政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147210

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/147210

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51036484 線上人數 : 935

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 風險管理與保險學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/147210

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147210

題名:	董事會多元性對碳排資訊之影響-以美國企業為例 The Impact of Board Diversity on Carbon Information: Empirical Evidence from the US Company
作者:	蔡皓暐 Tsai, Hao-Wei
貢獻者:	鄭士卿楊曉文 Jeng, Vivian Yang, Sharon S. 蔡皓暐 Tsai, Hao-Wei
關鍵詞:	碳排放碳排放董事會多元性女性董監事種族多元性學術董監事 Academic director Carbon emission Carbon intensity Board diversity Female director Ethnic diversity
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2023-09-01 16:07:17 (UTC+8)
摘要:	全球二氧化碳排放量逐年上升，而高碳排的經濟活動將導致的全球暖化，對社會造成不可逆的氣候變遷風險。另一方面，企業擁有者和經理人之間存在代理問題，而多元化的董事會將增加獨立性、專業性與提供更全面的經營策略。然而多元化董事會是否能有效減少企業之碳排放、碳密度及是否改善隔年度碳績效為本研究欲探討之議題。本研究使用2018年至2021年MSCI所收錄擁有碳績效之美國上市企業，探討當董監事具有女性、學術背景與種族多元性等三項因素時，對企業碳績效數值與碳績效是否改善的影響，且後續再進一步將企業區分為高碳產業及低碳產業，探討董事會多元性對高低碳產業的影響。本研究在碳績效數值中採用線性迴歸模型，以及在碳績效是否改善中採用羅吉斯迴歸模型，且避免研究結果產生內生性問題，進行二階段最小平方法(Two-Stage Least Squares, 2SLS)，同時控制年度及產業效應。研究結果顯示，學術董監事比例越高時，將提升隔年度碳排放與碳密度改善的機率，表示學術董監事相較於其他董監事具有較高的獨立性、專業知識及道德標準，能更有效監督環境績效。另外，女性董監事比例越高、種族越多元時，公司的碳排放、碳密度將顯著下降，此效果在高碳產業更加顯著，表示女性董監事有效地的進行碳排放監督、專注於社會的環境議題。綜上所述，若董事會中擁有女性董監事、學術董監事與不同種族之董監事，能夠替企業提供新穎的減碳方法、更有效地進行環境監督，進而減少企業之碳排放、碳密度，及提升隔年度改善碳績效之機率。 Global carbon emissions are increasing every year, and the high carbon emissions from economic activities are causing irreversible climate change risks. In addition, board diversity has been important to corporate decisions and helps to boost independence and expertise of the directors. Whether board diversity can effectively reduce carbon emission and intensity, and improve carbon performance in the following years are the topics under investigation in this study. We use US-listed firms with carbon performance in the MSCI from 2018 to 2021 to investigate the impact of board diversity in three aspects: gender diversity, academic background, and ethnic diversity. We use generalized linear regression and logistic regression models and further categorize our sample into high-carbon and low-carbon industries. After considering the endogeneity problem, we find that a higher proportion of female directors, as well as greater ethnic diversity, are associated with reduced carbon emissions and carbon intensity, and the effect is more statistically significant in high-carbon industries. Furthermore, a higher proportion of academic directors demonstrate effectiveness in improving a company`s carbon performance. In conclusion, having female board members, those with academic backgrounds, and ethnically diverse board members leads to lower carbon emissions and intensity, and improves carbon information in the next years.
參考文獻:	湯念璇 (2022)。學術型獨立董監事對企業揭露 SASB 準則及 TCFD 氣候揭露原則之影響。國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士學位論文。朱冠儒 (2022)。學術型獨立董監事與風險趨避：以台灣上市櫃公司為例。國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系碩士學位論文。 Alesina, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross Section of Countries. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1872-1911. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.1872 Apergis, N., Eleftheriou, S., & Payne, J. E. (2013). The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 88, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.024 Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of business ethics, 97, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of business ethics, 97, 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010 Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699 Bord, R. J., & O`Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social science quarterly, 830-840. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863734 Bowman, R. F. (2005). Teacher as servant leader. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(6), 257-260. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.6.257-260 Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398780 Carter, D. A., D`Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034 Cho, C. H., Jung, J. H., Kwak, B., Lee, J., & Yoo, C. Y. (2017). Professors on the board: Do they contribute to society outside the classroom?. Journal of business ethics, 141, 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2718-x Coleman, S. (2005). The impact of human capital measures on firm performance: A comparison by gender, race and ethnicity. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 10(2), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.57229/2373-1761.1057 Cucari, N., Esposito de Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452 Das, J., & DiRienzo, C. E. (2010). Is ethnic diversity good for the environment? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(1), 91-113. DOI: 10.1177/107049650355274 Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business strategy and the environment, 28(1), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250 Fan, P., Qian, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101931 Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2015). Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial management, 44(3), 547-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12069 Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001 He, R., Zhou, M., Liu, J., & Yang, Q. (2021). Female directors and carbon information disclosure: evidence from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7772601 Hollindale, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Chapple, L. (2019). Women on boards and greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Accounting & Finance, 59(1), 277-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12258 Huang, H.-Y., Lee, C.-H., & Liao, C.-H. (2021). The Value of Academic Directors to Stakeholders: Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of International Accounting Research, 20(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2020-037 Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017 Jermias, J., & Gani, L. (2014). The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance. The british accounting review, 46(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.001 Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 103, 351-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of management journal, 42(5), 564-576. https://doi.org/10.5465/256977 Khan, H. U. R., Khidmat, W. B., Habib, M. D., & Awan, S. (2022). Academic directors in board and corporate expropriation: Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(2), 372-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3388 Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). The effect of corporate governance on carbon emission disclosures: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2017-0144 Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279 Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X., & Ning, L. (2018). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1089-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6 Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002 Liu, W., Ren, T., & Tang, W. (2021). Teachers in the top management team and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 13(24), 13795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413795 Loft, L., Gehrig, S., Salk, C., & Rommel, J. (2020). Fair payments for effective environmental conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 14094-14101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919783117 Mardini, G. H., & Elleuch Lahyani, F. (2022). Impact of foreign directors on carbon emissions performance and disclosure: empirical evidence from France. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(1), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2020-0323 McBrayer, G. A. (2018). Does persistence explain ESG disclosure decisions?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1074-1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1521 McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001 Nuber, C., & Velte, P. (2021). Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1958-1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2727 Singh, V. (2007). Ethnic diversity on top corporate boards: A resource dependency perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(12), 2128-2146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701695275 Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018 Uadiale, O. M. (2010). The impact of board structure on corporate financial performance in Nigeria. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n10p155 Yasin, I., Naseem, S., Anwar, M. A., Madni, G. R., Mahmood, H., & Murshed, M. (2022). An analysis of the environmental impacts of ethnic diversity, financial development, economic growth, urbanization, and energy consumption: fresh evidence from less-developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 79306-79319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21295-7
描述:	碩士國立政治大學風險管理與保險學系 110358022
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110358022
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
802201.pdf		2009Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋