政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146983

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146983

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50943338 Online Users : 928

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Land Economics > Theses > Item 140.119/146983

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146983

Title:	應用生態補償策略於精進綠建築標章社區類之研究 The Study of Applying Ecological Compensation Strategy to Improve EEWH-EC (Green Building Label - Ecological Community)
Authors:	謝秀雯 Hsieh, Hsiu-Wen
Contributors:	孫振義 Sun, Chen-Yi 謝秀雯 Hsieh, Hsiu-Wen
Keywords:	生態社區生態補償生物多樣性模糊德爾菲法層級分析法 Ecological community Ecological compensation Biodiversity Fuzzy Delphi Method Analytical Hierarchy Process
Date:	2023
Issue Date:	2023-09-01 15:13:27 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	因應氣候變遷、全球暖化的衝擊，聯合國永續發展核心議程早在2015年已將「陸地生態系統與生物多樣性」列入，因生態系服務的崩壞速度加快，為了推進自然生態系統環境資源達到零淨損失的政策目標，「生態補償策略」之議題也開始受到關注，以更有效率實現對於自然資源的恢復和保護，達到永續發展目標。因人類土地利用後大量建築量體和工作物等的存在大幅改變之影響，各種生態區位皆受衝擊，快速影響地球整體生態環境，人類對生態認知的態度也因此有所轉變。傳統以人為中心的考量已漸向以生態為中心的土地倫理觀平衡模式趨進。透過文獻回顧，本研究發現德國綠建築社區發展系統(DGNB)，指標詳細程度及對永續發展的覆蓋範圍為各方面之最。進一步了德國生境網絡系統，乃是一附隨環境侵擾—補償制度、價值中立的運作系統為初始，至其後被納入成為自然環境母法（德國聯邦自然保護法）核心價值目標，並非偶然。衡酌台灣綠建築標章—生態社區類，似有異曲同工之處。在台灣，綠建築評估系統(EEWH)自1999年起推行至今，一貫以生態、節能、減廢、健康為主軸，其中生態社區類(EEWH-EC)誕生之初，迄今始終為六大家族評估範圍中最大尺度者，且創設之初即建立具有非強制性（資訊相對客觀）及開發區內生態統計調查（適度量化）之基礎，希能於其中尋求更加適應台灣本土特性，於增加環境淨增益目標下有更具實質進展之對接手段和策略。爰此，本研究首先運用模糊德爾菲問卷的調查，確立目前EEWH-EC下涵蓋的生態軸向中，擴充可行性前提下，有益於的環境淨增益關鍵評估因素，進一步以層級分析各分類與指標因子之權重值，得出相對重要之排序，以作為未來引導基礎設施與現有周遭生態更多自然連結，營造更符合永續共生的社區環境。 In response to the impact of climate change and global warming, the United Nations core agenda for sustainable development has included "terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity" as early as 2015. In order to promote the policy goal of zero net loss of natural ecosystem environmental resources, " The issue of "ecological compensation strategy" has begun to receive attention. Due to the great changes in the existence of a large number of buildings and working objects after human land use, various ecological locations are affected, rapidly affecting the overall ecological environment of the earth, and human attitudes towards ecological cognition have also changed. The traditional human-centered considerations have gradually moved towards the ecologically-centered land ethics balance model. Through literature review, this study found that the German Green Building Community Development System (DGNB) has the most detailed indicators and the coverage of sustainable development in all aspects. A further understanding of the German habitat system is a value-neutral operating system with an accompanying environmental disturbance-compensation system. Considering Taiwan`s green building labels-ecological communities, there are similarities in purpose. In Taiwan, the Green Building Evaluation System (EEWH) has been implemented since 1999, and has always focused on ecology, energy saving, waste reduction, and health. Among them, the ecological community category (EEWH-EC) has been evaluated by the six major families since its birth. The one with the largest scale and non-mandatory, based on relatively objective information and appropriate quantification. Therefore, this study first uses the investigation of fuzzy Delphi questionnaire to establish the key evaluation factors of beneficial environmental net gain in the current ecological axis covered by EEWH-EC under the premise of the feasibility of expansion, and further analyzes each classification and The weights of the index factors are used to obtain a relatively important ranking, which will serve as a guide for the future to guide more natural connections between the infrastructure and the existing surrounding ecology, and create a community environment that is more in line with sustainable symbiosis.
Reference:	江宜炫，2006，「軌道建設與生態工程之整合研究」，逢甲大學交通工程與管理所碩士論文。何世華，2013，「因應氣候變遷土砂易致災集水區水土保持之調適策略」，國立中興大學水土保持學系碩士論文。周子翔，2015，「氣候變遷影響下濕地規劃之探討—以淡水河重要流域為例」，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文。孟曉蘭，2007，「道路建設造成景觀格局變遷之研究」，國立台灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。林小伃，2017，「地貌變遷對鷸鴴科水鳥休息地之衝擊評估—以彰濱工業區為例」，東海大學環境科學與工程學系碩士論文。林玉梅，2010，「共有資源治理模式之探討—以花蓮地區河川土石採取作業為個案分析」，國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文。林秀蕙，2016，「臺北市既成社區改造為生態社區評估架構之研究」，國立臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士論文。林亞青，2013，「都市生態廊道觀點探討生活街道綠化策略之研究－以台中市1期重劃區仁美里為例」，逢甲大學建築所碩士論文。林宛瑩，2008，「山區高速公路建設生態環境融合對策之探討，中華大學土木與工程資訊學系（所）碩士論文。林冠佑，2007，「道路生態工程檢核評估表之應用」，國立臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所碩士論文。林晉輝，2005，「交流道生態土地多元使用之研究」，義守大學土木與生態工　程學系碩士班碩士論文。邱銘源，2001，「國道建設應用生態工法準則之研究」，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。帥柏任，2012，「台灣海岸濕地保育與開發利用之管理架構研擬」，國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。莊函諺，2013，「濕地抵換與濕地補償性緩解措施之立法研究」，國立中興大學法律學系科技法律碩士班碩士論文。郭宇智，2005，「台灣道路建設導入生態補償制度之研究」，義守大學土木與生態工程學系碩士班碩士論文。陳佑樺，2007，「都市周邊地區生態系服務之生態能量分析研究—以臺北桃園地區為例」，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。陳志豪，2017，「都市發展及海岸管理之生態補償策略及評估」，東海大學環境科學與工程學系博士論文。陳貝貞，2009，「以景觀生態學觀點探討濕地廊道評估架構之建立」，東海大學景觀學系碩士論文。陳怡君，2012，「新竹香山濕地及週邊土地利用生態系服務功能分析之研究」，中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士班碩士論文。陳泳霖，2018，「海岸鹽沼型濕地沉積物之碳庫與碳匯能力之分析研究—以高美濕地為例」，國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所碩士論文。陳昱凱，2009，「金門國家公園慈湖地區居民對生態旅遊、生態保育暨生態補償政策態度之研究」，中國文化大學觀光事業學系碩士論文。陳靖瑜，2015，「淡北道路開發之生態補償策略研究-以淡水河紅樹林濕地為例」，臺北市立大學地球環境暨生物資源學系環境教育與資源碩士班碩士論文。曾光霝，2004，「道路建設之生態補償研究：台灣實施案例經驗評析」，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。曾彥儒，2008，「道路建設對鄰近昆蟲生態影響之研究」，明新科技大學營建工程與管理研究所碩士論文。黃紋綺，2012，「台灣港埠建置導入生態補償之研究—以高雄港為例」，國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所碩士論文。黃渝誠，2011，「高速公路建設生態效益評估指標比較方法之研究」，逢甲大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士論文。黃禮佑，2014，「生態補償應用於生態工程之評估架構研究」，大葉大學環境工程學系碩士論文。楊華勳，2009，「交通建設生態補償初期評估之研究」，中華大學營建管理學系碩士班碩士論文。楊進忠，2017，「社區類綠建築評估應用於住宅社區之實證研究」，逢甲大學建築系在職碩士論文。楊懿芹，2010，「生態社區評估系統EEWH-EC在工業園區適用性之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文。廖真妙，2015，「建構既有集合住宅綠建築評估系統-以臺北市為例」，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文。歐姿君，2008，「生態補償應用於台灣河川建設之研究」，國立高雄應用科技大學土木工程與防災科技研究所碩士論文。蔡叡昕，2000，「都市生態社區選址評估指標體系之研究」，朝陽科技大學建築及設計都市研究所碩士論文。鄧伯齡，2009，「台南縣官田水雉復育區的棲地管理模式對水雉繁殖影響之研究」，國立高雄師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文。謝婷如，2015，「鰲鼓濕地明智利用之減碳效益」，國立中興大學水土保持學系碩士論文。 A. Reith, Melinda Orova,「Do green neighbourhood ratings cover sustainnab-ility?」 , Ecological Indicators, Vol. 48, (2015), 660-672. Arthur George Tansley, 「The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms」, (1935), 284-307. Bulgaria. Burkhard B, Maes J (Eds.) et al. 「Mapping Ecosystem Service’s」, (Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 2017), 374. C. Pigou, M. A., 「The Economics of Welfare」, (Lodon: Macmilian And Co., Limited, Fourth Edition, 1920). Daniel Sitarz ed., Agenda 21: 「The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet」 (Colorado: Boulder, 1993), 13。 De Groot et al. 「A Typology for the Classiﬁcation Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services」, Vol. 41, Issue 3 (Ecological Economics, 2002), 393-408. Edward O. Wilson and France M. Peter, 「Biodiversity」, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1998). Ernst Haeckel, 「Generelle Morphologie der Organismen」, vol. 1.(Berlin: G. Reimer, 1866), 28–29. Eugene P. Odum & Gary W. Barrett, 「Fundamentals of ecology」 (Fifth Edition, 1953) Forman, R. T. T. & Gordon, 「Landscape Ecology」, (John Wiley & Sons.,1986) Greenbuildingindex SDN BHD, 「Malasia GBI Assessment Criteria for Township V2.0」, (Kuala Lumpera: Malasia, 2017). I. Bruchmann & C. Hobohm, 3 Factors that create endemism, (Endemism, 2003) Lindeman, RL, 「The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology」, Vol.23, No.4, (Ecology, 1942), 399–418. Martine Maron et al. 「The many meanings of nnl in environmental policy」, (NATurE Sustainability, vol 1, Jan, 2018), 19–27. Martine Marona et al. 「Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies」 , Vol. 155, (Biological Conservation, 2012), 141-148. McKenney et al. 「Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets-A Review of Offset Frameworks」, 2010. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, (2005). Mirka Laurila-Pant, 「How to value biodiversity in environmental management」, Vol.1, No.1, (Pittsburgh：Services Sciences, 2015), 1-11. Pachauri, M., 「Climate Change – Synthesis Report」, (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, Vol. 7,2004). Reid Ewing, 「Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable? 」, Vol. 63 No.1 (Journal of the American Planning Association,1997), 107-126. Robert Costanza, 「The value of the world`s ecosystem services and natural capital」, Vol. 387 No.15 (Nature,1997), 253-260. Rudolf de Groot, 「Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making」, Vol 29, Issue 169, (Natural Resources,1992). Safitri, R., & Desiyana, I., 「Investigating the Eco-community Concept toward Socio-Spatial Quality in Sector 7 and 9, Bintaro, South Jakarta 」, Vol 179, (Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, ,2015), 183-194. Sizemore, S., 「Urban eco-villages as an alternative model to revitalizing urban neighborhoods: The eco-village approach of the seminary square/price hill eco-village of Cincinnati 」, (Ohio, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2004). Thomas L. Saaty, 「Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process 」, Vol. 1, No. 1：Pittsburgh，America (Services Sciences, , 2008). V. Plyusnin & B. Müller, 「Assessment, Compensation and Biodiversity Offsets of Environmental Impacts」, (The German-Russian Compendium, Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development & Sochava Institute of Geography of the SB RAS. 2014), p.14 Vale, T. R., Vale G. R., 「Suburban bird populations in west-central California 」, Vol. 3 (Journal of Biogeography,1976), 157-165. Vietnam Green Building Council,「LOTUS New Construction V3 Technical Manual 」, (VGBC, 2019). Young, M. D., 「Sustainable investment and resource use 」, (United Nations educational, Scientific and cultural Organization. The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited, Carnforth, ,1992) Aichi Biodiversity Targets, 2010, https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/, last visited on Jul, 21, 2023, via http://www.swan.org.tw/pg.php?pgid=82，download site:http://www.swan.org.tw/docdir/24BC539871.pdf）, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 BCA, 2018, Singapore GM Green Mark Assessment Criteria and Application Forms, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-certification-scheme/green-mark-assessment-criteria-and-online-application, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Buzer.de, 2017, https://www.buzer.de/s1.htm?g=bbaug&a=1a,35, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Buzer.de, 2010, http://www.buzer.de/gesetz/8972/index.htmm, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Convention on Biological Diversity, 2007, What is biodiversity，http://www.archives.biodiv.be/, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2018, The 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects, https://population.un.org/wup/DataQuery/, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Meetings of the Conference of the Parties（COP），2019，https://www.cbd.int/cop/, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 OECM, 2018, Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity –protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf, last visited on Jul. 21, 2023 Crump, A., 1993, Dictionary of Environment and Development: People, Place, Ideas and Organizations, Cambridge: MIT Press. Tumin, M. M., 1985, Social Stratification: The Forms and Functions of Inequality, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentic-Hall, Inc. Basch, L., Nina, G. S. and Cristina, S. B., 1994, Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States, Amsterdam: .Gordon and Breach Science Yinger, J., Bloom, H. S., Borsch-Supan, A., and Ladd, H. F., 1988, Property Taxes and House Values-Theory and Estimation of Intrajurisdictional Property Tax Capitalization, Washington, D. C.: Academic Press。 Gage, J., ed. and trans., 1980, Goethe on Art, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Grusky, D. B., ed., 1994, Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Voulder, CO: Westview Press. Ong, A. and Donald, M. N., eds., 1997, Ungrounded Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism, New York: Routledge.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班 106923018
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106923018
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Land Economics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
301801.pdf		9807Kb	Adobe PDF2	119	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback