政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146545
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113478/144464 (79%)
Visitors : 51489887      Online Users : 853
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146545


    Title: 總體審慎政策對台灣房市的影響
    The Effect of Macroprudential Policies on Taiwan Housing Market
    Authors: 羅元辰
    Lo, Yuan-Chen
    Contributors: 朱琇妍
    Chu, Shiou-Yen
    羅元辰
    Lo, Yuan-Chen
    Keywords: 不動產授信風險權數
    資本適足率
    總體審慎政策
    動態隨機一般均衡模型
    Risk-Weight
    Capital Adequacy Ratio
    Macroprudential Policies
    DSGE Model
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:58:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 111年2月，金管會提高不動產授信風險權數遏止房價上升。相較於升息與調整貸款成數，風險權數會直接影響到銀行資本適足率的計算，從源頭去管制資金流向，並期望藉此達到穩定房市的目的。
    本研究建立一個動態隨機一般均衡模型(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, DSGE)，將政府調高不動產授信風險權數、升息與調降貸款成數等調控房市的措施視為外生衝擊，觀察衝擊對台灣房地產市場的影響。本論文研究發現，三項政策都可有效抑制房價，而升息會減少儲蓄者的購屋需求，貸款成數降低會減少借款者的房屋消費量，兩者透過降低購屋能力，影響借貸市場的需求，導致房價下跌。調高風險權數著重在管制銀行的放貸意願，減少借貸市場的資金供給，控制銀行風險，以抑制房價上漲。
    在升息、不動產授信風險權數及貸款成數三項總體審慎政策中，三者都能抑制房價並使國內銀行資本適足率上升，從不同角度影響房價和金融體系，調節借貸市場的供需，達到國內房價下跌，銀行資本適足率上升的目的。其中又以影響銀行端的不動產授信風險權數最能抑制房價，民眾在短期內不會受到過多衝擊，對民眾的影響最小，房屋消費量上升，整體產出也增加，因此這項政策最能兼顧民眾感受與降低房價的需求。
    In February 2022, The Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan (FSC Taiwan) raised the risk-weighted of real estate loans to moderate housing market. Compared with adjusting the interest rate and loan-to-value ratio (LTV ratio) which affected the demand side, raising the risk-weight would directly influence the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of the bank. Therefore, the government was tackling the problem at the source by controlling the funding to cool off the housing market.
    This paper develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model and analyzes risk-weighted of mortgage loans shock, interest rate shock and LTV ratio shock to explore the influences of Taiwan housing market. The results indicate that all of three policies can reduce the housing price. In addition, raising the interest rate can decrease the savers’ housing transaction and reducing the LTV ratio can curb borrowers’ housing consumption. Since regulating the interest rate and LTV ratio directly influences the demand of the credit market, the housing price decreases. Enhancing the risk-weight focuses on controlling the supply of credit market to reduce housing price.
    All macroprudential policies can suppress housing prices and increase the capital adequacy ratio of domestic banks. They regulate the supply and demand in the credit market, aiming to achieve a decline in domestic housing prices and an increase in the capital adequacy ratio of banks. The impact of the risk-weight on the bank`s side is the most effective in suppressing housing prices. It has minimal impact on the public in the short run, and the increase in housing consumption leads to output growth. Therefore, this policy can best balance the public`s perception and the need to lower housing prices.
    Reference: 王柏元 (2018)。台灣的貨幣政策與總體審慎政策(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所，台北市。
    李宗憲 (2014)。以動態隨機一般均衡模型分析臺灣最適總體審慎政策(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所，台北市。
    陳旭昇與陳柏瑜(2023)。台灣的利率政策與房價。經濟論文叢刊。
    陳南光與鄭漢亮(2012)。外部融資溢酬、台灣房屋市場與景氣波動。經濟論文，40(3)，307-341。
    黃俞寧(2013)。動態隨機一般均衡架構在台灣貨幣政策制定上之應用。中央銀行季刊，35(1)，3-33。
    張天惠、朱浩榜、陳南光(2023)。房價上漲與資源誤置。經濟論文叢刊。
    Ahmad, R., Ariff, M., & Skully, M. J. (2008). The determinants of bank capital ratios in a developing economy. Asia-Pacific financial markets, 15(3-4), 255-272.
    Aktas, R., Bakin, B., & Celik, G. (2015). The Determinants of Banks’ Capital Adequacy Ratio: Some Evidence from South Eastern European Countries. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(1 (J)), 79-88.
    Angelini, P., Neri, S., & Panetta, F. (2014). The interaction between capital requirements and monetary policy. Journal of money, credit and Banking, 46(6), 1073-1112.
    Ayuso, J., Pérez, D., & Saurina, J. (2004). Are capital buffers pro-cyclical?: Evidence from Spanish panel data. Journal of financial intermediation, 13(2), 249-264.
    Babihuga, R. (2007). Macroeconomic and financial soundness indicators: An empirical investigation. IMF Working Paper, No.115, International Monetary Fund.
    Bateni, L., Vakilifard, H., & Asghari, F. (2014). The influential factors on capital adequacy ratio in Iranian banks. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(11), 108-116.
    Brewer Iii, E., Kaufman, G. G., & Wall, L. D. (2008). Bank capital ratios across countries: Why do they vary?. Journal of Financial Services Research, 34, 177-201.
    Brzoza-Brzezina, M., Kolasa, M., & Makarski, K. (2015). Macroprudential policy and imbalances in the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 51, 137-154.
    Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398.
    Chu, S. Y. (2018). Macroeconomic policies and housing market in Taiwan. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 404-421.
    Francis, W. B., & Osborne, M. (2010). On the behavior and determinants of risk‐based capital ratios: revisiting the evidence from UK banking institutions. International Review of Finance, 10(4), 485-518.
    Francis, W. B., & Osborne, M. (2012). Capital requirements and bank behavior in the UK: Are there lessons for international capital standards?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(3), 803-816.
    Funke, M., Kirkby, R., & Mihaylovski, P. (2018). House prices and macroprudential policy in an estimated DSGE model of New Zealand. Journal of Macroeconomics, 56, 152-171.
    Funke, M., & Paetz, M. (2013). Housing prices and the business cycle: An empirical application to Hong Kong. Journal of Housing Economics, 22(1), 62-76.
    Gelain, P., & Bank, N. (2011, May). Macro-prudential policies in a DSGE model with financial frictions. In 7th Dynare Conference, Atlanta, USA.
    Gerali, A., Neri, S., Sessa, L., & Signoretti, F. M. (2010). Credit and Banking in a DSGE Model of the Euro Area. Journal of money, Credit and Banking, 42, 107-141.
    Germaschewski, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2021). Distributional effects of nonresident investors on the housing market and welfare. Review of International Economics, 29(5), 1300-1326.
    Hadjixenophontos, A., & Christodoulou-Volos, C. (2018). Financial crisis and capital adequacy ratio: A case study for Cypriot commercial banks. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 8(3), 87-109.
    Iacoviello, M., & Neri, S. (2010). Housing market spillovers: evidence from an estimated DSGE model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 125-164.
    Kalifa, W., & Bektaş, E. (2018). The impacts of bank-specific and macroeconomic variables on the capital adequacy ratio: evidence from Islamic banks. Applied Economics Letters, 25(7), 477-481.
    Lambertini, L., Mendicino, C., & Punzi, M. T. (2013). Leaning against boom–bust cycles in credit and housing prices. Journal of Economic dynamics and Control, 37(8), 1500-1522.
    Martynova, N. (2015). Effect of bank capital requirements on economic growth: a survey. De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper No. 467
    Monacelli, T. (2009). New Keynesian models, durable goods, and collateral constraints. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 242-254.
    Rubio, M., & Carrasco-Gallego, J. A. (2013). Macroprudential measures, housing markets, and monetary policy. Moneda y Crédito, 235, 29-59.
    Rubio, M., & Carrasco-Gallego, J. A. (2014). Macroprudential and monetary policies: Implications for financial stability and welfare. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 326-336.
    Rubio, M., & Carrasco-Gallego, J. A. (2016). Coordinating macroprudential policies within the Euro area: The case of Spain. Economic Modelling, 59, 570-582.
    Teo, W. L. (2009). Estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the Taiwanese economy. Pacific Economic Review, 14(2), 194-231.
    Wang, P. Y. (2021). Does Taiwan Need a Macro-Prudential Policy? How to Do It? How to Coordinate with Monetary Policy?. Academia Economic Papers, 49(1), 1-40.
    Williams, H. T. (2011). Determinants of capital adequacy in the banking sub-sector of the Nigeria economy: Efficacy of Camels.(A model specification with co-integration analysis). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 233.
    Wong, J., Choi, K. F., & Fong, T. P. W. (2008). Determinants of the capital level of banks in Hong Kong. The Banking Sector In Hong Kong: Competition, Efficiency, Performance and Risk, 159-190.
    Yahaya, S. N., Mansor, N., & Okazaki, K. (2016). Financial performance and economic impact on capital adequacy ratio in Japan. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(4), 14-21.
    中央銀行(2022)。中央銀行業務報告暨 111 年度業務計畫及營業預算報告。
    中央銀行(2022)。本行公告新臺幣存款準備率調整事項。中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網。民112年3月19日，取自:https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-459-153020-0e06c-1.html。
    中央銀行(2023)。消費者貸款及建築貸款餘額(112.1)。中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網。民112年3月5日，取自:https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-526-1078-7BD41-1.html。
    中央銀行(2023)。銀行存放央行準備金乙戶利率。中華民國中央銀行全球資訊網。民112年4月14日，取自:https://www.cbc.gov.tw/tw/cp-563-149628-31af9-1.html。
    內政部全球資訊網(2023)。外國人地權管理。內政部統計月報。民112年2月22日，取自:https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/400/relfile/0/4413/79c158fd-d51f-4061-b24b-fbcdb0fb92d9/month.html#4%E5%9C%B0%E6%94%BF。
    內政部地政司(2021)。內政部統計顯示：法人擁有多房比例及短期交易行為均明顯高於自然人。中華民國內政部。民112年5月28日，取自:https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4&s=213457。
    內政部地政司(2023)。平均地權條例修正案三讀 內政部：抑制炒作、健全交易。中華民國內政部。民112年2月12日，取自:https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4&s=275437。
    內政部地政司(2023)。房價所得比。內政部不動產資訊平台。民112年2月12日，取自:https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0201.aspx。
    內政部地政司(2023)。房價負擔能力統計。內政部不動產資訊平台。民112年5月27日，取自:https://pip.moi.gov.tw/v3/e/scre0105.aspx。
    行政院主計總處(2023)。國民所得及經濟成長統計資料庫。中華民國統計資訊網。民112年3月5日，取自:https://nstatdb.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbasAll/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=dgmaind。
    金融監督管理委員會(2019)。銀行資本適足性及資本等級管理辦法。全國法規資料庫。民112年4月18日，取自:https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=G0380046。
    金融監督管理委員會(2022)。金管會將發布令釋調整不動產抵押貸款所適用之風險權數。金管會新聞稿。民112年3月5日，取自:https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202202170004&aplistdn=ou=news,ou=multisite,ou=chinese,ou=ap_root,o=fsc,c=tw&dtable=News。
    勞動部(2023)。工時制度及工作彈性化措施介紹。民112年5月25日，取自:https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/28162/28166/28218/28220/32907/。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    110255018
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255018
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    501801.pdf3182KbAdobe PDF2103View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback