Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147074
|
Title: | 探討專利與政策關係-以中國逆變器產業為例 Exploring the Relationship between Patents and Policies: Evidence from Inverter Industry in China |
Authors: | 胡博翔 Hu, Po-Hsiang |
Contributors: | 李浩仲 李文傑 Li, Hao-Chung Li, Wen-Jie 胡博翔 Hu, Po-Hsiang |
Keywords: | 再生能源 逆變器 專利網絡 政府補貼 Renewable Energy Inverters Patent Networks Government Grants |
Date: | 2023 |
Issue Date: | 2023-09-01 15:34:43 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 再生能源為現今受到全球重視的重要議題之一,為了達成碳中和目標各國紛 紛祭出能源政策,相關廠商也隨之受惠。過去中國大量政策補貼太陽能產業,以 低價競爭的方式破壞國際太陽能市場,最終導致各國築起關稅壁壘。為了瞭解這 樣的結果是否會在再生能源的儲能領域中重現,本研究整理中國歷年再生能源政 策,並舉太陽能與儲能的共通關鍵零組件-逆變器為例,從專利角度切入,以逆 變器之專利公開狀況對照中國各階段的政策,結果發現隨著中國政策的轉向,專 利數據也有趨勢性的改變。本研究另整理中國市佔前幾名逆變器廠商的專利資料 以及財務資料,建構迴歸模型討論政府補貼與中國企業研發投入的關係,發現兩 者呈現正向相關。而我們也觀察到掌握儲能技術的廠商,也會有較好的財務績效, 驗證目前市場的風向的確吹往儲能領域。實證結果顯示能源政策仍須有國家在背 後的支持才得以發展,而未來各國仍須提防中國於再生能源領域的佈局。 Renewable energy is one of the important global issues that is currently receiving significant attention. In order to achieve carbon neutrality goals, many countries have implemented various energy policies, benefiting related companies. In the past, China heavily subsidized the solar energy industry, which led to international market disruption through low-price competition and eventually resulted in the imposition of tariffs by other countries. To understand whether similar outcomes may occur in the energy storage field of renewable energy, this study examines China`s renewable energy policies over the years. Taking key component of solar and energy storage, inverters, as an example, the study investigates the patent application status of inverters in relation to China`s policy changes. The results reveal that patent application data exhibit a trend in line with shifts in China`s policies. Additionally, the study compiles patent application and financial data of the top inverter manufacturers in China and constructs models to examine the relationship between government subsidies and R&D investment by Chinese companies. The findings demonstrate a positive correlation between the two. Furthermore, it is observed that companies with expertise in energy storage technologies also exhibit better financial performance, confirming the current market trend toward the energy storage sector. The empirical results indicate that energy policies still require support from national governments for development, and countries need to be cautious of China`s positioning in the field of renewable energy. |
Reference: | Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of financial economics, 77(1), 57-116. Ascensión Barajas, Elena Huergo and Lourdes Moreno (2017): Public Support to Business R&D and the Economic Crisis: Spanish Evidence. Documentos de trabajo de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, No 17-03. Barberá-Tomás, D., Jiménez-Sáez, F., & Castelló-Molina, I. (2011). Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks. Research policy, 40(3), 473-486. Borensztein, E., & Ostry, J. D. (1996). Accounting for China`s growth performance. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 224-228. Chen, X. (2018) The Effect of China’s Public R & D Policy on R & D Expenditure of Enterprises. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 1123-1138. Connolly, R. A., & Hirschey, M. (1988). Market value and patents: A Bayesian approach. Economics Letters, 27(1), 83-87. Czarnitzki, D. and Fier, A. (2002). Substitutive or Complementary? Innovation Subsidies in the German Service Sector. Appled Economics Quarterly, 48 (1), 1-25. Damanpour F, Walker RM, Avellaneda CN. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations. J Manage Stud 2009;46(4):650–75. David, P.A., Hall, B.H., and Toole, A.A. (2000). Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D?: A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 497–529. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Himmelberg, C. and Petersen, B. (1994). R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study 34 of Small Firms in High-Tech Industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 38-51. Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 107(3), 632-654. Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social networks, 11(1), 39-63. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993). ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No.3, pp. 577-598. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), pp.45-57. Koga, T. (2005). R&D Subsidy and Self-Financed R&D: The Case of Japanese Hig- Technology Start-Ups. Small Business Economics, 24 (1), 53-62. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND journal of economics, 129-151. Lester C. Thurow (1999). BUILDING WEALTH: The new rules for individuals, companies, and nations. Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value- relevance of R&D. Journal of accounting and economics, 21(1), 107-138. Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J., & Wu, H. L. (2006). Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 53(1), 17-26. Lundvall, B.A., Borràs, S., 2005. Science, technology and innovation policies. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Pre. Mamuneas, T.P. and Nadiri, M.I. (1996). Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the US Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Public Economics, 63 (1), 57-81. 35
Markman, G. D., Espina, M. I., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Patents as surrogates for inimitable and non-substitutable resources. Journal of management, 30(4), 529-544. Riitta Katila, 2000. "Using patent data to measure innovation performance," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2/3), pages 180-193. Schmookler, J. (1966) Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Shen, J., & Luo, C. (2015). Overall review of renewable energy subsidy policies in China–Contradictions of intentions and effects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1478-1488. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Haffe, A. (1997). University ver-sus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention.Economics of Innovation and New Technology,5(1), 19–50. Triulzi, G. (2015). Looking for the right path: technology dynamics, inventive strategies and catching-up in the semiconductor industry. Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in complex systems, 10(01), 93- 115. Yang, X., He, L., Xia, Y., & Chen, Y. (2019). Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect. Energy Policy, 132, 156-166. 孔東民 & 李天賞(2014),政府补贴是否提升了公司绩效与社会责任?,《证券 市场导报》,頁 26-31。 陳忠榮(1999),研究發展、專利與市場價值-Tobin`s Q 理論的運用,手稿,頁 1- 20。 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 經濟學系 110258046 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110258046 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
804601.pdf | | 1893Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 24 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|