Rule of law;Principle of presumption of innocence;Requirement of rapid action
    Date: 2023-06
    Issue Date: 2023-12-04 16:33:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來數起精神病犯犯下嚴重犯行之案件，引起社會大眾恐慌，也揭露我國刑事訴訟法長年以來欠缺相對應於刑事實體法之程序雙軌制。現行刑事訴訟法之羈押或預防性羈押，精神衛生法緊急安置及強制住院，以及保安處分執行法之緊急監護處分，都無法滿足適當處置無責任能力被告，以保護大眾安全之需求。本文經由比較德國刑事訴訟法第126a條之暫時安置，評析我國二○二二年二月公布之暫行安置新制（刑事訴訟法第121條之1至第121條之6），指出條文之缺失並提出修法建議。
    In recent years, several cases of serious crimes committed by mentally ill accused have caused panic among the public. They also revealed that there had been a lack of a dual system of criminal procedures corresponding to substantive criminal law for a long time. The current legal institutions, such as remand detention or Danger of recidivism as the ground for remand detention, the Mental Health Act, and Emergency tutelage, are not suitable institutions to deal with the mentally ill accused for public security. By comparing with German provisional placement (§126a German code of criminal procedure), this article examines the new regulations regarding provisional placement in Taiwan (§121-1 -§121-6 Taiwanese code of criminal procedure) and proposes a suggestion for improvement.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 173, 227-304
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/102398202023060173004
    DOI: 10.53106/102398202023060173004
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    173-4.pdf2291KbAdobe PDF119View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback