政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/146390
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51188015      在线人数 : 862
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146390


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146390


    题名: 長期型機構投資人及企業創新之關聯性-以美國上市公司為例
    The Relationship between Long-term Institutional Investors and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from US Listed Companies
    作者: 鄭至均
    Cheng, Chih-Chun
    贡献者: 張祐慈
    鄭至均
    Cheng, Chih-Chun
    关键词: 企業創新
    長期型機構投資人
    短視行為
    公司治理
    Corporate innovation
    Long-term institutional investors
    Myopic behavior of management
    Corporate governance
    日期: 2023
    上传时间: 2023-08-02 13:24:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 創新一直是企業成長關鍵的一環，若企業缺乏創新，在市場快速更迭且競爭激烈的時代，可能會就此失去市場地位。然而企業創新程度高低卻會受諸多因素影響，如企業規模、企業文化、經營狀況、財務狀況、管理階層的行為、機構投資人持股高低等等。隨公司治理議題日益重要，加上機構投資人在資本市場中扮演重要角色，OECD也在2015年公司治理原則中的六大基礎中新增了「機構投資人、證券市場及其他中介機關」，而根據優勢投資人(superior investor)觀點，長期型機構投資人更在乎企業長期績效。因此本研究將探討長期型機構投資人對於企業創新的影響，並研究長期型機構投資人是否能削減企業管理階層的短視行為。

    研究結果發現，長期型機構投資人對於企業創新有正向的影響，且對於大型企業影響更為明顯；然對於企業管理階層的短視行為並無顯著改善。另外本研究針對「長期型機構投資人是否能削減企業管理階層的短視行為」在額外測試中將樣本依據該年度企業獲利結果及其管理階層可能操弄盈餘可能性高低分為三組子樣本並做研究，得出結果，長期型機構投資人對於企業管理階層的短視行為仍無顯著改善。
    Innovation has always been a crucial aspect of business growth. In an era of rapid market changes and intense competition, companies that lack innovation may risk losing their market position. However, the degree of innovation in a company can be influenced by various factors such as company size, corporate culture, operational and financial conditions, behaviors of management, institutional investor ownership, and more. With the increasing importance of corporate governance issues and the significant role played by institutional investors in the capital market, the OECD added " Institutional investors, stock exchanges and other intermediaries" as one of the six principles in its 2015 Corporate Governance Principles. From the perspective of superior investor, long-term institutional investors are more concerned with a company`s long-term performance. Therefore, this study aims to explore the impact of long-term institutional investors on corporate innovation and investigate whether they can mitigate the myopic behavior of management.

    The findings of this study reveal that long-term institutional investors have a positive impact on corporate innovation, with a more pronounced effect observed in large companies. However, they do not significantly improve the myopic behavior of management. Additionally, this study conducts additional tests on whether long-term institutional investors can reduce the myopic behavior of management by dividing the sample into three sub-samples based on the company`s annual profitability and the likelihood of management manipulating earnings. The results indicate that long-term institutional investors still do not significantly improve the myopic behavior of management.
    參考文獻: 王志袁、劉念琪，2011，研發投入、研發組織管理與研發績效，商略學報，第三卷第4期：269-280。
    王曉雯、王泰昌與吳明政，2008，企業經營型態與研發活動績效，管理學報，第二十五卷第2期：173-193。
    金成隆、林修葳與邱煒恒，2005，研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性：以企業生命週期論析，中山管理評論，第十三卷第2期：617-643。
    Aghion, P. and Reenen, K.V. and Zingales, L. 2013. Innovation and Institutional Ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277-304.
    Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review, 66, 818-829.
    Berger, P. 1993. Explicit and Implicit Tax Effects of the R & D Tax Credit. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 131-171.
    Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305-333.
    Bushee, B. J. 2001. Do institutional investors prefer near‐term earnings over long‐run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 207-246.
    Burgstahler, D. and Dichev, I. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 99-126.
    Chang, C. and Chi, Y. and Kuo, W. and Tsui, S 2021. Do Blockholder Incentives Matter? Evidence from Firm Innovation. Review of Securities and Futures Markets 33: 2, 51-104 (2021)
    Duke, J., and H. Hunt. 1990. An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (January), 45-63.
    Falk, N. and Train, K. 2016. Patent valuation with forecasts of forward citations. Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, 16.
    Hall, Bronwyn H, Adam B Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg, 2001, The nber patent
    citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools, NBER Working
    Paper.
    Hall, Bronwyn H, Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005, Market value and
    patent citations, RAND Journal of Economics 16–38.
    Jiang, X. and Yuan, Q. 2018. Institutional investors` corporate site visits and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance 48, 148-168.
    Kim, H., and Park, K., and Song, K.2019. Do long-term institutional investors foster corporate innovation? Accounting and Finance 59, 1163-1195.
    Kleinknecht, A. 1989 Firm size and innovation: Observations in Dutch manufacturing industries. Small Business Economics 1, 215–222(1989).
    Kochhar, R., & David, P. 1996. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal 17(1), 73–84.
    Lin, B. W., Lee, Y. and Hung, S. C. 2006. R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance, Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685.
    Myers, S. 1984. The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance,39(July), 575-592
    Porter, M. 1992 Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Business School, Boston.
    Shefer, D. and Frenkel, A. 2005. R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation 25(2005), 25–32.
    Tsetsekos, G. and Zantout, Z. 1994. The wealth effects of announcements of R&D expenditure increases. The Journal of Financial Research 17, 205-216
    Rajgopal, S. and Venkatachalam, M. 1997. The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: An empirical investigation. Working paper, Stanford University.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353013
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353013
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    301301.pdf2055KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈