政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147260
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50929289      線上人數 : 1020
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147260


    題名: 由美國社區處遇制度論我國觀護制度立法——以老年非暴力犯罪為中心
    Comparative Study on Community Corrections in Taiwan and the United States: Analyzing Legislation with Emphasis on Nonviolent Elderly Crimes
    作者: 蔡明憲
    Tsai, Ming-Hsien
    貢獻者: 楊雲驊
    蔡明憲
    Tsai, Ming-Hsien
    關鍵詞: 二元主義
    社會復歸
    社區處遇
    觀護
    老年犯罪
    非暴力犯罪
    Social Reintegration
    Community Corrections
    Rehabilitation
    Elderly Crimes
    Nonviolent Crimes
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-09-01 16:19:05 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 源於我國復歸處遇不足，以及對監獄超額收容之關注，本論文探討美國社區處遇制度引入我國之可行性，並以老年非暴力罪犯為核心進行研究。本論文首先介紹美國社區處遇與傳統機構處遇之差異、優勢與限制，並歸納老年受刑人於監獄中管理方式與健康醫療需求，再探討非暴力罪犯於美國社區處遇制度下之成功應用案例及其再犯率成效。另一方面，本文整理美國分流制度之優點，併介紹美國於COVID-19疫情期間之因應。接著分析我國中間處遇制度之現況與缺失，包括我國外役監、自主間外作業之現狀，以及介紹過往觀護專法草案之立法狀況。隨後進一步以美國社區處遇制度之成功經驗，探討其對我國的啟示，評估我國建構老年非暴力犯罪社區處遇制度之實益，同時探討現行法下調整保安處分、緩起訴之可行性與限制。

    社區處遇制度對於犯罪後之社會復歸具有重要意義，於現代刑罰二元主義思潮下，以社區處遇作為實現二元主義之手段將有助實現特別預防、社會復歸之矯正目標。未來研究可進一步規劃社區處遇實行之具體操作，或進行正反方意見討論，以解決社會復歸刑事政策實務上可能面臨之困難。
    This thesis explores the feasibility of introducing the community corrections system from the United States to Taiwan, focusing on the elderly nonviolent crimes. Originating from the advantages of community corrections and the concerns over the inadequacy of correctional system and prison overcrowding in Taiwan. The study highlights the advantages of community corrections and its potential to enhance the criminal rehabilitation process, specifically for elderly nonviolent crimes.

    The characteristics, benefits, and limitations of the community corrections system in the United States are examined. Successful case studies are referenced to illustrate its effectiveness. This part investigates the healthcare requirements, strategies for medical management, and the influence on recidivism rates among elderly prisoners in the correctional system. Another aspect of the research introduces various community-based programs in the United States, including probation-related issues, the benefits of diversion, and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Moving on, the study analyzes the problems of the criminal rehabilitation system in Taiwan. It assesses the existing conditions of probation and the corrections of elderly nonviolent offenders, and the legislative landscape of community corrections or intermediate sanctions in Taiwan.

    Subsequently, a comparative analysis is conducted to evaluate the successful experiences of the community corrections system in the United States. It explores its implications for Taiwan and assesses the feasibility, necessity and the practical benefits of establishing a specialized community corrections system tailored to elderly nonviolent offenders. Lastly, the conclusion summarizes the research findings and provides policy recommendations for future developments in the field. It also suggests avenues for further research.
    參考文獻: 壹、中文文獻
    一、專書（依作者姓氏筆畫順序）
    1. 林山田，刑法通論（下冊），元照，增訂10版，2008年1月。
    2. 林山田、林東茂、林燦璋、賴擁連，犯罪學，三民，修訂6版，2020年1月。
    3. 林順昌，觀護再論，元照，初版，2019年3月。
    4. 許春金，刑事政策與刑事司法，三民，初版，2011年10月。
    5. 許福生，犯罪與刑事政策學，自版，初版，2010年9月。
    6. 楊士隆，暴力犯罪：原因、類型與對策，五南，4版，2020年2月。
    7. 鄧煌發等合著，觀護制度與社區處遇，洪葉文化，初版，2013年1月。

    二、學位論文（依作者姓氏筆畫順序）
    1. 石玉華（2011），慢性犯罪者及其犯罪特徵之探討，臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文。

    三、期刊論文（依作者姓氏筆畫順序）
    1. 王紀軒（2021），臺灣社區矯治法制的建構－與大陸社區矯正法的對照，刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集，24，69-93。
    2. 王榮聖（2010），社區處遇方式運用於刑罰制度之探討，軍法專刊，56（6），157-179。
    3. 任全鈞（2020），國外矯正機構實施自主監外作業之比較與啟發，刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，25，117-181。
    4. 林順昌（2018），論保護管束、觀護處遇、保安處分及社區處遇之差別（一），法務通訊，2908，3-5。
    5. 林順昌（2018），論保護管束、觀護處遇、保安處分及社區處遇之差別（二），法務通訊，2909，4-6。
    6. 林順昌（2019），從即時強制之新聞報導談保護管束之修法必要（一），法務通訊，2935，3-5。
    7. 林順昌（2022），美國社區矯治措施之分類與運用－兼論對我國法制之借鏡與建議，軍法專刊，68（1），117-156。
    8. 張麗卿（2018），社區矯正法制之比較法檢討－以德日法制為借鑑，月旦法學，279，118-138。
    9. 許春金等（2022），慢性犯罪者概念及復歸問題之檢視──兼論美國近代社會復歸法案之借鏡，刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，33，181-232。
    10. 陳慈幸（2022），淺談矯正機關收容人高齡化之現況與其矯正政策分析：特以長刑期收容人為例。當代法律，10，163-171。
    11. 黃朝義（2020），刑事政策刑罰論。中央警察大學法學論集，39，1-55。
    12. 溫祖德（2019），從起訴裁量論起訴政策及轉向計畫之訂定，檢察新論，26，27-41。
    13. 鄧煌發（1999），社區處遇之探討，警學叢刊，30（3），133-156。
    14. 蕭宏宜（2015），社區矯治之政策與法制改革。東吳法律學報，27（1），1-40。

    四、政府資料
    1. 林順昌（2021），如何推動我國社區矯治制度未來之發展與轉型，臺灣桃園地方檢察署110年度自行研究報告。
    2. 賴擁連、楊士隆、陳玉書（2022），「我國自主監外作業制度之研究－兼論對再犯預防機制之影響」成果報告，法務部司法官學院委託研究。
    3. 立法院公報處（2009），立法院公報，103卷43期。
    4. 立法院公報處（2009），立法院公報，98卷37期。
    5. 法務部統計處（2022），法務統計年報110年統計表。
    6. 監察院（2020），109司調0075調查報告。
    7. 監察院（2022），108司調0033調查報告。
    8. 監察院（2022），111司調0042調查報告。

    五、我國司法院大法官解釋與實務判決
    1. 司法院釋字第471號解釋。
    2. 司法院釋字第669號解釋。
    3. 司法院釋字第751號解釋。
    4. 司法院釋字第775號解釋。
    5. 司法院釋字第799號解釋。
    6. 司法院釋字第812號解釋。
    7. 臺灣高等法院104年度上易字第352號刑事判決。


    貳、外文文獻
    一、英文期刊論文
    1. Benjamin A. Barsky et al. (2021), Vaccination Plus Decarceration-- Stopping COVID-19 in Jails and Prisons, 384 N. Eng. J. Med. 1583-1585.
    2. Caroline M. Upton, Note (2014), A Cell for a Home: Addressing the Crisis of Booming Elder Inmate Populations in State Prisons, 22 Elder L. J. 289-324.
    3. Carrie Leonetti (2020), What Coronavirus Has Taught Us About Unnecessary Incarceration, 58 Am. Crim. L. Rev. Online 36-48.
    4. Charles R. Tittle & Harold G. Grasmick (1997), Criminal Behavior and Age: A Test of Three Provocative Hypotheses, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 309 -342.
    5. David Best & Susan Broderick (2021), Recovery-Oriented Justice Initiatives & the Pivotal Role of the Prosecutor, 55 Prosecutor 20-23.
    6. Dawn Miller (2011), Sentencing Elderly Criminal Offenders, 7 NAELA J. 221-248.
    7. Frank J. Porporino (2014), Managing the Elderly in Corrections, 157 Int`l Training Course Visiting Experts` Papers 34-56.
    8. Grace McCarten (2019), Jailed While Frail: Examining Rationales for Incarcerating Aging and Infirm Criminals, 27 Elder L. J. 221-260.
    9. Jalila Jefferson-Bullock (2020), A Little Child Shall Lead Them: Juvenile Justice, Aging Out, and the First Step Act, 87 Tenn. L. Rev. 569-628.
    10. Jason S. Ornduff (1996), Releasing the Elderly Inmate: A Solution to Prison Overcrowding, 4 Elder L. J. 173-200.
    11. Jay Whetzel, Marie Garcia, Scott Anders (2020), All Hands on Deck! Toward a Reentry-Centered Vision for Federal Probation, 84-DEC Fed. Probation 3-13.
    12. Kimberly J. Cullen (2022), State-Sponsored Surveillance and Punishment: How Municipal Crime-Free Ordinances Exacerbate the Carceral Continuum, 31 B.U. Pub. Int. L. J. 47-79.
    13. L. Gavin (2011), What Happens to the Correctional System When a Right to Health Care Meets Sentencing Reform, 7 NAELA J. 249-269.
    14. Lyle B. Brown (1998), The Joint Effort to Supervise and Treat Elderly Offenders: A New Solution to A Current Corrections Problem, 59 Ohio St. L. J. 259-302.
    15. Marjorie P. Russell (1994), Compassionate Release of Terminally Ill Prisoners--Is the Cure Worse than the Disease, 3 Widener J. Pub. L. 799-855.
    16. Michael Moore (1999), Victims and Retribution: A Reply to Professor Fletcher, 3 Buff. Crim. L. Rev. 65-89.
    17. Mirko Bagaric (2014), The Punishment Should Fit the Crime - Not the Prior Convictions of the Person that Committed the Crime: An Argument for Less Impact Being Accorded to Previous Convictions in Sentencing, 51 San Diego L. Rev. 343-418.
    18. Mirko Bagaric, Dan Hunter, Gabrielle Wolf (2018), Technological Incarceration and the End of the Prison Crisis, 108 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 73-135.
    19. Mirko Bagaric, Dan Hunter, Jennifer Svilar (2021), Prison Abolition: From Naïve Idealism to Technological Pragmatism, 111 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 351-406.
    20. Mirko Bagaric, Marissa Florio, Brienna Bagaric (2017), A Principled Approach to Separating the Fusion Between Nursing Homes and Prisons, 44 Pepp. L. Rev. 957-1038.
    21. Mirko Bagaric, Sandeep Gopalan (2016), Saving the United States from Lurching to Another Sentencing Crisis: Taking Proportionality Seriously and Implementing Fair Fixed Penalties, 60 St. Louis U. L. J. 169-242.
    22. Molly Connor (2020), From First Steps to Second Chances: Addressing Mass Incarceration in State Prisons, 95 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1699-1730.
    23. Molly Fairchild James (1992), The Sentencing of Elderly Criminals, 29 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1025-1044.
    24. Nadine Curran (2000), Blue Hairs in the Bighouse: The Rise in the Elderly Inmate Population, Its Effect on the Overcrowding Dilemma and Solutions to Correct It, 26 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 225-264.
    25. Ornduff, Jason S. (1996), Releasing the Elderly Inmate: A Solution to Prison Overcrowding. Elder L. J. 173-200.
    26. Richard Lowell Nygaard (1998), Crime, Pain, and Punishment: A Skeptic`s View, 102 Dick. L. Rev. 355-382.
    27. Ronald H. Aday & Jennifer J. Krabill (2006), Aging Offenders in the Criminal Justice System, 7 Marq. Elder`s Advisor 237-258.
    28. Ruth Shonle Cavan (1987), Is Special Treatment Needed for Elderly Offenders?, 2 Crim. Just. Pol`y Rev. 213-224.
    29. Thomas Ellsworth & Karin A. Helle (1994), Older Offenders on Probation, 58 Fed. Probation 4, 43-50.
    30. Vera Institute of Justice (2020), Next Steps: An Agenda for Federal Action on Safety & Justice, 33 Fed. Sent. R. 40-71.
    31. William E. Adams Jr. (1995), The Incarceration of Older Criminals: Balancing Safety, Cost, and Humanitarian Concerns, 19 Nova L. Rev. 465-486.
    32. William E. Adams Jr. (2001), The Intersection of Elder Law and Criminal Law: More Traffic than One Might Assume, 30 Stetson L. Rev. 1331-1352.
    33. Yelena Yukhvid (2015), Should Elderly Criminals Be Punished for Being Prisoners of the Mind? An Analysis of Criminals with Alzheimer`s Disease, 50 Gonz. L. Rev. 43-74.


    參、網路資料
    一、中文網路資料
    1. Brian Spegele（2021），華爾街日報：中國對人民的大規模監控 因為疫情更加貼緊日常生活，https://www.storm.mg/article/4574731?page=1。
    2. 公視新聞網（2022），過去用來追蹤犯嫌 警方雲龍系統精準掌握確診者足跡，https://news.pts.org.tw/article/510096。
    3. 世界衛生組織（2022），2022 Revision of World Population Prospects，https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Files/1_Indicators%20（Standard）/EXCEL_FILES/2_Population/WPP2022_POP_F06_1_POPULATION_PERCENTAGE_SELECT_AGE_GROUPS_BOTH_SEXES.xlsx。
    4. 立法院司法及法制委員會（2021），「從屏東挖眼案看社會安全網破洞」公聽會報告。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/213433/File_19732136.pdf。
    5. 立法院議案關係文書（2009），院總第658號 委員提案第9068號。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfc8cfcccecacfcec5cec6ccd2cdc9cf。
    6. 民間司法改革基金會（2022），殺警案後，外役監相關問題的釐清。https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/2357#2-1
    7. 林瑋婷（2017），監外自主作業—即將名存實亡的改革？。https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/1438。
    8. 監察院（2022），111-12-14監察委員新聞稿。https://www.cy.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=125&s=25768。

    二、英文網路資料
    1. Bill Barr (2020). Memorandum from Att`y Gen., to the Dir. of the Fed. Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/docs/bop_memo_home_confinement_april3.pdf
    2. Bureau of Just. Stat. (2020). Correctional Populations in the United States, 2017-2018. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpus1718.pdf
    3. Deborah N. Archer (2019). The New Housing Segregation: The Jim Crow Effects of Crime-free Housing Ordinances, https://www.racism.lawschoolmoodle.org/articles/basic-needs/propertyland/301-housing/7854-the-new-housing-segregation
    4. Deborah N. Archer (2021). ‘Crime-Free’ Housing Ordinances, https://theappeal.org/the-lab/explainers/crime-free-housing-ordinances-explained
    5. Derecka Purnell (2020). The System is Built for Power, Not Justice, https://level.medium.com/the-system-is-built-for-power-not-justice-c83e6dc4dd66
    6. Drew Harwell (2021). Home-security cameras have become a fruitful resource for law enforcement—and a fatal risk, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/02/ring-camera-fears/
    7. Eddie Burkhalter et al. (2021). Incarcerated and Infected: How the Virus Tore Through the U.S. Prison System, N.Y. TIMES, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/04/10/us/covid-prison-outbreak.html?searchResultPosition=1
    8. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (2023). COVID-19 Inmate Test Information, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/index.jsp
    9. FOX NEWS (2015). Analysis Finds Not Enough Monitoring of Monitoring Bracelets in US, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/28/analysis-finds-not-enough-monitoring-monitoring-bracelets-in-us.html
    10. Jaboa Lake (2021). Preventing and Removing Barriers to Housing Security for People with Criminal Convictions, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/poverty/news/2021/04/14/498053/preventing-removing-barriers-housing-security-people-criminal-convictions
    11. Juliet Lapidos (2009). You`re Grounded! How Do You Qualify For House Arrest? https://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2009/01/youre_grounded.html,
    12. Letter from Catherine E. Lhamon (2019). Chair of U.S. Comm`n on C.R., to Donald Trump, President, https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/2019/06-13-Collateral-Consequences.pdf
    13. Mark Morri (2014). New Electronic Anklets a Tougher Collar for Prisoners, http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/new-electronic-anklets-a-tougher-collar-for-prisoners/news-story/c2e00e5356bbf7a8e7596d4285df4971
    14. Matt McKillop & Alex Boucher (2018). Aging Prison Populations Drive Up Costs, Pew Charitable Tr., https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/02/20/aging-prison-populations-drive-up-costs
    15. Maya Schenwar (2015). The Quiet Horrors of House Arrest, Electronic Monitoring, and Other Alternative Forms of Incarceration, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/01/house-arrest-surveillance-state-prisons/
    16. Michael Barajas (2020). How COVID-19 Upended Texas Prisons, https://www.texasobserver.org/how-covid-19-upended-texas-prisons
    17. Michael Ollove (2016). Elderly Inmates Burden State Prisons, http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/03/17/elderly-inmates-burden-state-prisons
    18. Osborne Association (2014). The High Costs of Low Risk: The Crisis of America`s Aging Prison Population, https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/Osborne_Aging_WhitePaper.pdf
    19. Pew Charitable Trusts (2016). Use of Electronic Offender-Tracking Devices Expands Sharply. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2016/09/use-of-electronic-offender-tracking-devices-expands-sharply
    20. Prison Policy Initiative (2021). The most significant criminal justice policy changes from the COVID-19 pandemic, https://www.prisonpolicy.org/virus/virusresponse.html
    21. Roni Caryn Rabin. Vulnerable Inmates Left in Prison as Covid Rages, N.Y. TIMES (2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/27/health/coronavirus-prisons-danbury.html
    22. Sun Sentinel (1987). Program Caters to First-Time Senior Offenders, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/1987/01/25/program-caters-to-first-time-senior-offenders/
    23. The Effects of Recidivism Among Federal Offenders (2016), U.S. Sentencing Commission 22, https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-publications/2017/20171207_Recidivism-Age.pdf
    24. Timothy Williams, Benjamin Weiser & William K. Rashbaum (2020). Jails Are Petri Dishes: Inmates Freed as the Virus Spreads Behind Bars, N.Y. TIMES, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/30/us/coronavirus-prisons-jails.html
    25. U.S. Dep`t of Just., Fed. Bureau of Prisons (2016). Change Notice to Home Confinement, https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/7320_001_CN-1.pdf
    26. U.S. Dep`t of Just., Off. of Att`y Gen. (2019). The First Step Act of 2018: Risk and Needs Assessment System, https://nij.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh171/files/media/document/the-first-step-act-of-2018-risk-and-needs-assessment-system_1.pdf
    27. US Department of Justice (2011). Electronic Monitoring Reduces Recidivism, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/234460.pdf
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法律科際整合研究所
    109652013
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109652013
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[法律科際整合研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2161檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋