English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50914399      Online Users : 594
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146698


    Title: 故事要素在國民法官法庭之運用 -以臺灣臺南地方法院111年度第二次國民法官模擬法庭為例
    The Application of Storytelling Elements in the Lay Judges` Court -The Second Mock Trial of Lay Judges in Tainan District Court, Taiwan, 111th Year
    Authors: 李尚宇
    Li, Shang-Yu
    Contributors: 林玲遠
    李尚宇
    Li, Shang-Yu
    Keywords: 國民法官法
    故事
    論述設計
    Discuss design
    Lay Judges Act
    Story
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 14:34:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「國民法官法」在2023年1月1日在我國正式施行,這全新制度所帶來的變革,是我國審、檢、辯三方從未經歷過的。為因應將來法庭活動的變革,固有引進外國的「案件理論」作為參考。然除此之外,是否亦能從傳播的角度,找尋得以製造張力、增加對觀眾影響力的方法,來協助檢、辯雙方未來在法庭上的運用?甚至成為偵查檢察官在偵查階段的偵辦指引?本論文之研究目的,即從陪審團相關研究、建立信任感,到如何完成成功演講等面向,歸納出故事對於人的影響力,並在諸多故事要素中,找尋得以在法庭上運用的故事要素,在符合訴訟制度下,嘗試建構一套得以協助檢、辯雙方運用之論述架構,最後再以模擬法庭個案進行研究,並透過專家訪談之方式,驗證論述架構的可行性。
    The "Lay Judges Act" has officially taken effect on January 1, 2023. The changes which bring about by this brand-new system have never been experienced by the trial, prosecution, and defense parties in Taiwan. In order to cope with the changes in court activities in the future, it is inherent to introduce foreign " Case Theory " for reference.

    In addition to " Case Theory ", whether it is possible to find ways to create tension and increase influence on the audience from the perspective of communication, which can improve the application of the prosecution and defense parties during the court procedure , or even become the investigative prosecutor`s investigation guide during the process of investigation, will be worth discussing issues.

    The research purpose of this essay is to summarize the influence of stories on people from jury-related research, building trust, and how to complete a successful speech, and to find the elements of stories that can be used in court among numerous story elements, and to try to construct a set of narrative frameworks that can be used to assist the prosecution and the defense in compliance with the litigation system.

    After getting a comprehensive understanding of the relevant concepts, in order to link with the practice , this essay will also exhibit the research result of mock court cases and validate the narrative frameworks by means of expert interviews.
    Reference: 一、期刊論文
    杉田宗久,張永宏譯(2013)。〈日本裁判員制度之程序與運用〉,《司法週刊》,1650:1-35。
    林俊益、林信旭(2012)。〈人民觀審制之建構【六】〉,《軍法專刊》,59-2:1-16。
    林裕順(2014)。〈卷證不併送下審判程序的論理-以日本「裁判員」檢討評估為中心〉,《檢察新論》,15:39-55。
    林裕順(2018)。〈人民參審 法庭風貌-回歸刑事審判初衷〉,《檢察新論》,24:184-198。
    金孟華(2017)。〈人民參與刑事審判檢察機關的變革-以審判程序為中心〉,《檢察新論》,22:100-109。
    陳靜慧(2013)。〈檢察官在觀審法庭活動之角色與功能〉,《檢察新論》,13:203-218。
    二、書籍
    王永福(2014)。《上台的技術》。臺北:商周出版,城邦文化事業股份有限公司。
    朱怡康譯(2019)。《怎樣談科學》。新北:遠足文化事業股份有限公司。(原書Olson, Randy[2015]. Houston, We Have a Narrative: Why Science Needs Story.)
    李芳齡譯(2016)。《TED TALKS 說話的力量》。臺北:大塊文化。(原書Anderson, Chris[2016].TED Talks:The Official TED Guide to Public Speaking. N.Y, USA: Mariner Books)
    張永宏(2014)。《我國引進國民參與刑事審判制度之研究》。臺北:政大出版社。
    張家瑜、孫斌、洪維德、張玴銘、郭怡青譯(2013)。《法庭辯護技術》。臺北:臺北律師公會。(原書日本辯護士聯合會[2013].法庭辯護技術. 日本:日本辯護士聯合會)
    黃政淵、戴洛棻、蕭少嵫譯(2013)。《故事的解剖》。臺北:漫遊者文化事業股份有限公司。(原書Robert, Mckee[1997].Story:Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting. USA: Azoth Books Co., Ltd)
    廖澺蒼譯(2016)。《影視編劇基礎》。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。(原書Hicks D., Neill[2006].Screenwriting 101:The Essential Craft of Feature Film Writing.)
    臧國仁、蔡琰(2017)。《敘事傳播-故事/人文觀點》。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    蔡秋明、方佳俊譯(2002)。《訴訟技巧》。臺北:商週出版。(原書Hicks D., Neill[2006].Trial Techniques. USA)
    羅雅萱、劉怡女譯(2014)。《跟TED表達,讓世界記住你:用更有說服力的方式行銷你和你的構想》。臺北:先覺。(原書Carmlen, Gallo[2014].Talk Like TED :The 9 Public-Speaking Secrets of the World’s Top Minds.)
    三、政府出版品
    蔡元仕(2015)。〈控制實驗下的人民觀審制度-從模擬法庭實踐經驗看人民觀審試行條例草案所面對之課題〉,《104年度法務研究選輯》。臺北:作者。
    法務部(2023)。〈地方檢察署偵查案件終結情形〉,《法務部法務統計資料》。上網日期:2023年1月19日,取自file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/A01_A101_4_11112%20(1).pdf。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院碩士在職專班
    107941004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107941004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100401.pdf1583KbAdobe PDF2116View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback