English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50924301      Online Users : 913
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146417


    Title: 僕人領導與員工工作活力與學習關係之研究:員工世代之調節角色
    An Examination of the Relationship between Servant Leadership and Employee Thriving At Work :The Moderating Effect of Employee Generation
    Authors: 張嘉威
    Cheung, Ka-Wai
    Contributors: 胡昌亞
    Hu, Chang-Ya
    張嘉威
    Cheung, Ka-Wai
    Keywords: 僕人領導
    工作活力與學習
    世代差異
    Z世代
    Y世代
    Servant Leadership
    Thriving at work
    Generational Differences
    Generation Z
    Generation Y
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:29:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討僕人領導風格對員工工作活力與學習的正向影響,並進一步檢驗員工世代是否調節前述正向關係。本研究採用便利抽樣,以229份有效樣本(Z世代 N=79 ,Y世代 N=150)進行分析。本研究以多元迴歸分析進行假設檢驗,分析結果發現僕人領導對員工活力與學習皆有正向影響。此外,員工世代調節僕人領導與員工學習間的正向關係,此正向關係在Z世代員工更強。然而,員工的世代並未調節僕人領導與活力的關係。最後也討論此研究的理論與實務的意涵,並提出研究限制以及未來研究的建議。本研究結果對理解僕人領導如何影響不同世代員工的工作活力和學習具有重要的意義。
    This study examines the positive impact of servant leadership style on employee thriving at work (vitality and learning), and the potential moderating role of employee generation moderate in the aforementioned positive relationships. The study used convenience sampling and obtained a total of 229 valid samples (79 Generation Z employees and 150 Generation Y employees). Results of multiple regression analysis showed that servant leadership is positively related to both employee vitality and learning. Additionally, the employee generation only moderated the positive relationship between servant leadership and employee learning such that the positive relationship being stronger for Generation Z employees. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed, as well as its limitations and suggestions for future research.
    Reference: 王嘉瑜 (2012) 。 台灣職場企管主管丶80世代與70世代對80世代員工評價之差異比較。 未出版之碩士論文,實踐大學,企業管理學系碩士在職專班。
    吳佩旻。 〈Z世代地雷在哪?5大方向溝通無礙. 〉 《天下Cheers》。 https://www.cwlearning.com.tw/posts/09e4fc51-dc23-4f0a-a5ff-0e33fc4b95b1
    胡立宗(2022年11月2日)。〈Z世代在想什麼?這是一群「有原則的務實主義者」〉。《天下Cheers》。https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5101341&page=2
    胡昌亞(2023年1月4日)。〈Z世代員工跟你我沒什麼不一樣〉。《哈佛商業評論》 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/21720/gen-z-employees
    陳佩丶楊付丶石偉 ,2016。 公僕型領導:概念、測量、影響因素與實施效果。 心理科學進展 2016, Vol. 24, No. 1, 143–157.
    張嘉伶、黃鄭鈞、陳亞維、廖和明 ,2023 。 〈金融Z世代員工:如何留他的人、留她的心〉。《台灣銀行家》,161。
    梁巧恩 (2022年9月19日) 。〈【人才荒】2025年Z世代佔勞動人口約27% 資深HR︰離職率比30歲高〉。《ctgood job》 https://it.ctgoodjobs.hk/article/1318-31927/%E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E8%8D%92-2025%E5%B9%B4z%E4%B8%96%E4%BB%A3%E4%BD%94%E5%8B%9E%E5%8B%95%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3%E7%B4%8427-%E8%B3%87%E6%B7%B1hr-%E9%9B%A2%E8%81%B7%E7%8E%87%E6%AF%9430%E6%AD%B2%E9%AB%98
    游絨絨 (2023年1月12日) 。 〈中高階主管必學:僕人式領導]為部屬清除路上障礙,給他們更多發揮點子的空間〉。《科技報橘》https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2023/01/12/masters-of-scale-3/
    黃海艷 ,2013 。 服務型領導風格、工作滿意度對研發團隊創新行為的影響。當代經濟管理, 35(10).
    楊尚融 ,2023。 Y世代和Z世代職場態度差異之研究。 未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,企業管理研究所。
    魏德翔 ,2016 。 以僕人式領導、服務氣候探討工作滿意度。 未出版碩士論文,元智大學,企經營管理碩士。
    Oliver Lee丶讀者太太(2019年3月11日)。〈想要吸引優秀人才,心甘情願為你打拚?請先成為懂得「服務團隊」的領導! 〉《天下雜誌 換日線》https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16652

    英文文獻
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
    Barbuto, J. E., Jr., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300–326.
    Cohen,J.,&Cohen,P.(1983).Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Science (2nd ed.).Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbau.
    Demirbilek & Keser (2022). Leadership Expectations of Generation Z Teachers Working in Educational Organizations. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership Volume: 7, Issue: 1 / March 2022.
    Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Publishing Center.
    Jaramillo, F., Grisaffe, D. B., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A. (2009). Examining the impact of servant leadership on salesperson`s turnover intention. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29(4), 351–366.
    Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. J Organ Behav. 2019;40:973–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2375
    Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manger,19(1),65-76.
    Kaltiainen, J., & Hakanen, J. (2022). Changes in occupational well-being during COVID-19: the impact of age, gender, education, living alone, and telework in a Finnish four-wave population sample. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 48(6), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4033
    Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
    Maloni, M., Hiatt, M. S., & Campbell, S. (2019). Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. The Internation Journal of Management Education, 17, 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100320
    Maslow, A. (1998). Maslow on Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
    Boyd, N. M. (2015). Introducing thriving at work to the field of community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(6), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21752
    Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Sach, F. (2012). Thriving at work—A diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 468–487.
    Paulin, D., & Suneson, K. (2012). Knowledge transfer, knowledge sharing and knowledge barriers–Three blurry terms in KM. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 81-91.
    Paterson, T., Luthans, F., & Jueng, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 434–446.
    Prensky, M. (2003). Digital Game-Based Learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1, 21.https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
    Robert C. Liden , Sandy J. Wayne , Hao Zhao , David Henderson. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly 19. ScienceDirect.
    Robert C. Liden, Sandy J. Wayne, Chenwei Liao and Jeremy D. Meuser.(2013). Servant Leadership and Serving Culture: Influence on Individual and Unit Performance. Academy of Management Journal 57(5). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0034
    Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in organizational behavior, 30, 91-127.
    Sakdiyakorn, M., Golubovskaya, M., Solnet, D. (2021). Understanding Generation Z through collective consciousness: Impacts for hospitality work and employment. Internation Journal of Hospitality Mangement,94, 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhn.2020.102822
    Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace?. California Management Review, 61(3), 5-18.
    Gretchen Spreitzer, Kathleen Sutcliffe ,Jane Dutton, Scott Sonenshin, Adam M. Grant (2005). A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549.
    Spreitzer, G. M., & Porath, C. (2012). Creating sustainable performance. Harvard Business Review, 90, 92–99.
    Paterson, T. A. (2014). Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 35, 434–446.
    Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
    Wang, N. (2017). We are all in this together!: examining the effect of peer pressure on eco-fashion consumption between Generation Z and Generation Y (Doctoral dissertation) Catolica Lisbon Business & Economics https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/22752/1/152115086_Thesis_Nanxi%20Wang.pdf
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    108363110
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363110
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    311001.pdf783KbAdobe PDF2113View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback