政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146558
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 112704/143671 (78%)
造访人次 : 49798845      在线人数 : 503
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146558


    题名: 掙脫框架的主體:愛特伍《證詞》中難以規訓的身體、團結和抵抗
    Becoming a Different Subject: Undisciplined Bodies, Solidarity and Resistance in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments
    作者: 蔡錦萱
    Tsai, Chin-Hsuan
    贡献者: 邱彥彬
    Chiou, Yen-Bin
    蔡錦萱
    Tsai, Chin-Hsuan
    关键词: 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍
    《證詞》
    米歇爾‧傅柯
    權力技術
    抵抗
    團結
    建 立關係
    Margaret Atwood
    The Testaments
    Michel Foucault
    Discipline
    Resistance
    Solidarity
    Bonds
    日期: 2023
    上传时间: 2023-08-02 14:01:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在《使女的故事》中，主角奧芙弗雷德作為使女的掙扎是學者討論和關注的焦點，而在其續集《證詞》中，瑪格麗特‧愛特伍娓娓道來其餘高階級女性的痛苦和困境，像是嬤嬤和大主教之女兒。本文藉由米歇爾‧傅柯的權力理論為基礎，以分析《證詞》中的基列國是如何以權力技術（disciplinary techniques）治理而帶給主角們痛苦。而後本文也將透過理論所述之權力和抵抗去探討書中團結和抵抗的重要性。在愛特伍的反烏托邦世界中，權力透過各種權力技術實施和治理而有效地塑造和管理基列國人的行為，例如個體化（individualization）和規範化（normalization）。儘管權力技術有效且高效，但主角們仍舊先後以個人和群體之方式反抗基列國政權。憑藉建立關係、團結和團隊合作，主角們終能抵抗個體化及規範化並脫離基列國的統治。
    In The Handmaid’s Tale, Offred’s struggles as a handmaid are the locus of discussion and attention, while in The Testaments, the plight of the Aunts and the Commander’s daughter are unveiled. The Testaments provides a whole picture depicting the suffering of the high-ranking women who speak to Atwood’s political concerns and demonstrate their methods to overcome obstacles. This thesis explores the governing techniques that bring the female protagonists struggles and suffering. It also examines the importance of solidarity and resistance to injustice and status quo in Atwood’s work with Foucault’s theory of power and resistance. In Atwood’s dystopian world, the operation and effectiveness of power are secured by various disciplinary techniques such as individualization and normalization to shape and manage Gileadeans’ behavior. Despite the effectiveness and efficiency of disciplinary techniques, the female protagonists carry out counter-conduct to resist the regime individually and collectively. With their bonds, solidarity, and teamwork, the female protagonists facilitate their liberation from Gilead’s domination.
    參考文獻: Atwood, Margaret. Second Words: Selected Critical Prose 1960–1982. House of Anansi Press, 1982.
    ---. The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland&Stewart, 1985.
    ---. The Testaments. Anchor Books, 2019.
    Conboy, Sheila. “Scripted, Conscripted, and Circumscribed: Body Language in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Anxious Power: Reading, Writing, and Ambivalence in Narrative by Women, edited by Carol J. Singley, State University of New York Press, 1993, pp. 349–362.
    David, Hogsette. “Controlling Women’s Voices in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by David E. Nelson, Greenhaven Press, Detroit, MI, 2012, pp. 98–112.
    Davidson, Arnold I. “In Praise of Counter-Conduct.” History of the Human Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, 2011, pp. 25–41., https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625.
    Dreyfus, Hubert L., et al. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, 2007.
    Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 1975. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Anchor Publishing, 1995.
    ---. Foucault Live: (Interviews, 1961-1984). Edited by Sylvère Lotringer, Semiotext(e), 1996.
    ---. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France 1977-1978. 1977-1978. Edited by Arnold Davidson and Michel Senellart. Translated by Graham Burchell, Picador USA, 2009.
    ---. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley, Vintage Books, 1990.
    ---. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 4, 1982, pp. 777–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.
    Fraser, Nancy. “Michel Foucault: A ‘Young Conservative’?” Ethics, vol. 96, no. 1, 1985, pp. 165–84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381333. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.
    Freibert, Lucy M. “Control and Creativity: The Politics of Risk in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Essays on Margaret Atwood, edited by Judith McCombs, G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 280–291.
    Gheorghiu, Oana Celia, and Michaela Praisler. “Rewriting Politics, or the Emerging Fourth Wave of Feminism in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 28 May 2020, pp. 87–96., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.87-96.
    Heller, Kevin Jon. “Power, Subjectification and Resistance in Foucault.” SubStance, vol. 25, no. 1, 1996, pp. 78–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3685230. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.
    Howells, Coral Ann., editor. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    Feldman Kołodziejuk, Ewelina. “Mothers, Daughters, Sisters: The Intergenerational Transmission of Womanhood in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 67–85., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.67-85.
    Kuznetski, Julia. “Disempowerment and Bodily Agency in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments and The Handmaid’s Tale TV Series.” The European Legacy, vol. 26, no. 3-4, 9 Mar. 2021, pp. 287–302., https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2021.1898108.
    Labudová, Katarína. “Testimonies in The Testaments by Margaret Atwood: Images of Food in Gilead.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 97–110., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.97-110.
    May, Todd. The Philosophy of Foucault. Routledge, 2006.
    Nealon, Jeffrey T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford University Press, 2007.
    Neuman, Shirley. “‘Just a Backlash’: Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Brooks Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 138–152.
    Pickett, Brent L. “Foucault and the Politics of Resistance.” Polity, vol. 28, no. 4, 1996, pp. 445–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3235341. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.
    Rigney, Barbara Hill. Margaret Atwood: Women Writers. Macmillan Press, 1987.
    Rubenstein, Roberta. “Nature and Nurture in Dystopia: The Handmaid’s Tale.” Margaret Atwood: Vision and Forms, edited by Kathryn Van Spanckeren and Jan Castro Garden, Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, pp. 101–112.
    Staels, Hilde. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Resistance Through Narrating.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 227–245.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    110551003
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551003
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    100301.pdf1041KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈