政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146550
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51088337      在线人数 : 963
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146550


    题名: 政府債務對於創新影響的實證分析
    An Empirical Study on the Impact of Government Debt on Innovation
    作者: 林冠宏
    Lin, Guan-Hong
    贡献者: 吳文傑
    Wu, Wen-Chieh
    林冠宏
    Lin, Guan-Hong
    关键词: 創新
    全球創新指數
    專利權
    政府債務
    Innovation
    Global Innovation Index
    Patent
    Government debt
    日期: 2023
    上传时间: 2023-08-02 14:00:03 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文旨在研究影響國家創新能力的因素，其中著重於分析政府債務的影響，並使用OECD部分會員國西元2008年至2019年的追蹤資料進行研究，探討各項因素對於國家創新能力所產生的效果。
    本文將政府債務對於國家創新能力的影響分為正向的創新建設效果與負向的債務排擠效果，相反的兩種效果加總後即為淨效果。這兩種效果的大小會因不同國家或時間的背景條件而有所差異，以不同的變數衡量創新也會得出不同結果，因此政府債務對創新的影響依國家、時間或創新衡量方式而異。
    實證結果顯示，政府債務對於國家創新有正向影響。隨機效果模型與一元固定效果模型中，政府債務對於全球創新指數、專利權申請數皆有顯著的正向影響；二元固定效果模型中，政府債務對於專利權申請數有顯著的正向影響，但對於全球創新指數為正向不顯著影響。因此創新建設效果大於債務排擠效果，政府債務能促進國家創新能力與創新產出增加，此結論異於過去創新相關文獻。推論原因是近年創新趨勢所需的資金與建設投入越來越多，當政府以公債投入創新建設時，除了能推動國家創新發展，更能進一步加速私人創新研發能力。
    另外，本文發現企業研究與發展支出、期刊研究數量、研究員數量對於創新具正向影響，為創新促進因子；政府研究與發展支出對於創新具負向影響，為創新惡化因子。
    This paper aims to study the factors influencing national innovation capabilities, with a particular focus on the impact of government debt. The research is conducted using longitudinal data of selected OECD member countries from 2008 to 2019.
    The impact of government debt on national innovation capabilities is divided into two aspects: the innovation construction effect and the debt crowding out effect. The magnitude of these effects may vary across country or time periods, measuring innovation with different variables may also yield different results.
    The empirical results indicate that government debt has a positive effect on national innovation capabilities. In the random effects model and the one-way fixed effects model, government debt has a significant positive effect on Global Innovation Index and patent applications. In the two-way fixed effects model, government debt has a significant positive effect on patent applications, but the impact on the Global Innovation Index is insignificant. This result shows that the innovation construction effect outweighs the debt crowding out effect, enabling government debt to promote national innovation capabilities and increase innovation output. This conclusion differs from previous literature on innovation. It is inferred that the innovation trend in recent years necessitates a greater investment of funds and infrastructure. When the government invests in innovation and infrastructure through public debt, it not only promotes the country`s innovative development but also further accelerates private innovation and research capabilities.
    Furthermore, the empirical results show that enterprise research and development expenditure, the quantity of journal articles, and the number of researchers have a positive influence on innovation, serving as innovation-promoting factors. By contrast, government expenditures on research and development have a negative impact on innovation, acting as a innovation-deteriorating factors.
    參考文獻: Aali Bujari, A., & Venegas Martínez, F. (2016). Technological innovation and economic growth in Latin America. Revista mexicana de economía y finanzas, 11(2), 77-89.
    Andrijauskiene, M., & Dumčiuvienė, D. (2019). Inward Foreign Direct Investment and National Innovative Capacity. Engineering Economics, 30(3), 339-348. doi:10.5755/j01.ee.30.3.22832
    Ari, I., & Koc, M. (2018). Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt. Sustainability, 10(11), 3901. doi:10.3390/su10113901
    Becker, B. (2015). PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942. doi:10.1111/joes.12074
    Brons, M. R. E., De Groot, H. L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2000). Growth Effects of Governmental Policies: A Comparative Analysis in a Multi‐Country Context. Growth and Change, 31(4), 547-572. doi:10.1111/0017-4815.00144
    Cassia, A. R., Costa, I., & De Oliveira Neto, G. C. (2022). Assessment of the effect of IT infrastructure on the relationship between knowledge sharing and technological innovation capability: survey in multinational companies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-21. doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2069005
    Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2012). The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro area. European economic review, 56(7), 1392-1405.
    Chen, C.-P., Hu, J.-L., & Yang, C.-H. (2011). An international comparison of R&D efficiency of multiple innovative outputs: The role of the national innovation system. Innovation, 13(3), 341-360.
    Chi, W., & Qian, X. (2010). The role of education in regional innovation activities: spatial evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 15(4), 396-419. doi:10.1080/13547860.2010.516158
    Coccia, M. (2013). What are the likely interactions among innovation, government debt, and employment? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 456-471. doi:10.1080/13511610.2013.863704
    Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(3), 495-522.
    DiPietro, W. R. (2012). Favorable and unfavorable conditions for innovation: Some cross country evidence. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2(1), 14-19.
    Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2011). Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation. Journal of knowledge management.
    Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 63(3), 67-72.
    Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
    Fan, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Zhao, P. (2022). Does government debt impede firm innovation? Evidence from the rise of LGFVs in China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 138, 106475.
    Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan: Burns & Oates.
    Freeman, C. (2004). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 541-569.
    Fu, X., & Yang, Q. G. (2009). Exploring the cross-country gap in patenting: A stochastic frontier approach. Research Policy, 38(7), 1203-1213.
    Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still?: National innovative productivity among ‘follower’countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy, 33(9), 1329-1354.
    Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4
    Gavurova, B., Kocisova, K., Belas, L., & Krajcik, V. (2017). Relative efficiency of government expenditure on secondary education. Journal of International Studies, 10(2).
    Gong, G., & Keller, W. (2003). Convergence and polarization in global income levels: a review of recent results on the role of international technology diffusion. Research Policy, 32(6), 1055-1079.
    Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European economic review, 35(2-3), 517-526.
    Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(3), 225-243. doi:10.1080/10438590290004555
    Guloglu, B., & Tekin, R. B. (2012). A panel causality analysis of the relationship among research and development, innovation, and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 2, 32-47.
    Hajian, H., Mohamed, A., & Habibullah, M. S. (2017). The impact of government debt on output, private investment and human capital stock in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Business and Economics Research (GCBER 2017).
    Heinemann, F. (2002). Factor mobility, government debt and the decline in public investment.
    Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322-1349.
    Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China`s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1465-1479.
    Kearney, C., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Entrepreneurship in developing economies: transformation, barriers and infrastructure. In Necessity Entrepreneurs (pp. 103-117): Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Koc, T., & Ceylan, C. (2007). Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies. Technovation, 27(3), 105-114.
    Kousar, S., Ahmed, F., Afzal, M., & Segovia, J. E. T. (2023). Is government spending in the education and health sector necessary for human capital development? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01514-3
    Krammer, S. M. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845-860.
    Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of development Economics, 29(3), 253-268.
    Kurniawati, M. A. (2021). ICT infrastructure, innovation development and economic growth: a comparative evidence between two decades in OECD countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(1), 141-158.
    Law, S. H., Lee, W. C., & Singh, N. (2018). Revisiting the finance-innovation nexus: Evidence from a non-linear approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 143-153.
    Lora, E., & Olivera, M. (2007). Public debt and social expenditure: Friends or foes? Emerging Markets Review, 8(4), 299-310. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2006.12.004
    Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42.
    Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
    Malik, S. (2020). Macroeconomic determinants of innovation: Evidence from Asian countries. Global Business Review, 0972150919885494.
    Marmullaku, B., Avdimetaj, K., & Haziri, A. (2021). Impact of Public Investment through Public Debt on Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis in European Countries in Transition. Transition Studies Review, 28(2), 93.
    Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights and economic development. Case W. Res. J. Int`l L., 32, 471.
    Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 175-199.
    Mukim, M., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2012). The Location Choices of Foreign Investors: A District-level Analysis in India. The World Economy, 35(7), 886-918. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01393.x
    Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis: Oxford University Press on Demand.
    Oche, M. O., Mah, G., & Mongale, I. (2016). The effects of public debt on foreign direct investment in South Africa (1983-2013): an empirical analysis. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 6(4), 448-456.
    Oecd. (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: innovation to strengthen growth and address global and social challenges. In: OCDE Publications Paris.
    Oecd, E. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris 2005, Sp, 46, 1-34.
    Pattillo, C. A., Poirson, H., & Ricci, L. A. (2002). External debt and growth.
    Picarelli, M. O., Vanlaer, W., & Marneffe, W. (2019). Does Public Debt Produce a Crowding out Effect for Public Investment in the EU? SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3376471
    Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a Time of Debt. American economic review, 100(2), 573-578.
    Rodríguez‐Pose, A., & Wilkie, C. (2019). Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America. Growth and Change, 50(1), 4-37.
    Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
    Rosenberg, N. (2006). Innovation and economic growth.
    Saad, M., Guermat, C., & Brodie, L. (2015). National innovation and knowledge performance: the role of higher education teaching and training. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1194-1209. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.881344
    Sadiq, M., Wen, F., Bashir, M. F., & Amin, A. (2022). Does nuclear energy consumption contribute to human development? Modeling the effects of public debt and trade globalization in an OECD heterogeneous panel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 133965.
    Sivak, R., Caplanova, A., & Hudson, J. (2011). The impact of governance and infrastructure on innovation. Post-Communist Economies, 23(02), 203-217. doi:10.1080/14631377.2011.570050
    Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 312-320.
    Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century, 308, 308-325.
    Tan, A.-L., & Ismail, N. W. (2015). Foreign direct investment, sovereign debt and growth: Evidence for the Euro Area. American Journal of Trade and Policy, 2(2), 51-58.
    Tasleem, H. (2021). Impact of Public Debt on Health and Education in SAARC Countries. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 2(2), 52-58. doi:10.52223/jess.20212203
    Van Bon, N. (2015). The relationship between public debt and inflation in developing countries: Empirical evidence based on difference panel GMM. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 5(9), 128-142.
    Varsakelis, N. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083-1090.
    Wu, J., Ma, Z., & Zhuo, S. (2017). Enhancing national innovative capacity: The impact of high-tech international trade and inward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 26(3), 502-514.
    Xiong, F., Zang, L., & Gao, Y. (2022). Internet penetration as national innovation capacity: worldwide evidence on the impact of ICTs on innovation development. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 39-55.
    Zhang, C., & Wang, X. (2019). The influence of ICT-driven innovation: a comparative study on national innovation efficiency between developed and emerging countries. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(9), 876-886. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1584645
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    110255030
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255030
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    503001.pdf2955KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈