政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146497

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146497

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51277560 線上人數 : 859

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 國家發展研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/146497

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146497

題名:	糧食安全、剩食議題與食物銀行：比較臺灣食物銀行聯合會與臺灣全民食物銀行協會 Food security, food waste and food bank: A comparison between the Alliance of Taiwan Food banks and Taiwan People’s Food Bank Association
作者:	蔡竺君 Tsai, Chu-Chun
貢獻者:	林義鈞蔡竺君 Tsai, Chu-Chun
關鍵詞:	糧食安全糧食安全指標剩食食物銀行全球公民社會組織網絡 Food security Food security indicators Food waste Food banks Global civil society Organizations Networks
日期:	2023
上傳時間:	2023-08-02 13:45:49 (UTC+8)
摘要:	糧食安全為目前各國重視的議題之一，其中對於糧食浪費（剩食議題）的探究更具急迫性。根據聯合國農糧署（FAO）2020年最新統計，全世界有6.9億人口處於飢餓狀態，每年超過三分之一的食物在農田裡、餐廳中或家裡的廚房被丟棄，本應充足的食物供給卻有大量浪費與分配不均的問題。為解決糧食浪費，食物銀行扮演極為重要的角色，扮演著企業、政府、民眾之間的重要橋梁，其中臺中市的食物銀行發展為全臺之首，為全臺唯一訂定食物銀行自治條例與創立最多食物銀行的城市，兩大全國性食物銀行也於此發展。除了政府創立的食物銀行之外，許多非營利組織亦投入食物銀行的行列，隨著食物銀行蓬勃發展，在全球公民社會的脈絡下，出現不同解決重大議題的非國家型行為者，而這些行為者都被殊異的組織與網絡影響，而各個非營利組織也依循此脈絡實現其宗旨。在解決剩食議題中，食物銀行即為重要的行為者之一，需要整合性的平台協助資源取得與分配協調，台灣食物銀行聯合會與台灣全民食物銀行協會等全國性食物銀行因此成立，各自解決不同的剩食議題，然而目前對於全國性食物銀行組織網絡以及解決糧食安全模式的相關研究仍付之闕如，故本研究以食物銀行的組織與網絡來釐清全國性食物銀行扮演的角色為何，探究兩個全國性食物銀行是如何解決糧食議題。因此形成以下的問題意識：全國性的食物銀行網絡是如何形成？兩者之間的差異為何？不同的食物銀行模式在是否在糧食安全或剩食議題上處理方式與策略訂定有所差異？本研究發現兩個全國性食物銀行的網絡組成與互動以及協助對象有各自的特色，所著重的糧食安全議題也不盡相同。 Food security is currently one of the major concerns for countries, with a particular focus on exploring food waste. According to the latest statistics from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 2020, there are 690 million people worldwide suffering from hunger, and over one-third of the food produced is wasted in fields, restaurants, or household. The issue of food waste and unequal distribution poses a significant challenge to ensuring an adequate food supply. Food banks play a crucial role in addressing food waste and act as important bridges between businesses, governments, and the public. Among them, the development of food banks in Taichung City, Taiwan, is at the forefront, being the only city in Taiwan to establish autonomous regulations for food banks and having the highest number of food banks. Two national-level food banks have also been established in Taiwan. In addition to government-established food banks, many non-profit organizations have also joined the food bank movement. With the flourishing development of food banks, non-state actors have emerged within the global civil society context to address significant issues. These actors are influenced by diverse organizations and networks, and various non-profit organizations follow this context to achieve their goals. In addressing the issue of food waste, food banks are important actors that require integrated platforms to assist in resource acquisition and coordination of distribution. The Alliance of Taiwan Food banks and Taiwan People’s Food Bank Association were established to address different aspects of the food waste issue. However, there is currently a lack of research on the national-level organizational networks of food banks and the related models for addressing food security. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the roles played by national-level food banks in terms of their organizational and network structures and explore how these two national-level food banks address food security issues. Consequently, the following research questions are formed: How does the national-level food bank network form? What are the differences between the two? Do different food bank models differ in their approaches and strategies for addressing food security or food waste issues? This study finds that the network composition, interactions, and assistance targets of the two national-level food banks have their own characteristics, and they also prioritize different aspects of food security issues.
參考文獻:	參考文獻一、中文文獻方荷生，2019，〈「食與實」的服務方案-從食物銀行到食享冰箱的發展〉。社團法人臺北市臻佶祥社會服務協會，未出版。王秀燕，2013，〈搭建過剩與匱乏橋樑：臺中市愛心食物銀行的實施經驗〉，《社區發展季刊》，143：231-242。王思為，2012，〈聯合國糧農組織與糧食安全〉，《台灣國際法季刊》，9（4）：7-34。王瑤芬、蕭敏秀、尤介彥，2018，〈從「剩」到「惜」：剩食課程實施之學習成效〉。《餐旅暨觀光》，15（2）：21-49。doi:10.6572/JHT.201812_15(2).0002 江明修，2002，《非營利管理》，臺北：智勝文化。江明修，2010，〈全球治理趨勢下非營利組織的發展與前瞻〉，2010年，「2010年社會福利論壇」研討會，臺北：中華救助總會。行政院農業委員會，2016，〈新農業創新推動方案〉， https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC85NzMzL2E2ZTg2OGU3LTM1ZWUtNDE2MS05ODQ1LThiMTA3NmFjMGIxZC5wZGY%3d&n=NV8xMDUxMjA4X%2baWsOi%2bsualreWJteaWsOaOqOWLleaWueahiC5wZGY%3d&icon=.pdf 何昌垂，2013，《粮食安全：世纪挑战与应对》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。李仁耀，2012，〈主要國家糧食自給率內涵比較分析〉。《因應氣候變遷及糧食安全之農業創新研究-102年度成果發表暨研討會論文集》 https://www.tari.gov.tw/df_ufiles/eng/no183-1.pdf。李欣泯，2018，〈剩食餐廳商業模式之初探—以七喜廚房剩食餐廳為例〉，2018，臺北：輔仁大學社會企業碩士學位學程。李柏諭，2010，〈跨域公共事務的管理邏輯：治理演化的類型分析〉，《文官制度季刊》，2 （4）：1-39。李詩柔，2015，〈非營利組織於實物給付福利的協調合作─以高雄市實物銀行為例〉，屏東：屏東科技大學社會工作系學位論文。李靜怡（譯¬），2012，《浪費：全球糧食危機解密》，新北：遠足文化（Tristram Stuart, 2009）。周信輝、蔡志豪，2013，〈網絡組織間關係治理的搭架：行動者網絡理論的動態觀點〉。《臺大管理論叢，23（S1）：135-164。胡幼慧，1996，《質性研究：理論、方法與本土女性研究實例》，臺北：巨流。范麗娟，1994，〈深度訪談簡介〉。《戶外遊憩研究，7（2）: 25-35。食品安全衛生管理法（2017年07 月13 日）食品捐贈之安全衛生指引（2023年2月6日）食農教育法（2022年4月19 日）。唐風，2009，《新糧食戰爭》，臺北：大地出版社。氣候變遷因應法（2023 年 02 月 15 日）袁鶴齡，2003，〈全球治理與國際合作：論其策略與困境〉，《全球政治評論》，4：25-45。張曉文，2004，〈從全球治理探討非政府組織之角色：一個人權與人道救援之觀點〉，碩士論文。國立中正大學，https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fn3u5x。張靜貞、徐世勳，2021，〈減少糧損與食物浪費　創造雙重紅利－我國參與APEC糧食安全論壇的經驗分享〉，《國際開發援助現場季刊》，（3），13-20。梁雅淇、陳知襄、趙珮妤，2018，〈食物銀行的區位特性與在地人群互動－以南機場食物銀行為例〉，《中國地理學會會刊》，61：83-98。許育嘉，2015，〈臺灣食物銀行的發展與執行現況－以臺中市愛心食物銀行為例〉，臺北，世新大學行政管理學系碩士學位論文。郭良文、林素甘，2001，〈質化與量化研究方法之比較分析〉，《資訊傳播與圖書館學》，7（4）：1-13。陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。陳金貴，1993，〈美國非營利組織的分析〉，《行政學報》，25 ：27-46。陳建元、王葳、胡士文、林韋婷，2010，〈糧價穩定、糧食安全與制度設計〉，《農業經濟叢刊》，15（2）：59-97。陳晧，2019，「從「食」的服務方案看見南機場社區的發展性取向」，碩士論文，輔仁大學社會工作學系碩士班， https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h6r9e5。黃全慶，2015，〈邁向多元化、去標籤化的食物銀行〉，《社區發展季刊》，150：268-267。黃有才，2011，〈一百年來台灣農業的回顧與展望〉，《科學發展》，457：135-139。黃佳慧，2017，《全球糧食安全的進展與挑戰》，臺北：行政院農業委員會。黃信吉，2015，〈孫理蓮及其弱勢關顧事工〉桃園，中原大學宗教研究所學位論文。黃晏青、杜美勳，2011，〈全球糧荒之成因、影響與因應對策〉，《經濟研究，11：199-230。楊敏宗．蘇宗振，2011，〈99年「小地主大佃農」推動成果及改進措施〉，《農政與農情》，225。萬文隆，2004，〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉，《生活科技教育》，37（4）：17-23.。葉重新，2001，《教育研究法》。台北：心理臺中市食物銀行條例（2016年1月18 日）。趙忠傑、林淑真、謝懷恕，2019，〈臺灣社會企業實踐個案析探--以南機場幸福食物銀行為例〉，《兩岸企業社會責任與社會企業家學術期刊》，110-122。歐鴻鍊（外交部），2008，《NGO國際參與成果彙編》，臺北：外交部。潘淑滿，2003，《質性研究－理論與運用》。台北：心理。蔡育仁，2020，〈淺談糧食安全〉，《消費者報導雜誌》，466：10-13。鄭偉德、黃蔘，2011，〈盱衡全球糧食安全問題，與時俱進探討臺灣農地利用〉，《農業推廣文彙》，56：307-317。鄭襄憶、游卉庭（譯），2015，《壞農業：廉價肉品背後的恐怖真相》，台北：如果出版社（Lymbery Philip& Oakeshott Isabel. 2014）蕭新煌，2004，〈臺灣的非政府組織、民主轉型與民主治理〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，1（1）：65-84。謝英宗，2013，〈氣候變遷與糧食安全－我們未來的糧食在哪裡？〉，《臺灣博物季刊》，32（2），38-41。鍾京佑，2003，〈全球治理與公民社會：台灣非政府組織參與國際社會的觀點〉，《政治科學論叢》，18：23-51。簡春安、鄒平儀，1998，《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流圖書。顧忠華，2000，〈二十一世紀非營利與非政府組織的全球化〉，「邁向廿十一世紀的台灣非政府組織」研討會，臺北：外交部、亞太公共事務論壇、新世紀文教基金會。二、英文文獻 Anheier, H., & Themudo, N.S. 2002. Organizational forms of global civil society: implications of going global. In: Glasius, Marlies, Kaldor, Mary and Anheier, Helmut K., (eds.) Global Civil Society 2002. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 191-216. Babar, Z., & Mirgani, S. 2014. Food security in the Middle East / Zahra. Oxford University Press. Babbie, E. R. 2020. The practice of social research, 15th Edition. Cengage learning. Bacon, C & Baker, G. 2017. The rise of food banks and the challenge of matching food assistance with potential need: towards a spatially specific, rapid assessment approach. Agriculture and Human Values. 34. 10.1007/s10460-017-9783-y. Basher, S., Raboy D., Kaitibie S., and Hossain, I. 2013. “Understanding challenges to food security in dry Arab micro-states: evidence from qatari micro data.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 11 (1): 1-19 Bazerghi, C., McKay, F. H., & Dunn, M. 2016. The Role of Food Banks in Addressing Food Insecurity: A Systematic Review. Journal of community health, 41(4):732–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0147-5 Bickers, K. N ., Williams, J. T. 2001 .Public Policy Analysis: A Political Economic Approach.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin. Capone, R., ElBilali, H., Debs, P., Cardone, G., and Driouech, N. 2014. “Food Economic Accessibility and Affordability in the Mediterranean Region: an Exploratory Assessment at Micro and Macro Levels.” Journal of Food Security, 2(1): 1–12. Castells, M. 2008. The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1):78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877 Chaboud, G., & Daviron, B. 2017. “Food losses and waste: Navigating the inconsistencies.” Global Food Security, 12: 1-7. Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J.P. & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 32(9): 1149-1170. Daft, Richard L. 2004. Organization theory and design. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western. DeLaurentiis, V., Caldeira, C., and Sala, S. 2020. “No time to waste: assessing the performance of food waste prevention actions.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161. Economist Impact. 2021. Global Food Security Index 2021 The 10-year anniversary Economist Impact. 2022. Global Food Security Index 2022 FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. 2021. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en FAO. 2011. Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/mb060e/mb060e00.htm. Accessed 21 Nov 2020. FAO. 2013. Impacts on natural resources: Food wastage footprint. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/000d4a32-7304-5785-a2F-f64c6de8e7a2/. Accessed 22 Nov 2020. FAO. 2014. Global hunger index: The challenge of hidden hunger. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/411837/. Accessed 28 Nov 2021. FAO. 2017. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/472484/. Accessed 28 Nov 2020. FAO. 2019. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019: Safeguarding Against Economic Slowdowns and Downturns. Rome: FAO. https://www.wfp.org/publications/2019-state-food-security-and-nutrition-world-sofi-safeguarding-against-economic. Accessed 28 Jan 2021. FAO. 2020. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/publications/sofi/2020/en/ . Accessed 30 Jan 2021. FAO. 2021. The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. Sustainability Transformations of Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb4474en. Accessed 13 Oct 2022. Government Office for Science. 2017. Food waste: A response to the policy challenge. Greenpeace East Asia. 2023. Food Injustice: The State of Food Security and Agriculture in Asia Pacific 2020-2022. Retrieved from https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-taiwan-stateless/2023/03/9ceab19e-food-injustice-2020-2022.pdf Irani, Z., Sharif, A.M., Lee, H., Aktas, E., Topaloglu, Z., van’t Wout, T. and Huda, S. 2018, “Managing food security through food waste and loss: small data to Big data.” Computers and Operations Research, 98: 367-383. Kaldor, M. 2003. Global civil society: An answer to war. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Keane, J. 2003. Global Civil Society? (Contemporary Political Theory). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615023 Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press. Keohane, R. O., & Nye Jr, J. S. .2000. Globalization: What`s new? What`s not?(And so what?). Foreign policy, 104-119. Kim, S. 2015. “Food bank systems in Korea and the USA.” International Journal of Social Welfare, 24: 145-158. Knoke, D. & Kuklinski, J. 1982. Network Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills. Kolk, A., Levy, D. L., & Pinkse, J. 2008. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4): 719-745. doi: 10.1080/09638180802489133 Lewis, D. 1998. Nongovernmental Organizations, Business, and the Management of Ambiguity. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9: 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.9202 Lin, S. Y. 2013. “Growing Global Civil Society Complements Global Environmental Governance: Lessons learned from the Issue of the Lancang/Mekong Dam Projects.” Issues and Studies, 49(4): 141-188 Lin, S.Y. 2017. “The Evolution of Food Security Governance and Food Sovereignty Movement in China: An Analysis from the World Society Theory.” J Agric Environ Ethics, 30: 667-695 Linz, Juan J. & Stepan Alfred. 1996. Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7, 2: 14-33. Lorenz, S. 2012. “Socio-ecological consequences of charitable food assistance in the affluent society: the German Tafel.”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32 (7): 386-400. Marchetti, Raffaele. 2016. Global Civil Society. E-International Relations, 1-5 Marsden, Peter. 1990. Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology. 16: 435-463 Maxwell, S., & Smith, M. 1992. Household food security: a conceptual review.In S. Maxwell and T. Frankenberger, eds.Household food security: concepts, indicators, and measurements: a technical review. New York, NY, USA and Rome, UNICEF and IFAD Mbow, C., C. Rosenzweig, L.G. Barioni, T.G. Benton, M. Herrero, M. Krishnapillai, E. Liwenga, P. Pradhan, M.G. Rivera-Ferre, T. Sapkota, F.N. Tubiello, Y. Xu, 2019: Food Security. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.007 McNeely, C.L. 2012. World Society Theory. In The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, G. Ritzer (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog836 Merriam, S. B. 2002. Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 1(1): 1-17. Mihoreanu, L., Cismas, L. M., and Danila Jianu, L. M. 2019. “Enlarging the Application of the Food Security Index at European Union Regions.” Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 8(1): 38. Padgett, D. K. 1998. Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Sage Publications, Inc. Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., and Ujang, Z.bin. 2014. “The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 76: 106-115. Parfitt, J., Barthel M., and Macnaughton, S. 2010. “Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 365: 3065-3081 Riches, G. 1997. “Hunger, food security and welfare policies: Issues and debates in ﬁrst world society.” The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 56: 63-74. Riches, G. 2002. “Food Banks and food security: Welfare reform, human rghts and social policy. Lessons from Canada?” Social Policy & Administration, 36(6): 648-663 Rizvi, A., Wasfi, R., Enns, A. et al. 2021. The impact of novel and traditional food bank approaches on food insecurity: a longitudinal study in Ottawa, Canada. BMC Public Health 21:771. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10841-6 Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. .2007. Organizational behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Rutten, M. M. .2013. “The Economic Impacts of (Reducing) Food Waste and Losses: A Graphical Exposition.” WASS Working Paper; 7. Salle, J. D. L., & Unwin, J. 2016. Social Innovation in Food Banks: An Environmental Scan of Social Innovation in Canadian and US Food Banks. Greater Vancouver Food Bank. Retrieved from https://www.feedopportunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Social-Innovation-Scan-of-Food-Banks.pdf Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., and Gözet, Burcu. 2018. “Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 182: 978-991. Scholte, J. A. 1999. Global Civil Society: Changing the World? Department of Politics and International Studies, Univesity of Warwick, CSGR Working Paper No. 31/99 Starkey, L. J., Kuhnlein, H.V., and Gray-Donald, K. 1998. “Food bank users: Sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics.” Cmaj, 158(9):1143–1149. Stoker, Gerry. 1998.“Governance as theory: five propositions.” International Social Science Journal. 155: 17-28. Tarasuk, V., Fafard St-Germain, AA. & Loopstra, R. 2020. The Relationship Between Food Banks and Food Insecurity: Insights from Canada. 31: 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00092-w The Global FoodBanking Network .2023. https://www.foodbanking.org/. Accessed 2 Feb 2023 The Global FoodBanking Network. 2021. Partnering With New Food Banks. Retrieved from https://www.foodbanking.org/what-we-do/partnering-with-new-food-banks/. Accessed 2 Feb 2022. Thomas A.C., D’Hombres B., Casubolo, C., Saisana M., and Kayitakire F. 2017. The use of the Global Food Security Index to inform the situation in food insecure countries. Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2760/83356 Tutty, L. M. , Rothery, M. and Grinnell, J. R. M. 1996. Qualitative Research for Social Workers: Phases, Steps & Tasks. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon . United Nations. 1945. Charter of the United Nations, Chapter X — The Economic and Social Council, Article 71. New York: UN. https://legal.un.org/repertory/art71.shtml. Accessed 1 Feb 2022. United Nations. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. New York: UN. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed 13 Nov 2020. United Nations. 1966. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. New York: UN. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx. Accessed 14 Nov 2020. United Nations. Food Systems Coordination Hub. 2021(n.d.). New York: UN. https://www.un.org/foodsystems/about. Accessed 21 Feb 2023. WBCSD. 2016. Reporting matters 2016. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development. https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Redefining-Value/External-Disclosure/Reporting-matters/Resources/Reporting-matters-2016. Accessed 16 Dec 2020. 三、網路資料中研院，2018，〈【專欄】談糧食自給率與糧食安全指標〉，https://newsletter.sinica.edu.tw/%E8%AB%87%E7%B3%A7%E9%A3%9F%E8%87%AA%E7%B5%A6%E7%8E%87%E8%88%87%E7%B3%A7%E9%A3%9F%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E6%8C%87%E6%A8%99/查閱時間2020/8/14。孔德廉，2017，〈台灣糧食耗損每天可疊74座101大樓解決食物浪費從何做起？〉，https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/101013/，查閱時間：2020/7/30。古碧玲，2018，〈偏鄉孩子缺營養食物銀行送牛奶堅果補充包〉，https://sdgs.udn.com/sdgs/story/12159/3284755，查閱時間：2020/09/18。古碧玲，2019，〈世界糧食日 DHL攜手台灣全民食物銀行共同呼籲惜食愛地球〉，http://www.foodbank-taiwan.org.tw/new-blog/2019/10/17/-dhl-，查閱時間：2020/09/14。古碧玲，2020，〈糧食危機不患寡，而是患不均——全球「食物銀行」募集多餘糧食，盼餵飽 8.1 億飢餓人口〉，https://www.seinsights.asia/article/3272/7113 ，查閱時間：2020/9/14。台灣公益團體自律聯盟，2021，〈社團法人中華安得烈慈善協會〉，https://www.twnpos.org.tw/team/team_detail.php?Key=147 ，查閱時間：2021/01/13。台灣全民食物銀行協會，2021，〈「沒有浪費，沒有飢餓，我們幫助「助人的人」〉，http://www.foodbank-taiwan.org.tw/540484115841，查閱時間：2021/01/03。台灣全民食物銀行協會，2021，〈育成「社區型食物銀行」讓地方也履踐SDGS〉，https://www.foodbank-taiwan.org.tw/new-blog/2021/4/1/-sdgs-nbsp，查閱時間：2023/01/03。台灣全民食物銀行協會，2023，〈全球食物銀行網絡(GFN) 二三事〉，https://www.foodbank-taiwan.org.tw/new-blog/2023/3/6/gfn-，查閱時間：2023/4/26。台灣食物銀行聯合會，2017，〈「剩食再利用」台灣經驗將在APEC發表〉，http://www.atf.tw/atf/public/service/view/11，查閱時間：2021/01/03。台灣食物銀行聯合會，2023，https://www.atf.tw/，查閱時間：2023/05/12 台灣食物銀行聯合會官方網站。 https://www.foodbank.org.tw/，查閱時間：2023/5/30。安德烈食物銀行，2023，https://www.chaca.org.tw/，查閱時間：2023/4/27。吳碧霜、張玉鈴，2022，〈食農教育法通過後的下一步〉https://si.taiwan.gov.tw/Home/citizensSay/view/1423，查閱時間：2022/8/13。林太新，2016，〈剩食中的希望——食物銀行〉，https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/83319/2020，查閱時間：2020/7/30。林鳳，2020，〈世界糧食日愛不分距離〉，https://www.url.com.tw/blog/?p=49687，查閱時間：2022/11/3 洪玉盈，2018，〈社區的「食」在力量：「南機場幸福食物銀行」不只做到不浪費，更實現食善永續〉，https://npost.tw/archives/48829，查閱時間：2021/1/30。財團法人中技社，2017，〈台灣糧食自給率之影響及因應專題報告〉。，https://www.ctci.org.tw/media/4451/2017-02%E5%B0%88%E9%A1%8C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%B3%A7%E9%A3%9F%E8%87%AA%E7%B5%A6%E7%8E%87%E4%B9%8B%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E5%8F%8A%E5%9B%A0%E6%87%89.pdf。財團法人中技社，2020，負責任的生產和消費食品模式研議，https://www.ctci.org.tw/media/8821/2020-12%E8%B2%A0%E8%B2%AC%E4%BB%BB%E7%9A%84%E7%94%9F%E7%94%A2%E5%92%8C%E6%B6%88%E8%B2%BB%E9%A3%9F%E5%93%81%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E7%A0%94%E8%AD%B0.pdf 財團法人青年和平團，2008，〈《食物銀行》青年和平團送粽還幫忙課輔〉，https://www.merit-times.com/NewsPage.aspx?unid=83206，查閱時間：2023/1/29。基督教芥菜種會，2021，〈芥菜種會花蓮第一個「社區共好冰箱」啟用珍惜食物，共享食物〉，https://www.mustard.org.tw/tab/939/id/2724，查閱時間：2021/03/11。張以牧，2018a，〈食物銀行50年――淺談美國食物銀行的發展與現況〉，https://goo.gl/LKeVTD，查閱時間：2020/11/30 張以牧，2018b，〈在地多元化發展食物銀行展現台灣生命能量〉，https://mscommunity.azurewebsites.net/foodbank_foodbanktaiwan02/，查閱時間：2020/12/1 張淑珠，2021，原民食物銀行2.0版上路，https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%8E%9F%E6%B0%91%E9%A3%9F%E7%89%A9%E9%8A%80%E8%A1%8C2-0%E7%89%88%E4%B8%8A%E8%B7%AF-130228819.html，查閱時間：2023/4/22。張靜貞，2022，〈SDG 2 消除飢餓：高糧價無法避免，糧食安全人人有責！〉，https://www.impactio.com/tw/blog/sustainable-development-goals-sdgs-series_interview-with-professor-chang-ching-cheng1，查閱時間：2022/12/10。郭及天，2022，〈台灣惠而浦歲末送暖 200台珍食冰櫃捐贈全臺132個社福單位〉，《工商時報》https://ctee.com.tw/livenews/aj/ctee/A07634002022012417293988，查閱時間：2023/2/13。舒詩偉，2006，〈世界糧食日特刊──美國的「社區糧食安全運動」（上）〉，https://e-info.org.tw/node/15292，查閱時間：2023/4/12。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 107261003
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107261003
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[國家發展研究所] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
100301.pdf		3768Kb	Adobe PDF2	122	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋