政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147755
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造访人次 : 50923930      在线人数 : 957
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147755


    题名: Unaccusative and unergative verb variation in overpassivization errors: examining split intransitivity hierarchy
    非賓格動詞與非作格動詞在過度被動化錯誤中的變異：檢視分裂不及物動詞階層理論
    作者: Lin, Yowyu
    林祐瑜
    贡献者: 台灣語言學期刊
    关键词: Overpassivization;Unaccusative verbs;Unergative verbs;Split Intransitivity Hierarch
    非賓格;非作格;過度被動化;分裂不及物動詞階層理論
    日期: 2023-07
    上传时间: 2023-10-04 13:50:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: One of the most well known errors in second language acquisition is overpassivization of intransitive verbs. Even though many theories have been proposed to explain the nature of second language (L2) acquisition , very few can explain the huge verb variation found in these studies. Sorace’s Split Intransitivity Hierarchy was originally proposed to explain native speakers’ auxiliary selection across unaccusative and unergative verbs. Verbs in the hierarchy are classified into “Core,” “Less Core” and “Periphery” groups. Recently, this theory has been extended to explain L2 learners’ acquisition of intransitive verbs. The current study re-examined overpassivization errors among L2 Mandarin learners with three different proficiency levels by looking at whether the error numbers they produced conform to the predictions of Sorace’s Split Intransitivity Hierarchy and Perlmutter’s Unaccusative Hypothesis. Participants were asked to describe pictures using target intransitive verbs, including both unaccusative and unergative verbs. The results were in support of Sorace’s hypothesis. Subjects produced significantly more errors in “Periphery” and “Less Core” categories than in the “Core” category. In addition, the results of the experiment also supported the Unaccusative Hypothesis.
    二語習得中最著名的錯誤之一為不及物動詞的過度被動化。雖然很多理論提出不同的見解解釋二語學習者為何會犯下這些錯誤，但是非常少研究發現二語學習者犯的錯誤在不同的不及物動詞間有非常大的差異。Sorace的分裂不及物動詞階層理論將不及物動詞加以分為「核心」、「次核心」及「邊陲」三個階層。近來，這個理論已被用來應用在二語學習者在不及物動詞上的習得狀況。本研究應用此理論來重新檢視中文母語者在學習英文上的過度被動化現象。實驗要求受試者用英文描述含有不及物動詞的圖片。結果發現受試者在「次核心」及「邊陲」兩個階層所犯的過度被動化錯誤遠多於「核心」。此外，研究結果也支持非賓格理論。
    關聯: 台灣語言學期刊 (Taiwan Journal of Linguistics), 21(2), 1-43
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.202307_21(2).0001
    DOI: 10.6519/TJL.202307_21(2).0001
    显示于类别:[台灣語言學期刊 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    21-2-1.pdf752KbAdobe PDF2152检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈