Reference: | (一)中文文獻 書籍 汪文聖(2019),《現象學作為一種實踐哲學:胡塞爾.海德格.鄂蘭的倫理、政治與宗教哲學》,聯經出版。 汪文聖(2022),《「讓出空間」與「敬畏」作為公共領域價值的基礎》,時報出版。 傅偉勳(2017),《西洋哲學史》,三民書局。 蔡英文(2002),《政治實踐與公共空間─漢娜鄂蘭的政治思想》,聯經出版。
翻譯書籍 Arendt, H.(著),李雨鍾(譯)(2022),《極權主義的起源》,商周出版。 Arendt, H.(著),李雨鍾、李威撰、黃雯君(譯)(2021),《過去與未來之間》,商周出版。 Arendt, H.(著),林宏濤(譯)(2017),《人的條件》,商周出版。 Arendt, H.(著),施奕如(譯)(2014),《平凡的邪惡─艾希曼耶路撒冷大審紀實》,左岸文化。 Arendt, H.(著),蔡佩君(譯)(1996),《共和危機》,時報文化。 Arendt, H.(著),蔡佩君(譯)(2017),《政治的承諾》,左岸文化。 Arendt, H.(著),蔡佩君(譯)(2017),《責任與判斷》,左岸文化。 Arendt, H.(著),蘇友貞(譯)(2007),《心智生命》,立緒文化。 Young-Bruhl E. (著),江先聲(譯)(2017),《愛這個世界:漢娜鄂蘭傳》,商周出版。
(二)英文文獻 書籍 Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press. (HC) Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. Harcourt Brace. (CR) Arendt, H. (1977). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Books. (First Published by The Viking Press 1963) (EIJ) Arendt, H. (1978). The Life of the Mind. Harcourt (Thinking : LMT ; Willing : LMW) Arendt, H. (1994). Essay in Understanding 1930-1954. Schocken Books. (EU) Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken Books. (EU) Arendt, H. (2005). The Promise of Politics. Schocken Books. (PP) Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. Penguin Books. (First Published by The Viking Press 1961) (BPF) Arendt, H. (2006). On Revolution. Penguin Books. (OR) Arendt, H. (2017). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Penguin Classics. (First Published by Harcourt 1951) (OT)
期刊論文 Balmer, T. (2013). What`s a Judge to Do? Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 18, 139-153. Benhabib, S. (1988). I. Judgment and the moral foundations of politics in Arendt`s thought. Political theory, 16(1), 29-51. Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge University Press. Bernstein, R. (2000). Arendt on thinking. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 277-292 Bernstein, R. J. (1986). Philosophical profiles: Essays in a pragmatic mode. University of Pennsylvania Press. Bilsky, L. Y. (1996). When actor and spectator meet in the courtroom: Reflections on Hannah Arendt`s concept of judgment. History and Memory, 8(2), 137-173. Clarke, J. P. (1993). Social Justice and political freedom: revisiting Hannah Arendt’s conception of need. Philosophy & social criticism, 19(3-4), 333-347. D’entrèves, M. P. (2000). Arendt’s theory of judgment. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 245-260. D’Entrèves, M. P. (2002). The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt. Routledge. Deutscher, M. (2016). Judgment After Arendt. Routledge. Dew, R. (2020). Arendt Reading Aristotle. In Hannah Arendt, Springer Nature, 35-51. Disch, L. J. (1994). Hannah Arendt and the limits of philosophy. Cornell University Press. Felman, S. (2001). Theaters of justice: Arendt in Jerusalem, the Eichmann Trial, and the redefinition of legal meaning in the wake of the Holocaust. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 1(2). Fry, K. (2001). The role of aesthetics in the politics of Hannah Arendt. Philosophy Today, 45(Supplement), 46-52. Gottlieb, S. Y. A. (2011). Beyond tragedy: Arendt, Rogat, and the judges in Jerusalem. College Literature, 45-56. Hauff, L. (2012). Die Richter im Eichmann-Prozess. In Interessen um Eichmann: israelische Justiz, deutsche Strafverfolgung und alte Kameradschaften. Campus Verlag, 119-146. Horsman, Y. (2020). Theaters of Justice. Stanford University Press. Jager, C. (2016). Transitional Justice in Prometheus Unbound. In The Workshop, 26-31. Klusmeyer, D. (2005). Hannah Arendt’s critical realism: Power, justice, and responsibility. In Hannah Arendt and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, 113-178. Lederman, S. (2016). The actor does not judge: Hannah Arendt’s theory of judgment. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 42(7), 727-741. Lee, S. (2021). The lex of the earth? Arendt’s critique of Roman law. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(3), 394-411. Marshall, D. L. (2010). The Origin and Character of Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Judgment. Political Theory, 38(3), 367-393. Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity: a phenomenology of human rights. Routledge. Parekh, S. (2013). Hannah Arendt and Global Justice. Philosophy Compass, 8(9), 771-780. Parvikko, T. (1998). Hannah Arendt as judge. A conscious pariah in Jerusalem, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 37-57. Pendas, D. O. (2007). “Eichmann in Jerusalem", Arendt in Frankfurt: The Eichmann Trial, the Auschwitz Trial, and the Banality of Justice. New German Critique, (100), 77-109. Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political theory, 9(3), 327-352. Sari, Y. (2020). Towards an Arendtian Conception of Justice. Research in Phenomenology, 50(2), 216-239. Schaap, A. (2005). Forgiveness, Reconciliation, Transitional Justice. In Hannah Arendt and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, 67-94. Shaked, M. (2015). The Unknown Eichmann Trial: The Story of the Judge. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 29(1), 1-38. Steinberger, P. J. (1990). Hannah Arendt on judgment. American Journal of Political Science, 803-821. Stonebridge, L. (2009). Hannah Arendt`s testimony: Judging in a lawless world. New Formations, 67(67), 78-90. Taminiaux, J. (2000). Athens and Rome. In D. Villa (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press, 165-177 Ucnik, L. (2022). Hannah Arendt`s action and contemplation: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Social Philosophy, 53(1), 76-92. Volk, C. (2010). From nomos to lex: Hannah Arendt on law, politics, and order. Leiden Journal of International Law, 23(4), 759-779. Wilkinson, M. A. (2011). Between freedom and law: Hannah Arendt on the promise of modern revolution and the burden of ‘the tradition’. https://web.archive.org/web/20170922040214id_/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/38066/1/WPS2011-05_Wilkinson.pdf Yar, M. (2000). From actor to spectator: Hannah Arendt’s ‘two theories’ of political judgment. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(2), 1-27.
(三)德文文獻 Arendt, H. (2002). Denktagebuch. Piper. (DT) Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlass. Piper. (WP) Arendt, H. (2017) Es gibt nur einziges Menschenrecht. In Menke C. & Ramondi F. (Eds.), Die Revolution der Menschenrechte (pp. 394-410). Suhrkamp. Arendt, H. (2020). Eichmann in Jerusalem: Ein Bericht von der Banalität des Bösen. Piper. (EIJD) Arendt, H. (2020). Über die Revolution. Piper. (RD) Arendt, H. (2020). Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. Piper. (VA) Arendt, H. (2021). Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft: Antisemitismus, Imperialismus, Totalitarismus. Piper. (EUH) Arendt, H. (2021). Fragwürdige Traditionsbestände im politischen Denken der Gegenwart. Piper. (FT) Arendt, H. (2021). Menschen in finsteren Zeiten. Piper. (MZ) Arendt, H. (2022). Ich will verstehen: Selbstauskünfte zu Leben und Werk. Piper. (IWV) Höffe, O. (2021). Gerechtigkeit: Eine philosophische Einführung. Verlag C.H. Beck. Scarano N. (2018). Einleitung. In Horn C. & Scarano N. (Eds.), Philosophie der Gerechtigkeit (pp. 335-354.) Berlin, Suhrkamp. Nussbaum M. (2021). The Monarchy of Fear. Oxford University Press.
(四)網路資料 Gerechtigkeit. (n.d.) In DWDS. Retrieved from https://www.dwds.de/wb/Gerechtigkeit injustice. (n.d.) In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/96117?redirectedFrom=injustice#eid iustitia (n.d.) In An Elementary Latin Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0060%3Aentry%3Diustitia justice. (n.d.) In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/102198?rskey=ewyxjh&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid Ungerechtigkeit. (n.d.) In DWDS. Retrieved from https://www.dwds.de/wb/Ungerechtigkeit δικαιοσύνη (n.d.) In Biblissima. Retrieved from https://outils.biblissima.fr/en/eulexis-web/index.php |