政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146828
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51340401      線上人數 : 857
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146828
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146828


    題名: 薪酬差距之成因:探討經理人權力與不同類型機構投資人之影響
    The Cause of Pay Gap: Exploring the Influence of CEO Power and Different Types of Institutional Ownership
    作者: 蕭冠維
    Hsiao, Kuan-Wei
    貢獻者: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    蕭冠維
    Hsiao, Kuan-Wei
    關鍵詞: 經理人權力
    暫時型機構投資人
    專門型機構投資人
    薪酬差距
    CEO Power
    Transient Institutional Investor
    Dedicated Institutional Investor
    Pay Gap
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-09-01 14:40:54 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究基於管理者權力理論之觀點,探討形成差距的原因。首先,發現當經理人擁有越高的權力時,會因為管理據守而更有可能有租金提取的行為圖利自身,因而導致公司有越高的薪酬差距。其次,本研究按照機構投資人的持股集中度和投資組合週轉率進行分類,將機構投資人分類為擁有低持股集中度且投資組合週轉較高的暫時型機構投資人以及擁有較高持股集中度與投資組合週轉較低的專門型機構投資人。本研究發現當公司被越多的暫時型機構投資人所持有時,會有較高的薪酬差距,該結果代表被暫時型機構投資人持有的公司,高階經理人更有可能有管理據守的情形發生。然而並未發現專門型機構投資人的持股比會顯著地影響薪酬差距。在額外分析中,本研究改以公司最終控制者型態探討其對薪酬差距的影響,發現當公司係由政府持有時會有顯著較低的薪酬差距;若公司係由經理人主導時,會有顯著較高的薪酬差距。
    Based on the perspective of managerial power theory, this research explores the cause of pay gap. Firstly, because of managerial entrenchment, the managers who have more power would extract higher rent from the company to benefit themselves, leading to higher pay gap. Secondly, this research classifies institutional investors into transient institutional investors with low ownership concentration and high portfolio turnover and dedicated institutional investors with higher ownership concentration and lower portfolio turnover. It is found that when the company held by more transient institutional investors will be a higher pay gap. The result implied that it is likely to occur managerial entrenchment in the company held by transient institutional investor. However, it is not found that the ownership of dedicated institutional investors will significantly affect the pay gap. In an additional analysis, this study examines the influence of the ultimate controller type on pay gap and finds that companies controlled by the government have significantly lower pay gap, while companies controlled by managers have significantly higher pay gap.
    參考文獻: 卜正球,2009,公營事業績效管理的幾個關鍵問題,研考雙月刊,第33卷第2期:48-60。
    李佳玲,2006,不確定性, 高階經理人報償差距與公司績效之關連性: 競賽理論之驗證,會計評論,第42期:23-53。
    李冠皓與黃培琳,2010,公司治理模組解釋(四)集團控制型態--以上市櫃公司為例,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第83卷:93-101。
    汪進揚與王妤如,2021,董事及高階管理者超額薪酬對員工薪酬之影響︰ 執行長權力調節效果之探討,會計學報,第8卷第2期:35-69。
    汪進揚與林慧茹,2021,薪酬公平性:員工生產力與控制權偏離之影響,管理學報,第38卷第2期:203-230。
    林宛瑩與許崇源,2008,臺灣集團企業之控股型態及公司治理衡量指標之研究與建議,第28卷第1期:269-312。
    梁嘉紋、吳幸蓁與林芯妤,2022,非擔任主管職務之全時員工薪資與企業揭露員工薪資調整情形之關聯性研究,會計審計論叢,第12卷第2期:87-138。
    陳家偉,2021,公司治理是否降低了高管與基層員工間的薪資差異?以臺灣為例,證券市場發展季刊,第33卷第4期:1-29。
    單驥與吳玉瑩,2004,臺灣管理階層薪資結構:Tournament Theory之實證研究,管理評論,第23卷第2期:47-68。
    葉銀華,2004,以公司治理角度衡量家族企業的利弊-利於企業永續發展,弊在控權圖利濟私,會計研究月刊,第228期:92-95。
    Abernethy, M. A., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. (2015). The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1265-1306.
    Antony, G. M., & Rao, K. V. (2007). A composite index to explain variations in poverty, health, nutritional status and standard of living: Use of multivariate statistical methods. Public Health, 121(8), 578-587.
    Armstrong, C. S., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2010). Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(2), 225-271.
    Bachmann, R. L., Loyeung, A., Matolcsy, Z. P., & Spiropoulos, H. (2020). Powerful CEOs, cash bonus contracts and firm performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(1-2), 100-131.
    Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. M., & Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199-221.
    Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71-92.
    Bhide, A. (1993). The hidden costs of stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 34(1), 31-51.
    Borochin, P., & Yang, J. (2017). The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(1), 171-199.
    Brown, C., & Medoff, J. (1989). The employer size-wage effect. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1027-1059.
    Bugeja, M., Matolcsy, Z., & Spiropoulos, H. (2017). The CEO pay slice: Managerial power or efficient contracting? Some indirect evidence. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(1), 69-87.
    Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 305-333.
    Bushee, B. J., & Noe, C. F. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 171-202.
    Chan, H. L., Kawada, B., Shin, T., & Wang, J. (2020). CEO-employee pay gap and firm R&D efficiency. Review of Accounting & Finance, 19(2), 271-287.
    Chang, W., Dambra, M., Schonberger, B., & Suk, I. (2022). Does sensationalism affect executive compensation? Evidence from pay ratio disclosure reform. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(1), 187-242.
    Chen, Z., Huang, Y., & Wei, K. C. J. (2013). Executive Pay Disparity and the Cost of Equity Capital. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 48(3), 849-885.
    Cheng, S. (2004). R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 305-328.
    Chung, K. H., & Zhang, H. (2011). Corporate governance and institutional ownership. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 247-273.
    Coles, J. L., Lemmon, M. L., & Meschke, J. F. (2012). Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 149-168.
    Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176.
    Elyasiani, E., & Jia, J. (2010). Distribution of institutional ownership and corporate firm performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 606-620.
    Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical tests on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262-280.
    Gabaix, X., & Landier, A. (2008). Why has CEO pay increased so much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 49-100.
    Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691-719.
    Grossman, W., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2006). The impact of strategic persistence on executive compensation. Journal of Management, 32(2), 257-278.
    Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119-1158.
    Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2351-2374.
    Haß, L. H., Müller, M. A., & Vergauwe, S. (2015). Tournament incentives and corporate fraud. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 251-267.
    Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1251-1271.
    Henderson, A. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: A competitive test of economic and behavioral views. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 96-117.
    Ho, J., Huang, C. J., & Karuna, C. (2020). Large shareholder ownership types and board governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101715.
    Janakiraman, S., Radhakrishnan, S., & Tsang, A. (2010). Institutional investors, managerial ownership, and executive compensation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(4), 673-707.
    Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
    Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864.
    Lel, U., & Tepe, M. (2021). Does CEO pay slice reflect poor corporate governance? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(2), 67-89.
    Miller, J. S., Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2002). The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 745-756.
    Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. European Comission, Ispra, 15(1), 19-20.
    Newton, A. N. (2015). Executive compensation, organizational performance, and governance quality in the absence of owners. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 195-222.
    Oehmichen, J., Firk, S., Wolff, M., & Maybuechen, F. (2021). Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness. Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1083-1108.
    Pan, Y., Pikulina, E. S., Siegel, S., & Wang, T. Y. (2022). Do Equity Markets Care about Income Inequality? Evidence from Pay Ratio Disclosure. Journal of Finance, 77(2), 1371-1411.
    Phan, T.-T., & Yu, H.-C. (2022). Innovation, institutional ownerships and board diversity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59(4), 1647-1693.
    Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(2), 4-16.
    Rayton, B. A. (2003). Firm performance and compensation structure: performance elasticities of average employee compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 333-352.
    Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
    Rouen, E. (2020). Rethinking Measurement of Pay Disparity and Its Relation to Firm Performance. Accounting Review, 95(1), 343-378.
    Shin, J. Y., & Seo, J. (2011). Less pay and more sensitivity? Institutional investor heterogeneity and CEO pay. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1719-1746.
    Shin, T. (2014). Explaining pay disparities between top executives and nonexecutive employees: A relative bargaining power approach. Social Forces, 92(4), 1339-1372.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
    Van Essen, M., Otten, J., & Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164-202.
    Xu, S., & Ma, P. (2021). CEOs’ poverty experience and corporate social responsibility: Are CEOs who have experienced poverty more generous? Journal of Business Ethics, 1-30.
    Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
    Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.
    Zheng, Y. (2010). Heterogeneous institutional investors and CEO compensation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 35, 21-46.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353048
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353048
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    304801.pdf1881KbAdobe PDF2151檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋