English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50919578      Online Users : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146433


    Title: 探究影響消費者對擬真型虛擬網紅所代言產品的購買意願與品牌關係品質之因素
    An Examination of the Factors Affecting Consumers` Purchase Intention and Brand Relationship Quality towards Products Endorsed by Realistic Virtual Influencers
    Authors: 魏鈺家
    Wei, Yu-Chia
    Contributors: 陳冠儒
    魏鈺家
    Wei, Yu-Chia
    Keywords: 擬真型虛擬網紅
    擬人化
    恐怖谷效應
    名人認同
    信任
    顧客品牌參與
    購買意願
    品牌關係品質
    Brand Relationship Quality
    Virtual Influencer
    Anthropomorphism
    Uncanny Valley
    Celebrity Identification
    Customer Brand Engagement
    Trust
    Purchase Intention
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:33:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究目的為探討消費者在面對擬真型虛擬網紅所代言產品時所經歷的決策過程。研究方法採用問卷調查法,透過網路問卷形式,共蒐集344份有效問卷。研究結果發現,顧客品牌參與在擬人化、恐怖谷效應、名人認同、信任分別對購買意願及品牌關係品質的影響上皆存在部分中介效果。而謹慎性人格對於擬人化和名人認同經由顧客品牌參與對購買意願及品牌關係品質具有調節效果。而謹慎性人格對於恐怖谷效應和信任經由顧客品牌參與對品牌關係品質具有調節效果。而外向性人格對於擬人化、恐怖谷效應、名人認同經由顧客品牌參與對購買意願具有調節效果。本研究學術上闡明消費者在面對擬真型虛擬網紅行銷所可能展現的消費行為,實務上則可作為企業採取擬真型虛擬網紅行銷之參考。
    In the context of virtual influencer marketing, this study aims to explore the effects of anthropomorphism, uncanny valley, celebrity identification, and trust on purchase intention and brand relationship quality through customer brand engagement. In addition, this study investigates whether personality, specifically focusing on conscientiousness and extraversion, has moderating effects in the process.
    A total of 344 valid responses were collected through an online survey method. The results revealed that customer brand engagement partially mediates the effects of anthropomorphism, uncanny valley, celebrity identification, and trust on purchase intention and brand relationship quality, respectively. Conscientiousness moderates the effects of anthropomorphism and celebrity identification on purchase intention and brand relationship quality through customer brand engagement. Extroversion, on the other hand, moderates the effects of anthropomorphism, uncanny valley, and celebrity identification on purchase intention through customer brand engagement. This study illustrates the consumer behaviors in response to virtual influencer marketing, and serves as a practical reference for companies to collaborate virtual influencers.
    Reference: 英文部分
    Aaker, D.A. (1996). Building Strong Brand. NY: The Free Press.
    Aaker, D. A. (1998). Managing Brand Equity. NY: The Free Press.
    Achrol, R. S. (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: new forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 77-93.
    Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468-479.
    Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of consumer research, 39(2), 307-323.
    Altman, I., & D.A. Taylor (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Arjun, C., & Morris, B. H. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81-93.
    Atkin, C., & Block, M. (1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 57-61.
    Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C. Krämer, Christian Becker-Asano, Kohei Ogawa, Shuichi Nishio, & Hiroshi Ishiguro (2014). The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human-Android Interaction in the Field. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1), 67-83.
    Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes.
    Barker, R. G. (1963). On the nature of the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 19(4), 17-38.
    Bartneck, C., Croft, E., & Kulic, D. (2008). Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. Proceedings of the Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction Workshop in affiliation with the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2008), Technical Report 471, Amsterdam, 37-44.
    Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big five personality dimensions and job
    performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-27.
    Biel, Alexander L. (2000). Converting Image into Equity. Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, ed. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 67-82.
    Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior 9th. South-Western Thomas Learning. Mason, OH.
    Brown, W. J., & Fraser, B. P. (2007). Global identification with celebrity heroes. InS. Drucker, & G. Gumpert (Eds.), Heroes in a global world, 30-44. Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.
    Brown, W. J. (2010). Steve Irwin`s influence on wildlife conservation. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 73-93.
    Callcott, M. F., & Phillips, B. J. (1996). Observations: elves make good cookies: creating likable spokes-character advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 73-79.
    Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. Jossey-Bass.
    Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
    Cohen, J. (2001), Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245-264.
    Cornwell, T. B., & Coote, L. V. (2005). Corporate Sponsorship of a Cause: The Role of Identification in Purchase Intent. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 268-276.
    Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Obessa: FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2011). Personification in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 121-130.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, 70 Brand, and Store Information on Buyers` Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Dwyer, F. Robert & Rosemary R. LaGace (1986). On the Nature and Role of Buyer-Seller Trust. AMA Summer Educators Conference Proceedings, T. Shimp et al. eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 40-45.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Gefen, D. (2003). TAM or just plain habit: A look at experienced online shoppers, Journal of End User Computing, 15(3), 1-13.
    Guthrie, Stewart (1993). Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford.
    Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125-130.
    Greene, A. L.; Adams-Price, Carolyn; (1990). Adolescents` secondary attachments to celebrity figures. Sex Roles, 23(7-8), 335-347.
    Grewal, D., Monroe, K.B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers` Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.
    Homburg, C., Jozić, D., & Kuehnl, C. (2017). Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (3), 377-401.
    Kim, H. W., Xu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2012). Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 241-252.
    Kumar, V., Aksoy, L., Donkers, B., Venkatesan, R., Wiesel, T., & Tillmanns, S. (2010). Undervalued or overvalued customers: capturing total customer engagement value. Journal of service research, 13(3), 297-310.
    Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1989). Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(12), 1221-1228.
    Lawrence A. Crosby, Kenneth R. Evans, & Deborah Cowles (1990). Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81.
    Larzelere Robert E., & Ted L. Huston (1980). The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595-604.
    Lee, K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
    Linda D. Hollebeek, Mark S. Glynn, & Roderick J. Brodie (2014). Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 149-165.
    MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 297-337.
    Man To Tang, Victor Long Zhu, & Voicu Popescu (2021). AlterEcho: Loose Avatar-Streamer Coupling for Expressive VTubing. 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 128-137.
    Marshall, P. D., & Redmond, S. (2015). A companion to celebrity. John Wiley & Sons.
    Martos-Partal, M., Gonzalez-Benito, O., & Fustinoni-Venturini, M. (2015). Motivational profiling of store brand shoppers: differences across quality tiers. Marketing Letters, 26(2), 187-200.
    McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Busch C. M. (1986). Evaluating Comprehensiveness in Personality Systems: The California Q-set and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 54(2), 430-446.
    McCrae, R. R. (1999). Mainstream Personality Psychology and the Study of Religion. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1209-1218.
    Mollen A, & Wilson H. (2010). Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 63, 919-925.
    Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
    Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande R. (1992). Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynammics of Trust Within and Between Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314-328.
    Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which "intenders" actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
    Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
    Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46-54.
    Oliver, R. L., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1988). Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 495-507.
    Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. R. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 136-153.
    Patterson P, Yu T, & de Ruyter K. (2006). Understanding customer engagement in services. Advancing theory, maintaining relevance, proceedings of ANZMAC 2006 conference, Brisbane.
    Phillips, Barbara J. (1996). Defining Trade Characters and Their Role in American Popular Culture. Journal of Popular Culture, 29(4), 143-58.
    Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. F. (2009). Pushing the envelope of brand and personality: antecedents and moderators of anthropomorphized brands. Advances in consumer research, 36(1), 413-419.
    Robinson, M. J., & Trail, G. T. (2005). Relationships among spectator gender, motives, points of attachment, and sport preference. Journal of Sport Management, 19, 58–80.
    Rotter (1971). Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust. American Psychologist, 443-452.
    Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., Gardner, W. L., & Martin, T. N. (1990). Management dialogues: Turning on the marginal performer. Organizational Dynamics, 18(4), 47-60.
    Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer Behavior, 7th. NY: Prentice Hall, 15-36.
    Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on Exchange Processes: Buyer’s Preconceptions of a Seller’s Trustworthiness and Bargaining Toughness. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 939-953.
    Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
    Smith, JB. (1998), Buyer-seller Relationships: Similarity, Relationships Management, and Quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15(1), 3-21.
    Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514-521.
    Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw., J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the Relationship Between Abusive supervision and subordinates` resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 974-983.
    Valarie A. Zeithaml (1998). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
    Welsh, Jonathan (2006). Why Cars Got Angry. Wall Street Journal, March 10, W1-W10.
    Wölfl, S., Feste, J. M., & Peters, L. D. K. (2019). Is Somebody There? Anthropomorphic Website Design and Intention to Purchase from Online Stores. Twenty-Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Cancun, Mexico.
    Wong, Y., Hung, H., & Chow, W.K. (2007). Mediating effect on relationship quality on consumer relationship: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 25(6), 581-596.
    Zhicong Lu, Chenxinran Shen, Jiannan Li, Hong Shen, Daniel Wigdor (2021). More kawaii than a real-person live streamer: understanding how the otaku community engages with and perceives virtual YouTubers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-14.

    中文部分
    胡光夏(2001),流行文化「名人」推薦廣告之研究─解析「電視廣告就是媒介內容」的類型與意義建構過程,廣播與電視,第17期,頁95-117。

    網路資料
    Alison Bringé (2022). The Rise Of Virtual Influencers And What It Means For Brands. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2022/10/18/the-rise-of-virtual-influencers-and-what-it-means-for-brands/?sh=15e67b986b56 on October 18, 2022.
    Makena Rasmussen (2021). What`s the Difference Between Virtual Influencers, VTubers, Artificial Intelligence, Avatars, and More? Retrieved from https://www.virtualhumans.org/article/whats-the-difference-between-virtual-influencers-vtubers-artificial-intelligence-avatars on September 27, 2021.
    Marie Périer (2018). Lil Miquela took over the Prada Instagram account before their show. Retrieved from https://www.vogue.fr/fashion/top-models/diaporama/meet-lil-miquela-the-avatar-influencer-turned-pat-mcgrath-muse/48902 on February 22, 2018.
    Valentina Dencheva (2023). Virtual influencers - statistics & facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/9805/virtual-influencers/#topicOverview on January 6, 2023.
    Werner Geyser (2023). The State of Influencer Marketing 2023: Benchmark Report. Retrieved from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/ on February 7, 2023.
    Ariel Lin & Ray Lee(2019年5月17日),時尚界最火紅「虛擬KOL」Lil Miquela:擁有百萬IG追蹤者的她,甚至不是「人類」?,BAZAAR,2023年6月21日,取自:https://www.harpersbazaar.com/tw/fashion/news/g22645792/virtual-influencer-lil-miquela/
    GQ Taiwan(2022年9月21日),爆紅正妹「Zora」! 竟是由TOYOTA 親手打造的虛擬網紅?,GQ Taiwan,2023年7月14日,取自:https://www.gq.com.tw/entertainment/article/toyota-zora
    Monet(2023年2月13日),2023最受矚目精品寵兒是她!日本首位虛擬模特兒「imma」時尚資源驚人,FENDI、SK-II都跟他合作,KOHA,2023年6月21日,取自:https://koha.tw/life/style/imma/
    Zimmer L.(2022年10月16日),#RethinkingFashion:曾在時尚圈中掀起浪潮,虛擬 KOL 又將捲土重來?,The Femin,2023年6月21日,取自:https://thefemin.com/2022/10/2022-virtual-key-opinion-leader/
    陳琬樺 (2023年1月5日),虛擬網紅完美排除醜聞、也不會撞檔期!明知是假的,為何消費者會買單?,數位時代,2023年5月31日,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/73602/virtual-influencer-rising
    陳建鈞 (2019年11月27日),Instagram虛擬網紅關鍵報告:互動率比真人高3倍,但背後要靠高工時與砸大錢,數位時代,2023年6月22日,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/55668/instagram-virtual-influencer
    隋昱嬋 (2023年03月08日),華碩找虛擬KOL代言,摺疊筆電飆價10萬元!鎖定「口袋深、愛酷東西」Z世代,數位時代,2023年6月28日,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/74246/asus-vr-inf-mar-23-mag
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    110363031
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110363031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    303101.pdf5486KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback