政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146794
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113160/144130 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50754640      線上人數 : 547
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146794


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146794


    題名: 社群通訊工具的選擇對於遠端工作者之界限違反議題探討
    Issues on Boundary Violation for Remote Workers When Selecting Social Communication Tools
    作者: 張宜庭
    Chang, Yi-Ting
    貢獻者: 周致遠
    Chou, Chih-Yuan
    張宜庭
    Chang, Yi-Ting
    關鍵詞: 遠程工作
    即時通訊
    企業社交網路平台
    邊界理論
    工作滿意度
    Remote work
    Instant messaging
    Enterprise social networking platform
    Boundary theory
    Work satisfaction
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-08-16 13:33:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 新冠疫情迫使全球數百萬人採用「在家工作」（WFH）的工作模式。儘管人們逐漸從這場危機中恢復，但遠程工作已成為一種偏好的工作安排和新常態。在疫情期間，資訊及通訊技術（ICT）的使用使人們能夠在任何時間、任何地點進行工作。然而，隨著「工作與生活平衡」（work-life balance）的概念越來越受到關注，資訊及通訊技術（ICT）的增加使用被人們既讚揚又批評，因為它模糊了工作和個人生活在家之間的界限。即時通訊（IM）應用和企業社交網絡（ESN）平台是在工作中常用的社交通訊工具。然而，過去的邊界理論研究並未廣泛研究這兩種社交通訊工具的差異。此外，工作滿意度對於許多人來說是一個重要問題。因此，本研究旨在探討即時通訊和企業社交網絡平台的使用以及工作滿意度是否能夠調節邊界理論中的界線違反。
    The COVID-19 pandemic has forced millions of individuals worldwide to adopt the “work from home” (WFH) approach. Although people are gradually recovering from this public health crisis, remote work is becoming a preferred working arrangement and a new norm. During the pandemic, the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has enabled people to work virtually from any location at any time. However, the increased use of ICT has been both praised and criticized for blurring the boundaries between work and personal life at home, as the concept of “work-life balance” (WLB) gains more attention. Instant messaging (IM) applications and enterprise social networking (ESN) platforms are commonly used communication tools for work. However, past boundary theory studies did not extensively research these two types of social communication tools. Furthermore, job satisfaction is a critical issue for many individuals today. As such, this paper aims to investigate whether the use of IM and ESN tools and work satisfaction can moderate the boundary violations in boundary theory.
    參考文獻: Adisa, T. A., Ogbonnaya, C., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). Remote working and employee engagement: a qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic. Information Technology & People(ahead-of-print).
    Ahmad, H., Ahmad, K., & Shah, I. A. (2010). Relationship between job satisfaction, job performance attitude towards work and organizational commitment. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 257-267.
    Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68.
    Althammer, S. E., Reis, D., van der Beek, S., Beck, L., & Michel, A. (2021). A mindfulness intervention promoting work–life balance: How segmentation preference affects changes in detachment, well‐being, and work–life balance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 282-308.
    Ammons, S. K., & Markham, W. T. (2004). Working at hdome: Experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociological Spectrum, 24(2), 191-238.
    Anders, A. (2016). Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 224-261.
    Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day`s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management review, 25(3), 472-491.
    Avery, C., & Zabel, D. (2001). The flexible workplace: A sourcebook of information and research. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 383-400.
    Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall.
    Bellmann, L., & Hübler, O. (2021). Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance–robust or heterogeneous links? International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 424-441.
    Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592-610.
    Buitendach, J. H., & De Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity, extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction and affective organisational commitment of maintenance workers in a parastatal. South African Journal of Business Management, 36(2), 27-37.
    Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human behavior, 21(1), 85-103.
    Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. (2015). The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 273-293.
    Cho, H.-K., Trier, M., & Kim, E. (2005). The use of instant messaging in working relationship development: A case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), JCMC1044.
    Chung-Yan, G. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(3), 237.
    Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770.
    Crandall, W., & Gao, L. (2005). An update on telecommuting: Review and prospects for emerging issues. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(3), 30-37.
    Darics, E. (2014). The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communicative situations in work-related instant messaging. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(4), 337-358.
    Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045-1068.
    DuBrin, A. J. (1991). Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of telecommuters versus in-house employees: a research note on work in progress. Psychological Reports, 68(3_suppl), 1223-1234.
    Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195-212.
    Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336-361.
    Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541.
    Grinter, R. E., & Eldridge, M. A. (2001). y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Bonn, Germany.
    Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York.
    Gurstein, P. (2001). Wired to the world, chained to the home: Telework in daily life. UBC Press.
    Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996). The future of telecommuting. Futures, 28(3), 227-240.
    Harpaz, I. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of telecommuting for the individual, organization and society. Work Study, 51(2/3), 74-80.
    Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 220-241.
    Hirschfeld, R. R. (2000). Does revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form make a difference? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 255-270.
    Hislop, D., Axtell, C., Collins, A., Daniels, K., Glover, J., & Niven, K. (2015). Variability in the use of mobile ICTs by homeworkers and its consequences for boundary management and social isolation. Information and Organization, 25(4), 222-232.
    Hunter, E. M., Clark, M. A., & Carlson, D. S. (2019). Violating work-family boundaries: Reactions to interruptions at work and home. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1284-1308.
    Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D. J., & Kamm, C. (2002). The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York.
    Jostell, D., & Hemlin, S. (2018). After hours teleworking and boundary management: Effects on work-family conflict. Work, 60(3), 475-483.
    Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
    Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407.
    Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106.
    Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., & Choi, V. K. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63-77.
    Kramer, A., & Kramer, K. Z. (2020). The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. 119, 103442.
    Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work‐home segmentation or integration: A person‐environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(4), 485-507.
    Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704-730.
    Kuegler, M., Smolnik, S., & Kane, G. (2015). What’s in IT for employees? Understanding the relationship between use and performance in enterprise social software. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 90-112.
    Leon, R. D., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R., Gómez-Gasquet, P., & Mula, J. (2017). Social network analysis: A tool for evaluating and predicting future knowledge flows from an insurance organization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 103-118.
    Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 796-816.
    Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1-19.
    Liao, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, M., & Kwan, H. K. (2016). Work–family effects of LMX: The moderating role of work–home segmentation preferences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 671-683.
    Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2013). Work‐to‐family spillover effects of workplace ostracism: The role of work‐home segmentation preferences. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 75-93.
    Mäntymäki, M., & Riemer, K. (2016). Enterprise social networking: A knowledge management perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1042-1052.
    Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management review, 5(3), 361-367.
    Matli, W. (2020). The changing work landscape as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic: insights from remote workers life situations in South Africa. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 1237-1256.
    Milewski, A. E., & Smith, T. M. (2000). Providing presence cues to telephone users. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York.
    Moe, N. B., Cruzes, D. S., Dybå, T., & Engebretsen, E. (2015). Coaching a global agile virtual team. 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, Ciudad Real, Spain.
    Morgan, R. E. (2004). Teleworking: an assessment of the benefits and challenges. European Business Review, 16(4), 344-357.
    Müller, T., & Niessen, C. (2019). Self‐leadership in the context of part‐time teleworking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 883-898.
    Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York.
    Ng, P. M., Lit, K. K., & Cheung, C. T. (2022). Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organization-environment (TOE) context. Technology in Society, 70, 102022.
    Nilles, J. M. (1997). Telework: enabling distributed organizations: implications for IT managers. Information Systems Management, 14(4), 7-14.
    Nippert-Eng, C. E. (2008). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
    Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432-445.
    Ou, C. X., & Davison, R. M. (2011). Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 61-72.
    Park, Y., Fritz, C., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 457-467.
    Park, Y., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 133–152.
    Pérez, M. P., Sanchez, A. M., & de Luis Carnicer, M. P. (2003). The organizational implications of human resources managers’ perception of teleworking. Personnel Review, 32(6), 733-755.
    Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management review, 9(4), 712-721.
    Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 513-534.
    Qi, C., & Chau, P. Y. (2016). An empirical study of the effect of enterprise social media usage on organizational learning Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS`16). Proceedings, Paper 330, Chiayi, Taiwan.
    Quan-Haase, A., Cothrel, J., & Wellman, B. (2005). Instant messaging for collaboration: A case study of a high-tech firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4), JCMC10413.
    Richter, A., & Riemer, K. (2013). The contextual nature of enterprise social networking: A multi case study comparison. 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Utrecht, Netherlands.
    Riemer, K., & Scifleet, P. (2012). Enterprise social networking in knowledge-intensive work practices: A case study in a professional service firm Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Geelong, Australia.
    Sandoval-Reyes, J., Idrovo-Carlier, S., & Duque-Oliva, E. J. (2021). Remote work, work stress, and work–life during pandemic times: A Latin America situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7069.
    Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Xiao, X., & Ahuja, M. (2012). Managing employees’ use of mobile technologies to minimize work-life balance impacts. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(4), 143-157.
    Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage.
    Suh, A., & Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27, 140-159.
    Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001). Home‐based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co‐residents. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 123-145.
    Turban, E., Bolloju, N., & Liang, T.-P. (2011). Enterprise social networking: Opportunities, adoption, and risk mitigation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 21(3), 202-220.
    Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. basil Blackwell.
    Valcour, P. M., & Hunter, L. W. (2004). Technology, organizations, and work-life integration. In Work and life integration (pp. 76-98). Psychology Press.
    Van Der Lippe, T., & Lippényi, Z. (2020). Co‐workers working from home and individual and team performance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1), 60-79.
    Van Meel, J. (2011). The origins of new ways of working: Office concepts in the 1970s. Facilities, 29(9/10), 357-367.
    Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (1992). Examining the causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Management, 18(1), 153-167.
    Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 313-323.
    Voida, A., Newstetter, W. C., & Mynatt, E. D. (2002). When conventions collide: the tensions of instant messaging attributed. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York.
    Vyas, L. (2022). “New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets. Policy and Society, 41(1), 155-167.
    Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59.
    Wheatley, D. (2012). Good to be home? Time‐use and satisfaction levels among home‐based teleworkers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 224-241.
    Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Shen, C., Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2019). Work-family segmentation preferences and work-family conflict: Mediating effect of work-related ICT use at home and the multilevel moderating effect of group segmentation norms. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 834.
    Zhang, M., Zhao, K., & Korabik, K. (2019). Does work-to-family guilt mediate the relationship between work-to-family conflict and job satisfaction? Testing the moderating roles of segmentation preference and family collectivism orientation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103321.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    110356014
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110356014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    601401.pdf1343KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋