English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51023358      Online Users : 866
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146539


    Title: 臺灣實施社會住宅政策之動態隨機一般均衡模型分析
    Social Housing Policy in Taiwan: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Analysis
    Authors: 林亞雯
    Lin, Ya-Wen
    Contributors: 朱琇妍
    Chu, Shiou-Yen
    林亞雯
    Lin, Ya-Wen
    Keywords: 動態隨機一般均衡模型
    社會住宅
    房價
    租金補貼
    囤房稅
    DSGE model
    Social housing
    Housing prices
    Rent subsidy
    Home hoarding tax
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:56:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年臺灣房價不斷攀升,導致民眾購屋壓力沉重,社會出現重視居住權的聲浪,市民主張「捍衛居住正義」的口號,並要求政府緩解住宅問題,標榜只租不售的「社會住宅」成為臺灣實施住宅政策的焦點,並引起廣泛關注和討論。
    本研究建立一個動態隨機一般均衡(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, DSGE)模型,模擬政府增加社會住宅數量與提供租金補貼,探討實施社會住宅政策對臺灣房屋市場的影響。研究結果顯示,增加社會住宅供給及提升租屋者對社會住宅的需求,能有效降低房屋擁有者購買非自住房屋的囤房行為,進而抑制房價上漲。因此,社會住宅政策對於臺灣房屋市場價格的穩定和居住正義的實現,具有重要的政策意義。
    In recent years, housing prices in Taiwan have continued to rise, resulting in heavy pressure on the public to purchase houses. There has been a growing societal emphasis on the right of residence, with citizens advocating for the protection of housing justice and demanded that the government alleviate the housing problem. "Social housing" that is only rented and not sold has become the focus of Taiwan`s housing policy and has attracted widespread attention and discussion.
    This study establishes a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model to simulate the effects of the government increasing the supply of social housing and providing rent subsidies on the housing market in Taiwan. The research findings demonstrate that increasing the supply of social housing and enhancing the demand for it among renters can effectively reduce the behavior of homeowners to purchase non-self-occupied properties, thereby curbing the rise in housing prices. Therefore, the social housing policy has important policy significance for the stability of Taiwan`s housing market price and the realization of housing justice.
    Reference: Alpanda, S., & Zubairy, S. (2016). Housing and tax policy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(2-3), 485-512.
    Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383-398.
    Chorley, F., & Liu, C. (2021). Does UK social housing affect housing prices and economic growth? An application of the ARDL model. Economic issues, 26(1), 21-43.
    Chu, S.-Y. (2018). Macroeconomic policies and housing market in Taiwan. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 404-421.
    Du Preez, M., & Sale, M. (2013). The impact of social housing developments on nearby property prices: a Nelson Mandela Bay case study. The South African Journal of Economics, 81(3), 451-466.
    Fahey, T., & Norris, M. (2011). Housing in the welfare state: Rethinking the conceptual foundations of comparative housing policy analysis. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(4), 439-452.
    Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class : and how it`s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life / Richard Florida. New York, N.Y: Basic Books.
    Funke, M., & Paetz, M. (2013). Housing prices and the business cycle: An empirical application to Hong Kong. Journal of Housing Economics, 22(1), 62-76.
    Harloe, M. (2008). The people`s home: social rented housing in Europe and America: John Wiley & Sons.
    Harriott, S., & Matthews, L. (1998). Social housing: an introduction: Longman.
    Hwang, Y.-N., & Ho, P.-Y. (2012). Optimal monetary policy for Taiwan: a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium framework. Academia Economic Papers, 40(4), 447.
    Iacoviello, M., & Neri, S. (2010). Housing market spillovers: evidence from an estimated DSGE model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 125-164.
    Leeper, E. M., Walker, T. B., & Yang, S.-C. S. (2010). Government investment and fiscal stimulus. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(8), 1000-1012.
    Leeper, E. M., Walker, T. B., & Yang, S. C. S. (2013). Fiscal foresight and information flows. Econometrica, 81(3), 1115-1145.
    Monacelli, T. (2009). New Keynesian models, durable goods, and collateral constraints. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(2), 242-254.
    Reeves, P. (2013). Affordable and Social Housing: Policy and Practice: Routledge.
    Teo, W. L. (2009). Estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the Taiwanese economy. Pacific Economic Review, 14(2), 194-231.
    Van Nes, T. (2020). The effect of social housing developments on housing prices in Amsterdam.
    Wang, P.-Y. (2021). Does Taiwan need a macro-prudential policy? How to do it? How to coordinate with monetary policy? Academia Economic Papers, 49(1), 1-40.
    于欣可、劉柏宏、黃一平 (2021)。不只是房子:社會住宅城市生活新關係/于欣可[等]作;劉柏宏主編;黃一平總策劃 (初版ed.)。新北市:左岸文化/遠足文化事業股份有限公司。
    內政部營建署 (2016a)。住宅資訊統計彙報。民112年4月15日取自:https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0103.aspx。
    內政部營建署 (2016b, 2016/11/29)。住宅需求動向調查。民112年4月15日取自:https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0101.aspx。
    王雨讓 (2016)。總體政策對房屋價格的穩定效果。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    王南喻、劉峰旗、黃志仁、張煜明 (2020)。誰需要社會住宅?住宅學報, 29(2),99-129。
    住宅法 (2021)。
    朱瑞琪 (2013)。臺北市公營住宅政策績效評估之研究。國立臺北大學,臺北市。
    李得全、羅煊、謝一鋒 (2020)。論居住正義及其解方:臺灣與臺北。Journal of Taiwan Land Research, 23(2),157-193。
    李曜霖 (2019)。居住正義實踐?臺北市社會住宅政策探討。國立臺北大學,臺北市。
    李子瑋 (2013)。臺北市社會住宅政策之探討:政策工具觀點。
    林貝珊 (2018)。臺北市公共住宅對周邊居住環境影響之研究。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    林純綺 (2018)。社會住宅去標籤化與創意階層混居之研究。 國立政治大學,臺北市。
    施筱宣 (2022)。房貸成數與囤房稅對臺灣房價之效果。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    徐曼薰 (2022)。臺灣實施囤房稅政策之動態隨機一般均衡模型分析。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    張金鶚、陳明吉、鄧筱蓉、楊智元 (2009)。臺北市房價泡沫知多少?房價 vs. 租金,房價 vs. 所得。住宅學報,18(2),1-22。
    張朝琴 (2015)。居住正義的體現:以社會住宅為例。致理科技大學,通識學報,61,新北市。
    梅強與林尚毅 (2017)。 臺灣總體經濟變數對六都房價之影響分析。亞太經濟管理評論,21(1),33-48。
    陳柏如 (2018)。 總體審慎政策工具與臺灣房價的關係-特定目標信用工具與房市相關租稅工具的影響。 經濟研究,54(2),287-330。
    曾意辰 (2015)。 居住正義-臺灣社會住宅論述與政策之分析。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    黃俞寧 (2013)。 動態隨機一般均衡架構在臺灣貨幣政策制定上之應用。 中央銀行季刊,35(1),3-33。
    楊屯山、林哲群、張金鶚 (2022)。 總體審慎措施對房地產價量變化的影響。 住宅學報,31(2)。
    劉浩學 (2014)。 社會住宅提供方式之探討。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    黎德星 (2012)。 社會住宅:過去、現在和未來。住宅學報,21(2),91-99。
    謝明瑞 (2014)。 我國房市政策的社會責任-兼論居住正義。Paper presented at the 2014 全方位成功國際學術研討會。
    謝紫純 (2021)。 臺北市社會住宅政策執行。世新大學,臺北市。
    魏文欽與郭宗諭 (2012)。 影響房價變動因素之系統動態模擬 (兼論奢侈稅)。 International Journal of Lisrel,5(1),31-49。
    蘇曉瑞 (2021)。社會住宅供給對房價與地方消費之影響。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    109255011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109255011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    501101.pdf2629KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback