English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113148/144119 (79%)
Visitors : 50711261      Online Users : 300
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146890
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146890


    Title: 物聯網應用倫理之研究
    An Investigation of IoT Ethical Concerns
    Authors: 陳品臻
    Chen, Pin-Jhen
    Contributors: 杜雨儒
    Tu, Yu-Ju
    陳品臻
    Chen, Pin-Jhen
    Keywords: 物聯網
    物聯網倫理
    道德
    PAPA理論
    倫理影響評估
    Internet of Things
    IoT Ethics
    Ethics
    PAPA
    Ethical Impact Assessment
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-09-01 14:53:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文旨在了解IoT設備與服務對於社會的倫理影響,以及其所產生的主要倫理問題。由於各國的IoT規範尚未完善,需暫時仰賴IoT倫理以保障使用者,然而,目前仍未有一致性的IoT倫理框架。因此,我們將PAPA理論作為主軸,延伸加入資訊科技倫理影響評估框架的價值觀,建構六大倫理面向:隱私、準確性、所有權、近用性、安全和正義,以更完整的涵蓋IoT倫理。

    本研究採用系統性文獻回顧法,檢索六個知名的商業、資訊管理與科技資料庫,篩選後獲得20篇與IoT倫理相關的文獻。我們以六大IoT倫理面向作為分析核心,並發現如今IoT確實在上述面向充滿道德挑戰。隨著IoT的持續發展,道德困境有些已然浮上檯面,然而歧視、數位落差等相關議題,仍然需要更多的關注。
    This thesis aims to understand the ethical impact of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and services on society. Until the regulations governing IoT become sufficient, it is necessary to rely on IoT ethics to protect users. However, as a consistent IoT ethical framework is yet to be formulated, we take the PAPA theory as this study’s main axis and use the values of the ethical impact assessment (EIA) to derive six aspects—privacy, accuracy, property, accessibility, safety, and justice—to cover IoT ethics comprehensively.

    This study conducted a systematic review of the literature, searched six well-known business, information management, and technology databases, and obtained 20 articles related to IoT ethics after screening. We take the six ethical aspects as the core of the analysis and find that today IoT is indeed full of ethical challenges in the above aspects. With the continuous development of IoT, some of these ethical dilemmas have surfaced. However, related issues such as discrimination and the digital divide still need more attention.
    Reference: AboBakr, A., & Azer, M. A. (2017). IoT ethics challenges and legal issues. 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES).
    Allhoff, F., & Henschke, A. (2018). The internet of things: Foundational ethical issues. Internet of Things, 1, 55-66.
    Atlam, H. F., & Wills, G. B. (2020). IoT security, privacy, safety and ethics. Digital twin technologies and smart cities, 123-149.
    Baldini, G., Botterman, M., Neisse, R., & Tallacchini, M. (2018). Ethical design in the internet of things. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 905-925.
    Carpintero Benítez, F. (2020). The Fundamentals of Ethics. Criminal Law and Morality in the Age of Consent: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 171-189.
    Chatterjee, S. (2020). The safety of IoT-enabled system in smart cities of India: do ethics matter? International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(4), 601-618.
    Chatterjee, S., Kar, A. K., & Mustafa, S. Z. (2021). Securing IoT devices in smart cities of India: from ethical and enterprise information system management perspective. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(4), 585-615.
    Chen, S., Xu, H., Liu, D., Hu, B., & Wang, H. (2014). A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges, and opportunities with china perspective. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 1(4), 349-359.
    Cornish, P. (2023, 2023 Jan 11). Ring doorbell users urged to check three key privacy settings in their mobile app. Express (Online). https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/property/1719548/ring-doorbell-privacy-settings-footage-wifi-network
    De Cremer, D., Nguyen, B., & Simkin, L. (2017). The integrity challenge of the Internet-of-Things (IoT): on understanding its dark side. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1-2), 145-158.
    Dhirani, L. L., Mukhtiar, N., Chowdhry, B. S., & Newe, T. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review. Sensors, 23(3), 1151.
    Dudhe, P., Kadam, N., Hushangabade, R., & Deshmukh, M. (2017). Internet of Things (IOT): An overview and its applications. 2017 International conference on energy, communication, data analytics and soft computing (ICECDS).
    El‐Khoury, M., & Arikan, C. L. (2021). From the Internet of things toward the Internet of bodies: ethical and legal considerations. Strategic Change, 30(3), 307-314.
    Espinoza, J., & Lee, D. (2023, 2023 Feb 15). EU set to investigate Amazon’s $1.7bn purchase of Roomba-maker. Financial Times(Online). https://www.ft.com/content/b05a1260-ee5a-4ac8-9a34-31cdb8104cf1
    Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. Bmj, 323(7321), 1103-1105.
    Gaur, M. N., & Gupta, V. (2022). Ethical Framework for Iot in People Analytics: Risks and Opportunities. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(1s), 376-387.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.
    Hill, K., & McCabe, D. (2022). Texas Sues Google for Collecting Biometric Data Without Consent. New York Times (Online). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/20/technology/texas-google-privacy-lawsuit.html
    Karale, A. (2021). The challenges of IoT addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws. Internet of Things, 15, 100420.
    Kaupins, G., & Coco, M. (2017). Perceptions of internet-of-things surveillance by human resource managers. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 82(2), 53.
    Kirtley, J. E., & Memmel, S. (2018). Too smart for its own good: Addressing the privacy and security challenges of the Internet of Things. Journal of Internet Law, 22(4).
    Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: UK.
    Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a literature review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 127-132.
    Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.
    Madakam, S., Lake, V., Lake, V., & Lake, V. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT): A literature review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3(05), 164.
    Maiese, M. (2020, 2020 Jul). Principles of Justice and Fairness. https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/principles_of_justice/
    Maple, C. (2017). Security and privacy in the internet of things. Journal of cyber policy, 2(2), 155-184.
    Mason, R. O. (1986). Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/248873
    McKinsey. (2015). The Internet of Things: Mapping the Value Beyond the Hype. McKinsey & Company, New York, NY, USA. In.
    Mikton, J. (2015). The Internet of Things: ethics of our connectivity. The International Schools Journal, 35(1), 56.
    Mittelstadt, B. (2017a). Designing the health-related internet of things: ethical principles and guidelines. Information, 8(3), 77.
    Mittelstadt, B. (2017b). Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review. Ethics and information technology, 19(3), 157-175.
    Ndiaye, M., Oyewobi, S. S., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M., Hancke, G. P., Kurien, A. M., & Djouani, K. (2020). IoT in the wake of COVID-19: A survey on contributions, challenges and evolution. Ieee Access, 8, 186821-186839.
    Oosman, B. S., & Dudhe, R. (2021). Review on the ethical and legal challenges with IoT. 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE).
    Patel, K. K., Patel, S. M., & Scholar, P. (2016). Internet of things-IOT: definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application & future challenges. International journal of engineering science and computing, 6(5).
    Peslak, A. R. (2006). PAPA revisited: A current empirical study of the Mason framework. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3), 117-123.
    Popescul, D., & Georgescu, M. (2014). Internet of Things–some ethical issues. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 13(2 (18)), 208-214.
    Rao, K. S. (2008). Informed consent: an ethical obligation or legal compulsion? Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, 1(1), 33.
    Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European journal of information systems, 23(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.7
    Saritha, S., & Sarasvathi, V. (2017). A study on application layer protocols used in IoT. 2017 International Conference on Circuits, Controls, and Communications (CCUBE).
    Segkouli, S., Fico, G., Vera-Muñoz, C., Lecumberri, M., Voulgaridis, A., Triantafyllidis, A., Sala, P., Nunziata, S., Campanini, N., & Montanari, E. (2022). Ethical Decision Making in Iot Data Driven Research: A Case Study of a Large-Scale Pilot. Healthcare.
    Sethi, P., & Sarangi, S. R. (2017). Internet of things: architectures, protocols, and applications. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017.
    Shahraki, A., & Haugen, Ø. (2018). Social ethics in Internet of Things: An outline and review. 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), 509-516.
    Silva, R., & Iqbal, R. (2018). Ethical implications of social internet of vehicles systems. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 6(1), 517-531.
    Singh, M. P., & Murukannaiah, P. K. (2023). Toward an Ethical Framework for Smart Cities and the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Computing, 27(2), 51-56.
    Tanzi, T. J., Sebastien, O., & Rizza, C. (2015). Designing autonomous crawling equipment to detect personal connected devices and support rescue operations: Technical and societal concerns. URSI Radio Science Bulletin, 2015(355), 35-44.
    Tzafestas, S. G. (2018). Ethics and law in the internet of things world. Smart cities, 1(1), 98-120.
    Ustek Spilda, F., Powell, A., & Nemorin, S. (2019). Engaging with ethics in Internet of things: imaginaries in the social milieu of technology developers. Big Data and Society, 6(2).
    Vermanen, M., Rantanen, M. M., & Harkke, V. (2022). Ethical framework for IoT deployment in SMEs: individual perspective. Internet Research, 32(7), 185-201.
    Wachter, S. (2018). Normative challenges of identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, profiling, discrimination, and the GDPR. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(3), 436-449.
    Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and information technology, 13, 199-226.
    Wu, M., Lu, T.-J., Ling, F.-Y., Sun, J., & Du, H.-Y. (2010). Research on the architecture of Internet of Things. 2010 3rd international conference on advanced computer theory and engineering (ICACTE).
    Zakerabasali, S., & Ayyoubzadeh, S. M. (2022). Internet of Things and healthcare system: A systematic review of ethical issues. Health Science Reports, 5(6), e863.
    Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    110356032
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110356032
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    603201.pdf916KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback