政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146560
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50928444      線上人數 : 889
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146560


    題名: 超越通俗劇：舒馬克的歌劇魅影（2004）
    Transcending Melodrama: Joel Schumacher’s The Phantom of the Opera (2004)
    作者: 林思敏
    Lam, Sze Man
    貢獻者: 姜翠芬
    Jiang, Tsui-fen
    林思敏
    Lam, Sze Man
    關鍵詞: 《歌劇魅影》
    喬伊·舒馬克
    安德魯·洛伊·韋伯
    通俗劇
    The Phantom of the Opera
    Joel Schumacher
    Andrew Lloyd Webber
    melodrama
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-08-02 14:02:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 改編自安德魯·洛伊·韋伯1986年的同名音樂劇，靈感同時來自卡斯頓·勒胡於1910年所出版的法國小說《歌劇魅影》──2004年舒馬克執導的電影改編版《歌劇魅影》將觀眾帶入了通俗劇的世界。通俗劇因使用了固定的人物形象和公式化的情節安排而一直被學者蔑視並被視為低級文化。然而，學者忽視了通俗劇在改寫傳統和公式方面的靈活性和適應性。本論文以《歌劇魅影》（2004）為通俗劇範例，探討編劇安德魯·洛伊·韋伯和喬伊·舒馬克如何利用通俗劇元素並同時顛覆它們，繼而超越通俗劇的限制。從角色塑造和情節安排方面來說，本論文主張這部電影比傳統的通俗劇更加複雜和多維，成為了現代通俗劇發展的一個例證。
    Based on Andrew Lloyd Webber`s 1986 musical of the same title, which in turn is inspired by the 1910 French novel Le Fantôme de l`Opéra by Gaston Leroux, the 2004 film adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera, directed by Joel Schumacher, brings the audience to the world of melodrama. Melodrama has long been despised and regarded as low culture by scholars, due to its use of stock characterization and formulaic plot arrangement. However, the scholars overlook the flexibility and adaptability of modern melodrama in rewriting the traditions and formulas. This thesis, focusing on The Phantom of the Opera (2004) as a melodrama, explores how the screenwriters, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Joel Schumacher, utilize the melodramatic elements and subvert them at the same time, transcending the limitations of melodramas. I argue that, different from the traditional melodramas, the 2004 film adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera justifies how this modern melodrama proves itself as a valuable and respectable literary artwork, due to its portrayal of the complexity of human nature and melodramatic but innovative plot rewrite. In this film, the screenwriters utilize the melodramatic elements and subvert them at the same time, so as to go beyond the limitations of melodramas.
    參考文獻: Abrams, M. H., and Geoffrey Galt Harpham. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Cengage Learning, 2015.
    Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Anthony Kenny, Oxford UP, 2013.
    Biodrowski, Steve. “Film Review: The Phantom of the Opera (2004).” Hollywood Gothique, 22 June 2019, http://new.hollywoodgothique.com/review-phantom-opera-2004/.
    Boos, Kristin Ashlee. The Mega-, Melo-, and Meta-Drama in Adaptations of The Phantom of the Opera. 2008. College of William and Mary, Undergraduate thesis.
    Brooks, Peter. The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess. Yale UP, 1995.
    Desilet, Gregory E. Our Faith in Evil: Melodrama and the Effects of Entertainment Violence. McFarland, 2006.
    Gledhill, Christine. “The Melodramatic Field: An Investigation.” Home Is Where the Heart Is: Studies in Melodrama and the Woman`s Film, edited by Christine Gledhill, British FiIm Institute, London, 1987, pp. 5–42.
    Glover, Robert A. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!: A Proven Plan for Getting What You Want In Love, Sex and Life. Ebook ed., Barnes & Noble Digital, 2000.
    H., Chelsea R. “The Phantom of the Opera: Book vs. Musical vs. Movie.” An Ordinary Pen, 15 Feb. 2018, https://anordinarypen.wordpress.com/2018/02/15/the-phantom-of-the-opera-book-vs-musical-vs-movie/.
    Herget, Winfried. “Villains for Pleasure? The Paradox of Nineteenth-Century (American) Melodrama.” Melodrama!: The Mode of Excess from Early America to Hollywood, edited by Frank Kelleter et al., Universitätsverlag Winter, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 19–34.
    Hiles, M. T. “Movie vs Musical: The Phantom of the Opera.” M. T. Hiles Writing, 2 June 2021, https://mthiles.com/2021/06/01/movie-vs-musical-the-phantom-of-the-opera/.
    Holman, C. Hugh. A Handbook of Literature. Macmillan, 1992.
    Howe, Blake, et al. “`Pitiful Creature of Darkness`: The Subhuman and the Superhuman in The Phantom of the Opera.” The Oxford Handbook of Music and Disability Studies, Oxford UP, Oxford, 2016, pp. 795–814.
    Ingarden, Roman. “A Marginal Commentary on Aristotle`s Poetics. Part II.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 20, no. 3, 1962, pp. 273–285.
    James, Henry. The Art of Criticism: Henry James on the Theory and Practice of Fiction. Edited by William R. Veeder and Susan M. Griffin, University of Chicago Press, 1986.
    Kavaler-Adler, Susan. “Object Relations Perspectives on ‘Phantom of the Opera’ and Its Demon Lover Theme: The Modern Film.” The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 69, no. 2, 2009, pp. 150–166.
    Keller, Simon. “Moral Blackmail and the Family.” Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 6, 2016, pp. 699–719.
    Kelleter, Frank, et al. “The Melodramatic Mode Revisted. An Introduction.” Melodrama!: The Mode of Excess from Early America to Hollywood, edited by Barbara Krah and Ruth Mayer, Universitätsverlag Winter, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 7–17.
    Lardy, Leonard Anthony. McTeague: A Study in Determinism, Romanticism, and Fascism. 1959. The University of Montana, MA thesis.
    Lee, Changnam. “The Ghost-Image on Metropolitan Borders-In Terms of Phantom of the Opera and 19th-Century Metropolis Paris.” Societies, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–15.
    Leroux, Gaston. The Phantom of The Opera. Harper Perennial, 1987.
    Lloyd Webber, Andrew, and Joel Schumacher. Script of The Phantom of the Opera. Script Slug, https://www.scriptslug.com/script/phantom-of-the-opera-2004
    Lloyd Webber, Andrew, et al. Libretto of The Phantom of the Opera (1986 Musical). PDFCOFFEE, https://pdfcoffee.com/phantom-of-the-opera-full-musical-script-deluxe-version-pdf-free.html
    McKee, Alison L. “‘Think of Me Fondly’: Voice, Body, Affect and Performance in Prince/Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera.” Studies in Musical Theatre, vol. 7, no. 3, 2013, pp. 309–325.
    Morse, William R. “Desire and the Limit of Melodrama.” Themes in Drama: Melodrama, edited by James Redmond, vol. 14, Cambridge UP, 1993, pp. 17–30.
    Moura, Caroline Navarrina de, et al. “From the Damsel in Distress to the Female Hero: the Wanderings of Christine Daaé in Gaston Leroux`s The Phantom Of The Opera and Its Last Film Adaptation.” ITINERÁRIOS, 2018, pp. 101–117.
    Newman, Kim. “The Phantom of the Opera.” Sight and Sound, Feb. 2005, pp. 65–66.
    Phelan, James. “Authors, Resources, Audiences: Toward a Rhetorical Poetics of Narrative.” Style, vol. 52, no. 1-2, 2018, pp. 1–34.
    Postlewait, Thomas. “From Melodrama to Realism: The Suspect History of American Drama.” Melodrama: The Cultural Emergence of a Genre, edited by Michael Hays and Anastasia Nikolopoulou, St. Martin`s Press, New York, 1999, pp. 39–60.
    Rahill, Frank. The World of Melodrama. Pennsylvania State UP, 1967.
    Rebeck, Theresa. Your Cries Are in Vain: A Theory of the Melodramatic Heroine. 1989. Brandeis University, PhD dissertation.
    Rooney, Monique. “Voir Venir: The Future of Melodrama?” Australian Humanities Review, no. 54, 2013, pp. 81–102.
    Rush, Adam. “The ‘Phan’-Dom of the Opera: Gothic Fan Cultures and Intertextual Otherness.” Contemporary Gothic Drama, 2018, pp. 139–158.
    Ryan, Marie-Laure. “Cheap Plot Tricks, Plot Holes, and Narrative Design.” Narrative, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 56–75.
    Schumacher, Joel, director. The Phantom of the Opera. Entertainment in Video, 2004.
    Shah, Raj. “The Publication and Initial French Reception of Gaston Leroux`s Le Fantôme De L`opéra.” French Studies Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 138, 2016, pp. 13–16.
    Smith, James L. Melodrama. Edited by John D. Smith, vol. 28, The Critical Idiom, Me-thuen, 1973.
    Sternfeld, Jessica. “`Pitiful Creature of Darkness`: The Subhuman and the Superhuman in The Phantom of the Opera.” The Oxford Handbook of Music and Disability Studies, edited by Blake Howe et al., Oxford UP, Oxford, 2016, pp. 795–814.
    Walter, Benjamin. One-Way Street and Other Writings. Translated by J. A. Underwood, Penguin, 2009.
    Winkler, Amanda Eubanks. “Politics and the Reception of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s The Phantom of the Opera.” Cambridge Opera Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, 2014, pp. 271–287.
    Zarzosa, Agustin. “Melodrama and the Modes of the World.” Discourse, vol. 32, no. 2, 2010, pp. 236–255.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    110551025
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551025
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    102501.pdf758KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋