政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146408
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51103267      線上人數 : 843
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146408


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146408


    題名: 應用文字探勘分析致股東報告書語調與ESG評等及ESG揭露程度之關聯性
    Analyzing the Tone of Letter to Shareholders through Text Mining: Exploring the Association between Tone, ESG Rating, and ESG Disclosure
    作者: 李宗澤
    Lee, Tsung-Tse
    貢獻者: 張祐慈
    Chang, Yu-Tzu
    李宗澤
    Lee, Tsung-Tse
    關鍵詞: ESG
    企業社會責任
    文字探勘
    語調分析
    ESG
    Corporate social responsibility
    Text mining
    Tone analysis
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-08-02 13:27:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究使用2016年至2021年台灣非金融業上市公司的資料。首先，我隨機選取2016年所有致股東報告書中的80%為訓練集，其餘20%為測試集。我以人工方式標記每個句子的語調，並用訓練集中的句子訓練BERT語言模型。透過測試集的資料測試，BERT判讀語調的準確率高達86%。接著，我運用BERT模型計算出之致股東報告書語調分數，探討股東報告書的文字語調分別與企業未來ESG表現和ESG揭露程度之間的關係。實證結果顯示，致股東報告書語調越正面，企業未來一年ESG的表現和ESG揭露程度都會較好，有顯著正向關聯。進一步分析發現，致股東報告書語調越正面，企業未來一年分別在環境(E)、社會(S)、治理(G)的表現和揭露程度都會較好。本研究的結果顯示企業年報中的文字資訊確實有資訊價值，可以預測企業未來ESG表現和揭露意願。
    This study uses data from non-financial listed companies in Taiwan from 2016 to 2021. Firstly, 80% of the letters to shareholders from 2016 were randomly selected as the training dataset, while the remaining 20% were designated as the testing dataset. Each sentence in both sets was manually labeled with its tone. The Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) language model was then trained using the training dataset. After training and testing, BERT achieved an 86% accuracy rate in classifying tones. Subsequently, by utilizing the tone scores obtained from the trained model, I examined the relationship between the tone of the letter to shareholders and the company’s future Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and disclosure level. The empirical results demonstrate that a letter to shareholders with a more positive tone is significantly associated with better ESG performance and higher ESG disclosure level in the following year. Further analysis reveals that the more positive the textual tone, the better the company’s performance and disclosure level in the areas of environment, social, and governance, respectively. The study highlights the importance of textual information in a company’s annual report as an indicator of its future ESG performance and disclosure level.
    參考文獻: Abdul Rahman, R., and Alsayegh, M. F. 2021. Determinants of corporate environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(4): 167.
    Ahmed, K., and Courtis, J. K. 1999. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review 31(1): 35-61.
    Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., and Yao, L. 2009. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 7(1): 1-19.
    Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F., Alkurdi, A., and Bazhair, A. H. 2022. Capital structure decisions and environmental, social and governance performance: Insights from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting (ahead-of-print).
    Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., and Zhang, C. 2019. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science 65(10): 4451-4469.
    Al-Gamrh, B., and Al-dhamari, R. 2016. Firm characteristics and corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Business Management 10(18): 4283-4291.
    Allegrini, M., and Greco, G. 2013. Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance 17: 187-216.
    Amel-Zadeh, A., and Serafeim, G. 2018. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal 74(3): 87-103.
    Andrikopoulos, A., Samitas, A., and Bekiaris, M. 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in financial institutions: Evidence from Euronext. Research in International Business and Finance 32: 27-35.
    Arayssi, M., Dah, M., and Jizi, M. 2016. Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 7(3): 376-401.
    Ardito, L., Dangelico, R. M., and Messeni Petruzzelli, A. 2021. The link between female representation in the boards of directors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from B corps. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28(2): 704-720.
    Barnea, A., and Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97: 71-86.
    Bear, S., Rahman, N., and Post, C. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 97: 207-221.
    Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., and Pelizzon, L. 2021. Inside the ESG ratings:(Dis) agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28(5): 1426-1445.
    Blau, B. M., DeLisle, J. R., and Price, S. M. 2015. Do sophisticated investors interpret earnings conference call tone differently than investors at large? Evidence from short sales. Journal of Corporate Finance 31: 203-219.
    Bochkay, K., Hales, J., and Chava, S. 2020. Hyperbole or reality? Investor response to extreme language in earnings conference calls. The Accounting Review 95(2): 31-60.
    Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., and Naranjo, A. 2014. Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance 26: 164-181.
    Brammer, S., and Millington, A. 2006. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(1): 6-18.
    Broberg, P., Tagesson, T., and Collin, S. O. 2010. What explains variation in voluntary disclosure? A study of the annual reports of corporations listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Journal of Management & Governance 14: 351-377.
    Brown, N. C., Crowley, R. M., and Elliott, W. B. 2020. What are you saying? Using topic to detect financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research 58(1): 237-291.
    Brown, S. V., and Tucker, J. W. 2011. Large‐sample evidence on firms’ year‐over‐year MD&A modifications. Journal of Accounting Research 49(2): 309-346.
    Brown, S. V., Tian, X., and Wu Tucker, J. 2018. The spillover effect of SEC comment letters on qualitative corporate disclosure: Evidence from the risk factor disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 35(2): 622-656.
    Bryan, S. H. 1997. Incremental information content of required disclosures contained in management discussion and analysis. The Accounting Review 72(2): 285-301.
    Çera, G., Belas, J., Maroušek, J., and Çera, E. 2020. Do size and age of small and medium-sized enterprises matter in corporate social responsibility? Economics and Sociology 13(2): 86-99.
    Chava, S. 2014. Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science 60(9): 2223-2247.
    Chen, Y., and Lin, C., 2022. Application of transfer learning and text mining on reports to shareholders. Taiwan Accounting Review 18(1): 123-166.
    Chi, W., Wu, S. J., and Zheng, Z. 2020. Determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from private firms. The British Accounting Review 52(6): 100939.
    Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., and Patten, D. M. 2012. Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(1): 14-25.
    Christensen, D. M. 2016. Corporate accountability reporting and high-profile misconduct. The Accounting Review 91(2): 377-399.
    Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., and Vasvari, F. P. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4-5): 303-327.
    Cucari, N., Esposito de Falco, S., and Orlando, B. 2018. Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(3): 250-266.
    Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., and Ellstrand, A. E. 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42(6): 674-686.
    Davis, A. K., and Tama‐Sweet, I. 2012. Managers’ use of language across alternative disclosure outlets: earnings press releases versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research 29(3): 804-837.
    Davis, A. K., Ge, W., Matsumoto, D., and Zhang, J. L. 2015. The effect of manager-specific optimism on the tone of earnings conference calls. Review of Accounting Studies 20: 639-673.
    Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., and Yang, Y. G. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87(3): 723-759.
    Dowling, J., and Pfeffer, J. 1975. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review 18(1): 122-136.
    Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., Reichelstein, S., Schwenen, S., and Zaklan, A. 2021. The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. Review of Accounting Studies 26: 1137-1175.
    Drempetic, S., Klein, C., and Zwergel, B. 2020. The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics 167: 333-360.
    Durnev, A., and Mangen, C. 2020. The spillover effects of MD&A disclosures for real investment: The role of industry competition. Journal of Accounting and Economics 70(1): 1-19.
    Endrikat, J., De Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., and Guenther, E. M. 2021. Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society 60(8): 2099-2135.
    Eng, L. L., and Mak, Y. T. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(4): 325-345.
    Esa, E., and Anum Mohd Ghazali, N. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government‐linked companies. Corporate Governance 12(3): 292-305.
    Fahad, P. and Nidheesh, K.B. 2021. Determinants of CSR disclosure: an evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research 13(1): 110-133.
    Fahad, P., and Rahman, P. M. 2020. Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17(2-3): 155-167.
    Fama, E. F. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance 25(2): 383-417.
    Galbreath, J. 2010. Drivers of corporate social responsibility: The role of formal strategic planning and firm culture. British Journal of Management 21(2): 511-525.
    Galbreath, J. 2011. Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization 17(1): 17-38.
    Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., and Verbeeten, F. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5: 233-262.
    Gao, L., and Zhang, J. H. 2015. Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation. Journal of Corporate Finance 32: 108-127.
    Gregory, R. P. 2022. The influence of firm size on ESG score controlling for ratings agency and industrial sector. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment: 1-14.
    Gul, F. A., and Leung, S. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23(5): 351-379.
    Habbash, M., Hussainey, K., and Awad, A. E. 2016. The determinants of voluntary disclosure in Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 12(3): 213-236.
    Haniffa, R. M., and Cooke, T. E. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(5): 391-430.
    Henry, E., and Leone, A. J. 2016. Measuring qualitative information in capital markets research: Comparison of alternative methodologies to measure disclosure tone. The Accounting Review 91(1): 153-178.
    Hiew, J. Z. G., Huang, X., Mou, H., Li, D., Wu, Q., and Xu, Y. 2019. BERT-based financial sentiment index and LSTM-based stock return predictability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.09024.
    Huang, A. H., Lehavy, R., Zang, A. Y., and Zheng, R. 2018. Analyst information discovery and interpretation roles: A topic modeling approach. Management Science 64(6): 2833-2855.
    Huang, H., and Ye, Y. 2021. Rethinking capital structure decision and corporate social responsibility in response to COVID‐19. Accounting & Finance 61(3): 4757-4788.
    Husted, B. W., and de Sousa-Filho, J. M. 2019. Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research 102: 220-227.
    Ibrahim, K. 2014. Firm characteristics and voluntary segments disclosure among the largest firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance 5(4): 327-331.
    Ismail, A. M., and Latiff, I. H. M. 2019. Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research 10(3): 31-50.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76(2): 323-329.
    Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.
    Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., and Chang, K. 2014. Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management 43(3): 505-531.
    Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., and Stratling, R. 2014. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics 125: 601-615.
    Lang, M., and Stice-Lawrence, L. 2015. Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60(2-3): 110-135.
    Lattemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S., and Schneider, A. M. 2009. CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17(4): 426-442.
    Li, F. 2010. The information content of forward‐looking statements in corporate filings—A naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research 48(5): 1049-1102.
    Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. 2017. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 72(4): 1785-1824.
    Mallin, C. A., and Michelon, G. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research 41(2): 119-144.
    Mayew, W. J., Sethuraman, M., and Venkatachalam, M. 2020. Individual analysts’ stock recommendations, earnings forecasts, and the informativeness of conference call question and answer sessions. The Accounting Review 95(6): 311-337.
    McCarthy, S., Oliver, B., and Song, S. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence. Journal of Banking & Finance 75: 280-291.
    Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., and Gray, S. J. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 26: 555-572.
    Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., and Qi, G. Y. 2016. The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 33: 267-291.
    Naciti, V. 2019. Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 237: 1-8.
    Naughton, J. P., Wang, C., and Yeung, I. 2019. Investor sentiment for corporate social performance. The Accounting Review 94(4): 401-420.
    Ortas, E., Gallego‐Alvarez, I., and Álvarez Etxeberria, I. 2015. Financial factors influencing the quality of corporate social responsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 22(6): 362-380.
    Price, S. M., Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., and Bliss, B. A. 2012. Earnings conference calls and stock returns: The incremental informativeness of textual tone. Journal of Banking & Finance 36(4): 992-1011.
    Rosati, F., Costa, R., Calabrese, A., and Pedersen, E. R. G. 2018. Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(6): 1306-1319.
    Ryans, J. P. 2021. Textual classification of SEC comment letters. Review of Accounting Studies 26(1): 37-80.
    Siano, F., and Wysocki, P. 2021. Transfer learning and textual analysis of accounting disclosures: applying big data methods to small (ER) datasets. Accounting Horizons 35(3): 217-244.
    Suttipun, M. 2021. The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 18(4): 391-402.
    Swandari, F., and Sadikin, A. 2016. The effect of ownership structure, profitability, leverage, and firm size on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Binus Business Review 7(3): 315-320.
    Temiz, H., and Acar, M. 2023. Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in different disclosure environments. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (March): 1-18.
    Tsang, A., Frost, T., and Cao, H. 2023. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure: A Literature Review. The British Accounting Review 55(1): 101149.
    Udayasankar, K. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics 83(2): 167-175.
    Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., Kilic, M., and Karaman, A. S. 2021. Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28(6): 1730-1748.
    Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303-319.
    Waluyo, W. 2017. Firm size, firm age, and firm growth on corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: The case of real estate companies. European Research Studies Journal XX(4A): 360-369
    Webb, E. 2004. An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance 8: 255-277.
    Wisse, B., van Eijbergen, R., Rietzschel, E. F., and Scheibe, S. 2018. Catering to the needs of an aging workforce: The role of employee age in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics 147: 875-888.
    Withisuphakorn, P., and Jiraporn, P. 2016. The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters 23(4): 298-301.
    Zubeltzu‐Jaka, E., Álvarez‐Etxeberria, I., and Ortas, E. 2020. The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(3): 1361-1374.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353045
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353045
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    304501.pdf1804KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋