English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112878/143845 (78%)
Visitors : 50008749      Online Users : 670
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146405
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146405


    Title: 永續經營的整合性解決方案-以 C 循環經濟公司為例
    The Total Solution of Sustainable Operation-A Case Study of C Circular Economic Company
    Authors: 陳揚介
    Rickie, Chen
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    Wu, Anne
    陳揚介
    Rickie, Chen
    Keywords: 永續經營
    SO 計分卡
    永續平衡計分卡
    作業價值管理
    Sustainable operation
    SO scorecard
    Sustainable balanced scroecard
    Activity value management
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:27:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本論文以個案研究法探討「新創」公司如何結合「永續」與「策略」,清楚定義環境、社會與公司治理 (Environmental, Social and Governance, ESG) 精神下世界的趨勢並且提供公司整合性解決方案之完整架構。以 SO (Strengths and Opportunities, SO) 計分卡、平衡計分卡以及作業價值管理等管理工具及相關理論基礎記錄個案公司如何透過其獨特專利之向上循環技術在永續經營上成功。
      本研究透過 SO 計分卡、平衡計分卡及作業價值管理記錄個案公司永續營運的過程。首先確定個案公司之使命、願景及價值觀,整理其內部優勢、外部機會及四大重要條件,透過 SO 計分卡形成永續策略。形成永續策略後,透過平衡計分卡之策略地圖垂直連結個案公司四大構面的「研發、設計與行銷」三條主線及「形成產品與出售產品」兩大核心,並水平連結所有策略議題、策略目標、策略性衡量指標及其目標值。最後以作業價值管理精準、即時地衡量個案公司策略執行之狀況。
      This thesis discusses how the highlighted case company combines “sustainability” and “strategy” through the case study method. It clearly defines the trend of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance, ESG) and the company’s possible total solution’s structure; utilizes relevant management tools and theoretical foundation such as SO (Strengths and Opportunities, SO) scorecard, balanced scorecard, and activity value management to record how the case company uses its unique upcycled technology to achieve successful sustainable operation.
      This research documents the case company’s formation, implementation, and measurement of sustainable operation through SO scorecard, balanced scorecard, and activity value management. First, it determines the mission, vision, and values of the case company and assesses its internal strengths, external opportunities, and four important conditions for generating sustainable strategy using SO scorecard. Next, it uses balanced scorecard to vertically connect the company’s four dimensions’ three main lines (research, design, and marketing) and two cores (production and sales); to horizontally connect all strategy issues, strategy targets, strategy measurement indicators, and target values for strategy measurement indicators. Finally, it measures case company’s strategy implementation status accurately and timely by activity value management.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    1. 田瀨和夫,2022,2030 永續企業革命:全方位 ESG 永續實踐攻略,鄭舜瓏譯,台北:城邦文化。
    2. 呂祐萱,2022,政策失靈?我國限塑政策哪裡出了問題?眼底城事。
    3. 吳安妮,2003,平衡計分卡之精隨、範疇及整合 <上>,會計研究月刊,第211期(6月): 46。
    4. 吳安妮,2017,談以 SO 計分卡形成「創新策略」,哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版。
    5. 吳安妮,2018,策略形成及執行:以 BSC 為核心,為企業創造「利」與「力」,台北:城邦文化。
    6. 吳安妮,2019,企業策略的終極答案,台北:臉譜出版社股份有限公司。
    7. 陳佳安,2015,台灣製鞋業面臨的挑戰,金屬中心。
    8. 喬治.塞拉分,2022,目的與獲利 ESG 大師塞拉分的企業永續發展策略,廖月娟譯,台北:遠見天下文化。
    9. 經濟部統計處,2023,工業產銷存動態調查產品統計,鞋類製造業,https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GMWeb/investigate/InvestigateDA.aspx。
    二、英文部分
    1. Abram, N. J., B. J. Henley, A. S. Gupta, T. J. R. Lippmann, H. Clarke, A. J. Dowdy, J. J. Sharples, R. H. Nolan, T. Zhang, M. J. Wooster, J. B. Wurtzel, K. J. Meissner, A. J. Pitman, A. M. Ukkola, B. P. Murphy, N. J. Tapper and M. M. Boer. 2021. Connections of Climate Change and Variability to Large and Extreme Forest Fires in Southeast Australia. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(8).
    2. Cooper, R. and R. S. Kaplan. 1991. Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, 69(3): 130-135.
    3. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
    4. Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. Case Study. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4: 301-306.
    5. Galpin, T., J. L. Whitttington and G. Bell. 2015. Is Your Sustainability Strategy Sustainable? Creating a Culture of Sustainability. Corporate Governance, 15(1): 1-17.
    6. Gunnar, F., T. Busch and A. Bassen. 2015. ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4): 210-233.
    7. Kaplan, R. S. and S. R. Anderson. 2004. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11): 131-138.
    8. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review: 71-79.
    9. Kaplan, R. S. 2009. Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 3: 1253-1269.
    10. Kaplan, R. S. and D. McMillan. 2021. Reimagining the Balanced Scorecard for the ESG Era. Harvard Business Review.
    11. Kates, R. W., T. M. Parris and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2012. What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values and Practice. Environmental Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3): 8-21.
    12. Katsuyama, Y., M. Inastu and T. Shirakawa. 2019. Response of Snowpack to +2°C Global Warming in Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Glaciology, 66(255): 83-96.
    13. Krueger, P. 2015. Corporate Goodness and Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2): 304-329.
    14. Mirvis, P., B. Googins and S. Kinnicutt. 2010. Vision, Mission, Values: Guideposts to Sustainability. Organizational Dynamics, 39 (October): 316-324.
    15. Niven, P. R. 2002. Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons: 9.
    16. Oliver, S. 1923. The Philosophy of Management. New York, Sir I. Pitman.
    17. Parris, T. M. and R. W. Kates. 2003. Characterizing and Measuring Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28: 559-586.
    18. Porter, M. E. 1996. What is Strategic? Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61-78.
    19. Sterling, R. R. 1968. The Going Concern: An Examination. The Accounting Review, 43(3) (July): 481-502.
    20. Tellis, W. 1997. Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 3(2) (July).
    21. Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage.
    22. Yoon, B., J. H. Lee and J. H. Cho. 2021. The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance—Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(12).
    23. Yüksel, İ. 2012. Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for PESTEL Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24) (October): 52-66.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353041
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    304101.pdf2433KbAdobe PDF279View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback